By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
When my lease was up, I leased a FX45. But I miss the LS. My 15 year old son will soon be driving and I'm shocked that a 2004 LS V-6 can be had for under 25k. That's a steal! I'll let him drive the wifey's Volvo and The wife can drive the new LS. Of course, I will have to help her drive. I'll do the four wheel drifts and she can do the regular driving.
Secret: The "Sport" models were not that much better than the "Non-Sport" in handling. Very small diff if any. The driver can make more of a difference.
Well, I remember you talkin about replacing them, don't I? ...
You still have the FX don't you? I have a similar car squeeze going on here. 16.5 year old daughter needs something to drive. Choices are: my 5 speed LS (fat chance!) our '04 Navigator (Big fat chance) my '86 Cherokee 5 speed (a tough drive for first car, plus at 210,000 I dont know if I wanna trust it for her) our '98 Dodge Ram conversion van (she'd probably back over a freshman in that first time out!)
So, we're going to sell the van and get her something. I'm thinking of a Toyota 4x4 Tacoma - and she likes the idea. They're awful pricey though and I'm talking used ones.
So you're getting a new LS? For $25K? Can u believe that price? Thanks, Lincoln. Great for buyers now. A real screw job for us early adapters. I've been mulling over the idea of selling my MTX LS. But I don't know if I could get enuf $$$s for it. I'm not upside down in it though.
Anyway, nice to hear from ya. Best o'luck. Got any NICE homes in SD area for $400K ?? :>)
I only have the 96 Volvo wagon and the FX45. So we need an addition. A new V-6 LS "stripper" is not much more than a Saturn or some other cheap FWD and the LS has RWD. Worlds ahead. And the new V-6 has VVT so it probably would give our MTXes a run even with the slush box.
I did consider a truck because of the safety issues, but my kid liked the LS a lot. I'm not so much for a 4x4 because of weight,complexity and mileage issues. We'd never use 4 wheel drive here in San Diego.A company here called Pro-Gear makes a ton rebuilding front diffs because they are never used. The seals dry out, then the bearings rust out and on and on.Most 4x4's here never go "off-road".
I regret not buying my LS out of the lease, even though they wanted 4k more than market then.
Stan - Yeah, an Altima or an LS ... no brainer. Even a stripper LS is nicely equipped as they say. And what is the V-6 now, 240 HP? That's a decent number.
I've been toying with the idea of selling my LS and getting into one of the new Subaru Outback XT wagons. AWD, 250 HP and torque, turbo-4 (Boxer) engine, 5speed does 0-60 in close to 6 seconds, and all the reviews rave about the handling. Well, they rave about the handling of it's twin brother the Legacy GT anyway. That's the one to get if sports handling is more important that 8.7" of ground clearance. The Outback, they say, is almost as good in the mountains. For me, I'll take a slight dip in handling for the extra height. And they actually look nice, in and out, with this year's redesign. LS V-6 gets better mileage though.
ANT - do you know if the Shelby version will be produced by Ford or by Shelby?
The article also gives the LS other accolades, describing the LS's IRS as "superb" and giving it an overall superior track performance rating to the BMW 528 and Audi A6 based on their back-to-back testing.
As I've read elsewhere, GRM attributes the lack of Mustang IRS on the drag racing crowd who prefer a solid rear axle for "launching" purposes as well as an incremental manufacturing cost increase of $1600.
Like you Allen, I'm waiting on a Cobra before deciding on departing with my 2000 LS. Five years since I took delivery of my LS, and NOTHING comes close to tempting me away yet.
The rear seat is useless for adults, but a cruel dad like me would have no problems making their "grown-out-of-child-safety-seat kid" ride back there! My daughter, is nearly big enough to go without the child safety seat, so the Stang is looking like a real contender for my car dollar.
Thanks for the tip, Stan. COuldn't find the article on line. But that's OK.
-Paul
I'm sure every has seen the over-abundance of Buick Crossfire comercials that are on about every commercial break, during certain popular shows. There are 2 - the one with the lady dressing up in different colors and looking at herself in front of the car. Then there is the race track one - that leads you to believe it is a race car.
Too bad Lincoln didn't create some cool commercials for the LS and advertise it like Buick is advertising the Crossfire.
So, does this mean Buick is trying to catch up to Lincoln?
Look at the latest Lincoln commercials. They don't even show or mention the LS. It's like they're pretending it doesn't exist.
And I don't think ANT was talking about a Lincoln version of the stang. I think he was talking about a special edition of the stang. Or was he? Hmmm...
