By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
In fact, I seem to recall my Protege saying something to the effect that the belt should be changed at 105k, but should be inspected at 60k. Thus Mazda covers both the emissions warranty and their butts if a belt fails before 105k.
on both models.
However, a footnote on page 8-6 says: "If the vehicle is operated in cold districts {below 0 degrees F} replace the timing belt at 60,000 miles."
I hear that the Protege will become the Mazda3 in 2004. I'm not sure on the specifics.
BTW the Mazda6 does not have the cylinder designation in its name. We just use 6s and 6i as shorthand for clarity.
Mazda6s5.5AWDT?
Mark.
$800 every 60.000 miles. I do that in about 3 yrs, but I still wouldn't touch a Corolla over a Protege just b/c of that.
Pretty poor reasoning...
Dinu
I've had that experience when the 1994 Civic's most popular color was a medium gray metallic. Parking at the post office one morning, when I came out I got into the wrong Civic. Mine was two cars over with a big van blocking my view. Knew it was the wrong one when I saw a teddy bear on the back seat. Looked around to see who was watching as I sheepishly got out.
The problem I have found with 4W disc breaks is, when approaching cars that have stopped suddenly, do I have enough space to stop and if so, does the car behind me have disc/drums and are they working good? Is the driver paying attention? Not usually. So I brace for a crash and pray.
It isn't always how good YOUR brakes are, how a good a driver YOU are. For most trips ABS never comes into play. And for city driving I wonder if they are necessary or overkill. (pardon the expression)
What I would like to see talked about here are the buyers, their ages, and what their choices were; which color, which engine, etc. Did they go with Mazda's sport colors or the conservative colors and why?
fowler3
Timing chains are the way to go.....why belts are even CONSIDERED by engineers is beyond me. Unless they can make a decent belt that will never need replacement over the life of the car.
ABS is a neccessity in cold climates....
Front wheel drive is an ok tradeoff to RWD if the chassis is goos which the 6 appears to be.....
all car stereos nowadays should have input jacks standard for mp3 portables......
hey why don't they take the rear discs off the gee35 if we dont need em?
Anyone who knows knows that 4 wheel discs are an all around better solution.
What about the child with a ball who runs in front of your car? What about the deer who darts in the way? (However, on that last one, I am now hearing if it is truly at the last minute, you should just keep driving the same speed and not dart left or right. Many people are killed when they go off the road or hit traffic in other lanes, especially oncoming...Others when the car submarines and the deer comes into the car).
Still, I would rather be able to stop. Why on earth would you not want to?
That kid running in front of you will have no hope if the surface you are travelling on is slippery. Discs are no better than drums if they are locked up. If you are going to use the "safety" aspects of 4 wheel discs it shows a lack of reasoning to then spout "I don't need ABS".
The G35 is a RWD car with 50/50 weight dist. Rear discs are more necessary in this car than in a FWD car such as the 6. But of course since we are "enthusiasts" here we already knew that.
ABS is much more a safety feature than 4 wheel discs since almost any emergency stop that the advantage of 4 wheel disc brakes would influence would be made even more controllable with ABS.
Engines can be designed a bit more efficient if they have the piston move through the space the valves move through (more compression in the same space), which is known as an interference design. Luckily, Mazda's engines with timing belts are all non-interference designs, so your valves and piston heads won't get wacked if you neglect your timing belt and it breaks.
If I could choose, I'd pick a timing chain over a belt for the durability and resistance to creep. Chains break too, but with much less frequency than belts.
To repeat what others said, both NA engine options in the Mazda6 use a timing chain.
Unfortunately, nobody in the Memphis area had the automatic (or manual for that matter) with just the premium package. It was basically an all or nothing deal with what they had. (I was in St. Louis for a few days in there while I was shopping, though, and they had a few like that.)
Also unfortunately, my car (a 94 Accord EX-L) was totalled the week before, so I had to buy fairly quickly and couldn't wait to order one or for the hatch or whatever else might have been cool options for me at one time.
I liked the grey best since it was not as flashy as some of the others. The silver seems to be a very popular color now and (as was mentioned before) as a Mazda6 buyer, I kind of want to get away from the "norm" so silver was out.
On another note, this is the first car I've bought with my own money. Liberating to say the least.
I feel the same as you about silver and yellow. Personally I tend to like white even though I know it screams "rental car."
Keep us posted on your new car!
- 4 doors (hatchback is OK)
- Can be configured with manual transmission, cloth seats, ABS, and side air curtains.
- 4-wheel disc brakes
- Minimum 150HP, normally-aspirated (non-turbo) engine
- Minimum 3000lbs curb weight
- Seating for 5
- Chain-driven camshaft (timing chain)
- Minimim 95 cu.ft. interior space
- Power windows and door locks
- CD player
- Leather-covered steering wheel
- Folding rear seatback
- Handling better than Camry/Accord (majority opinion)
- MSRP less than $22000 as configured above
AFAIK, there are only two car models that can meet these requirements. See if you can name them.
Oh, wait, how about the Altima 2.5?
