Mazda6 Sedan

19394969899342

Comments

  • indysabreindysabre Member Posts: 42
    S Plan is Ford Partner pricing (Suppliers and Fleet customers). Check the follwoing for info:


    http://burt.com/partners/fordx.htm


    https://www.fordpartner.com/index.asp


    I could be mistaken but I think I remember seeing blue guy on one of the Altima boards here. IMHO, he is definately intitled to his opinion but understanding where it is coming from might be helpful to you when you evaluate his review.


    I myself am torn between the 6S and Accord EX V6, I like the M6 better but lease deals (now) are more attractive on Accords due to their higher residual value.

  • gee35coupegee35coupe Member Posts: 3,387
    The Mazda transmission to the VW transmission. Talk about vague. VW's are the worst. Almost flimsy in comparison.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    Hopefully the 6 will require far fewer trips to the service department than my bavarian princess did.


    That's probably very true. 3s are pretty, fun and hold their value well, but boy do they hit the pocket book hard when repairs are due.


    I could be mistaken but I think I remember seeing blue guy on one of the Altima boards here. IMHO, he is definately intitled to his opinion but understanding where it is coming from might be helpful to you when you evaluate his review.


    I have posted on the Altima and I wouldn't buy one. The altima's bargain basement interior makes the car unlivable. If I had to choose between the two the 6 wins hands down. Even though it's not as quick and doesn't handle as well as the altima the 6 still is the car in that class that I'd prefer to own.


    Slap some wider wheels and maybe get a swaybar and I think you can get the 6 to handle with a bit more precision. I'm not sure about the power aspect but if Mazda really does produce an MPS version with a supercharger, 18s, tighter suspension and maybe a 6 speed the 6 MPS would be hard to pass up.

  • mazda6smazda6s Member Posts: 1,901
    Ha, I hope you're not driving up and down those hills in Co. Springs! I used to live there, and what a mess when it snowed. My '86 626 did pretty good, but it had 70s on it. I wonder how the 6 will do in snow with the 215/50R17s? It's got to be better than any RWD car by a large margin!
  • ruefusruefus Member Posts: 254
    "But the car's not really that much fun"


    I took your comments as contstructive criticism until I read that. Then I just realized that you and I must have WILDLY different preferences. IMHO - The Altima was stale and boring in corners. The 6 looks at your corner entry speed and whispers into the devilish side of your mind 'faster'.


    The 6 is the definition of a fun car to drive. The Alitma isn't boring, but it doesn't make this driver want to go looking for twisty roads as the 6 does.

  • dinu01dinu01 Member Posts: 2,586
    Any idea what brand of tire they're putting on the 6's in Canada? > Doesn't it say in the brochure? I didn't even know they had brochures on the 6 out yet.

    No heated mirrors on any package! In Toronto! Give me that instead of a valet key system(huh?). > Heated mirrors are obviously better that a valet key system. How often does one use that? Personally I prefer driving my car 100% of the time, not allowing some bozo that just got his license learn to park using my baby. I've never had heated mirrors in any car, but they'll be nice when it rains.

    Well at least they give you floor mats. > The black floormats in my PRO look really nice, but you still have to visit Walmart or Cdn. Tire for the rubber kind when salt and mud reason starts.

    Us older guys like more neutral colours. > We (read myself) like bright colours. I would probably get yellow or fire engine red. My PRO is silver now and it hides dust, salt stains and the like pretty well. I will never get a black car - if it rains, it needs to get washed AND dried.

    Geez I don't even like sun roofs anymore > No way! That's a feature I have to have on my next. You can tint the glass and still have light coming in...

    Dinu
  • stretchsjestretchsje Member Posts: 700
    http://mazdausa.com/mazda6/asp/mz6_mov_car_h.asp

    Those on a slow connection, right click and "save as".
  • dinu01dinu01 Member Posts: 2,586
    me wanna buy one now.

    Dinu
  • mazdafunmazdafun Member Posts: 2,329
    Looks nice going through those curves.

    Man, bring on the hatch and wagon!
  • stretchsjestretchsje Member Posts: 700
    Hooray! Go Mazda6. Agreed, for those not checking out the video posted above, you're missing out. It's C&D's 10best Mazda6 test. They really rave about the car and show it taking some pretty fast corners.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    Wow, what a review. I am not in the market for a car right now, but I plan to go this weekend and drive both an Altima 2.5S or 3.5SE and a 6i. I want to do a comparison myself, because I have yet to drive either car.
  • ashutoshsmashutoshsm Member Posts: 1,007
    Shouldn't that be more like "Ha, Ha - what a review!"?