Now, the new Mustangs platform isn't really bad at all. In many aspects it improves some torsion/rigidity numbers over the LS'. When you hear the media describing that it's "cheaper", it's really only because it doesn't use as much aluminum, as the LS does.
Obviously what replaces the LS will be improved in many ways, specially it's ride and handling. That customer core will not be ignored either...
Well – that may be obvious to you, but I have seen no official statement from Ford / L-M that indicates in the near term (say, 1 yr. To 18 months out) that a significantly improved product will be forthcoming.
By ‘significantly improved’, here I mean: Something like the 500+ improvements made for the 2003 model year. Improvements not only in ride and handling, but in acceleration (better HP / TQ) and many other areas – both dynamic and luxury / creature comfort-wise. (The cooled front seats come immediately to mind.)
- Ray
Who (on ownership of LS #2 now) would really LIKE to believe this . . .
However, since the abysmal marketing effort put forth on the LS, and based upon Lincoln-Mercury's track record for abandoning what I've always perceived as their better vehicles, I don't beleive this leapord will ever change it's spots. I've given up hope that the Ford Motor Company will ever produce anything similar to the LS with respect to luxury, sport, utility, and overall value. I chalk the LS up to dumb luck on their part for ever putting that combination together in the first place.
Some, I suppose.
Also people like J Rogers - now gone. . .
- Ray
Waiting . . .
Nice looking car, IMHO.
And, I agree, Lincoln has forgotten the LS and has let GM's CTS take center stage.
Way to go, Ford Motor Comnpany!
You announce a decent product (Mustang), forget some real good ones (LS) and announce a real yawner, the 500/Montego. Every roadtest knocks the car's lukewarm powerplant. Sounds a lot like dejevu all over again ala the Marauder initial roadtests, and we all know where that led.
The worst commentary I can say about the 500 is that, while sitting at a traffic light, I just happened to see the 500 emblem on the back of the car in front of me. Otherwise, I wouldn't have given the car a second look, even though in some respects, it does resmble some Mercedes Benz models from the back.
But I must admit, the Montego is a much more impressive vehicle up close than in pictures. It's big, roomy inside and trunk (no ITHs) looks well made. Yeah the looks are me-too vanilla but they are clean and more Mercedes-like than anything. Interior is nicely done too.
If only it had the 3.5 liter or something. Oh, and with the transverse mounting of the Duratech, I don't know how you get to the rearward bank of plugs. Good thing it's only every 100,000 miles.
just comical commentary.
This car, the 500, is waaaay too plain. Nuns look hotter going down the road than and the Montego isn't much better off. They should have gone for the catholic school girl uniform look. I love the room it offers but that is its best attribute.
I had considered this an option for my next but after sitting in it I just couldn't do it to myself.
As far as the Montego goes. I think that and the 500 are both steps in the right direction.
I remember someone had a 1974 Montego. It was much uglier than its Sister, the (Gran) Torino - which was my first hand-me-down vehicle. It was a good car. (A tank, yes - but I sure did feel safe driving it.)
Most of you posting at the moment know that I share Chris's sentiments, plus others, in spades. What I think it comes down to is a commitment to the luxury sport sedan segment, or the lack thereof.
The LS represented a very brief commitment in the Ford/Lincoln executive suite -- could have been measured in minutes. The concept was great, but the execution. . .
Of course there was the Expedition tire fiasco & other financial woes, but the fact remains that there was a group of people in the organization at some point that thought that the LS made sense.
Where are they now?
If you want to attract a new (younger) demographic to a brand, it takes quite some time. Advertising is involved, over a protracted period, as well as continuous improvement to the product. If selling trucks is the sole goal, why even launch the LS?
I haven't mentioned the elimination of the manual. . .until now. The Audi A6 people are dealing with this, while the CTS crowd is asking where to find them. Sad to say, the Cadillac dealer cabal may cause much of the same trouble we had with the LS, with respect to the manual. Or maybe not.
Talk is cheap. Follow-through isn't, but pays huge dividends, long-term. Long-term is how most North American financial executives don't think.
That is all. . .for now.
Best quote:
"Overall, the car has a profoundly geriatric feeling about it, like it was built with a swollen prostate. To drive this car is to feel the icy hand of death upon you, or at least the icy hand of Hertz, because it simply screams rental."
Yep, I don't like the Avalon, Crown Vic or the Grand Marquis. You see, I still have all my own teeth and don't own any white shoes or belts. And my wife's hair isn't blue...
OTOH, I DO like the 300C-make mine a SRT-8.
