By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
They bad mouthed the rear seat comfort and exitability, yet if you look at the final scores it rates #1 for comfort and tied for #1 on exitability. And how can they put the exterior styling second to the Passat?
They did catch all the cheapening Chrysler did. I wasn't aware that the headreasts no longer articulated. And the older models all have lining in the storage compartments, etc. (and evidently now they don't). Then the crappy 2002 stereo gets trashed (deservingly I'm sure). At least it was rated the most fun to drive.
Okay...I'm done ranting.
Thanks in advance.
http://www.manassaschrysler.com/Chrysler/290033.html
And yes, it does lack several luxury features. They listed them and made note of what the other cars did have in comparison. But, then again, why would I ever want to start yet another debate on this TOWNHALL board?!
Oh, and the one editor's comment: "various interior rattles, a slightly loose center console, front doors that rubbed against the firewall pads whenever they were opened or closed and misaligned exterior body panels."--that's an EXACT representation of our past 00' M.
If the car had been put up against the last "sports sedans" comparison, the outcome would have been even worse.
Finally, an article written that might give Chrysler a clue! But, then again, why would they care what actual people think of their products!
Oh, and the stereo sounds like....well, you know the rest of the story. I think Edmunds hit it right on the head in their analysis.
A more appropriate choice would have been the Concorde Limited (Nee LHS).
It has the wood dash and softer ride that the segment demands, yet still offers the sportiness of the 300M.
That said, I still think it would have scored in the exact same spot (it isn't as sumptuous as the Lexus), but it would have garnered much more favourable comments.
Oh yeah, don't forget that, out the door, it costs about $6000 less than the next least expensive entry (Lexus - $32,000).
It's basically getting old and more people are starting to realize it.
Decontenting- Jeez, by the time the new 300N comes out, it'll be equipped like a base Sebring. Cloth seats and a 2.7 (hope to god they aren't this stupid), with only the usual power features and a CD player! Or, maybe they're doing it for a reason, and the 300N will be packed to the gills, but I wouldn't bet on it being standard, but mainly in a "high-end" model. Can't wait for the Hemi in the car though! I just hope they don't screw things up and make it unresponsive and gruff. A nice mellow rumble and tire-melting grunt from a stop would sure be nice (oops, we already have that, just not in a Chrysler!).
arby500- hey Arby , how you been .We have missed you on the board. Thanks , yes one more week to go . just waiting to see who our union picks on Monday as the next company to be the strike target , GM was first they were offered 3,3 and 2 % wage increase's for the next 3 years . Hope DC will giveus the same
beach15 - that pic does not do the black justice, this is one color that has to be seen in person to get the full effect.
P.S. my 2002 Acura TL-S is starting to rattle more than my '99 300M ever did. How'bout that?
Jon
As for the Edmunds review, so what? Every car runs it's cycle and falls to the end of the line eventually. The M is no exception. It certainly isn't the worst (actually one of the better ones, Honda's included) car I've ever owned. That award goes to an 86 Saab 9000 I owned briefly (VERY). Now that thing was a "sob" story.
I've been reading some preliminaries on the 5.7 Hemi in the RAM p/u's and when the first N with a Hemi hits the road it will be glorious!
Lexus Infiniti Passat 300M Sabb
Engine 6.8 9.0 9.4 7.6 5.0
Transmission 6.8 8.2 7.8 6.6 6.6
Braking 8.2 7.4 7.0 7.8 5.8
Suspension 8.4 6.8 7.8 7.6 5.2
Tires 6.0 7.4 7.4 8.4 6.4
Steering 7.0 7.0 8.4 7.2 5.4
Fun to drive 4.8 7.2 7.6 9.2 4.6
Comfort 7.4 7.2 8.8 8.0 8.4
Pricing 18.1 19.1 16.6 20.0 15.5
Totals 73.5 79.3 80.8 82.4 62.9
And the winner is; Oh no Beach 15 .It's the 300M!!!!!!
The totals are as follows
Lexus 73.5
Infiniti 79.3
Passat 80.8
300 M 82.4
Saab 62.9
The M's still wins Yeahhhh !!!!
