By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
The dealer said I needed a new clutch, and replaced it for US$1100. However, as I drove the car home from the dealer, the clutch was still getting stuck on the floor, on occasion (though they have obviously put in a new clutch, because it engages much closer to the floor). I brought the car back this morning and am waiting to hear what the new diagnosis is.
Two questions:
1) Any educated guesses what the problem is?
2) Any suggestions about what I should do with respect to paying for the fix? I'm a little frustrated about paying $1100 to put in a new clutch, which wasn't the cause of my problems. What is a reasonable solution for this? Pay for parts but not labor for the 'new' fix?
Any input is very appreciated.
Any experience with FWD here on this board?
Related question. Sometimes ECU reset is recommended in cases of poor mileage. Does it really work, and how?
BTW, my car is 2000 legacy wagon with AT. MPG ranges 16-24 depending on driving conditions. 24 is with pure hwy driving.
Re: 30,000 miles service. In my 2000 legacy it includes more than "to replace the brake fluid and air cleaner in addition to the regular service".
From what I remember the following are replaced:
engine oil and filter, air filter, fuel filter, coolant, brake fluid, AT fluid, spark plugs.
In my area, it runs slightly over $300.
If 2003 LL bean requires less maintanance, it should be less than that.
I'd open a case with Subaru on this one.
Could be an issue with the clutch engagement hydraulics -- there is a master cylinder and a slave cylinder if I remember right. First thing to check is the fluid level for the clutch hydraulics (this is separate from the manual transmission fluid).
If the original problem seemed to be related to hot weather, I would definitely suspect the clutch cylinders and/or fluid level. That fluid can actually boil in certain conditions, causing exactly the symptom you described. Low fluid level would also be suspect.
Good luck! Let us know how it works out.
I'm on my way to the beach for a couple days!
Craig
The 2005 H6s make 250hp now, so it's likely there will be a bigger loss for using regular fuel, since I think they upped the compression.
The 2005 also gets a 5 ratio auto tranny, and IMO that was the big improvement, not the engine's extra HP.
-juice
I don't think this is an issue with hot weather...the problem with the clutch sticking to the floor actually initially showed up when the car was first started in the morning. After warming up a bit, the problem would disapate somewhat, though now it is happening when the car is warm or cold.
Thanks for the input. Still looking for some answers...
When I went back to my regular dealer to get the diagnostic fee back, he said he would have absorbed the cost of the head replacement if that wasn't the proper fix. It was his lucky day when I took my car elsewhere. He refunded everything I'd paid on the initial visit, even an oil change.
This should be your starting point when you talk to the dealer. Did you have them keep the old parts?
Good luck.
Thanks,
Patti
Thanks!
Patti
-mike
The weird thing is the back brakes were more warped than the front and the rear pads had to be replaced (under warranty). I always thought the front brakes wore faster? Go figure.
Steve
No complaints, other than minor quirks, after 30K km on the Legacy just disappointed that I can not justify a change to the 2005 for quite a time!
Gordon
Totally different scenario. On the part-time 4wd units that were produced in those years they were designed to be driven on-road in FWD (you can't drive em on-road in 4wd) and when they disengaged the rear wheels it is physically and totally disconnected, unlike with the viscous coupling of the MT AWD system or the electronic AWD system found on the automatics.
-mike
-mike
Saw your previous post about pad transfer and if I wasn't still in warranty would have given it a try. My question is, if Subaru rotors do not warp why are Subaru paying for either machining or rotor replacement under warranty. The pad refacing would be much cheaper for them.
Living in a fairly hilly (even mountainous area) have never had warping problems previously except on a full size Ford wagon years ago. Dealer blames over heating due to riding brakes downhill but on my wife's Acuras over the last 14 years (who never shifts down going downhill) no problems. What I have noticed with the Legacy is that the rotors pick up surface rust much quicker, and in greater volume, than our other vehicles (Honda, Acura, Mazda, VW). Could this be something that causes the pad transfer / warping?
Gordon
I called my case into the 800 Subaru number. They took my details down (you'll be able to find my file, I'm sure, using my name: M. Crair, if not, please tell me). Subaru also told me to first try and handle the situation directly with the dealer. If the dealer did not provide 'satisfactory' relief, then I should contact Subaru again, and they would try to intervene.
