Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see May lease deals!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
lawnman : Many GM brands including Saturn are above average in long term reliability. You are right, they aren't all there yet (GM is not @ Toyota levels yet), but difference in the # off issues / 100 cars shrinks every year.
alpha : Thanx man. ;-)
I understand about the plastic body panels (have them on our L200), and yes, the engines and transmissions from GM are very good (perhaps the best automatic transmissions in the world), but that doesn't change the QUALITY of the car.
A Cavalier may start everyday and go for 100,000 miles, but it is still a VERY low quality car. The interior is disgustingly cheap, the seats are downright uncomfortable and the driving position is horrible. Everything that the driver sees or touches inside the car is simply junk.
The Ion is much better, but the same thinking that put those crappy components in the Cavalier interior is evident in the Ion. If the rebates were as good as Mazda's, then I probably would have bought the car despite that, because my GMS pricing would put it under 10K with air, which I cannot argue with. However at 13K, I honestly felt that the car was overpriced for the quality it delivers.
In contrast, we bought our L200 in January of 2001 for just under $16,000, fully loaded. That was before the rediculous rebates and 0% financing that followed 9/11, and we still got a 3.9% APR, which was as good as it got at that time except for the traditional GM divisions which had 0% (wouldn't drive anything they were selling). The L200 had some interior components that were very dissappointing after shopping the Accord and Camry, but it was about $2,500 less than either of those cars, no to mention the savings from the cheap financing. The Ion is barely $1,000 cheaper than the better equipped Civic and Corolla, even with my GMS pricing, and that, in my opinion, is just poor value.
lawman : I remember you from a couple months ago when you were car-shopping, and we happen to share similar monikers. You sound embittered - you loved once but it's all over now.... [Fellas, there's no convincing the jilted lawman in re: ION. Give it up. Better luck massaging regfootball - he sounds like he's ready to love again.]
Fender bender: A month ago an uninsured driver in a friggin' Tahoe rearended my little ION2 while we were idling at a red light. A Tahoe fender is wedge-shaped, leaving a concave dent in my back fender. Interestingly, it popped itself back out the following day. If not for the fact that my trunk wouldn't close flush and the warranty requirements, the damage would have gone unnoticed. Cost to repair & replace back fender & parts by ins. co. pro shop: ~$2,000.
Noises: I don't hear the bushing bracket noise that post #2627 complained of. Although the ION2 interior noise is far improved from our previous car ('92 SL1 sedan), I noticed that the outside highway noise - though apparent - becomes less of a nuisance when I crank up my music through my coaxial speakers. Without the music, that wind noise is unmistakable. I don't hear engine noise like I used to - but the downside is that I can no longer diagnose potential problems by listening to how the car sounds.
After going through a weird guilt period where I would badmouth my ION because everyone else does, I realized that I still really like and enjoy driving this car. I am about to get my 3rd oil change along with a scheduled-maintenance tire rotation. I am also wondering how cheaply I can get window tinting and if doing so affects my limited warranty coverage. This car was too cheap to believe and yet feels like a whole lot more car. ...It's all good.
Also glad you had a good time up here in the Great White North. It does look white today, we got our first real sprinkling of snow here in the Toronto area.
I was looking at the Natural Resources Canada fuel economy ratings for new cars and noticed that they have upgraded the highway fuel economy for a number of vehicles. The ION is one of them. Previously rated at around 29/44 mpg based on imperial gallon for the 5 speed manual, it has now been boosted to 30/47 (US: 25/39). This still ranks below the Civic at 35/50 (US: 29/41)or the Corolla at 40/53 (US: 33/44)but it is better. This guide is pretty accurate in terms of what I have been able to achieve (I usually can better it on the highway by one or two). But it still does not beat my old SLs which, gently driven, could yield an incredible 56 mpg (US 46)on the highway! (Multiply the above figures by 0.83 gives you US mpg).
My Ecotec gets about what the ION gets. City is ok, highway is pretty good. Saturn / GM should work on getting better mileage numbers out of the Ecotec IMO.
Those Daewoo-based Chevies have pretty terrible mileage numbers for each size class. Ofcourse most feature those low-tech iron block Daewoo engines which are robust but thirsty. Give me a real GM engine any day.
Here is a link on the Redline series Saturns.
http://www.autoweek.com/cat_content.mv?port_code=autoweek&cat- - _code=reviews&loc_code=index&content_code=04395168
I also maintain that GM is not, and won't like won't ever reach Toyota quality standards. That isn't the be-all, end-all of a good car, but it is important. Other factors, such as bang for buck can overcome it, as they did when I bought out L200.
Incidentally, despite some minor problems, the L200 is running great at 50,000 miles and still looks and feels like it did when new (cheap switchgrear, amazingly comfortable seats and all.
lawnman : In spite of what Toyota sales people will tell you, Toyotas are not trouble free. While they are about the best in the biz, you have to put it all in perspective. We are talking about a fraction of 1 problem extra per car. What are you comparing with to say the base ION is not a good value vs the competition?
My first tank on my 2003 Protege returned 23.5 MPG in mostly city driving, but since it was the gas the dealer gave me, I have no clue if it was REALLY full, or just on F.