One thought occurred to me here (that's my daily quota): If Ford was to put a decent engine in the Montego and tighten up the suspension, I wonder if they'd then think they have a new Lincoln?
We see that, George..... (He He)
I had heard, that it would be built upon the same platform (DEWlite) that the current Mustang just came out on. Not quite as great, but not altogether a bad thing. I'm sure, there'll be a Lincoln version or two of the Montego.....and, I'll be interested in checking them out.
Lincoln does not need another car for the geriatric set. Mercury's got that market cornered now it seems.
The last thing Lincoln needs is a car review like the one in the LA Times for the Montego.
On the LA articles, yes I read it. I make notes from it. Some writer's show a certain bias and when I'm able to link it from their past reviews/articles, I fire off a nice letter to point it out to them.... I've already fired one, with no reply, go figure...
Just how I make notes when these "market analysts" predict something negative, it gets blasted on the front page news, then when they are proven wrong, NO ONE points it out...But I too send them a nice little note and point it out.
Specially this month that I feel so generous and I'm Teasin' the Season :-)
Interestingly one pretty important (maybe preceeded by self-) auto industry guy, DeLorenzo over at autoextremist (.com) spends some time bashing the Detroit bashers in his dec 15 site rants and then writes a few paragraphs about this very review by Dan Neil and DeL loves it, calls DN one of the best (and apparently a Pulitzer Prize winner) and recalls how he, DeLorenzo, has been "hammering Ford since last January about these cars..."
It's just a shame. Best quote from the review is : "Has Ford ever seen the competition?"
Styling(or lack thereof)?
Reliability?
Interior design and quality?
I just don't see this car making a ripple in the marketplace, much less giving the Japanese any sleepless nights...
Styling(or lack thereof)?
Reliability?
Interior design and quality?
I just don't see this car making a ripple in the marketplace, much less giving the Japanese any sleepless nights..."
*Styling? -- Yes, you may not find the Five Hundred appealing, but the car does have a certain "presence" which the Camry and Accord are sorely lacking, it ahs to do with the cars size and proportions, they're much like a real 1950's sedan -- not a faux "choppped" design like the Chrysler 300's but more like a Checker Marathon not sexy but kind of imposing and substantial, you really have to see the cars in person to get it.
*Reliability? -- Only time will tell.
*Interior design and quality? -- Yes, these cars have it, they're a bit more spartan and utilitarian than the Japanese, but they are certainly comfortable and the amount of space and flexibility of the interior packaging is outstanding, and the higher seating position is a boon to anyone whose job requires making frequent entries and exits from the car. I ordered a Montego myself, it is really the only sedan I considered because I frequently need to carry large and awkward cargo, but really didn't want a minivan or SUV because of the mediocre handling and fuel economy and lack of covered storage.
The Five Hundred and Montego are niche vehicles in many ways, as are sports sedans and luxury sedan, but I think they occupy a pretty large niche.
BTW I do not consider mysellf "dull", but my interests are more in the activities that my car helps me do than in the car itself. It's probably the same with most of those other people who buy dull cars out there. Cars really are appliances for most people most of the time.
And I've done the same with even a boring car as a Camry... Borrowed a friends Camry to cure some "hesitation" the engine had. She never thought the car could do as much as it did (front end alignment seems to be it's weak point, don't throw it over a curb like you can with a 500), and marshmellow suspension doesn't provide much feedback or confidence for quick turn-ins.
But most vehicles you can bring the soul out... It's just, in some it requires a bit more effort, whereas some others it's much less. As for the 500, it's there if you want it to be, but can also be a neutral driving vehicle if need be as well.
Well - WAKE UP DETROIT!!! 8 weeks later our car arrived only to have to be immediately repainted due to a huge flaw on the roof. Strange rattles that the dealer could not fix, headliner fell down in the back. It died in the shopping center parking lot on a busy Saturday - had to be towed to the dealership - faulty PCV valve. Gave us a 2 year old LS as a loaner and I realized the rolling junk heap we drove for 2 days was in our future. We love the LS ride, we love the solid handling, we love comfort of the front seats (forget about anyone over 5'5 riding in the back however).
We drove the Montego - geez what a joke! SOunds like a panel truck inside and rode about as well. Its a Passat wannabe without the German engineering and attention to detail.
We will be trading in our LS with less than 10K miles for the car we should have bought in the first place. When Detroit can build a car without myriad defects, starts doing smart engineering that is actually good design not just schlock for the masses, stops building 'Kleenex Cars' to use and just throw away, then maybe we will be back.