    Sure, everyone's entitled to their opinions, but I think it takes a lot of courage to go out and say things that outright contradict the best test-drive experts in the field (magazine and website testers) and say tha Mazda 6 has bad handling, clutch feel and shifting. All 3 of these have been unanimously praised as being superlative by every other person that's driven this car! I'm tempted to think whoever told this 'reviewer' to make sure he didn't drive a 626, may have had a point :)

    I'm still waiting for any of the NoVA area dealerships to get one with a 5-speed (preferably a 6i), but am prepared to wait a while, as I've decided I'm going to wait for the hatch, or at least better option combinations. I do only have 10 months to use my recent graduate rebate/discount, so it won't be any longer than that.

    And having driven a 5-speed Altima 4 cylinder (and been suitably impressed by everything but the fit, finish, interior quality), I still enjoyed the overall feel of the automatic 6i I test drove last month much more :)
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    Sure, everyone's entitled to their opinions, but I think it takes a lot of courage to go out and say things that outright contradict the best test-drive experts in the field (magazine and website testers) and say tha Mazda 6 has bad handling, clutch feel and shifting.

    Best test drivers? Okey dokey. I'm guessing they're comparing the shifter/clutch to the mainstream competition (such as the Altima's horrid tranny or even worse the Camry). When compared to all cars, the 6's tranny falls woefully short, in my estimation.

    And having driven a 5-speed Altima 4 cylinder (and been suitably impressed by everything but the fit, finish, interior quality), I still enjoyed the overall feel of the automatic 6i I test drove last month much more :)

    Also, you're talking about the 4 cylinder automatic equipped cars...vehicles I wouldn't touch with someone else's hand, let alone my own. The Altima 2.5 doesn't have the suspension, engine or tires of the 3.5. Without that 3.5 VQ, manual and 17 inch rims, the Altima, is downright bland and unexciting for my needs. At least the 4 banger equipped Mazda6 comes with one of the nicest interiors in its class - just no power.

    It seems many of the people commenting on my view of a car I sincerely wanted to love (and hopefully replace my current vehicle) didn't read all the details.

    Mazda6s (V6 equipped, manual, all options). In my opinion the car really only matches up against the plusher though less athletic Passat V6 and the more athletic and far less luxurious Altima 3.5 SE. The Camcord doesn't enter the frame as I'm not interested in mundane appliances.
  • ashutoshsmashutoshsm Member Posts: 1,007
    and while you're entitled to YOUR opinion, we find it hilarious that that opinion is based on the Altima being far more athletic than the Mazda 6. Experts are saying otherwise.

    And the Altima has the same suspension in the 2.5 and the 3.5, with the 17 inch alloy wheels with (possibly) grippier rubber being the only difference. And the 4 cylinder (just as in Mazda's case) is a better balanced and less nose-heavy car than the 6 cylinder versions, and SHOULD handle better. in any case, my observations and comparisons were vis-a-vis the 4-cylinder avataar's, and I prefer the auto Mazda over the stick-shift Altima!

    Again, just my opinions (and observations about your opinions). Take it with a grain of salt, or ignore it - that's up to you. According to the rest of us, the Mazda 6 is MORE athletic than the Altima, in any (comparable) avataar.
  • mazda6smazda6s Member Posts: 1,901
    Actually, the Altima 3.5S has a stiffer suspension than the 2.5S.
  • gee35coupegee35coupe Member Posts: 3,387
    In the four cylinder. Very flickable.

    And I drive Hondas(for what it's worth).
  • ruefusruefus Member Posts: 254
    "Best test drivers? Okey dokey. I'm guessing they're comparing the shifter/clutch to the mainstream competition (such as the Altima's horrid tranny or even worse the Camry). When compared to all cars, the 6's tranny falls woefully short, in my estimation."

    Well - have your opinion. I think you're all wet on this one, but that's ok. That's merely my opinion.

    Not once have I heard the Camry's transmission mentioned against the 6, and the Altima infrequently at best. Perhaps you got a bad car.

    The one I have heard it compared to is the Honda's. While not quite as good as what Honda puts out, more than a little praise was given to it in direct comparison to the Honda.

    Does the Honda tranny stink too in your estimation?

    And if the Car and Driver people aren't some of the best testers in the world, whom would you suggest?
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    Do you guys know if the 4 cylinder manual is different from the 6 cylinder manual?

