Chrysler 300M

1435436438440441507

Comments

  • blondablonda Member Posts: 542
    MRL859 - you know I sat in the special and didn't notice the missing headrests until I looked in the back of the "non-special". So honestly I can't say if the Special they had at the show had them or not. Possibly it could have even been an 2002 model.
  • kosh_2258kosh_2258 Member Posts: 338
    I suppose that's probably the case since you can't legally drive that fast anywhere in the US. They probably do that to avoid liability. That way nobody can sue them saying they crashed doing 90 because the cruise control was set at that speed.
  • beespecialbeespecial Member Posts: 69
    I got my 03 Special in November and never really looked at whether I had headrests in the back. Your discussion got me curious so I looked and yes, I've got 'em!
  • psterpster Member Posts: 293
    PJ, now try the exact same manuever on a 750cc Suzuki, but the driver of the car is a 17 year old (I won't say what sex) and she (oops!) doesn't miss, runs over you and drags you 50 yards before she wakes up..........it is no fun, as I can attest. I don't trust turn signals anymore. Ever.
  • topcuttopcut Member Posts: 54
    My 02 399M cruises nicely at 75-80 mile per hour ,,,,Not sure we need to be running 90 with the cruise on or off....Think we would just be asking for trouble and a ticket....I think Tenn and Missouri have 70 mile per hour speed limits .I never hedge more than 5 over the limit...But I have noticed my 300 just begs to be driven faster...:)
  • topcuttopcut Member Posts: 54
    I have seen notes of people complaining of rattles and squeaks in their 300M's....As I recall they were mostly 99's.....My 2002, I can honestly say is still tight as a drum with 20K miles on it..No rattles or sqeaks any where ..I hit a bump and all I hear is the thump of the tire....Am I alone in this ??..anyone else out there with a rattle free 02..??..I was thinking maybe it just took them 2 or 3 years to get their contsruction down right.....Or maybe I just got lucky??..I cannot say enough good things about this car...I know.....:)???? I bet OTTOWorker put it together up there in Canada....:)
  • blondablonda Member Posts: 542
    I have never cared for using the cruise control. Just can't get used to letting it take care of itself. I used to find myself hitting 100mph or higher without realizing it in my M the first year or so I had it. Since then I have learned the proper foot position to keep it under 85. I find to keep it at 65-70 requires a feather light touch of the foot which is difficult. I know cruise control is the cure for this -- but....

    My 1999 M with 53K still has no rattles. Solid as a rock. I think it's the luck of the draw on whether you have a rattley M or not. I have also been lucky enough to not experience many of the other problems that were common in 99/00 like the door locks and window motors. I like to think my M was in a good build time frame (Sept 1998) when they had made enough of them to get the parts pieced together correctly, and still using the earlier batches of parts, which can be better quality as vendors will sometimes cut quality for the sake of quantity as time goes along.
  • pjyoungpjyoung Member Posts: 885
    46,000 miles.
  • 300michael300michael Member Posts: 1,815
    Mine has a maximum of 87 mph also, on my 99.
  • beach15beach15 Member Posts: 1,305
    Our 2000 300M had them all over, the biggest offender being the IP cluster. Also some in the doors, the back window area, the console, the dash, the ceiling, and a few others. We weren't lucky in this regard and it was the single most annoying feature of the car, other than GY tire roar. That, and the 5* had more important things to do than those noises we heard....

    I still thank Otto and 300michael for going to the trouble about a year ago to give me instructions on how to get behind the IP and probably fix the rattle. I still have the few printed posts from this board, but I never had a chance to get any further than removing the lower dash panel. Oh well...
  • ottowrkrottowrkr Member Posts: 778
    You have a 50 / 50 chance I did . LOL
  • bluesky999bluesky999 Member Posts: 253
    Pster; hot damn, dragged for 50 yards? Glad you're still in the land of the living. At least you have a good story to tell, and probably a battle scar or 3.

