Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
Comments
Fair enough...
That information is no longer accurate. As of last year ALL road use diesel fuel is considered to be "Low Sulfur Diesel" and by law cannot exceed 15ppm.
Best Regards,
Shipo
- Regarding gas detergency, I am not aware of any additional detergency standards beyond Federal ones.
- As far as the differnce in gasoline brands go, in general, the only difference between gasoline sold to independents vs. branded jobbers in the "Ad Pac" added to the base gasoline at the truck terminal. Gasoline sold at Chevron has the "Techroline" additive package, while gasoline sold at "Bubba's Bait and Gas" has an ad pac that should meet minimum Federal standards.
- Fresh vs. Stale Gas: Of course, if Bubba does not maintain his in-line filters, underground tanks and/or he has low throughput at his gas station, the net effect may be gas which is somewhat "stale" and/or has more impurities than a similar gallon at Chevron's Super Mart. However, I would expect that in this day and age, these differences are much less of an issue than say 20 to 30 years ago.
- Edit regarding sulfur in gas: In general, the sulfur specification for gasoline is 30 PPM.
I'll keep filling my tank wherever the fuel costs less, as long as its not out of my way.
Has anyone here changed their thinking?
VERY different issues. One is fueling your car with the proper grade of gasoline to allow it to perform (both from a power and mileage perspective) to its best, the other is whether Brand-X fuel is of a sufficient quality for the average car.
Best Regards,
Shipo
I disagree with your contention that these are two different issues. The SINGLE issue is the hype that the oil companies have used forever. They are always trying to differentiate their products from those of their competitors, as well as to convince those gullible enough to listen, that they should be using premium grade fuel. If the engine manufacturer specifies the use of regular grade fuel, and if the engine runs fine with any brand of it, the only benefit is to BIG OIL when they oversell their product for dubious reasons.
The flip side of course is burning premium fuel in a car designed for regular. Same result, it will develop less horsepower (marginally) and return lower gas mileage than if it was fueled with what the engine was designed for.
Best Regards,
Shipo
Please read what I wrote "If the engine manufacturer specifies the use of regular grade fuel, and if the engine runs fine..." I wrote nothing about (as you wrote) "fuel with higher anti-knock ratings in high compression engines" or "an engine designed to run on premium fuel".
Please, let's keep the discussion on track and respond to what is written, not imagined.
"I disagree with your contention that these are two different issues. The SINGLE issue is the hype that the oil companies have used forever."
I maintain that the reasons for using name brand fuel are VERY different that the reasons for using Premium fuel. You seem to think otherwise, and that's fine, but don't try to tell someone who drives a BMW or a blown Audi that their purchasing of Premium fuel is a waste of money.
Then there was this comment:
They are always trying to differentiate their products from those of their competitors, as well as to convince those gullible enough to listen, that they should be using premium grade fuel."
Correct me if I'm wrong, but there has been no advertising espousing the use of Premium fuel in cars that don't call for it for quite some time now.
Best Regards,
Shipo
Best Regards,
Shipo
Best Regards,
Shipo
Of course, compression ratios are still very important to engine builders....many the amateur has come to grief by not doing his mathematics when shaving heads and/or changing the shape of piston tops or adding bolt-on turbos.
I was searching around for info on our BMW's catalytic when I found a site detailing several procedures different owners have gone through to get their E30 bimmer to pass emissions. I'm wondering if I shouldn't give this a shot before buying a new cat. I mean, it really just barely failed.
Unfortunately, I don't think it will help my Alfa.
I tried the old Italian tune-up last weekend and she still failed, although the numbers were better.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
20% sounds like alot, but to put that in perspective, I dropped the Alfa's CO by 33% by just driving it hard before getting to the station.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
While the sulfur content average is 30 ppm, the sulfur standard has a maximum per gallon concentration of 80 ppm.
Correct, but in Canada it wasn't until late last year and not until last month for Off-Road / Locomotive & Marine Fuel which has a spec of < 500 ppm. Many truck drivers still use colored (off road) diesel fuel because it's cheaper. And, to make things interesting, Canada has no regulatory compliance date for when the terminals must be transitioned to ULSD.
The sniffer cars could have giant claws, like those automatic tree-cutters :P
Let us know.
Best Regards,
Shipo
My dealer replaced my TPS, and bam, issue gone.
P.S. - car seemed worse when the weather was hot
For one thing, any automaker would give millions...no, hundreds of millions....for such a simple solution to increasing their fleet mileage averages. What a great piece of publicity! What a great marketing tool! What a great leg up on the competition! Just dump in a can of additive during EPA testing! WOW! 5 mpg more than your competitor's product.
For another thing, such amazing gas mileage increases would improve...no....SOLVE...the world's energy crisis...can you imagine the immense global impact of a 20% reduction in America's oil consumption OVERNIGHT?
But alas, the automakers refuse to add it to their engines, and instead spend $100 million dollars on engine development to gain 1 mpg. The fools? And the US government does not solve the energy crisis, but blindly turns an eye to this "miracle" before their eyes.
So how do you explain this?
Ah, then CONSPIRACY comes up, and really, conspiracy is a very poor explanation for the unexplainable, because it skips past a far more unpleasant thought--that automakers and the government know that these additives cannot in fact, increase gas mileage substantially, if at all, once they are put under rigorous scientific testing.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
Unless this car is an old beater of little value, I would either have the seal replaced or live with the leak and hope it doesn't worsen.
That being said, I have used products over the years that I could actually see, feel, or hear the benefit afterwards. After using their products for years, I actually worked for BG Products (see bgprod.com) for awhile. Part of the training included a trip to their headquarters, laboratory and production facilities in Wichita, Kansas. What I thought that I had known by previous years of positive experiences using their various products was just blown away by the knowledge gained after that visit.
BG develops all of their main products in house. They have a lab to develop products and an engineering department for testing. Heck, they even use employee vehicles for long term testing. They are quite thorough and their products do offer benefits to the systems for which they were created.
While there are plenty of benign products out there, BG is not one of them. They are not the cheapest, but they do strive to be the best. Two main products for consideration should be their 44K fuel additive that is used every 10-15K miles and MOA oil additive that is used every oil change. Check out their web site and try their products and you will see for yourself what a good additive along with regular maintenance can do for your vehicle!
I think the normal additives in good gasoline do the trick. In diesels, you have other factors such as algae growth, gelling, etc to watch out for.
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1219/751628505_ba11be6463_o.jpg
And a second shot from just above the injector down toward the fuel spray zone.
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1162/751628513_acc93f83cb_o.jpg
Geez, they sure look pretty clean to me, especially considering that engine had lugged a minivan all over New England for nine years, accruing 143,625 miles (at the time of the photos), and never used any fuel additives.
Best Regards,
Shipo
Best Regards,
Shipo
I used STP in a 60 Corvair to quiet and free up the hydraulic valves.
I've used "Restore", but can't say I could tell any difference.
(How are you and the Bellevue Biker Cop getting along these days?)