By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Just out of curiousity, I did look up car-related deaths for teens in 2003 and it was about 2,300 fatalities. Probably a lot related to drinking more than high HP cars.
Here's a "First Drive" report on the new Corvette from Edmunds, just up!
First Drive/Edmunds Road Test of 2005 'Vette
What gives. Let's hear some impressions. The car is out isn't it.
BTW, the factory has shut down production in the last few days. Seems there is a manual tranny issue, don't have any other details, but from MPOV not unexpected, there were bound to be some issues. Hope they sort it out soon.
My dealer only has one C-6 and it is on the floor for the big event this weekend, so I probably won't be able to get a test drive as I hoped. Have to make another effort after the event is over to do it. I'm due an oil change in another thousand, hmmm...
Also anyone know if the Navigation Radio plays MP3s? Also how does the HUD work for the NAV? Thanks in advance for the answers.
-mike
paisan- The only irritant I have noticed is that in the car wash [touchless only] I get a few drops of water running down the inside of the driver side window from the blaster. And I do mean just a few, so I have just accepted it as a door seal being overwhelmed by high pressure water. Course at the factory they put these things thru a real high pressure bath before clearing them for movement, so I wonder how they missed my trickle. No other deficiencies noted at all. Otherwise good build quality.
These days it's all in the "details" and in the grade of materials. I think having much better structural ridigity will keep the Corvette leaks and squeeks to a minimum. Probably their biggest challenge is upgrading the interior even more. That's better in 2005 too, I understand (but haven't seen).
I've always drawn parallels between Corvette and Harley in their evolution, but Corvette has broken that comparison wide open I think because their performance levels vis a vis other cars is much better than Harley vis a vis other bikes. A Japanese bike will humiliate a Harley but a Japanese car had best respect a new Corvette.
385 hp/torque was an achievement at the time (2001). (according to the Corvette engineers) A scant 5 years later?, 400 hp/torque is standard. Weight loss (100#'s) was a very distinct arduous chore. There are many other "constant improvement" type examples, but I think the concept is adequately expressed.
2002 now has 30k miles of which over 1k is on road tracks, more than normal stress. No problems except for a couple codes in the DIC which have all turned out to have tech service bulletins detailing the fix. Car is fairly bullet proof at this point. Wife's 2004 is flawless so far.
This makes sense, as GM brake rotors are notoriously bad across the board.
Certainly if you are a sporting and demanding driver and don't want to be swapping out rotors every couple years, a rotor and pad upgrade might be a smart thing on a C5.
-mike
-mike
I go through brake pads and tires pretty quickly. Sometimes when I park I can hear my brakes crackling. I like that.
-mike
Why he wants to pick on the HUD I don't know, I find it the one thing that disappoints me about driving other cars when I have to. I bet he didn't have a front plate and never thought about it.
Now how to find a job at such an obscure title that gets you into a test session, that's what I want to figure out.
Black top?
Opinions?
Thanks!
http://www.presstelegram.com/Stories/0,1413,204~32658~2484478,00.- html
Please note that the original Vette was White with Red, in a vert. But since I don't aspire to a Blue Flame Special under the hood, which might also be classic, I'll take my Corvette's in Blue, just like the GrandSports from the mid 60's. The issue to some of us is performance not looks.
Vettes were nice in white when they were smaller. Nowadays a big car doesn't look so good in white, since white makes a car look even bigger to the human eye.
Chevy: Build quality on the passenger door is not perfect, good but could use some work. Additionally, bring back the commercials, quit folding like a cheap umbrella and taking the safe road, what would have happened to GM if Durant did what you people are doing. Parents, if your young (or older) kids have access to your car keys and are able to get under your supervision radar or don't realize fantasy from reality...you have problems in your process not Chevy with their ads. You might as well not let them see the news for fear they will become a terrorist, murderer, or...a hurricane.
As to Blues, Marina, Admiral, Nassau or Electron just to name a few are all great IMO, navy is too dark and Le Mans is almost there as well. BTW, my car is faster in blue!
If you live in the right climate there is no better way to go. Until the C6 a convertible has been somewhat less convenient without a power top but with it's availability it makes more sense now.
Since I do like to drive it, (going on 66,000 miles vs a host of folks that keep these things as hangar kings/queens and folks that would flog them no matter what color) there were a host of practical considerations in no particular order:
1. white is many times more visible than black, this might be good when cruising, or when see and be seen is important
2 white shows dirt and imperfections less than black.
3 white absorbs way less heat than black, i.e., runs cooler
4 white paint deteriorates far less than colors approaching black
5 white NEEDS less cosmetic maintenance that colors approaching black
About white, I did that with a Volvo wagon, a Suburban, and a Pulsar, had all I could take even if it is easier to keep looking good. You'll get over it as well, I'm sure!
I always thought that "real" sports cars like the Corvette need to look like "machines" or at least "muscular". This is why pink, rose and lime green don't cut it.
Maybe the theme should be if it can be sensed, we can measure it.... If you can't sense something (such as the F117), you can't measure it....
Shifty, hope you aren't putting Blue in with those other "girlie men" colors. A nice medium blue to not arouse the attention of the radar folks.
For those who are into reading reviews:
http://www.suntimes.com/output/auto/car-news-vette25.html
One of the more comprehensive ones, yes it disses the skip shift, and seems to have almost all the facts correct, which many haven't.
Now as to practical solutions, most just buy $20 plug in bypass electronics, pretty easy. I don't mind it and started shifting into 3rd early on with just a hesitation and find that works great. However, I hardly ever find myself shifting below 2100 rpm. You can always put it back in 1st, btw. The only place I see a real complaint is people like in SF that have traffic and hills, you can get caught pulling out slow into the base of a hill and voila wrong gear. To me it's no big deal, and getting that much performance without GG tax is very nice.
CHEVROLET CORVETTE: Without even getting into technology and horsepower, the car is worth a cruise-by just to see its new headlights: mounted in the noses of the fenders instead of tucked away by ridiculous pop-up covers.
JR