    Rattles: My '99 is tight as a drum at 67K, except for when I open the moonroof shade I hear a slight noise from the moonroof. It doesnt' bother me, and since it's not functional, haven't bothered to get it fixed. For 67K I think it's quite impressive how tight the car still is. Sorry to the fellow/lady who got a rattler. Perhaps find a good mechanic to check it all out?
  • cmyers300mcmyers300m Member Posts: 206
    My 2001 M is solid, in fact it is more solid than my previous Nissans AND my wife's 2002 Honda Civic. That thing has a nasty vibration noise in the door that bugs the crap out of me!
  • brimstonsmbrimstonsm Member Posts: 24
    is that real chrome on the lower grill of your M?
    or is it painted chrome? Looks nice, if its chrome
    how did you do it. I have a billet grill been looking for the lower grill like yours to match.
  • peters300mpeters300m Member Posts: 11
    Hi There,

    Thanx for checking my page. Actually it is not real chrome. It is a very easy and cheap mod that I did myself. Go to your local Autoparts store like Pep Boys, and buy those wheel well moldings. Make sure they are the ones with the 3M back adhesive because they tend to stick the best. Make sure you clean the surface and apply it in pretty warm weather.

    Good Luck
  • laurasdadalaurasdada Member Posts: 5,207
    Like Bluesky999, the only rattle I have in my '99M with 43,000 miles comes from the sunroof cover when it is open. And it is not consistant, so no biggie.
    42 months later, still one of the best looking cars on the road. Still have the oem goodyears which I'll probably replace later this year. Traction in the snow is ok for now, but thank goodness for the traction control! From what I've read here and at tire rack.com, I'll probably go for the YokoOno Avid T4s.

    '21 Dark Blue/Black Audi A7 PHEV (mine); '22 White/Beige BMW X3 (hers); '20 Estoril Blue/Oyster BMW M240xi 'Vert (Ours, read: hers in 'vert weather; mine during Nor'easters...)

  • topcuttopcut Member Posts: 54
    Well , from all the people with rattle free cars, I would say that Chrysler's build quality sounds pretty good...I would also guess that the merger with MB should help them even more with the over all quality with their cars......So,I guess with all that I will wait and see what the LX models look like before trading....:)..I just have a feeling they are going to be super.!!!!
  • beach15beach15 Member Posts: 1,305
    Despite the rattles, that was one thing that I loved about the M. The interior just had a nice, quality feeling and you weren't worried about cutting your fingers on something sharp or having to be overly delicate with things for fear of breaking it. All the materials had a firm yet plush feel, appealing texture, the color was great, and nothing felt el-cheapo. Problem was, there were various small rattles in places, but I've yet to be in a car that didn't have one or two on a single day in its life.

    That's something I could NEVER say about any GM, as much as I wish I didn't have to say it. Last year, we still had the M (2 months after getting it back from the re-construction) and went to the Baltimore Auto Show. I tried out the front and back of just about every vehicle that was open there, and only a few made me comfortable (but one was a $60k Lexus!). We were there most of the day, but when we left and walked back to the parking garage, I still remember how it felt climbing back into the M. Even though the outside needed washed, the minute I touched the leather back seat, I felt at home. There's just something about the car. It's the same thing I remember after driving my grandmother's '99 Olds Intrigue all day two years ago, and then going for a short ride in the 300M downtown. It was like going from a Neon to a Lexus--the 300M had a much higher quality feel. While the Olds drives very sport-oriented (very firm ride and stiff steering) and felt very tight overall, the non-PHP 300M had a plush, luxurious, and soothing feel.

    It's only after a few days that the car would start to seem a little ragged, mainly due to the road noise. But still, overall the car always had a quality feel. I'm also very fond of the Intrigue, but to put things in perspective, I've had to re-install things like the radio knobs more than once--enough said. This, however, is not something common to our new Chevy truck. Everything is perfectly alligned, rattle-free, and tough.

    Rattles aren't all I used to crack them up to be. Still very annoying and not something I like or want, but just not something I seek out. Guess I've just been more involved with the driving lately and listening to the radio more.

    Fastdriver will think I've gone mad, but a used '99 M is actually a car I would consider buying in the next year. Granted, there are many other choices on the list too, but it's on there and that says something coming from me. I LOVE Av, but there are things I also loved about the M that I miss (and some that are annoying still). That is, unless we would happen to hit the Powerball or PCH anytime soon...
  • beach15beach15 Member Posts: 1,305
    Just read the full February '03 Car & Driver article on the new Magnum. Several pictures and quite a long article. Every time I see the car and read more about it, I love it even more. No one here has seen the new 300 yet, but I'm personally more attracted to the Magnum's sports tourer body. It is GORGEOUS! Okay, maybe the front needs a little refining (a little more car-like), but the rest is perfect. I'd be tempted to go and order a loaded new black Hemi-powered one too if I had the $$$ when they're available. Not everyone likes wagons (though even Dodge won't call it one), but this car may well change things.

