Subaru Crew: Official SOA Presence (aka Patti)

1373840424347

Comments

  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    I recognize that there are people who do not like this system. That being said, we do not receive many negative comments on it - and I would think we would after this past summer. I really don't have issues with mine (05 OB) nor did I in the Forester so maybe I'm not sensitive to it?

    Recalls are for safety issues - not AC issues. I know that there is a customer out in the western US that was petitioning for a recall, but since it's not safety related in design, it's not failing at a high rate and we are not having a significant number of complaints, that won't happen.

    I agree that it could be better - or at least more agreeable to the masses, but I don't see a production change this year anyway. Maybe we'll see improvements next year. I'm sorry I can't help with this issue.

    Thanks!

    Patti
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Wow, I bet Ed created the next big Subaru sensation!! This could be more successful than the WRX at appealing to juveniles!

    Craig
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    Maybe SoA can send me around the country to run DIY Cozy Coupe WRC clinics(?).

    I could very well make templates of the Impreza-specific decals, then repackage the Chartpak letters/numbers, flags etc. I wonder what I - erm, SoA - could sell those kits for? Licensing issues might arise as well.

    Ed
  • sdufordsduford Member Posts: 577
    Thanks for the reply Patti.

    I'm surprised that you don't get a lot of complaints since there is plenty of related evidence on several forums, and going back several years. There's even a guy who sells a "fix" for the Forester, so this is undoubtedly a widely spread and recognized problem.

    I'm guessing that many people who buy these cars have never been exposed to a good quality ACC before, hence they don't know better. But as you move upmarket, I think you will get more and more complaints. When you get in the price range of an OBXT Ltd or VDC, people expect and deserve better ACC than this.

    I understand that recalls are for safety issues but as far as I'm concerned the ACC is "broken" and doesn't work as advertised, so Subaru should make a fix available under warranty. The ACC is supposed to work for me, not the other way around. At this point I would be happier with a good old fashioned A/C system. This is not rocket science and probably would not cost all that much to design a better system so it smacks of negligence or indifference. I would be ashamed if I was the engineer who designed this system and Subaru is evidently capable of doing much better than this.

    I intend to send a letter of complaint to Subaru and to encourage as many people as possible to do the same. I am documenting in detail all of the strange and aggravating behaviors of the ACC as I discover them.

    Thanks again Patti, I know you're just the messenger, and I do love still love the car :)
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    sduford- I agree that the ACC design isn't the best but asking Subaru to provide a free "fix" is getting a little carried away. First off the ACC isn't "broken" since as far as I can tell it works as designed. That some of us aren't happy with that design is more our problem than Subaru’s. I for one knew going in that the ACC was an issue and as an informed consumer it was my responsibility to test the functioning for myself before buying. In my case I determined that the ACC added nothing to the value of the Forester but since it can easily be defeated it wasn’t really a factor in the purchase decision. Of course I do hope Subaru comes up with a better design for future models and in fact I believe that some changes have already been implemented for the 05 Forester.

    -Frank
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Good going Lark!

    Maybe we can paint up the L to match and we can travel around the country together :)

    -mike
  • sdufordsduford Member Posts: 577
    Well I guess we agree to disagree.

    Working as designed? You mean Subaru expressly designed it to overshoot it's set temperature by 5C (9F) or more? That they designed it to turn the A/C on and blast cold air in your face when it is 10C (50F) outside? (And I could cite many more problems) If Subaru really did that, then Subaru is really stupid. They should either do it right or leave it out.

    Can be easily defeated? Not entirely true either on the 05 OB; when you try to use it manually, it still makes many decisions for you, which greatly complicates obtaining the results you want. I also shouldn't have to spend so much time looking down to try and analyze what settings it decided to set for me. I'm a pretty smart guy who works in the software business and thrives on gadgets with lots of buttons. I've never had to look at an owner's manual to program a VCR for example. I can only imagine how puzzled my parents would be trying to make this thing work right! If a system is bad enough that you have to "defeat it", then the system is most definitely broken!