    I know Mazda can make a sublime tranny (Miata)...so I was taken aback at how shoddy the Mazda6s' manual felt.
  • novicecarguynovicecarguy Member Posts: 8
    I just heard back from a large mazda dealer in the
    philly area. She tells me the hatch will be out
    in June/July. Has anyone heard otherwise?
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    Does the Honda tranny stink too in your estimation?

    It's smooth and sure. Essentially the best part of any Honda is the manual. Too bad about the rest of the car though...

    And if the Car and Driver people aren't some of the best testers in the world, whom would you suggest?

    Um...yourself. What a magazine whore has to say is pretty much useless. Drive for yourself and make your own determinations. Would you buy a car you didn't like just because the guy at C&D said it's a good vehicle? Shouldn't the final decision come down to the vehicle you feel is worth your hard-earned cash?
  • gee35coupegee35coupe Member Posts: 3,387
    Agreed with the testers. The Mazda6 is a greast car.

    Too bad about??? Whatever.
  • zaimonzaimon Member Posts: 124
    Aren't the 6's Manual Tranny's (i and s) made by Jatco? Or is that the Automatic?
  • ruefusruefus Member Posts: 254
    Of course you should drive the car. Duh. However, I'd call the magazine writers whores and useless only if what they wrote was wrong most of the time. It isn't useless and isn't wrong most of the time, and it isn't wrong here.

    If you need a real-world endorsement, here it is. I've driven one extensively and tested the competitors for myself. I put my money where my mouth earlier this week is and ordered and all-options S. Should be here in February.
  • mazda6smazda6s Member Posts: 1,901
    The manual trans on the 6i and 6s have different gear ratios, but still could be from the same manufacturer.
  • mazdafunmazdafun Member Posts: 2,329
    The 5-spd AT in the 6s is by JATCO. I'm not sure who makes the 4-spd AT in the 6i.

    Both MTs are 5-spd, but the ratios differ between the 6i and 6s.

    I'm waiting for the hatch & wagon too. I like the sedan, but want the greater utility of these two variations. Of course, I'm waiting for the RX8 and Mazda3 5-dr as well. Too many appealing choices. :)
  • mazda6smazda6s Member Posts: 1,901
    So a car dealer told you something and you're going to even think about believing it? Bwaa ha ha ha!

    My uninformed, unbiased guess is that the hatch and wagon will be out in the fall of 2003 as 2004 models. Anybody wanna bet me lunch?
  • dinu01dinu01 Member Posts: 2,586
    Here in Canada they expect the HB in November/December 2003, as per my dealer, so they US **might** get it a few months earlier, just like what is happening with the sedan.

    Dinu
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    The 6 hatch is one sleek looking car. even in sedan form it's darn nice looking.

    I wonder if the extra power and torque of the V6 messes with the manual tranny when compared to the less torquey/less powerful 4. That might make the difference between a smooth clutch/shifter and some of the roughness and vagueness I felt. Or, maybe i drove one of the oops models. I'll have to drive another one...I so wanted this to be my next car but maybe I should just suck it up and just get a G35 or 3 series.
  • ambullambull Member Posts: 255
    I found a link posted on this board a while back which describes the Altenza Sport new five-speed manual transmission for the 2.3 liter engine. They make the transmission sound state-of-the-art. I think the V6 has another transmission, but I don't know for sure.

    http://www.mazda.com/publicity/public/200209/0924e.html
  • kenokakenoka Member Posts: 218
    The V6 and I4 use different manual transmissions. They have both received praise. Please do try another and see if you notice a difference.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    I said wow, because I thought the car would have gotten a much better personal review.

    And it's just that. These test drivers with magazines can give their own review about a specific car, but that doesn't mean it's going to be your review when you drive it.

    For instance, all magazines say how nice the Hondas are to drive. I find them boring. That's my opinion though, no one else's.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    ...to me, that everyone is mad because of one person's opinion. Isn't that what sites like this are about? Expressing your opinion? If Blueguy would have said something to the tune of, "the 6 was the best car I ever drove", I am sure the reviews of his opinion would have been alot different.

    I don't agree or disagree with his assumptions, because I have driven neither the 6 or the Altima. I do, however, agree that he should be able to say what he wants without everyone calling him down and ridiculing him about it.
  • maltbmaltb Member Posts: 3,572
    I think it's the fact that his review is quite contrary to what professional reviewers have said. I don't know that I'd call them whores as was done. Mazda doesn't exactly have the muscle to make journalists bend to their will, so the comment seems a little baseless.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    I think it's the fact that his review is quite contrary to what professional reviewers have said. I don't

    good grief, how much credence do you give to reviewers? "Well Kim Reynolds said this new Accord is the sportiest midsize he's driven." That's all fine and dandy but for your dollar will you buy one and buy that view even if you feel the Mazda 6 is better?