Now, between the two, I suspect that the Mazda 6i-MT will be more fun to drive and handle better than the Altima 2.5S-MT, so there you have it.
Hmm, can you get rear discs on any Accord? No. Can you get the curtain air bags on any Accord? No. TCS on any model? No.
Well, there goes that argument.
I'm hoping we will all stop talking about the Accord here. I'd like to buy one for my wife, but the more we talk about it, the more disappointed in it I get.
You're ignoring the concept of threshold braking. I could have gotten ABS on my car for very little extra every month. I chose not to because I've had ABS before and it stinks when it's really slippery out not to mention that ABS work is not cheap. Sometimes it's better to lock the brakes which is impossible with ABS. Also, it's a lot easier to use the "threshold" braking technique with 4 wheel discs. I had a Mustang with rear drums so I do know the difference in brake feel. Bottom line: rear drum brakes are used on cars because they're cheap, not because they're better or just as good as discs. There is no way Mazda could introduce a "sport sedan" with rear drum brakes. The only reason why you are debating this is because you have rear drum brakes.
In a panic stop, with kid's in the back seat - I want ABS on my side - I don't care how much it costs or what it "might" cost to repair in the event of a problem.
If anyone is really that adept at avoiding accidents, I suppose you could argue against the use of seatbelts too.
My 2 cents.
Hope you enjoy your Mazda6 and keep us posted as it runs in. Give us your first impressions and updates as those change, if at all.
I agree that yellow screams ATTENTION! Red like black is hard to keep clean. So is dark grey, but you have to choose something. White looks rental and corporate car, as in phone company, power company, etc. Silver has become a standard, they are everywhere, faux Mercedes-Benzes and bimmers. It is a classic alternate color to black. And the green has yet to be seen at dealers.
There is a family near my home that owns three vehicles: a black E-class MB, a black Audi A6, and a black Porsche Carrera. When passing their house they are always cleaning them. They live in a middle-income neighborhood. They must enjoy washing and waxing cars every week. I wouldn't.
fowler3
I saw blue at night, and thought it looked cool. My salesperson said that he first saw it at night and loved it, but thought it looked ugly in daylight. I haven't seen it in daylight myself, but there's been mixed reactions on this board. From what I've seen (some in the dark), I like the red, blue, and yellow. Color really shows off the car's lines. Except, that, I just can't bring myself to buy a yellow car. Still haven't seen the gray, and really don't like the black. Silver is ok, but conservative.
Black looks better, but after having a black car, I took a pass this time on it.
I wanted fire engire red, but they only had a dark/cherry red and no yellow on the sedan. I guess I'm a little different when it comes to colours...
Dinu
IMHO - Upon viewing the car, I don't care for the blue with the black interior of the sport package. Plus, I've seen SO many P5's in a very similar blue that I've becomed turned off on it. On the road and lined up 15 at a crack at the dealer.
Now the Gunmetal gray is VERY sharp, but I'm not taking care of another dark colored car. I just got rid of a 'charcoal' color. What a pain to deal with.
Yeah - the yellow screams at you, but there is no denying that it flat works on the car. I've had enough 'understated' cars, and I could care if many yellow ones are sold. The 6 isn't going to be ubiquitous in the first place. Then you add a specific color into the mix?
Because I originally wanted this color, I checked with the dealer and then called the factory myself. Only ONE 6 has been built in North America and made available to customers. No others will be produced until February or March due to paint supplier issues.
The car is an S with sport, cloth and Bose and should be arriving at Mazda of Bedford at any time. It'd be mine if it had a moonroof and leather, but oh well. If you're interested, contact Bert Gray. He's a good guy. And no - I do not work for them.
If I get the chance, I'll go take a look and post back. I'll probably take the digital camera with me and post a few pics on my website.
- 4 doors (hatchback is OK)
*Sedan or Wagon but no hatch.
- Can be configured with manual transmission, cloth seats, ABS, and side air curtains.
*Manual yes, cloth yes, ABS yes, side air bags yes.
- 4-wheel disc brakes
*Yup.
- Minimum 150HP, normally-aspirated (non-turbo) engine
*Yup. 165 @ 5600 rpm, 166 @ 4000 rpm, for the 2.5L H4. Why do I remember that? I have no idea....
- Minimum 3000lbs curb weight
*Yes. I think its 3300-3400lbs.
- Seating for 5
*Yup. In comfort.
- Chain-driven camshaft (timing chain)
*No but why is this a concern? With the H4 setup in the Subaru a chain would weight a ton and hinder the performance of the engine. A belt is better in some cases. Both should easily get to 100k+ without any problems.
- Minimim 95 cu.ft. interior space
*Oh so close. It think its 92 cu. ft. + 12 cu. ft. for the trunk in the sedan. However, one could get the wagon which would have more room.
- Power windows and door locks
*Oh yea. All that stuff.
- CD player
*Yes.
- Leather-covered steering wheel
*Real leather wrapped steering wheel and shifter. You also get a bunch of wood grain stuff (fake).