    Unlike you, I'm new to Subaru and I didn't know how bad it was going in, and I had no reason to know or suspect that it was this bad. The Subaru brochure said "Automatic Climate Control" It didn't say "Quirky Climate Control that has a mind of it's own and goes out of its way to make you uncomfortable." The salesman also didn't say to me: "the ACC is really quirky and doesn't work very well" There is also no way to properly test the ACC on a short test drive, so you can't blame me for not discovering this before I bought it. I came in with the expectation that the ACC would work, and as far as I'm concerned I paid for an ACC that works. I shouldn't have to go and find third party fixes for a brand new car.

    The fact that this is not a safety item in no way removes Subaru from it's responsibility to make sure it's products work. What if the power windows didn't work right and operated at random, shouldn't they get that fixed? Of course they should. So what's the difference other than the magnitude of the inconvenience? What if your laundry washing machine's programs did not do what they were supposed to do, would you expect the company to fix it? Of course you would!

    I'm sorry but I'm just not so emotionally attached to Subaru or numb to their quirkiness to overlook something like this and to make excuses for them.

    Sly
  • dsattlerdsattler Member Posts: 135
    I can't speak for others, but I bought my car in June and the ACC worked fine all summer long. (It was all air conditioning.) It was only when the heating season arrived that the shortcomings of the system were apparent. It seems like the fix would be fairly simple, probably a new or relocated sensor and software tweaks. Yes, I'm one of the folks who've complained to SOA, but obviously only recently: in June, July, August, September I would have told you the ACC worked fine (which it did). My wife's 2001 Toyota Sienna van's ACC works exactly as it should 12 months a year: just set the temperature and the ACC does the rest. I'm very disappointed in Subaru's ACC, especially because even with the manual override the "brain" of the ACC still does things from time to time, such as turn the AC on.
  • sdufordsduford Member Posts: 577
    Thanks for that info dsattler. I got mine on September 28th so I haven't experienced it in warm weather. It's been all cool weather and it's been all bad for the ACC.

    Sly
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Can be easily defeated? Not entirely true either on the 05 OB; when you try to use it manually, it still makes many decisions for you, which greatly complicates obtaining the results you want.

    OK, now don't take this the wrong way, but this is a perfect example of user error. From AUTO, any adjustment other than temperature that you make will put the system in a semi-AUTO mode where it still attempts to meet the set temperature with the other remaining controls. My wife spents months fighting the "semi-auto" mode in her Forester until I took the time to explain to her how it worked. So I understand how it can be confusing and frustrating when you push one button and the system changes something else to compensate.

    If you want full manual, turn the system to off and then bring it online with any button except auto. Make all the adjustments and settings you want, and they system will hold them for eternity.

    I agree that the "auto" behavior is not the greatest, but when you go to full manual mode, the ball is entirely in your court and you should be able to set the system precisely the way you want.

    Craig
  • amsbearamsbear Member Posts: 147
    Patti,

    My mileage was at 88,827 when it was towed to the service shop. Both head gaskets were replaced along with several other minor seals/o-rings/gaskets.

    My oil pump seal was replaced at this time along with the timing belt (oil fouled I assume). This same seal was replaced ~20,000 miles ago (16 months ago).

    The labor costs for this repair visit was the killer, 4 times the cost for the parts. Total was $1900.

    At minimum, I wanted this documented with SOA so that you can collect info on others that are experiencing the same/similar issue. You never know, it may initiate another campaign that may cover/assist with my MY and engine style.

    Thanks,

    Alan
    98 OBW Ltd
  • sdufordsduford Member Posts: 577
    Thanks for that info Craig, I will try that today. However, there is no mention of any "semi-auto" mode in the manual. It also doesn't explain why the system switches to recirc and A/C when I manually switch to bi-level mode (feet and face vents) and the outside air is much cooler then it is inside...

    It also reinforces my point that the Auto (or semi-auto) just doesn't work right, hence it is not a properly functioning ACC as advertised. The ACC is supposed to make your life easier, not make you fight for it to do what you need it to...
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Working as designed? You mean Subaru expressly designed it to overshoot it's set temperature by 5C (9F) or more? That they designed it to turn the A/C on and blast cold air in your face when it is 10C (50F) outside? (And I could cite many more problems)

    Yes I mean exactly that :-(

    If Subaru really did that, then Subaru is really stupid. They should either do it right or leave it out.