    Oh boy, maybe I'm just in too good of a mood...or maybe it's time for a doctor's appointment...
  • cebtebcebteb Member Posts: 138
    I was planning to buy a Nissan Maxima or Infinity I30 when the 300M debuted. With Nissan ruining the design of the Maxima and the 300M's advantages in power, looks, and room, we opted for a '99 non-PHP 300M (3/99 build date).

    The rattles began almost on day one. My wife ended up as primary driver and she has super-sensitive hearing (left mine on a machine gun range in '68). Our M has been to the shop at least a dozen times for various rattles. Still have them in the doors and somewhere in the back. One 10 mile trip down a gravel county road a couple of years ago loosened everything up and the dealers were unable to quiet them all back down. BTW, my new '03 Olds Bravada is still rattle-less after 2-1/2 months and 2,000 miles.

    Road noise has also been a distraction, but our recent installation of Yoko YF420s cut that in half. Harsh ride quality is our final remaining gripe w/ the 300. The ride quality only amplifies the rattle situation.

    What we still like about the 300M is the external looks, power, interior luxury, comfort, handling, and gas mileage.

    I considered buying another 300M in a couple of years, assuming the ride quality, noise isolation, and build quality would improve w/ time. But, w/ DC's new design direction I'll probably go to the '04 Maxima. The new DC design trend is unattractive (yes Queen Truckster is apt) and RWD doesn't cut it west of I-25 in Colorado. The new Maxima stays FWD, claims 0 to 60 in the low 6's, and borrows a lot of the current 300M's profile.

    Too bad for DC, I guess our '99 300M will be our first and last DC vehicle.
  • topcuttopcut Member Posts: 54
    I too took a look at the 04 Maxima's pictorial..The front end left me a little cold but the interior and engine figures were impressive...I owned and operated 2 Nissan agencies for several years before selling and retiring....During that period, I found the engines to be bullet proof....The bodys left a little to be desired....I also had Mazda coupled with Nissan in one store....I always felt the Mazda was a better automobile.....might check out the Mazda 6 too.....
  • ruskiruski Member Posts: 1,566
    you have a non-PHP 300M and you find the ride too harsh? WOW.
  • 300michael300michael Member Posts: 1,815
    Having a non PHP and going to a 2" drop with sport springs, is what I call harsh. You should have went with an LHS (softer ride). I can practually tell you if it was a dime or a penny I just ran over. LOL
  • antitech1antitech1 Member Posts: 7
    I voted. I love looking at other peoples 300Ms. I noticed in the picture of the gear shifter, that the center console is a bit darker than the rest of the console. Why is that? anyway, sweet ride.

    2001 no PHP, no rattles, no shakes, still a quality automobile after 37,000 miles in one year.
  • bluesky999bluesky999 Member Posts: 253
    Yes, the new Magnum is impressive, with its rwd and 345 hp & big torque. In the C&D article, it was listed as having JTEC. Sounds something like Acura's VTEC (variable timing engine control), but I wonder what the "J" is. But make no mistake, it's a big car.

    With the current edition of the Sebring and its Dodge platform-mate, I was sorely dissapointed that Chrysler used the Mitsubishi platform (remember they now own most of Mitsu) and even one or two of the Mitsu engines. Does anyone know when those cars will be redesigned, and if it will again be based on Mitsu design? The magnum is probably just too big for me (I don't have kids to cart around), and it would be nice if DC would offer something nice in something just a little smaller. I don't want the cruiser, for one thing because it has no 6 cylinder. Anyone know what the future is for the Ms smaller brethren? Of course, I'm thinking ahead--for the time being I'm very happy w/my 'M.

    Beach15--regarding buying a used 'M. I did (it was the 1st used car I ever bought) and have been quite happy with it. If you do, I would recommend bringing it to a CHrysler dealer to check it all out before buying it. I didn't do that, and I found out when the weather got warm that the a/c didn't work. It was fixed under the extended, but it did cost me the $50 deductible and the small inconvenience. Had I had it checked out I imagine they would have caught that.
  • cebtebcebteb Member Posts: 138
    Harsh ride in non-PHP, '99 300M

    The LHS wasn't even a consideration because of its styling and looks. However, at the time the auto reviews said the non-PHP and LHS were identical under the skin. On this board I've read otherwise.

    Maybe it's just the bad roads around metro-Denver. But, the last Service Manager that road with my wife to see/feel her complaint about jarring ride on city streets, said it was normal for a 300M. He said she would have to go to a $40K BMW to get performance handling and comfortable ride. Alternatively he suggested giving up the performance handling and getting a Dodge Intrepid. We haven't pursued either suggestion.

