By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Five vehicles named Top Safety Pick+ including new Civic, MKZ
Where are the Top Auto companies? Back to the drawing boards.
Pretty soon they're going to recall all bottled beer.
Back off your are NOT taking my beer NHTSA!
http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/10/ford-finally-issues-recall-for-230k-minivans-- - over-rust-problems/
Subaru's was small but they had a bigger one for puddle lights earlier this year.
Those Fords have been problematic - the axles were also known for rusting. Now floor boards and seats.
We considered one way back when, ironically that was because of good crash test and safety features they touted.
By now hopefully 2004 models are being used by plumbers, not families.
For a guy in the financial business - it's odd, but I totally agree with what you said. I have always gone after the car I wanted, and once that is determined, the cost is irrelevant beyond getting the best price I can get on what I want. Then I don't worry about it. I have never worried about true cost to own, depreciation, or how expensive the car may be. As a result, I have spent hundreds of thousands in my life on cars - not smart, but fun! Oh well.
Better to spend a little more and be happy, then keep it longer.
By conservative I don't mean "buying a used cheap to run car, drive it til it dies, and replace it with similar", because that's more frugal than I want to live. Conservative, as I'd define it for myself, would be the midpoint between the range that fintail describes. To elaborate, it means buying what you want and driving it until it becomes uneconomical to keep it. That's what I've done most frequently. That's partially because I tend to bond with my cars over time. I know that's not rational, any more than trading compulsively is.
I definitely don't believe in choosing a car just because it's cheap or the cost-to-own is low. That would go against me, but some people do exactly that, even when they could easily afford a more enjoyable ownership experience.
The Case Against Akerson, Part 3 of 3: Loss Of Confidence
I bond with cars too, which is one reason I recently moved on - the longer I kept the previous car, the harder it would be to part with it later. I already have the fintail as a sentimental object, I don't need to start hoarding old pets.
I can think like uplander, more fun to have a cool old car and a normal daily driver. But, I have an old car that I don't want to restore, and also a case of "you only live once", so a new modern car came my way.
Recall started in 2009 with 8,000 Pontiac G6 sedans from 2005 model year for brake light issues.
Brake Lights - NOT!
"On the topic of vehicle recalls, roughly 70 percent of respondents feel there are a lot of recalls today, but they also believe it's simply a normal part of everyday life now. In fact, while 42 percent of people try to keep up with recall updates, approximately 90 percent of respondents don't feel the recalls make them nervous about other vehicles on the road. Ultimately, nearly 50 percent of respondents said the recalls will not affect their next purchase or lease decision on their next vehicle."
Are Car Shoppers Bothered by Recalls and False MPG Claims? (theautochannel.com)
I've kept my 07 Expedition longer than any previous vehicle I've owned. I haven't owned a car with over 117k miles on it since the '75 Buick Regal my grandpa gave me when I was 16.
While the Expe is holding up okay, I am getting a bit paranoid. I'm not used to having a daily driver that I depend on when out in the middle of nowhere having this many miles. In the back of my mind I wonder if this is the day I'm going to need a tow truck.
At this point, my goal is just to keep driving it for another year or two if possible.
The government held about 19% of GM shares before the latest sale. Shares closed at $28.37 on Tuesday, up 6 cents.
A Treasury Department official recently confirmed that the government will not lift GM's executive pay restrictions until the government sells its final shares of GM stock.
One interesting thing about recent recalls is that Toyota reported a higher owner loyalty rate for those that *did* come in for recalls. You bring customers back to the dealer and have a captive audience; if the timing it right maybe they'll trade?
I went in for a spare tire chain that wasn't even rusty (it might have been rusty, the recall said) and they washed my minivan for free. Dealer is only 2 miles away so I basically got a free car wash.
Hopefully there are more of those. LOL
I've posted recalls here before...but never...'deciding whether to add cars to a recall...'. LOL
I remember some dude posted a three-year old Corvette recall on the other board as a new recall.
In related news, Nissan announced two separate recalls on 2013 models today...one for airbag issues that cover five models (including an Infiniti), and the other for a fire hazard on only 392 Sentras.
http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130314/AUTO0104/303140399/1148/rss25
It's a fairly big one.
Honda is recalling nearly 250,000 vehicles worldwide for brakes that can suddenly kick in even when the driver isn't braking.
From The Detroit News: http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130314/AUTO0104/303140399#ixzz2NXZxsUr0
The brakes activate without the driver pushing the brake pedal. How's that work out in rush hour traffic at 75 in a 55 zone on urban interstate--rear impact city!!!
Terrible dangerous problem from Honda here. :sick:
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
No crashes have been reported related to the defect
No crashes = terribly dangerous?
>No crashes = terribly dangerous?
Absolutely. If this were a GM recall, that's all we'd hear from one source.
(Spoken with great sarcasm.) Echo: Off.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Satisfaction with dealer service rises, Lexus and GMC are tops
Just sayin.
Read more: http://www.autonews.com/article/20130315/OEM02/130319941/ford-ceo-mulallys-2012-- compensation-falls-29-to-20-99-million&cciid=email-autonews-blast#ixzz2NcOdaKlO
Follow us: @Automotive_News on Twitter | AutoNews on Facebook
Imagine what he'd have made if Ford had hit its targets! :surprise:
Very positive review. Even seems like the MyLink works better.