Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
You pay for the difference between the capitalized cost (agreed purchase price) and the residual (a percentage of MSRP), plus interest, fees and taxes. Since your MSRP will be slightly higher, your residual value will be slightly higher, and the difference between that and the cap cost will be slightly less.
If your dealer is smart they already have an aftermarket source since the factory system has been delayed.
Our system fits very nicely under the drivers seat.
We haven't been able to find a screen we like for the headrests, because of the unusual shape of the headrests.
In the S80 75th Anniversary Edition the headrests have a different shape in back.
The security glass works fine with aftermarket tint, make sure you use a reputable, professional shop.
I like the added safety and piece of mind of the windows, wish they were standard.
Note: On the XC70 Volvo Tints the factory security glass.
As far as I'm aware the XC90 is a 50 state vehicle.
The Only Volvo's that arent are the S60 2.4 and the V70 2.4.
They have special low emmission engines for CA.
"This vehicle conforms to U.S. EPA NLEV regulations and California regulations applicable to 2003 model year new ULEV (LEV1) light duty trucks. It also conforms to applicable Canadian emission standards."
This vehicle also cleans the air as you drive. The radiator has a special coating, PremAir, which converts up to 75% of the ozone it encounters into oxygen. Could it be an environmentally friendly SUV? Only a Sport Utility Volvo!
Imfookie: The keys/free maintenance/17inch standard wheels/probable correction of first year problems. Please explain what you mean by free mainenance.
Ambaer: After we get it, if anyone is interested, I can post the 2004 pricing. It came in a little higher than I was guestimating so it will be interesting to see sticker with all the prices. Please post the 2004 pricing. Congrats on your car! Thanks!
I live in the Atlanta metro area. I ordered my 2004 XC90 T6 on March 25th, 2003. I have been requesting bi-weekly fax updates (the order status sheet) from my dealer - Dyer & Dyer. Initially, the ETA for the car was 6/3, but then, to my surprise, it got bumped up to 5/19. Recent orders on the sheet are showing delivery dates in mid-July. I guess I got lucky with the timing! All in all, that works out to just about 8 weeks from the time of order to the time of delivery (assuming the ETA is correct and the vehicle will arrive then )
As for the free maintenance, all 2004 XC90s come with free maintenance up to the 30k mile mark. The service intervals are every 7,500 miles (7,500, 15,000, 22,500, and 30,000).
I'm glad I waited for the 2004 - free maintenance, integrated key/remote, 1st year problems corrected (mostly). I'll post some driving impressions when I get it in two weeks!!
John
FYI - Dyer & Dyer has been great ... the vehicle sells at MSRP, so don't even bother trying to haggle. However, they didn't try to tack any add-ons on to my car (paint protection, exterior styling kit, wood grain kit, etc.). I think they realize that MSRP nets them enough profit that they don't have to try and gouge customers. I'd happily recommend them - the process has been smooth and they keep me informed of all changes regularly.
I don't expect it before the 05 model year.
Free maintenance: Volvo will pay for the first 4 scheduled services, 7500, 15,000, 22500 and 30000 miles. Provided that you complete the services within the first 4 years of ownership.
The program does not include wear and tear items so you are responsible for tires, brake pads, wiper blades etc.
I've been working with Dyer and Dyer in Dekalb.
FYI - My car IS on the boat and is due to arrive at port (Brunswick, GA) this Thursday the 8th. I can hardly contain myself waiting for my baby!!
John
The shifter is plastic, but a leather shift knob is a $50 option for 04.
According to tech rep's report, he could not duplicate the transmission condition, but based on my description, the lag is a "torque reduction" and is "...a designed feature on the 1-2 shift during heavy acceleration." This is to protect the drivetrain from excessive power, or heavy loads as when towing. The vehicle was pronounced by the rep to have "operated as designed." During a phone conversation he told me he experienced two "heavy duty" lags, but he did not put this in his report. This condition is unacceptable in a $42000.00 performance vehicle. Why put 268 horsepower into a vehicle if the drivetrain needs protection from the power? To me, this is a poor example of what is considered the flagship of the Volvo fleet. It's for sale.
Fantastic! I'm interested. How is it spec'd and what region are you in?
Steve, Host
Also a note to Volvobuster, probably all of us with T6's have noticed this hesitation in the 1-2 shift at first. I found originally that I noticed it only with moderately hard accleration, not when at full throttle. Since the software updates this quirk has essentially disappeared. As you may know this vehicle has an adaptive transmission that learns to shift the way you like to drive. The more you drive the XC90 the cleaner and more seamless the shifts should become. I think this is a great vehicle, and my advice would be to give it a chance to break-in before you give up on it.
The only change on the 04 stereo was a port upgrade to cure the sometimes poor reception of the radio.
Bass in the car kicks [non-permissible content removed] if you turn it up.
Check the equalizer and bass/treble settings in the radio menu
"One gets tired of how some people go on about things." Ha! I'd like to see what you would do if you plunked down over $42,000.00 for a car that malfunctions before you even get it home. Aren't you the one who complained about the XC70 wind noise with the back windows rolled down? I didn't even go into the small things like squeaks, water leaks, power steering noises, and other annoyances. I also own a 2002 Chevy Suburban with 18,000 miles on it. It's never had even the slightest problem. Neither has my '99 VW Beetle. So much for the latest in Swedish engineering. I'd gladly take back the '98 V70 T5 5 speed I traded, and "recycle" the XC90. Unfortunately, the V70 is gone. I've owned 25 new cars over the last 35 years, but the XC90 is by far the biggest disappointment. Sorry if this rubs anyone the wrong way, but the truth speaks for itself. I am meeting with the dealer this week to see what sort of solution we can come up with. This is a beautiful car with lots to offer. I guess even Volvo has "Monday" cars, too.