    Roger Ebert may gush about the latest Lord of the Rings or Spielberg film, so should we all defer to him and not speak about how the product felt to us?

    It's almost as if you're willing to let a so-called expert direct how you view products. Some group named the god-awful Altima as car of the year in 2002 (not motor trend, some other self-annointed group of "experts"). The movie industry picked the ultra syrupy, totally banal and witless A Beautiful Mind as the best film of 2001. So regardless of our opinions, should we just accept experts said these are the best and proclaim it forthwith?

    I know you're not that sequacious. It's only because I picked on the 6 (a car i still like more than any other in its class) that you're in atwitter over my opinions.
  • protege_fanprotege_fan Member Posts: 2,405
    Ebert wasn't all that favourable in his review of The Two Towers.

    Carry on with the 6 discussion :D
  • ashutoshsmashutoshsm Member Posts: 1,007
    ... we should probably be writing Ebert and telling him what we think as well, right? What does he think of himself ...?

    Back to our regular Mazda 6 love-fest ... oooops, discussion.

    Oh, and blueguy, a whole slew of critics can't be wriong, putting paid to your suggestion that one of them may have no idea what he's talking about. And irrespective of external reviewers, many of the regulars here have now reviewed the car, and their reports (in the majority) are diametrically opposed to your (anomalous) opinion. That's all. You're not being criticised for it, this is merley being pointed out - so you don't have to repeatedly make your point heard and drown everyone else out!
  • maltbmaltb Member Posts: 3,572
    BG.C,
    I'm not saying I blindly follow what a writer says, but I was merely noting that your opinion runs contrary to what numerous writers have said. So are they all sell-outs (whores), was their experience different or written from a different perspective?
  • dsm6dsm6 Member Posts: 813
    No. Therefore, I read bluedude's review and moved on. Now let's have the next reviewer step up to the plate.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    but I was merely noting that your opinion runs contrary to what numerous writers have said.

    My view of the Mazda6 was not that different: better than most of the competition, great style, good interior. I only ran counter to them in relation to my view of the engine and tranny.

    So are they all sell-outs (whores),

    I think they're just employees for the magazines and serve no useful purpose. I don't believe a word that comes from their fingertips. Like politicians, food critics and movie reviewers, if their lips are moving they're probably lying. You can test drive just about every single car they put through the paces, so what good are they? Test numbers? That's available through the manufacturer and can be published without all the excess opinions.

    was their experience different or written from a different perspective?

    Yes, their perspective is based on self preservation. They have a vested interest in keeping things interesting and keeping people (editors) happy, thus securing work.

    They're as useless a movie or food critic. I firmly believe a person should try every car in his or her price range that he fancies. Maybe it's just me, but i'm not gonna let some guy with a mortgage in Indiana and aspirations to be the next Hunter S. Thompson color my car buying process. They can pan or praise the Mazda6; regardless, it's still the best buy of that class for my needs.
  • aromasaromas Member Posts: 314
    How sporty\sleek does the 6 look in person without all the GFX? (specifically the dark grey) Do the brochure and websites do it justice? How about in comparison to the Altima?


    Getting very impatient waiting for it to arrive in Canada. Drove to the Bills game on Sunday hoping to see one on the road. No luck.

  • vadpvadp Member Posts: 1,025
    I only ran counter to them in relation to my view of the engine and tranny.

    Not true again. I think the most of us wouldn't really pay so much attention to that opinion.

    Some folks are power hungry and consider 220 horses anemic. Or spoiled by Honda's manual trannys (light cars).

    What really caught my attention is the following statement: and the car's steering/handling isn't nearly at the level of the altima!!!!!!!

    Nough said.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    How sporty\sleek does the 6 look in person without all the GFX? (specifically the dark grey) Do the brochure and websites do it justice? How about in comparison to the Altima?

    It looks great. The web sites don't do the car justice in person. It's by far the best looking midsize sedan out there right now. And that dark grey is the exact color I like...it makes the 6 look quite rich and luxurious.

    Vad:

    The Mazda6s according to Edmunds' tests pulls through the slalom at 63.1 (http://www.edmunds.com/reviews/roadtests/roadtest/77843/page001.html) while the Altima 3.5 SE does the same trick at 66.4 (http://www.edmunds.com/reviews/roadtests/roadtest/48102/page001.html).