    You'll get no argument from me. Since I always keep it in manual mode, I'd much rather not have had to pay anything extra for an "automatic" climate control.

    What if the power windows didn't work right and operated at random, shouldn't they get that fixed? Of course they should. So what's the difference other than the magnitude of the inconvenience? What if your laundry washing machine's programs did not do what they were supposed to do, would you expect the company to fix it? Of course you would!

    Your analogies are both flawed because they are based on the presumption that the ACC system isn't operating as designed. Which brings us back to the fact that it's a poor design (but not broken). Of course it's always possible that yours really is acting up so taking it in to the service dept to be checked out might not be a bad idea.

    Kudos to Craig for differentiating between auto, semi-auto and manual modes. When I first got my Forester I do vaguely remember being frustrated trying to manually influence the auto mode before discovering how to override it all together.

    I'm sorry but I'm just not so emotionally attached to Subaru or numb to their quirkiness to overlook something like this and to make excuses for them.

    I don't know that anyone is making excuses for Subaru. Merely pointing out that asking for a recall or a free fix is an exercise in futility. Your primary path for effecting change would be to ding Subaru on owner satisfaction surveys and to not buy another (assuming that the evil ACC outweighs all the positives of your 05 OB) ;-)

    -Frank
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I've never been a fan of this. Why do carmakers insist on giving us Rube Goldberg features??? Give me a good manual climate control any day.

    Bob
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    I told you Mike, I'm not bad at this race car paint scheme design stuff! ;-) Now only if I could get better at doing it electronically in three dimensions, rather than just on paper in two...

    I had no idea that so many people would respond so positively to Paul's car. Several people over on nabisco have asked for decal kits or templates. If SoA got in on the act they could afford to hire screenprinters who could make the "lights" look similar to real lights, the way they do on NASCAR cars or funny cars. Really, I'm very surprised at the feedback on something I did with vinyl, decals, spray paint, and a lot of love for my son.

    Ed
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Well, I think it's because your kid looks so cute in the pictures. Heck, it made me want one! (the car that is, I am still negotiating with the wife on kids...). I suppose I could rig up something like this for the cats....

    Craig
  • tsytsy Member Posts: 1,551
    a lot of love for my son.

    Ed, that's what makes it all really worthwhile. ;-)

    Remember that now that you're famous! ;-)

    tom
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Sly,

    An even easier way to submit your concerns is to either email Subaru or call them at 1-800-SUBARU3 and let them know.

    If this were a widespread concern, Subaru wouldn't know about it unless owners took the extra step and told Subaru directly. Patti certainly could pass on what she hears but direct communication from customers (and a lot of them) is what gets product engineering moving.

    While I'm not challenging the fact that the ACC system doesn't work for you, I do question how much of a problem it is with other customers. I'm on Legacygt.com all the time and I honestly have not seen many people dislike the HVAC system to the same extent. In my experience, problems that get brought up at owners' groups are not always representative of the general owner population.

    BTW, do you have your face vents pointed directly at yourself? Since the HVAC system measures air temperature below the steering wheel, I find that the system does a better job for me when the vents are directed away from me. By indirectly cooling/heating the air, the temp sensor will more likely be measuring what you perceive.

    For now, I'd do what Craig suggests -- don't ever touch the AUTO button and go full manual. In the rare cases that I do fiddle with manual control, I usually start with hitting the fan speed button, exactly like you would with a manual system. Choose the temperature, vent direction, A/C on/off, etc to your liking and when done, hit "OFF". When you hit the fan button again, it should have remembered all of your settings.

    Ken
  • sdufordsduford Member Posts: 577
    Craig, I went over the owner manual again and there is definitely no such thing as a "semi-auto" mode in the 05 Legacy/Outback.

    I also tried your suggestions and experimented with all the controls. The only difference in behavior I could detect when going to OFF versus selecting another contolr is this:

    When lowering the temperature all the way to minimum, if I had first hit OFF, the system goes into a high fan setting. If I didn't go through OFF first, it actually switches to RECIRC!

