By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
How is the visibility in the "real world"? My Mercedes has lots of glass and great visibility. In the Pacifica I feel a little bit like I'm in a bathtub and the windows are small.
How does it tow? I don't tow with the Mercedes but if we got this vehicle I may end up loaning it to my husband occasionally and he tows an enclosed trailer with two dirt bikes and gear.
Thanks for any hints. It's an interesting vehicle.
You can read more about this DCX marketing mumbo-jumbo here: http://www.caranddriver.com/article.asp?section_id=19&article- _id=1791&page_number=1
--Friend of mine was on the phone earlier
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&cate- gory=6783&item=2434740246
The salesman had offered "2% over invoice", I pressed for a specific $$$ amount. He wrote it down and slid it over, but it didn't jive with my computation of 2% over invoice. I insisted he pull the invoice so I could see where the difference was...regional ad fee.
He also pulled invoices for other vehicles and showed me it was added on every one, Pacifica or not. Bottom line though...I still ended up getting the car for the $$ I wanted because I negotiated on actual $$$ price, not a percent-over-invoice. I didn't focus so much on the invoice price, but on what I was actually willing to pay out the door.
We moved to a big house in the suburbs and my wife will divorce me if I'll leave her alone with the kids at home while I park our vehicle in the company parking lot.
I'm trying to be reasonable so I want a minivan (family of four), she wants branding and sex appeal so she wants an upscale SUV.
Our decision criteria:
A. Price
- under CDN$50,000 before tax
B. Features: security/safety, performance, warranty, luxury
- 5 star security rating, sporty/car performance, 4 yr minimum all-inclusive warranty, six seats minimum, top scale leather/wood trim interior
C. Branding
So we started to look around and after talking to dealers, taking test drives, we ended up with the following list and ratings:
1. Mercedes M class
- A7 - too expensive, B8 - lousy third row seating/too small, C10
2. BMW X5
- A7 - too expensive, B8 - not sexy enough/ a bit austere on the interior/too small, C10
3. Acura MDX
- A9, B7 - nice but not quite sexy, C8
4. Cadillac Escalade
- A4 - way too expensive, B9 - almost perfect/too big, C8
5. Lexus RX330
- A5 - too expensive, B9 - perfect/only 5 seats though, C10
6. Lincoln Aviator - FIRST CHOICE
- A6 - too expensive, B9 - almost perfect, C8
7. Volvo XC90 - not tried yet
8. Infinity FX35/45 - not tried yet
9. Chrysler Pacifica - SECOND CHOICE
- A9, B9 - almost perfect, C7
As a matter of fact after struggling to fit the Aviator into out budget, I literaly stumbled upon the Pacifica and fell in love.
Now I need to make a decision, and I am torn between buying on price (Pacifica clearly comes on top), Features (again Pacifica), or Brand (Infinity, Acura, Aviator)
So here is my QUESTION: What would you do if you were in my shoes ?
Pacifica seems to be the perfect choice. On price, it is CDN$10,000 cheaper than the Aviator, CDN$20,000 cheaper than the Lexus
PROS: in-dash GPS, 6 CD/DVD changer, DVD system, power tailgate, 5 star safety rating, European interior, surround sound system, automanual transmission, Mercedes power seats, HID lamps.
CONS: underpowered V6 4 speed automatic, no rear park assist, blind spots in the back, Chrysler quality and service (an unkown), cheap tonneau cover, third row seating leg space, cargo space,
ground clearance.
But then, alongside the RX33o, it is the only car that I found fun to drive. If only, I could fast forward one year and buy the 2005 model that has a more poweful motor, rear park assist, and a few inches more in length and ground clearance.
If anything, I find it much easier to enter and exit...I think Pacifica has a great step-in height.
Actually, if my kids were older and I didn't really need a third row of seats, I believe the Lexus RX330 to be a far superior vehicle hands down - no contest. However, my kids are small, I do need six seats, and I do not want to pay a fortune for the larger Lexus SUV to get that extra room. The Pacifica seems to be the compromise I am looking for.
Note that I am looking for a car and have not yet bought one. I am now trying to get a best deal from an area dealer before buying the Pacifica.
I bought a Pacifica after 2 300Ms, and one of the features I like most is the ease of entry/exit. The gliding seat feature makes it a breeze. I'm also 5'10".