I think that no matter what model they tested, the results would have been the same.
ruski-
Beginning to sound like you have the Honda Christine model!! Have you seen this- http://www.detnews.com/2002/autosinsider/0209/21/autos-593168.htm
fastdriver
Thanks in advance - Brian
PS: I wonder if Edmunds ever tested the cargo capabilities, the 300M can accomodate 8 foot pieces of lumber within the interior with the windows and trunk closed. Look at the additional savings by not having to buy a pickup.
Doesn't Chrysler have their "roadside service" toll-free number anymore? Maybe they can help. Otherwise, looks like you're stopped dead in your tracks.
fastdriver
The W8 and Lexus are much more expensive than the 'M, especially considering that many of us took advantage of rebates or low financing. In the real world those 2, the top 2 finishers, are around 10K more than the 'M. So of course they'll be a bit more luxurious. Then, if you take the Infiniti, which tied for 2nd, and is priced closer to the 'M, you get a car with Japanese derivative looks on the outside (it's like a contest to see who can be the most boring) and the inside doesn't even have any wood up high where the passenger or driver can even see it. Wham, bam, no thank you, ma'am!
Echoing posters before me, the M's combination of exterior looks, style, brakes, handling, interior ambience, value, and interior/trunk space give it a unique niche in the market that other entries don't match. Now, if Chrysler can just get a great looking body on the upcoming 'N, we'll be in good shape for a long time!
I went to Lakeside, that place must be the 300M capital of the world. For a town with only 2 main streets and to have 6 M's, I couldn't believe it. Sorry I didn't get to see any of you. Maybe next time.
There was a section of Interstate 8 a couple of miles into the AZ border, that is great to drive fast. We (a yellow Vette) were doing 85 on a 45mph section of down hill curves (I love that section). No tire squeel or anything. I think it kind of surprized him a little to see an (old mans car) staying with him. Driving under 80 should be a crime in this car. It really reaches it's own going up steep grades
You guys have a really nice looking car. Don't let reviewers (most with an agenda) tarnish your enjoyment of your car.
So far, I'm loving every mile- 19,010, of my "perceived Japanese reliability"!!
Wonder why DC came out with 7/70,000? Must be only to reassure all those minivan drivers!
fastdriver
Beach - Get some help. You always thought the emergency brakes were flimsy? That's probably the ONLY thing we didn't listen to you complain about over the last 6 months. I'm sure when someone comes out and says "the farnugger on my 300M failed", you'll be the first to say "Boy! I always THOUGHT that farnugger should have been made better!!" I've tried to avoid your posts, but like watching a train wreck I can't manage to NOT read them. Why don't you make one final post that says "boy, I love the look of the 300M but hate everything else about it".
Fastdriver - 7/70 is all about marketing and risk/benefit, and nothing about reliability. How many more people will buy the car because of it versus how much more it will cost DC for the people that use the service. Just like rebates on software. The revenues it generates is huge, and less than half submit the rebate. Same idea.
"7/70 is all about marketing and risk/benefit"
Mmmm... pretty big risk for them to take in their financial condition?
"Just like rebates on software. The revenues it generates is huge, and less than half submit the rebate."
WOW!! That's the ONLY reason that I buy it in the first place- the REBATE! ;-)) Am I the ONLY one who saves sales slips/warranties and "call" the company on it if their product fails before then? No wonder my friends call me Ralph Nader.
Have a Duracraft 18" oscillating stand fan that came with a 20 year warranty. It only lasted 8 years before the plastic fittings cracked and won't hold the fan up. Called the company. Getting a new fan now with a 3 year warranty! LOL....
These long warranties won't last. DC had them before and I'm sure it cost them a fortune which is why they disappeared in the first place. If they were cost efficient, they would have still been in effect all these years.
fastdriver
Maybe all those DC minivan owners and others with failing transmissions should do the same and start DEMANDING for a change, instead of just sitting back and paying for their replacement transmissions. If NHTSA can help Honda owners, I'm sure they can do the same for DC owners.