    Sly
  • sdufordsduford Member Posts: 577
    Frank: "Yes I mean exactly that :-( ".

    I find it very hard to believe they would design it like that on purpose. However I can belive that they were too lazy to design and test it properly.

    "Your analogies are both flawed because they are based on the presumption that the ACC system isn't operating as designed."

    I disagree because you are asking the wrong question. It is not whether it works as designed, but wether it works as advertised and expected. If the turbo was not designed with safeguards to keep from blowing up the engine would that be OK because it works "as designed"?

    Here's a quote from my owner's manual, page 4-10: "It [the ACC] activates when the 'AUTO' button is pressed, and is used to maintain a constant, comfortable climate within the passenger compartment". In relation to the separate control for the passenger it says on page 4-13: "... the system automatically adjust the temperature of air supplied from the outlets such that the desired temperature is achieved and maintained". That's what is advertised and expected, and it doesn't do that.

    For the passenger side, the system is physically incapable of doing that because there is only one sensor, on the driver's side. As far as I can tell, from experiment, it outputs a temperature difference with the driver's side, but it has no clue what the temperature actually is on the passenger's side.

    I know that getting this fixed is a long shot at best, but I will at least have the satisfaction of making a lot of noise about it and annoying Subaru at least as much as this is annoying me. I'm also hoping that if enough of us complain about it, they will at least fix it for the next MY. I'm sure they will lose a few sales over this noise, so if they are smart, they will react.

    I think you are making excuses. You are basically saying "ah well, they are stupid and quirky, so what did you expect?"

    When I plunck down $40K Cdn on a piece of machinery, I expect everything to work as advertised. Is that wrong?
  • sdufordsduford Member Posts: 577
    Thanks for the phone number Ken. I will be sure to call them and let them know how I feel about it. But they will hear a lot more from me :)

    While I would expect more people to be complaing, I'm not entirely surprised.

    First of all, many people are just not the critical type and just assume that's the way things should be, or will simply talk to their dealer and be told that's normal.

    Second is that it appears to work much better in warmer climates.

    Third is that many Subaru owners are repeat owners and probably have never experienced a real ACC before so they didn't have any expectations about how it should work.

    I have done as you suggest and gone to full manual, except when I'm experimenting and documenting the system's flaws. However, while this allows me to be comfortable, it still doesn't give me the ACC that I was expecting and that I paid for.

    Ah well, I'm off to Thailand for two weeks starting tomorrow, so I'll be out of you hair for a while.

    Sly
  • snowbeltersnowbelter Member Posts: 288
    My brain is spinning from the comments about ACC. As to Sly, I'm sorry you are having so many problems with the ACC. The ACC on my 02 VDC is not perfect, but is fine and I've learned to get around the things that are annoying. Ken's suggestion that you put your concerns in writing to Subaru are on the mark. I'm a bit confused though and pardon me if I've missed something. Sly's profile says he is in Canada and wouldn't this be a made for Canada vehicle? If so I'm wondering if there's some difference between the US and Canadian versions of the car. And, of course, if this a Canadian purchase, I'm trying to figure out how SOA and Patti would be involved. What am I missing here? One more thing. When I bought my car I remember sitting down with the manual and trying very hard to understand what it said regarding the ACC. Perhaps problems with the ACC and other components are compouned by unclear technical writing in the manual. Martin
  • tsytsy Member Posts: 1,551
    I think your conclusions are overgeneralizations.

    1. Many Subaru owners are engineers and other professionals and are quite critical and particular about everything, and especially their cars.

    2. Subarus are most popular in the Northern states, and while we are below Canada (Latitude wise, eh ;-) ) it still gets cold here in the US of A.

    3. Your last point about Subaru owners not experiencing 'real ACC' is almost insulting, as it implies we've never experienced 'real' cars, so please be careful, I'm sure you don't mean it. I still regularly drive my family's and friends' MBs, BMWs, Lexus's, as well as an exotic or two (It always changes) and I'm sure I'm not alone among Subaru owners. (Everybody has a rich uncle, right?)