As far as the sill step over, the Pacifica distance from seat edge to sill is only 10", compared to 17" for the new Cadillac SRX. In addition, the Pacifica sill is clean, due to the placement of the weatherstriping, hence no dirty trouser legs.
The Lexus RX330 is a great vehicle, but I think you get much more bang-for-the-buck with the Pacifica.
There hasn't been an update since they reported on the purchase (7/1/03 -- 90 days ago)!
In the past, they have reported on their test vehicles about every 30 days.
Maybe they all went on extended summer vacations or just can't decide what they think of the Pacifica...or maybe one of them liked it so much they haven't returned!
Other than that, the Lexus is boring and the Pacifica has some style.
Revka
Host of Hatchbacks & Wagons
Revka
Host of Hatchbacks & Wagons
Power: B
Not the strongest but then again, my wife and I don't drag race either. We enjoy the ride therefore we're never in a rush. I haven't used the manual stick yet. I'll use it when we go skiing this winter.
Looks: A-
Not alot of Pacificas on the road around my area. It turns heads. Looks like a van from a distance but I like the style.
Seats: A
Comfortable, easy to get in and out, lots of room on the second a third row. Haven't used the thrid row but people commented that it is definitely roomier than most SUVs. Heated seats on front and second rows seats will come in handy in the winter time:
Line of site:C
Lot of blind spots. Be careful. I'm just used to my Intrepid and Venture Van.
Cool Stuff: A-
My kid just can't get enough of the Entertainment center. He's five and knows how to navigate with the remote and wireless headsets. He's asking for Direct TV in the car. "What about it, Chrysler?" a Jet Blue on Wheels.
NAV is cool too. They definitely got it right on the money. BUT I think the MDX is a little better because of touch screen and integration of other controls in the touch screen. But that would've been another 5-8000 dollars more for an MDX.
Two or more profile settings is a god send. My wife is 5'4 and I'm 6'0. I just click on my remote and "viola" the seat, stereo presets, and side mirrors adjust to my settings.
I love the stereo controls on the steering wheel.
GAS Mileage: C
I'm taking it in in the next two weeks. I've seen in other posts that changing the oil will help. It's better than our second choice. A suburban.
Overall, so far: A
The 'allowing more space' part lasted only a month or so. I think this happens whenever you get a new car. Every vehicle has different sight lines, and you just need to allow yourself the time to get used to them.
I can now easily swing right into my garage without worrying about hitting anything.
Parking spaces, in and out, are no problem.
I'm changing lanes in traffic with a lot more ease because (a) I now have a good sense of the space needed, and (b) I know the acceleration timing required to stay with traffic.
I'd say that now, sight lines are a non-issue for me anymore.
Revka
Host of Hatchbacks & Wagons
"The plant, which builds Chrysler's upscale Town and Country minivans and the Pacifica wagon, produces 1,370 vehicles a day and employs about 6,000 people, Lewenza told Reuters"
http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/031003/autos_chrysler_1.html
http://www.globeandmail.ca/servlet/story/RTGAM.20031003.daimler/B- NStory/Business/
"amid slow demand for both the minivans and the Pacifica, which has been on the market less than six months."
Next thing you know they will be killing a great car because "oh, there wasn't enough demand"
BTW, I haven't seen any Pacifica ads on TV last 2-3 weeks.
To Everyone- Please be aware that you must keep a valid email address in your user profile in order to maintain your Town Hall membership status. Your email is private by default, so other members will not see it, unless you want them to. For additional privacy, you can also use an online email (i.e., hotmail/yahoo) address in your user profile.
And now, let's get back to the subject of the Chrysler Pacifica! ;-)
Revka
Host of Hatchbacks & Wagons
Julia
Recently had the opportunity to drive a FWD Pacifica during heavy rain. When accelerating from a stop, the front wheels were fighting for traction, with the traction control trying to do tt's job. The AWD would have just pulled away smartly.
Do you NEED AWD? I don't know, but I'm sure glad we have it!
Do you currently drive an AWD or FWD or RWD? How is it working out?
Obviously Julia has RWD ! All 1989 Volvos were RWD !
Actually the main question is if she really needs a car, because that car will drive 200,000 to 250,000 miles and till then it will be very cheap and easy to fix ! If she has a honest mechanic, obviously.
By the way, I have a 1989 Volvo me too. Can't get rid of the damn thing. It never dies. That's why I can't get the Pacifica.
Thanks again!
Julia