By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
The BMW X5 makes Ford look good, though, with 14 recalls already. This despite tiny volumes.
-juice
This just illustrates my point that production volume and recall frequency have no correlation.
Oh gosh. OK, a Mazda PR rep called the issue "rust" in an Autoweek article, so can we please stop calling it "staining"? Please? Attempting to minimize and sugar-coat this issue by calling it staining or a simple glitch isn't going to work anymore, and it is quite annoying to those who have the rust. If you can't call it what it is, then you shouldn't even bring it up.
Also, one person's "glitch" might be another person's rust in the door sash that has not been resolved after a dealer visit. Maybe I'm picky, or maybe rust on my brand new car is more than a simple glitch.
When you produce in massive volumes, you order more batches of parts from suppliers. In some cases, the parts change along the way, which is why some recalls affect, say, 1500 cars specifically, and not all from one model year.
There tends to be a correlation.
The X5 is an exception because it's a new model built in a new assembly line with many new suppliers, on turf that's relatively new to BMW. They just flopped the launch.
But recalls don't mean much in this case - X5s are selling like hot cakes.
-juice
http://www.baileycar.com/mazda6RT_html.html
It mentions some felt-like wheelwells linings which absorb sound, but may not last long.
(this article also has some relevence to the Mazda 6)
http://www.auto.com/industry/ford30_20020530.htm
I hope Mazda can remain mostly independent.
-juice
Think of it this way, Supplier A can only produce 10,000 widgets, but Ford can sell 12,000 cars with their multi-thousand dollar rebates. So they might need two suppliers to fulfill that need, hence doubling the likelihood that part will fail.
That's why recalls usually affect certain cars, and not all. Escape had 5 recalls, but I doubt you could find one particular Escape that was affected by all five of those recalls. Fact is most Escapes they've built have had no recalls at all, since they haven't had any since those early 5.
-juice
"Mazda is also talking about reviving the Mazda Performance Series, with up to three go-faster derivatives appearing during the next three years, culminating in a 280bhp, twin-turbo, four-wheel-drive version."
This is the first I've heard mentioned of multiple MPS versions of the 6. (Applauds)
As for me, I'd prefer the V6 manual.
The 4cyl, from what I hear, will be a nice motor so I wouldn't rule that out with a manual trans.
Avoid the Ford CD4E auto tranny, if they use that in the 4 cylinders. Numerous 626 owners complained about those, so I hope the 6 gets a different one. If not I'd avoid it.
-juice
If I read the above correctly, 'Bailey' claimed that the 4-cylinder in the 6 is based on Ford's 4cyl. It is my understanding that the newly-developed 4ycl is a Mazda creation that would eventually wind up in the 6, other Mazdas and Ford vehicles/trucks. It's only the v6 version that's being sourced from Ford (Duratec) and redesigned (I'm not an expert) to suit Mazda's preferences.
It appears that several of these 'automotive journalists' simply fail to undertake preliminary research before authoring their pieces. Let's hope he's right, however, regarding the 280bhp version of the 6.
If so, I bet the Protoge gets that 2.3l also.
-juice
It doesn't say that the base for these engines wasn't a Ford, just that Mazda did extensive development on them.
Mazda will be essentially be the primary designer of 4 cyl engines that will filter down to all the Ford family of brands.
BTW, just got the link below from Mazda
http://www.mindarrow.net/Mazda6/Static/Mazda6.asp?cid=739&mid=56
The contents look interesting and should whet our appetites for a while.
I did note on the product overview/concept page that it states all three body styles will be available world wide, confirming that the hatch will be available in the US!
by the way, you can reach that same page right from the mazdausa website, under the future models link.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
-juice
I think its too bad that Mazda is doing the same. Distictive and appealing products such as the Miata, RX-8, Mazda6, Protege and Protege-5 can overcome Mazda's current identify problems and an actual name can add to the identity of the car and brand. Here in the US, we all know who makes the Miata. However,in GB where it is known as only MX-5 only, lots of people apparently think its a Toyota. To me Protege sounds a lot more appealing than Mazda3.
I was surfing around the Japanese page again last night and am surprised that the gallery photos of the car have not expanded or that there is no way to see the car in different colors than the blue sedan, yellow 5-door, and red wagon. I'd like to see it in black, silver, and white in particular.
http://www.mazda.nl/modellen/mazda6/frame_home.html
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
I must admit that I don't like the new names; they are too generic and implicitly show that Mazda is unstable. Let's just hope they don't decide to change the names again in the coming years.
-juice
Mazda is mostly known for Miatas and needs to beef up their make image.
I like the Miata and Protege names. More appealing than MX5 and 3. Then again, they were 323, 626, 929 (Millenia) and RX-7. Maybe they're getting the line-up ready for the RX-8's introduction?
4000 orders in the first week!
Now I know how these marketing guys stay employed...
-juice
-juice
It also says the new engines run more quietly, qualify as ULEV and the valves have a 10 yr, 150,000 mile service life.
-juice
-juice
2.3L is expected to be 150hp
3.0L is 219hp.
I heard a rumor last week that the diesel model offered outside the US is now on the maybe list for north america. A year or two after the US launch at the earliest...still in the rumor stages.
The 6 will be offered with a range of engines. Not all for the North American market.
1.8L 4 cyl inline
2.0L 4 cyl
2.3L 4 cyl 16valve
2.0L Diesel 16 valve
3.0 V6 24 valve
all the engines except the 2.0 and diesel have an SVT balance shaft.
Have you seen the Letter from the Town Hall Manager on the Town Hall Welcome page? If not, you might want to follow that link to have a look.
And hang on to your seats. Change is never easy - for any of us - but resolving the Search problems we've had will be worth the pain.
Pat
Sedans Host