    Hope you have a nice trip, and I hope they fix your ACC, but either you're particularly sensitive to temperature or there's something very wrong with your car, becuase most of us don't have problems with our climate control. If we did, we would (and have) complained.

    Good luck, Sly
    Don't catch the flu in Thailand! There's a shortage of vaccines this year!

    tom
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Craig, I went over the owner manual again and there is definitely no such thing as a "semi-auto" mode in the 05 Legacy/Outback.

    I also tried your suggestions and experimented with all the controls. The only difference in behavior I could detect when going to OFF versus selecting another contolr is this:

    When lowering the temperature all the way to minimum, if I had first hit OFF, the system goes into a high fan setting. If I didn't go through OFF first, it actually switches to RECIRC!


    There is definitely a semi-auto mode, whether the manual explicitly spells it out or not. Starting from full auto, any control you tweak (other than temp) takes you from full auto towards full manual. Once you have tweaked (overridden) every possible setting it is in full manual. The in-between is what I am referring to as semi-auto.

    Our two previous Subarus (03 Forester XS and 02 LL Bean Outback) and my 05 XT are exactly the same in this regard (as is my wife's new Acura TSX). When you get in the "purgatory" of semi-auto, it seems like the system has a mind of its own but it's just trying to maintain the set temp any way possible. Instead, I think it just confuses everyone. Ideally, it's there for people to do something like turn the fan speed down if full auto is being too agressive.

    Starting from off, hit a mode, then fan speed, then set AC on/off, fresh/recirc, and temp to your liking. The system will be in full manual mode at that point and thereafter. If your system does not do this, then it is malfunctioning. Again, this is exactly the way our two previous and current Subaru operate.

    Craig
  • sdufordsduford Member Posts: 577
    Tom, I think you assumed I was over generalising. I did not say 'all' or 'most' owners, I said 'many'. I was trying to show that a significant portion of the Subaru owner population may not be seeing these problems for one reason or another. But I also think that there are a lot more people seeing the problem than Patti thinks, as I have seen lots of posts on this and other forums. But they probably don't make official reports.

    I've also seen several people say that they thought their's was working OK until I started explaining the issues and then they would OH! yeah, it does that!

    So we all have different tolerance levels. I guess it bugs me because I think it is inexcusable on a brand new $40K Cdn car, and there is absolutely no excuse for Subaru not to have at least re-engineered the temperature probe which is the biggest part of the problem. I could live with a quirky system, if it at least didn't overshoot it's temp by several degrees in heating mode.

    I will still miss my OXT while I'm gone :)

    BTW: no shortage of flu vaccine in Canada, and I got mine this week :)
  • tsytsy Member Posts: 1,551
    Patti, is the climate control on the OB different than the Legacy? I would assume they were the same but I don't really know. I haven't had any problems with my ACC yet Sly is having so many problems with his OB XT.

    Just curious.

    Sly, I just wanted to make sure you weren't offending a lot of the people who own subies, that's all. ;-)

    tom
  • rob_mrob_m Member Posts: 820
    I believe that Patti is aware of the ACC situation. Besides posts from several different owners, Sly and Patti started to discuss this at chat on Thursday night. No doubt that there is an issue here. The bigger problem at hand is replicating it. Is this isolated to one or several vehicles, vehicles built at a certian time period, or is it a universal issue? Just my thoughts! Rob M
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    It's the same on the 05 Legacy and Outback. And it behaves very similarly to the system on my 02 Outback. They have all worked OK in my experience. However, my wife continually fought with the systems until she got the hang of it. So I continue to think it's a combination of a less than perfect ACC and user inexperience/frustration. I learned how to use the system in my 02 after a few weeks (or resigned myself depending on your perspective) and the switch to the 05 was pretty much transparent.

    My gripe about the system is that you have to change both temperature knobs even when you want to maintain a single temperature. My wife's Acura is slightly better in this regard -- the driver's side temp knob controls both sides until the passenger side temp control is changed, at which point the two sided are independent. Subaru's system always has independent temps for driver and passenger sides.

