Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options
Comments
I didnt realize Honda changed the suspension setup in the 2002. Can you provide a link to where you got this information? Even so, Honda's pockets, especially where the NA market is considered, are a lot deeper than Saturns.
~alpha
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
drive the snot out of them.
after a certain amount of time in each car, one of them will feel 'right'.
when that happens, throw everyone else's opinion out the window and go with your gut.
If it was me i would also test drive many of the other fine competition in this class.
But if it was my money, the rebates and deals offered on the Ion would be a pull in that direction. Likewise, the upscale feel of some of the competition is a pull, too.
The day I went and test drove the Mazda 6 I thought it was my next car for sure, but I followed that up with a Saab 9-3 test drive and even though the 6 is wonderful, the 9-3 had a more interesting feel to it overall. Had I taken out an A4, BMW 3 and CTS also I would have had more choices.
Buying a car is like finding a wife or girlfriend. Finding 'the one' if you are too obsessive about it would take forever. Just go out and test drive a few, and at some point, one of them feels right. You go with it for a while and hope it works out.
hopefully that includes moving the gauges
"Third, the quirky styling of the Ion makes it more of a niche player than the S-series"
that's it in a nutshell right there.
If I could get a bright yellow or bright red Ion sedan with the colored cloth inserts the coupe has, that would help I bet.
I would consider the Ion, given the current incentives. Maybe give it a year and few tweaks and Ion sales will hit the stride. Better advertising would help.
If they don't go to Civic/Corolla, they go to Protege for its high fun to drive quotient and spades of interior room, the Sentra for its 165hp engine and dual chamber head/chest side airbags, and the Focus because it is a Ten Best winner and highest rated small/compact car by Consumer Reports- its just not recommended for its horrid track record. (With a big enough discount, Id buy a Focus with an extended warranty and side airbags- not a bad choice at all.)
~alpha
The Pontiacs are weird with the cladding etc but the basic cars are pleasant (like the Alero). In its best year the, the old S series sold 300,000 units. It was different but conservative overall.
Even the first Taurus, which was radical for the time, was a well balanced design. The 1996 googly eyed redo destroyed the Taurus. The current one is much better but the damage is done.
Even the French won't buy really weird as some of the truly odd designs from Renault are getting scrapped. You can be slightly ungainly like the new Camry or Accord (IMHO). But really weird does not sell.
The Echo got redone for 2003 making it far more normal on the outside. In Canada we will get a hatchback version which looks better. The Echo sells half the volume of the old conservatively styled Tercel.
The Ion is a good car, and its design would be fine for a low volume niche vehcile. But for a volume vehicle - Saturn's bread and butter -it has a very controversial design, arguably a sedan version of the Aztec. The Aztec has been a disaster in the marketplace despite being a decent vehicle. Meanwhile its more conservatively styled Buick Rendevouz stablemate outsells it by several times.
I hope I am wrong about Saturn, because if the Ion does not take off, the whole division will be in jeopardy.
dunworth : I don't think the ION is all that "wierd". Only odd things are the steering wheel and the center stack which is not all that unusual anymore.
~alpha
http://www.canadiandriver.com/testdrives/03ion3vti.htm
dunworth : Lack of sportyness seems to be the main issue with 2 or 3 reviews I have read. Perhaps the Redline Quad Coupe fill fill that void.
Didn't GM hire Renault's designer (Anne Ascencio) a couple of years ago? Is she responsible for the Renaults that are not selling? Did she do the Ion as well?
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
Protege advantages - standard interior is nicer, supportive seats (unless you have a big bottom then you wont fit) handles extremely well, hatchback allows more room.
Ion advantages - saturn service, MUCH quieter at 70 mph, better midrange power, lower insurance costs, lower maintinence costs, safer (assumption full test results not in yet).
My suggestion would be to make sure you drive the Protege5 on the freeway and see if you can live with the noise levels. I have sold several and I was cringing in the backseat because of how loud it was but both customers loved the handling and purchased. Bear in mind that the noise in the Protege5 will only get worse over time as the tires wear. Because it handles so well you'll most likely take corners faster and the tires probably won't wear evenly which will make more noise.
As Reg said, get what you like. If you have it down to these two and are having trouble deciding, I would suggest taking both overnight for an extended test drive.
thanks,
RCHALL
http://www.aisin-aw.co.jp/eng/n/n4.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&nod- e=&contentId=A15703-2002Oct12¬Found=true
Yesterday on PBS Detroit they ran "Autoline Detroit" with Saturn's VP of Sales and Marketing. It was taped sometime within the last month or so because they were talking about May sales but must have been before the plant closures because there was no mention of that. According to her everything was all sweetness and light. She didn't give me a whole lot of confidence that she knew what Saturn even was - sounded like she could have just as easily been selling soap or dog food. Maybe one of these days GM will learn they need to have people who understand cars running their business.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
http://www.ajccars.com/content/testdrive/2003/testdrivesaturn_ion- .html
You may have to cut and paste it because it is so long. Not a glowing review, but not a bad one, either.
I saw the green one at the dealer and it looked really nice and was similar to the colour of my Civic. Of course maybe it was an L series I saw with the lighter green colour. I will pay more attention next time.
Saturns generally have excellent paint and very flattering colours.
http://www.ajc.com/business/content/business/0603/24saturnrecall.- html
Uuga91 ::: I have only seen one green color so far, I should check the brochure to see what was available.
Plus GM is really improving its interiors like in the new Malibu,CTS Grand Prix etc. I am sure a mainstream car like the Cobalt will have a decent looking interior. Actually I like the basic design of the current Cav's interior, its just the quality of the materials I dislike. I really liked the interior of my two old Saturn SLs. They were not of Civic/Corolla quality but still nice.
Actually my 1992 Saturn had a nicer looking interior than that year's Corolla. IMHO only the Civic of that year was better - definitely a benchmark (I could not afford it). Mazda and Nissans were noticeably blander looking although of decent quality.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
GMs new vehicles from Korea have better looking interiors than the US built stuff they will compete with. In Canada we will get the entire 3-car Daewoo line-up. The two larger models will compete directly with the Cav/Cobalt and Malibu.
Mind you the GM NA stuff are still likely to be better cars overall in terms of engines etc.
I agree with you on the ION, a new wheel and some upgraded plastics would do a lot.