    Their numbers, not mine. I guess I'm way outa line with that...
  • ameen6ameen6 Member Posts: 16
    I test-drove a fully loaded 6s with 5-speed manual. Here are my thoughts…

    Handling:
    The car handled very well, I was able to take it on several curves and the car felt very planted and well controlled. At one point on a freeway on ramp, I pushed it hard enough to where the back end let loose a bit, I let off the throttle and the car immediately regained traction. Score: 9 out of 10

    Breaking:
    Didn’t really get a chance to do any hard stops, so can’t say much. But what little breaking I did felt excellent. Score 9 out of 10

    Acceleration:
    Here is where I was a little disappointed. Don’t get me wrong the car is fast, and by no means is it underpowered. It’s just not press you against your seat fast, you don’t get this powerful feel of thrust when you push the car. Also the fun really only begins after 3500-4000 rpm, it’s as rev happy as a Honda. I have not driven an Automatic, but I would venture to say that it would underutilize the cars handling ability. Score 8 out of 10

    Manual Tranny:
    No complaints about the clutch, perfect. The shifter has a good feel, with short throws. No ambiguity as far as finding gears, I was able to shift through all gears including 2nd to 4th and 5th to 3rd with out any difficulty, as if I have been driving the car for years. The only complaint I have is that the shifts felt a little chunky. The shifter engages into its location firmly rather than with fluidity. Score 8 out of 10

    Ride Quality:
    Here is where I was most impressed. I was expecting a stiff yet comfortable ride, but what I got was a perfectly comfortable ride. The car was smooth as silk at idle. At high speeds the car felt perfectly stable and smooth. At highways speed I only noticed road noise, no engine or wind noise. All aspects of the car's ride exuded quality. Score 9 out of 10.

    Interior:
    I thought the quality of the interior was inconsistent. For example the steering wheel, steering wheel controls, seats, HVAC and stereo controls where excellent, like a car worth $10 K more. The moon roof control, power window buttons felt a little cheap. Overall the interior quality was on par with Honda and Toyota and very adequate for a $25 K car. The Seats were very comfortable and I was quickly able to find an ideal driving position. The Bose stereo sounded very good, but well short of justifying its $635 cost, maybe it’s worth $200 extra but not much more. Score 8 out of 10.

    Overall, I’m definitely sold on this car. The dealer I was at was a bottom line no haggle dealer and his price was $500 below MSRP. I just need to sell my current car and shop around for price and then I will buy one, Black or Blue.
  • johnclineiijohnclineii Member Posts: 2,287
    Strangely enough, Boyd County Ford in Ashland, Kentucky has three Mazda6's as of last weekend, one s and two i's...the strange part? They are clearly marked at $1000 less than MSRP.

    Just thought I'd throw that in. I drove the V6 automatic and was impressed, but won't be buying any Mazda unless and until Sirius is available as an option.
  • brydymondbrydymond Member Posts: 41
    I went by a dealership last night just for kicks and they are preselling 6's now for 2 week delivery. I got a price of $627/mo (tax in) for 48 months inclusive of PDI/Freight, etc. That seems pretty high to me. They are using full MSRP, residuals of about 48% and 6.9%. That was for a GT, V6, automatic, GFX.

    I think I can get more car for about the same money.
  • mazda6smazda6s Member Posts: 1,901
    Not to get off-topic here, but $500 below MSRP is NOT a good price at all for a true no-haggle (fixed price) dealer. From my experience, $1000 under MSRP would be more like it. I suspect you are talking to what I call a "fake" no-haggle dealer, who want you to believe they are no-haggle, but in reality they're just trying to get you to pay more.
  • mazda6smazda6s Member Posts: 1,901
    You're really serious about this Sirius stuff? (sorry, I couldn't resist)
  • ashutoshsmashutoshsm Member Posts: 1,007
    Or XM?

    Having had XM in my car for almost 5 months now, I can't imagine driving a car without it, preferably. I'd settle for Sirius as well, if the company lasts long enough ;)

    It IS a pity that aftermarket add-ons are getting more and more difficult to accomplish. I'm sure I'm SOL on the XM option, at least as a dealer/manufacturer add-on - as XM has heavy investment from GM, and FoMoCo is associated only with Sirius.

    And Gary, once you've had satellite radio for a while - you ARE hooked. I understand where johncline is coming from, really!
  • wgrwgr Member Posts: 127
    I can see the benefit of this if you live in the boonies or if you drive cross-country. But if you live in a large city with 30+ radio stations, why pay $10-$15 a month) ? ... just to avoid commercials (as aggravating as they may be) ?
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.