BTW- in 18 months and 19,000 miles, my only "complaint" so far was a few weeks ago- the passenger door radio speaker material was wet. Brought it in with no appointment to have them check it. They looked at it and said that they would need it for a day or so to check it out and that they would give me a new TL to drive. Haven't had a chance to get back to them yet. Also, I did NOT buy the car from this dealer and don't know anyone who works there. How many new car buyers have had this experience in the first 18 months?
With Christine, I bought her on a Wed. and was back at the dealer Fri. and the following Mon. for the left 'drift" and the static in the radio. That wasn't even 48 hours, never mind 18 months!
Like I've said before, to each his own.
fastdriver
recently the right hand electric radiator fan has developed a wobble in the plastic ring type blade. Makes a loud grinding noise when it periodically touches the radiator fins. Have not pulled the fan off yet as it looks to be quite a job.
Has anybody else had this problem?
Is there a fix without replacing the whole assembly?
Understand from my mechanic the fan is quite expensive. If need to buy one, what is the least expensive source?
Carol (my wife) and I started back on the 15th. She drove to Kansas city where we changed seats. This was only the second time she had driven the m and the first on the highway. She said "I looked down and I was doing 90 and didn't even know it." Drove on to St. Louis and spent the night there as Carol had not been feeling well since leaving Chicago. The next day she drove a little over 100 miles. She was getting into this m thing. I told her it is a fun car to drive.
Will Sunday morning the 18th I got up, fed the the dog and went to wake Carol up but alas Carol was no longer with us. So I had lost my mother and my wife in 12 days. Needless to say I have been busy lately. Aug. was not a good month.
I took time Sat. to install the Joshua Tree wood trim kit. Carol did say that you need a spoiler to see where the rear end is so I'm ordering it this week.
I am so sorry to hear this. My thoughts and prayers are with you. I thought you were going to say that your wife was out driving the M.
fastdriver
Regarding the 7/70,000 warranty on the new Chrysler products' powertrain, it used to be 7/100,000 on the powertrain. I don't think the trouble is with the engine, I think it's with the transmissions. The 41TE/42LE is notoriously unreliable. I own a 1994 Dodge Intrepid and I bought it with 84,000 miles on it. So far I haven't had to replace the transmission, but I'm thinking that it's coming soon. It slips regularly on the 2-3 and 3-4 shifts, and has terrible "bump-shift" as it coasts down to stop. The torque converter is also having problems. The car now has 128,000 miles on it. My car has the 3.5L 24 valve V6, which is an earlier version of the 300M's engine, according to my dealer. The 300M uses the 42LE, they haven't changed it very much since '94.
I've had a lot of trouble with the car otherwise--I've had to put in two new steering racks, three sets of inner tie-rod bushings, a new a/c evaporator core (which Dodge paid for), a new paint job (Dodge paid for part of it), new automatic climate control head unit, new stereo head unit, new ABS cab module, and various other things. I think I just got a lemon, though, because the other Chrysler products in my family just have transmission trouble, but everything else is solid.
Just my take on the warranty--the transmissions cost them the most, not the engines. They make a darn good V6. If they could just drop in a few Hydra-Matics, maybe that would help.
Ed
saturnfan13185 - sorry to hear of your problems with your 94. I also have a 94 and its been a great car. No trans problems . Only problem I have had , is the A/C. Yup I also have had the evaporator changed . The paint on my car shines like the day it rolled off the line (but with a few stone chips) .Other than that I cant complain, its starts everyday and for a car almost 10 years old it still looks good .
Hey you guys wanna see my ride?
http://public.fotki.com/lhbuilder/my_ride/
Auto, I also had a 94 Intrepid ES in Fire Red, and my M is also Inferno Red. My cars in between were a Status (Grey) and a Cirrus (Gold) and the latter is my wifes current car. I'm also glad to see that good old Buzz has signed off on a contract with GM and it looks like DC may be next. I wish you guys well, but I will say that Buzz is not my kind of people. Good luck, and thanks for all your timely input on our site over the last year or so.
thanks to both of you.
Mike
300michael -Thanks, I just want to see happy LH owners .