Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options
Comments
I guess Cadillac has the Zep though.
http://edmunds.nytimes.com/new/2003/saturn/ion/100184104/roadtest- article.html?articleId=89616
GM seems to have not made many friends with this car.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
1) Power doesn't seem to be as good as the 140hp indicates
2) Center IP is hated by all reviewers
3) They always compare the car with the Corolla which has better quality on the interior/ dash. That said, it's average for this segment IMO.
I have still not driven one, but people who own them and reviewers seem to all say the ride quality is good. I think the car it self is good, but not the best in class and its a bit quirky so it will get panned by some.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
"200 hp engine next year"
Just curious. Thanks.
GMAC is a financial institution and is subject to lending restrictions just like any other financial institution.
Of course the offer of credit is not going to extend to people who do not qualify for credit.
If you don't comply with any of the above, don't bother to apply for subsidized 0% loans. Get a copy of your credit report and start on working to get your credit repaired. Takes time but the payoff is great later on. (I am not encouraging the use of bogus credit repair 'clinics', rather you developing healthy and responsible financial habits to improve your credit standing)
Too much debt, too many credit cards, late payments, charge offs, liens, judgements, bankruptcies, et al will not land you a bank loan or at least a loan with a decent interest rate.
When I was in law school I worked the first summer with an advertising company law department. The copywriter always try to push on what they claim to the very edge of what the law allows.
In my opinion, that sort of thing never really helps the client (in this case, Saturn).
My credit is not perfect, but I closed pretty much all of my credit cards and am paying them off one by one. None late though, and that totally matters when going for a loan.
vocus : I find GMAC up here very lenient. They let my brother in law buy a Grand Prix GTP and he has a horrid credit past.
I don't think the Ion is quirky. I guess some people associate being a little different as quirky, but the only big think with the Ion is the center IP. Big deal!
Would never buy a Korean car. My sister's Hyundia has been very poor in terms of quality / reliability and she is looking at getting a Mazda Protege to replace it soon.
I had 2 Proteges in the past, and they were very reliable cars. I wanted a Jetta though, that's the only reason I got rid of the last one.
I don'r think of the center IP as quirky. It's different, but not quirky. I have never driven an ION on the road, but did drive an ECHO. Got used to the dash panel within an hour or so, and it was no problem for me.
I don't know how he did it, but he always seems to get away with stuff regardless of his past poor credit.
I think we've gotten a little off-topic. My thoughts on the ION sedan: too heavy, too slow, not enough mpg, interior designed by mental patients. It's just disappointing that I will have to hang onto my old 93SL1 until I can get into something nicer .oO(maybe a Regal GS, mmmm)
Isn't it going from 100hp in the sohc engine (SL,SL1) ....?
LOL! TOO FUNNY!
I still contend that the ION is a disjointed car, with no style, no ground braking tecnology absolutely nothing going for it...just another generic/Blah product aimed at the hardcore Saturn/GM fan base.
Too bad that the Delta platform has been wrapped in such controversial looking car such as the ION. I think GM would have had much more sucess replacing the cuaternary-era Cavalier with a Chevy/Delta platform small sedan.
And I agree with Pete Buick about the interior design....made by a commitee of interior design apprentices....
If you wanna see how a worldclass small car interior is done RIGHT, just take a peek inside a VW Jetta/Golf or a MINI Cooper.
Saturn is in big trouble. As soon as the 2004 Chevy Malibu starts arriving in Chevy showrooms in a couple of months, watch the Saturn L Series sales drop like a big rock!
I am not sure what Bob Lutz is thinking of doing with this lost case division...if I were him, I would pull the plug at the Springhill, TN assembly plant or convert that plant to build something more desirable like the Pontiac Solstice roadster...
vocus : I really liked the QUad Coupe at the auto show. It's definitely a nicer looking car than the sedan and they had real cool colors.
**This is completely off topic but the truth must be heard**
Since I work for a Saturn dealership I know who does and who does not get the special 0% APR rates. Saying you need to have perfect credit or 700+ score is inaccurate.
GMAC uses a scoring system based upon a large variety of factors including your FICO or BEACON score. Their computer calculates the odds of a customer paying their loan based upon these factors.
The scoring system rates the customer from A-E. A is the best, E the worst. A GMAC credit analyst then takes a look and approves or disapproves the customer.
Generally speaking, all A customers will get the special rates. Most B customers also. C tier is often approved, with D being rare and E tier very rarely.
I have had quite a few customers get approved for the special rates who had less than a 600 FICO or Becon score. It depends on a whole lot more than just credit score...
One thing that is nice is GMAC is very loyal to its good paying customers. I had a customer who had HORRIBLE credit. Bankrupcy, 2 repos, and a FICO score less than 500. However they were coming out of a 36 month lease and had been perfect with their GMAC auto loan. They were an E tier but approved for 0% APR.
ION is selling well out here in Southern California....
The Edmunds review was pretty harsh, but their bias towards performance is quite obvious. Thats fine because as a "Car guy" I have the same slant. Most folks could care less.
The part of the Edmunds review I don't understand is where they talk about noise levels. The ION may not be the holy grail of compacts but it definately is very quiet FOR a compact. They mentioned the Protege - now THATS a loud car....
Anyways I haven't heard of any IONs being returned under the 30 day policy due to the seats causing back pain, so I discount that as well....
The quirky looks and interior design might be forgiveable if the rest of the car performed in a superior way. But given the reviews, that apparently is not the case. Sadly, GM appears to have misstepped badly once again. Could the Ion be the vehicle that marks the beginning of the end for Saturn?
It's very sad. I am now in a position to be buying a new vehicle in the next couple of months. I have a ton of GM Card cash I could use (even on a Saturn here in Canada). But none of GMs offerings are competitive. That GM Card money will likely go to waste.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
I don't think so.. The ION is one car, that will probably receive significant updates and changes in two or three model years should sales continue to be lack luster.
The VUE is Saturn's brightest star, outselling the CRV and RAV4 in recent months. The L Series will be replaced in 2005/2006.
Also, given Saturn has a minivan due out in 2004 that will help keep more customers with the brand, even if it is a rebadged Chevy Venture.
That's something I've been thinking a lot myself lately. I absolutely hate the commercials for the Ion and emailed Saturn about the first one, and am not a fan of the car, but I thought the loaded black sedan they had at an auto show was quite nice. Other than that, their just eccentric cars for eccentric people. The people who buy them love them, but they're in a very small minority of the regular public.
If I won one, I might keep it. I wouldn't buy one though...
I haven't seen that Ion brochure, but it reminds me of the 2000 Ford Focus brochure that I have. It is the worse piece of uninformative cliche-filled garbage I've ever seen. Had I been shopping for a car at that time, that brochure alone might have turned me off to the Focus. Some ad agencies seem to think they can sell cars the way they sell mouthwash or potato chips -- show a lot of happy people and associate that image with the product. I'm sorry, but when people are spending big money on a new car, they want information about the product, not a bunch of marketing.
-Andrew L