My wife's L200 averages about 22 in the city and 30 (best tank 35MPG all freeway) on the highway with the same Ecotec engine as the Ion and a 4-speed automatic, which is pretty good for a midsize car, so I'd guess the Ion should do better given its a lighter car.
I know at least two people who are less than thrilled with their Toyotas. Good cars but not trouble free. I think you are dreaming if you think so.
LOL
~alpha
I own a Mazda Protege and a Saturn L200. Both are good cars, and neither is best in its class. Still, I have no illusions that the only car from either manufacturer that might even HINT at being a lust-worthy object is Mazda's RX-8, and even that lacks serious cool.
The Redline? Nice car, but sorry, nowhere near the mark. I think GM's only got one solid and one potential car that can qualify as a sports car to lust after, and that is the Corvette.
I think sporty economy cars are terrific fun, but the 17-year-olds in auto shop will see any of them and just yawn, Redline included.
Cars generally in the subcompact class are more fun to drive than say a mid size car. I am not talking about BMWs et al but real cars for most middle class families. Cars like Protege, Lancer and Civic IMHO are more fun to drive than Sentra, Corolla and ION. The former handle better but have a stiffer ride while the latter are a better choice for long highway drives.
Each auto maker has a brand DNA which shows up across their lineup. All Toyotas (my family owns the entire lineup of family cars and many of the light trucks)are superbly well built and offer a soft quiet ride. They are not great handlers but OK. All of them are a bit dull to drive, like most of GMs cars. But I always choose GMs as rentals for long hauls and my Corolla is the car I take for longer highway trips. In a sense Toyota has emulated many of the things that GM is known for (nice quiet ride, solid feel, strong fuel efficient engines etc) and put it in a higher quality package with crisp execution.
alpha : Two people I know. I also people who aren't thrilled with their GM's and Honda's. Point is, Toyota is no different.
That Redline beat the Honda speed record by a significant margin. Whether that translates to sales or "cool" factor amongst the tuner crowd has yet to be seen. Prelim sales figures show that ION sales year to date still trail S series sales for the same period last year. Not good for a new model versus a tired 12-year design.
Maybe the Redline will inject some life into the ION's sales.
The Relay looks nothing like the concept picture posted on Edmunds some time ago. Those pictures had many of the ION design cues including the funky roof rails. This vehicle looks like a cross between a Honda Pilot SUV and a GM Minivan. It looks nothing like an ION and does not appear to be as attractive as the Vue. Still the Saturn looks better than the Buick.
Some time ago, someone on this board used a photoshop type program to soften the lines on the ION. Care to post the results?
I just read that the union at the Spring Hill TN plant, where the ION is produced, has agreed to a new contract that will move it towards the national GM contract with the UAW. The Spring Hill plant was originally set up like a Japanese plant with a no layoff policy. The new agreement will allow layoffs to adjust for weak demand. In exchange, GM will spend $90 million at the plant. I bet it is to improve the ION. Hopefully any changes will not be too little, too late as is evident for the L series.
Like some other UAW "lean" facilities, the main product at the Spring Hill plant is not doing well. Up here in Canada, we have a plant called CAMI that produced Suzuki Swifts (since discontinued) and Vitaras (soon to be discontinued), as well as their GM badge engineered variants. This is a great plant but crippled by the wrong product. It is now being converted to the Chevrolet Equinox which is based on the theta platform used for the Vue, although the two products look nothing alike.
Do any of you have any complaints about the car feeling like it suddenly, and randomly, loses some of its power? Not like it's going to stall out or anything, but just, out of the blue, it starts losing speed? She says it tends to do that a lot at highway speeds...all of a sudden the car just seems to lose some of its guts, and she'll drop in speed about 5 mph.
I asked her if it did it on hills, or if there was any predictability to when it did it, but she didn't pay attention at the time. She says she will now, though. I'm guessing that she's just coming to a hill, or a long, subtle upgrade even, and not putting her foot on the gas pedal enough, and that's why the car is losing its power.
Is there any "trick" to driving a car with a cvt, versus a 4-speed automatic like her old S-series had? Like, maybe you'd have to hit the gas harder in certain situations?
She is also complaining about poor fuel economy, although I don't know if she's actually tracking it, or just doing the "well it only went x amount of miles on a half tank, where my old car went y amount".
~alpha
:-)
~alpha
Anyone tried these or other arrangements?
The center instrument panel seemed like a good design that was unique and instantly comfortable. The controversy about it seemed like much ado about nothing. The lighted tach and speedometer were clear.
Two relatively small negative qualities I noticed with the ION. 1st, the suspension clunked over speed bumps, even when I took them slowly. I assume this is something that could be fixed, although my ION was an 04, and clearly it has not been fixed yet. 2nd, the rear seat seemed to lack in both headroom and legroom compared to the competition.
The trunk, however, seemed as large and as nicely finished as the one in my Honda Accord!
Overall, I would say that the Ion is a car that deserves to be on peoples shopping list. If you can get a good deal on it, it's an impressive entry level car.