- Folding rear seatback
*Yes. I think its 60/40 in the sedan. Or one could go wagon.
- Handling better than Camry/Accord (majority opinion)
*Absolutely. It, like all Subarus come with full-time AWD system with viscous limited-slip rear differential (manual, the auto has a different VTD system). Also has standard 16-inch alloy wheels.
- MSRP less than $22000 as configured above
*Oh so close again. MSRP is $25k but thats a joke. You can get a GT Sedan anywhere near St. Louis for about $23k easily. Probably less with some leg work to find one with no other options.
Most (at $23-24k) come with:
*Dual power fold-away mirrors
*Heated exterior mirror
*Windshield wiper de-icer
*8-way power driver's seat
*Dual-mode heated front seats
*Power moonroof (dual in the wagon but only one opens completely)
Even cars with disc/drum will stop in X number of feet on nearly any surface and when you add ABS you have a higher degree of control in a panic situation. In a panic stop, a car with 4 wheel discs on sand, snow, rain, etc. is at a disadvantage to not only a car with ABS equipped disc/drum, but drum/drum would be a better setup.
As for ABS, it's a question of personal preference. Yes, I used to own cars with and without ABS, and I (and many other, e.g., newcar) prefer car without it. Other people like it, and there is nothing wrong. If you need ABS to control your car in panic stop, so be it, but I don't. Let us have a choice.
Bruno
I'd go with those two. Such bright, happy colors (the rest are too boring for me).
As to your questions, my Mazda6 was bought for my 35 birthday. The color is blue. Both my fiancé and I love the blue, and someone even asked me about the color and said it was such a bueatiful color when I washed my car the other day:-) I bought my car at Tustin, CA, and my dealer told me that this is the first Mazda6 sold in Orange county CA. My car is loaded with almost everything including ABS & TCS, side air bags and curtains, leather seat, power moonroof, comfort package, sport package, premium package and Bose audio.
I did not negotiate the price, instead I negotiate the trade in price of my old car and the finance. I got 4.9 APR and it is not a bad deal. I don't think I can get 0 APR on this car.
I already talked about the driving experience before. I only want to mention the audio here. The Bose system is wonderful (awesome I'd like to use this word). Subwoofer and 6 speakers provide incredible experience. I don't think Honda offers such good quality audio system, because the audio on my old Acura Integra is just so-so.
mazda6s Dec 10, 2002 9:56am
A car with ABS is a much safer place to be than in a car that has 4 wheel discs. ABS equipped cars will be able to come to a stop in more conditions. The question that should be asked is "Why doesn't my car have standard ABS?" even in the base model.
so find me someone who want to swap disk for drum, and no one here say disks are necessary, especialy when the road is block by Accord.
And again, I don't like my car having ABS, get it???? Gezzz, That's what I've been saying for the last two days: I'm ready to pay someone to unplug/disconnect/remove ABS if my car had it. CLEAR?
I would MUCH rather have standard 4 wheel disc brakes than standard ABS. It really doesn't matter anyway because if ABS was standard on the Mazda6 base model, it would cost more. Mazda is just giving YOU one more choice. If you want ABS, you pay for it, if you don't want it, you don't pay for it. I prefer not to have ABS, even if it was free. I don't know of anyone who prefers rear drum brakes. Are rear discs available as an option on Accords that come standard with rear drums? 4 wheel disc brakes are a must on a car that is being marketed as a "sport sedan". ABS isn't. Simple. End of subject.
huh? Of course they do, and the answer is "optional equipment". With or without ABS, Mazda6 surpass competitor in many domain, including the brake. That's a fact, many reviews state it. If Mazda is cheap like Honda and put a drum in the back, they wouldn't earn that. But of course you're right, best brake is not necessary for a mid size sedan.
That's the new Accord you're describing, not the Mazda 6.
As far as ABS is concerned, if you want it, pay for it. It really doesn't matter if it's standard or not. If it was standard, the base price would be more. No matter how you look at it, if you want ABS you are going to pay for it, standard or not.
If you want an Accord with 4 wheel discs, then ...
Umm, sorry - you have to spend thousands (and thousands, depending) extra on the top of the line model. If you want an Accord with tcs, curtain air bags - same story.
I'm sorry, can't have any of that on anything but the top of the line model. Too expensive? Don't want the V6? Don't want an automatic? Sorry. Have a nice day. May I suggest looking at a Mazda 6?
Can we move on now?
The LX accord has no sporting aspirations. Just as the base 6. So the discs are unnecessary in this configuration. But even the base no option at all 6 will face rain, snow, and other slippery conditions where the discs would be worthless but the ABS would be priceless.
Again the 6 owner would ask why there is no standard ABS. There is no reason for this other than marketing. Discs look better.
Otherwise you'll force to write more and more absurdities like "base Mazda6 is not sporty" or "Mazda owners never ask where is the ABS".
This "You like 'em, he/she doesn't and wants ABS" is beyond tiresome.
It's a moot point - on the 6, discs are STANDARD and ABS isn't. Deal with it.