I'm still without my car...though the dealer now says it is a problem with the clutch hydraulics ('master cylinder'), instead of the clutch itself. I hope they are right this time.
The question remains, however, how much am I supposed to pay for these supposed 'repairs'?
Mike
Patti
Not sure, but it could be the pad material is poorly matched with the rotor compound. I know for instance the DBA rotors that were sold with wilwood 4-pot brakes to a lot of WRX owners back in '02-03 have a similar problem. The pad material was not matched up well with the rotors and there was a lot of pad transfer causing shaking etc. In fact right now i'm in the process of tracking down the correct pads for the wilwood calipers for a customer who is ditching the DBAs and putting on some of our racingbrake.com rotors.
My guess on the dealer replacing is that they don't know about the pad transfer and figures hey if FHI is gonna pay us to do a resurface or replace, might as well do it. Or the usual "the book says to do XYZ, so we are doing that" instead of what may be more correct.
-mike
Retorqued the lug nuts this morning. Did a search of posts and it looks like 55 - 75 ft-lbs was the acceptable range. I went for 65. Someone please correct me if the setting is wrong for the alloy wheels on the LL Bean model. I did notice at least one of the lugs on each wheel was beyond the torque of the others.
Thx
Steve O
Forget the viscous coupling, FWD fuse does not work on MT.
The best I understand, in AT AWD, when you insert the FWD fuse, the rear wheels ARE "physically and totally disconnected". The fuse fully activates the duty solenoid C which drops ATF pressue from the center differential and the cluch pack disengages the rear wheels.
I could be wrong, so please correct me.
Craig
Craig
I could be wrong, so please correct me.
Yes, but by fully activating the duty solenoid C, you increase the wear on this item, which is not meant to be fully activated all the time. The rear is not fully disengaged from the transmission in the fashion that it is in a part-time system, as was previously described for the part-time 4wd systems of the older subies <90ish.
-mike
I just recently purchased a 1995 Lsi Legacy wagon. And what a beautiful car it is! I purchased it from a dealership in California and the previous owners obviously had taken great care of it. It's loaded with AWD/ABS, CD/Tape, leather (looks like new), sunroof, etc. There does seem to be a problem with the speedometer. When accelerating from 0-25 the speedometer jumps all over the place: I'll be driving 5 mph and it shows it at 30. If I press on the accelerator, the speedometer seems to "catch" and show my exact speed. It's not a big problem, but might anyone know about this problem?
My real question, however, has to deal with the gas milage of this year and make. I have read that the 1995 wagons experienced some electrical problems and some owners don't use the gas gage to tell how full or low they may be. Does anyone out there know what milage the 1995 LSi wagon can presume to achieve on a full tank?
Thanks all!
I am not sure whether the 95 uses a cable drive for the speedometer but what you are describing sounds like a binding or failing cable. It is usually fairly simple to replace by a mechanic but a bit tricky at home.
On the fuel economy front. Check the fuel tank size from owners manual, fill the tank, drive 400 miles (well within bounds for any Subaru, refill and check usage.
Cheers
Graham
I would drive no more than 300 miles. I think you'll be walking before you get to 400 miles. The most miles I've every driven on a tank with my '96 Outback (same tank as '95 Leg. LSI) was 380 miles and that was a long pretty much 55 mph trip. I usually filled up around 300 miles. Of course, YMMV as my OB was a 2.5L and yours is a 2.2L.
DaveM
We have a 04 OB sedan. When I start the engine, I notice that the RPM jumps between 1500 and 2000. Is this normal? I was wondering if anyone has come across this and what is the normal RPM idle speed?
Thanks.
I'm going to replace my front rotors when the time comes for new front pads, and maintain a vigilant watch on lug torque from then on out.
Craig
I agree with you, there seems to be some risk of damaging solenoid C.
BTW, I experimented and inserted the FWD fuse (for limited driving only) and discovered no difference in MPG.
Whoops. Lost something in transaltion from kilometers to miles. Should have said 300 miles. Hope you are not walking!