    I wouldn't mind softer shocks/strut cartridges on our 300M. If the LHS does have different ones, would they be swapable to the 300M?
  • fastdriverfastdriver Member Posts: 2,273
    beach15-

    Time for a DR.'S visit! ;-))))))

    fastdriver
  • jona57jona57 Member Posts: 194
    My '01 300M (w/PHG & lux gp) is solid and ratlle-free after 18 mo. of trouble-free service. As many have documented here, there were a number of changes after 99 which made the M's quieter.

    I love cars & enjoy driving/comparing them. I would keep a dozen different cars if I could just for variety!!! No car is perfect for all applications, but I find my 300M as close to perfection for my daily driving as anything I've driven (in a reasonable price range). I would NEVER describe the ride as harsh-even with the PHG. It is firm and well-controlled but never harsh. A strut/shock replacement may be in order for M's (or any car) with over 35-40K miles (of ave. driving) to maintain the original ride quality- sorry to say that is about all most OEM struts are good for these days.

    Personally, I do not buy the 1st model year (or major redesign of an existing model) of any car- foreign or domestic. Most objective sources (e.g. JD Power surveys) indicate the 2nd model year tends to be more reliable & refined than the 1st. The 300M was no exception- (e.g. later years had improved power windows, weatherstrip, better noise insulation, and (my favorite) the Luxury Group real wood trim). I like a new design, but I would rather not be a beta-tester for any carmaker!

    Jon
  • topcuttopcut Member Posts: 54
    Words to live by.....I do the same..wait a year or 2 into the model change..Things have a way of improving with build repetition....The more you do something the better you get at it....and I think that is with anything, not just the car makers.....Good advice Jona57
  • psterpster Member Posts: 293
    Thanks Bluesky99, yes I did survive and you are exactly correct - I have "3" road badges.

    My 99 300M with 52K is still tight as a drum. The NVH improvements are a substantial reason I bought the car. There is an article about all the NVH and other improvements Chrysler put into the design of the 300M - I am sure many on this board have not seen it and it is well worth the read. I'll post it if I can find it. If you punch 300M and "NVH" into google, you may find it right away.

    Taking 300M in tonight for safety inspection and have either the A/C idle pulley or the Alternator idle pulley replaced. The whine is starting to really annoy me.

    Wife's Sebring LXi purchased new 1/01 just had its heater fail. As we drove it off the lot new one year ago this month, it dropped all its antifreeze as the lower radiator hose wasn't even attached. Well, turns out, they did't put ANY antifreeze back in when they fixed and refilled it, just water!!!! I just sent a note to the dealer owner. It wasn't nice. In fact, it was downright ugly. Chrysler needs to shut them down, they are destroying the brand value.
  • tayl0rdtayl0rd Member Posts: 1,926
    www.allpar.com

    Search for 300M and read the Technical section.
  • pjyoungpjyoung Member Posts: 885
    I guess as a trade off of buying the first year model (which is still doing fine), we got the "full content" 300M's. Seems like they've decontented a bit each year.
  • topcuttopcut Member Posts: 54
    went to the mentioned website ...Interesting read.....I see where they used ..what they called targeted vehicles for functional performance criteria were the ------Nissan Maxima, Infiniti's, Mazda Millenia, and the Lexus LS400...Thanks for the insight
  • kosh_2258kosh_2258 Member Posts: 338
    Now they've decontented the Special with ugly steel road wheels! OH NO! Or is that the "special winter package" wheels & tires? ;)

    It looks as bad up there as it usually does in Minnesota in winter, except this year we haven't got any snow!
  • beach15beach15 Member Posts: 1,305
    Wow, is that one ugly car! Amazingly, just wash it and change the wheels back and it would be gorgeous again.

    I could NEVER live there, or anywhere where it snows a lot, because I cannot stand any of our vehicles getting dirty. That, and since I started my own detailing business, I'm absolutely obsessed--dust really bugs me. How do you keep cars from turning to a pile of rust in all that junk!?
  • beach15beach15 Member Posts: 1,305
    Just thought of something. If he drove that car around a little more, he might get photographed by a spy pixer, and they might think it to be a new 300N test mule. Remember those few white 300M test mules with ugly black steel wheels? That look just like one!
  • toms99toms99 Member Posts: 252
    I went against all the rational advice and got a 99 (first year model) without hesitation. (The only "hedge" was that I leased for the first 3 years...just in case the car had major problems. It didn't, so I bought it for the residual at lease end.) The car was so beautiful and drove so nice, the design was so radically new, I just could not resist! (Car buying and "rational" don't always go together!)