    Of course, this is another example of how I have trained myself -- I automatically adjust both knobs when I am alone in the car. Still, it's an extra step and that seems to be the recurring theme with ACC -- lots of extra steps here and there.

    Craig
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    control in my test vehicle. I just try to keep my opinions out of it when folks don't like a particular aspect of our cars. I know that a customer out west really hates the set up in his Forester and another gent. came up with a set-up that he felt would be a big improvement. I brought it (off the record)to a friend in Product Planning and he felt that the concept was good, but the change would involve the placement of a fan that would be in the engine bay area - thus resulting in us having to re-crash test, re-certify the safety aspects of the car. Because the opinions on the issue were so varying (hate it to love it), it doesn't make sense for us to do that. But - I have shared the thoughts that have been presented here as I've committed to do - without my two bits.

    So - I really don't have anything else to add. I'm sorry Sly is so unhappy, but I'm glad he is happy with the car overall.

    Thanks.

    Patti
  • rob_mrob_m Member Posts: 820
    I got my package from the secret word game.

    It was like Christmas for Mikey, my 9 year old. He loved the binoculars, and went to bed with the Peter Solberg collector cards under his pillow. I'll bet he was having dreams of fast little Subarus! Rob M.
  • tsytsy Member Posts: 1,551
    I got my package too! My son loved the cards and stickers and stuff. There will be little subaru stickers all over his room soon!

    The binoculars are neat! They actually work too!

    tom
  • mruebuschmruebusch Member Posts: 25
    Can anyone tell me if there is a brachet for front license plates already on my 2005 suabru legacy gt ltd. or do I need to purchase one.
  • rob_mrob_m Member Posts: 820
    If it's anything like my 03 Outback, there are two tiny dimples in the front bumper cover. You just screw the plate right into the bumper. Rob M.
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Rob is correct. I used the dealer's license plate frame, flipped backwards, as sort of a bracket, but in reality you can screw the plate directly to the plastic. I just wanted to keep the rough edges of the plate away from the paint.

    I think Ken bought a generic flat mount/bracket at Walmart, which is also an option.

    Craig
  • rob_mrob_m Member Posts: 820
    This is a poor design. I see too many Subies in NE with the front plate folded in half from getting too close to a snowbank.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Use a self-tapping screw.

    Or drill a pilot hole slightly smaller than a regular screw first.

    rob: who's fault would that be? :o)

    Can't blame Subaru for physical damage like that. In any other car you'd just damage whatever license plate frame it had anyway.

    -juice
  • rob_mrob_m Member Posts: 820
    They had it right with the prior generation Legacy. The plate was slightly recessed within the air inlet on the lower part of the bumper, and mounted to a metal bracket.

    Of course, that didn't help one bit when some (#&%*)$&) stole my vanity plate off the front of the car one night!
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    My Miata has no bracket, so I added one that comes out from the air inlet.

    Funny thing is I like having the bumper way out in front, it's the first thing that touches and the bumper does not get damaged. The plate I can remove and reshape.

    -juice
  • tsytsy Member Posts: 1,551
    ASk your dealer to mount it. It should take them all of 15 minutes. If it's not law where you live, don't mount it!

    tom
  • dcm61dcm61 Member Posts: 1,567
    I agree that the front plate is a poor design. PA doesn't have front plates so it's not a big deal for me.

    But, both my mom and my brother bought OBWs that were dealer trades. The original dealer put on their dealer advertising plate. Since neither of them wanted the advertising and it looked silly with two holes in the front bumper, the purchasing dealer agreed to swap bumpers with another car.

    Subaru should rethink the front plate design.