Cheers
Graham
I will also check torque as soon as I get home and report back - I also suspect over-torquing as major culprit.
On the tire front, recently replaced OEM RE92's (which sucked in the wet!) with Bridgetstone RE950's and they are fantastic overall and superb in the rain (I have dedicated winter tires). I'll keep you posted on how they wear.
Cheers,
Matt
Craig
-mike
Just got back from 30k service at dealer. They replaced my front rotors for free (again!) and then torqued ALL the lug nuts to over 130 ft lbs!!! Several on each wheel were OVER 140 (well off the scale of my torque wrench!!!). Having suspected this as a cause of the warping before, I immediately checked when I got home - and I was shocked! Shouldn't the dealer take a little more care? I know this isn't the only cause of rotor warping, but it must be a significant contributor.
I got new tires at COSTCO a month ago, and they HAND TORQUED all the lug nuts (I still checked immediately, but they were all spot on!). Why can't the dealer do this? You would think SOA would catch on to this? It must cost them some serious dollars (not too mention customer loyalty!!!) Does Patti have any influence here?
On other service notes, overall they did do a good job with the service, tightened up the heat shield that was vibrating/rattling on cold starts (from my earlier post), and they did the recall on the cruise control clip, but the service set me back $457!!! YIKES! Oh well, considering all the service was free until now, I guess it isn't too bad for two years. I also got a new 2004 Outback as a free loaner car.
Cheers,
Matt
It would be good for you to talk to the dealer about the overtorqued lugs, perhaps follow up with Patti and SOA. Not only could it be causing the rotor problem (highly likely), it could also lead to stressed/snapped studs and even prevent you from getting the nuts off in an emergency. Last time the dealer overtorqued mine, I damn near hurt myself getting them off in my garage. If we got caught somewhere with a flat tire and the puny Subaru lug wrench, no way would we have been able to loosen those nuts.
Craig
Larry
I'm sorry that happened. Dang - that was extreme!
Patti
I started smelling burned oil odor through my vents so I got under the car and I noticed a great amount of lubricant dropping on my exhaust from the axle seal (where the axle is attached to the differential). It was when car had 28,200 miles. I went to the dealer for checking this stuff. They said this is normal, the axle is venting blah blah blah. Obviously they cleaned it so car was given to me without the leak. After another 400 miles it happened again. I made a picture, went to the dealer, showed this picture- immediately I was told that's a bad axle seal and it needs to be replaced. So they supposedly fixed it. Why supposedly? Because after another 500 miles it HAPPENED AGAIN (leaking dropping on my exhaust and generating vomiting like smell). What should I do now? What it a sloppy work at dealer's shop or they just did nothing and fooled me claiming that replacement was done? Of course that I am going back to the dealer but how can I made it fixed permanently? The car is still under warranty (Subaru Outback Wagon 2001). Any help is greatly appreciated
Thanks for your response. I appreciate your attention to this. I know this must be an area of concern for Subaru, as it seems very abnormal that a vehicle driven under "normal" conditions would need two sets of new rotors in less than 30,000 miles! (By comparison, I have never needed rotors on previous vehicles - one owned for 9 years and 150k).
And yes, I will absolutely fill out the customer survey if I get one. Let me say again, the service from Natick Subaru here in MA has been wonderful overall, very professional and competent - so I don't intend to have a negative tone - it just seems so odd that this severe over torquing should happen so consistently.
Thanks,
Matt
Thanks,
Mark
With the frequency this problem appears I'm surprised Subaru have not resolved. Is it a problem on subies worldwide and on both import and North America built Subies? After all the use of impact wrenches for lug nut tightening is worldwide, as is over tightening!
Surely Subaru are tired of paying out for machining or rotor replacement under warranty. I note paisan's comments about pad transfer but I know mine were warped as I saw the gauge as the rotors were turned. Also noted the after market rotors and have the name in my manual for when the time comes.
Gordon
Greg
It's somewhat inaccurate, since you have to free the lug and tighten it at the same time, but should not be more than 15-20% wrong. When I see 150 ft-lbs, I know they tightened them WAY too much!
Craig