    My 99 is at 47K and is very clean and solid. No squeaks or rattles (and no decontenting!)

    cebteb - I have an LHS and love the styling and looks...it really is a personal "love it or hate it" type of thing! I considered the M, but back when they first came out the PHP 300M models were as rare as hen's teeth, and I viewed them as essestially the same car. I finally decided on the LHS because I have 2 kids and figured the extra 2 inches of rear leg room and the extra few cubic feet of trunk space might come in handy. It has!

    Oh...another reason I chose the LHS: A lot of folks don't know this, but the very first M's didn't come with perforated leather seats and didn't have the chrome beveled white gauges...The guages looked like an Intrepid! Early in that first run only the LHS had the cool gauges, and that (plus the extra room) swung my decision to the LHS.

    I have also found that I can do 90% of the mods that you M'ers do, and I am a proud member of the 300M club....

    Otto - WOW! fugly rims man!

    :-)
  • 300michael300michael Member Posts: 1,815
    Yes they are interchangeable. For 99 they are as follow in the part book PHP, or PHP have the Degination of SDD or Performance, The Non PHP/PHG are SDC or Firm. The LHS si SDG or Luxury for the struts.
  • 300michael300michael Member Posts: 1,815
    That is normally good advice. But I do not follow it Most All but one of my vehicles were first year remodels. They were all excellent vehicles. I couldn't wait for another year to purchase my M (got all that extra time to love driving it) I figured 8 months was enough time to get the bugs out. This has been a good solid car for the past 4 years. I should say for the parts that are 4 years old. The only rattles is from some of the wireing I have added but since fixed, due to all the cavities are now filled with them (I have the door sills (both sides) filled and the top liners (both sides) are packed so no more rattles from the wires.
  • peters300mpeters300m Member Posts: 11
    Hi Eddie,

    Thanx for checking and voting my page. I hope u liked it. Anyways, u r right about the centre console being darker than the rest of the interior. U have a very good eye. The reason is because I bought that centre leather gear console from a junkyard, and it was beige. So I just spay painted it black. Wanted something a little different.

    Peter
  • bluesky999bluesky999 Member Posts: 253
    pster, that www.allpar.com had an excellent article on NVH. I'm going to check it out further-- thanks for the tip.

    Enjoy the weekend, all!
  • psterpster Member Posts: 293
    I think we've found the next RoboCop film's star!
  • ottowrkrottowrkr Member Posts: 778
    Kosh , yeah its a special package just for Canadians LOL . Its called the Ugly tire and wheel option, can can have the 18's, the 17 chrome or the black steel wheels with snow tires and a ice scraper - LOL. You know I still see a few Specials around town with the 18's still on , I know its not like the roads are snow covered all winter but all it takes is one snow and that nice Special is in the ditch .

    Beach - thats one really bad problem with living in the great white north. Winter, yuck I hate it. Give a car 10 years up here and not long after you see the rust. Oh well guess that helps keep my job. If cars lasted forever , I would be without one.

    pster- yeah robocar , coming to a theater near you

    toms99- no kidding , Fugly dont even come close.
  • ottowrkrottowrkr Member Posts: 778
    were did you all go ??
  • ruskiruski Member Posts: 1,566
    you scared them all away with those pictures
  • austinman7austinman7 Member Posts: 313
    Forgive me if this question has been answered recently, but I haven't followed this thread closely. Will the 2004 300M be a new design, or will the current 2003 model carry over another year? I may be in the market this coming fall and was just wondering. I have a generally positive image of the current model, so it would be fine with me if it stayed the same.

    Thanks.
  • beach15beach15 Member Posts: 1,305
    The 2003 model is out now, and will be made for another couple months. Then the 2004 model year will start early and will be virtually the same as the 2003's. It is not until the 2005 model year that the all new, rear wheel drive LX cars will be produced. So if you like the way they are now, you can buy a 2003 or wait a little bit for a 2004, and you'll have the same car.
  • fastdriverfastdriver Member Posts: 2,273
    austinman7-

    OR you can wait until 2005 and God only knows what it will look like by then. If you want power, get a Dodge truck or a souped up Neon. They'll leave the 300M in the dust as of now. ;-))

    fastdriver
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.