    DaveM
  • maverick1017maverick1017 Member Posts: 212
    (this may be long)

    I brough my car into my local dealership, AutoNetwork in Queens, NY for a head replacement under warranty. After some wrangling and calls to Subaru3 they finally did the job under warranty, but that is another complaint. This one has to do with theft, when I dropped off my car for service, I had over $20 in quarters in the coint tray/cabin fuse cover. When I picked up my car two days ago I did even look whether the coins are there or not, this morning I had to pay for parking at a meter and when I open the compartment there was only about $3 worth of coins in there!! Plus I open my glove box and everything in there has been moved and tossed about. I am a very, for lack of a better term, anal person, I know exactly how things are suppose to be in the glove box. I am furious, I called the dealership and talked to the service manager Steve, he claims this has never happened (bs)and claimed that he was inputting it into the system, even though I didn't hear any key strokes at all. His tone was the most aggravating thing to me, it was one of those "agree to it and get'em off the phone" type of tone. I have left my car over night and over several days at other dealerships, this is the first time anything was even moved in the cabin of my car. The entire repair was done on the engine, no one should be going through stuff inside the cabin! Steve claims that service techs sometimes have to go thru the glove box to look for registration stuff or manuals, what for?? service techs don't have access to manuals and have to look at the owners manual?! Its not really the money that has me fumming its the fact that I feel really violated. The way the inside of my car looked it seemed like someone was deliberatly opening compartments looking for stuff, the compartment on the driverside armrest was opened and stuff shuffled around, I didn't even have a chance to look at the back storage compartments under the floor. This is absolutly unacceptable! Is there any thing you can do? (not about the money I know that is long gone, but about the dealership and their lack of care)
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Take your business elsewhere, for starters.

    If they stole stuff from inside your car, quarters are the least of your concerns.

    I'd call the 800 number back again and register a formal complaint.

    I've had valets do that, which is why I prefer not to use those services. They once also damaged my leather shift knob (right on the top, no idea why).

    It could have been the lot attendant. I doubt it was the mechanic.

    -juice
  • maverick1017maverick1017 Member Posts: 212
    Its not the money that I am concerned about, at least its not the majority of my concerns. Its the lack of care from the service manager when I called to complain, apparently they don't have a General manager. that dealer ship is the closest to where I live, the other ones are a long drive (not distance, time) away. plus only one other one is accessable by mass transit and its not an easy commute from home or work to get to. Maybe this whole experience is some higher power telling me it was a mistake to move back to NYC. Should have stayed in Buffalo, or moved to Kentucky. I am just rambling now, but you are right Juice I am definatly not going back to that dealer, I was planning on buying my next Subaru from them but no more!
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    I'm really sorry that happened to you. I'll contact you off-line.

    Patti
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    noted and reported as of tonight. Thanks for the feedback!

    Patti
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Includes all models, including the STi!

    http://www.subdriven.com/news/publish/Subaru_News/article_267.sht- ml

    Now that's something SOA should consider doing.

    Bob
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    I used one of these to mount my front lisence plate:

    http://www.autobarn.net/cru79150.html

    As mentioned in earlier posts, the front bumper has dimples where you can use a self-tapping screw to mount the plate directly.

    I chose to mount the bracket above first and then mount the plate to the bracket for a nicer look. I also added a thin chrome plate holder to tie in the look.

    It would have been nice if Subaru did have a little "nicer" mounting area than what's available today. Perhaps a detail for future enhancements.

    Ken
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    it would work out over here. We'd never sell them after a gazillion folks drove 'em. Heck, some people get upset if their STi has 8 miles on it from the pre-delivery inspection! But, I guess I'm in a jaded mood today, huh?

    Patti
  • jon_in_ctjon_in_ct Member Posts: 137
    Originally posted by maverick1017:
    ... that dealer ship is the closest to where I live, the other ones are a long drive (not distance, time) away. plus only one other one is accessible by mass transit and its not an easy commute from home or work to get to. ...
    You realize, I hope, that many Subaru owners have to drive over a hundred miles to visit their nearest Subaru dealership? I am one of the fortunate ones, though. I have three Subaru dealerships within 20 miles. But NONE of them (or my residence) are within miles of "mass transit." I imagine this is true of over 99% of all Subaru owners.

    We've all have experienced, I think, "dud" dealers. But it's really hard to sympathasize with someone who won't consider alternative dealers because the MUST take either the subway or the bus.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    GM does that, but I doubt it'll really help sales in the end. And yeah, who would want a new car with 80 miles on it?

    Maybe if they had one loaner for each model, but logistically that would be tough, and it might not even be the tranny or model you want.

    Honda did that for the Pilot and Odyssey, at least when they were in short supply.

    -juice
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.