Both problems mentioned (audio cutting out and power lag) have been thoroughly discussed on-line.
I'd be annoyed at the need for a software update to fix the audio but it's not a big deal. Once fixed I'd quickly forget about it. Perhaps your dealer could have been more helpful.
I test drove a T6 and didn't notice a lag but I tend to accelerate modestly from a stop anyway. Evidently the slight lag is just the way the vehicle works and you adjust to it; this is apparently not unique to the XC90.
volvobuster: "Aren't you the one who complained about the XC70 wind noise with the back windows rolled down?"
I merely confirmed that wind noise was a known factor after someone asked about it.
Your car comparisons are, well, not credible.
The transmission in my car not only lags in the 1-2 shift, it often seems to be hunting for the proper gear, then clunks into the next gear. Kickdown is equally choppy. If there is a software fix for the transmission, neither the dealer nor the Volvo tech rep seem to know about it. My dealer, as evidenced by today's demo loaner, is more than willing to work with me. Time to play "Lets Make a Deal" and get back to enjoying a new Volvo.
To bigeddy - I was annoyed that it took three weeks to update the sound system software. Also, I mentioned my other vehicles merely as a statement of fact, not as a comparison. I know it's apples and oranges. Maybe apples and lemons would be more correct.
My thanks to everyone for your comments. I'll let you know how this turns out.
Just some random thoughts on the SUV. I have mine on order and will be going to Sweeden in November to pick it up and drive it around for 10 days before it gets shipped back. I am also the proud owner of a C70 HT (2000).
In reading some of the above posts, I just have the following observations...
You're buying a new model year so of course there are going to be some bugs in it. Rumor has it that the 98 C70's had the S70 door hinges which obviously caused a problem due to the difference in door weight given the weight of Coupe doors vs. Sedan doors.
If the T6 v. the T5 is anything like the LT coupe v. the HT coupe, then I would expect that the T6 wouldn't really have any 'oomph' in the low gears and that the turbo doesn't really react until you're at 40mph plus. Additionally, why would one expect to be able to gauge that after only 50 miles on the Odometer? You really need to break the car in before you can expect it to perform.
And lastly...I don't care if it is the T5 or the T6...It's a friggin SUV. It is NOT a performance vehicle. I really don't even consider my C70 a performance car just a very nicely supped up Coupe. If one wants a performance SUV go buy a Porsche, ML55 AMG, or the top of the line M5. Maybe I'm a little bit off but I bought the T6 for its safety and so that it had enough power to get out of trouble on the highway should something happen.
So...The reason I "plunked down $44k" this year... Round trip to Europe, SUV that has the power needed for problem spots, safety.
Reason I "plunked down 39k" three years ago....To get a kickbutt coupe that you don't see very often that I can get up to 125mph on occassion and that is comfortable, and safe, as hell and has had 3 years to work out the bugs.
However...I wouldn't take too many of these comments to heart as my wife says that I am mistaken in thinking I am always right.
Women....
I did have a question to the person who mentioned the updates on the 2004 model. Was all the changes mentioned (keys/free maintenance/17inch standard wheels/probable correction of first year problems) true/standard for ALL 2004 models? or is this area specific? I havn't talked to my dealer in a couple weeks, but I know when sitting down to order with him, he did not mention any of these changes. Also, what price differences have you seen between 2003 vs. 2004 because from my understanding it is not too much of a difference?
I know I still have about 1.5-2months to ponder these questions so any input on this car will help before I "plunk down 44K." Thanks!
My car now has around 1000 miles on it and performance has gotten worse instead of better. Why would my car be so bad, and another one with only 100 miles on it performs flawlessly? I'd really like to know. My sales rep intends to find out.
To: ellsupremo: Thanks for your comments. I guess the fun never ends.
I don't believe this crap about a first-year model. The engine and running gear have been around long enough for the "bugs" to be worked out. I've had many first-year cars with minimal problems.
It's gratifying to know how easy it is to stir some folks up. Just speak the truth about their beloved status symbols.
First-Year Myth Busted (WYFF)
Steve, Host
- faulty cup cover (doesn't open as smooth as before); new one on order
- uncentered steering wheel, which was fixed the first week we bought.
- audio system once did not turn on, which was odd; hasn't occurred since
Average/combine mileage has improved from 17.3mpg to what it is today -- 19.3mpg. We drive 30-40% city and the rest highway. I've resetted the trip computer several times for the last 2000 miles and it's been pretty consistent with my manual calcuations.
Recently I had a trailer hitch installed ($199 part; $360 labor) and a reverse sensing system installed ($700) by the dealer. The reverse sensing is a great addition -- the other day we almost backed into a 5 foot metal pole if we didn't have the system installed.
Anyhow, good luck to everyone else!
JD Powers does'nt rate this SUV very high or any Volvo for that matter.
THis makes me think about what a person of referent power said on TV a year ago: that Ford will no longer be doing 'Quality is job 1' since they are in poor shape market/finance wise. I would think VOlvo would not be isolated from the brains at Ford HQ. When the big management says, cut costs, well what is an engineer to do, but do just that; i.e., cut costs and ways of doing this are: (1) cheaper parts, (2) software that has not rung out enough bugs (remember, bugs are removed in a log-normal way, not in an exponentially decreasing way as in hardware disign), and (3) open up the specification limts on parts so that material is not lost at high a rate as it would be with tighter specs, an this means you can make the ports more sloppy by working faster or making parts with lower quality workers, or making parts with cheaper manufacturing equipment.
No car companies let their engineers give detail engineering interviews with people, so the idea is to keep the people in a fog as mush as possible and try to sell cars on perception, not truth, facts, or data.