Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
Comments
EMM ARR TOO
( Except that toyota can't seem to play in this space for less than $25K )
tC (dull coupe) Celica (ugly coupe) are close - so go get !
[randy] > MANUAL WINDOWS are standard? Just shows how cheaply they're going with this car to me.
I hate being forced to pay for worthless auto-features just because 99% of new buyers have been conditioned to see them as signs of luxury/quality - Auto windows add weight, complexity, repair expense, and represent additional points of failure.
This will never be a refined tourer, and I don't think they care. They're competing against cars like the MX-5, which I think is a tough, tough, tough car to compete with, especially now that they just released an all-new version. Time will tell, we'll see.
But, to say that a new GM car is doing so much better than they used to compared to the competition, is just wrong. People have ALWAYS said that. Every step forward that the big three make, the Japanese made five years ago and are now WAY better. I don't think Consumer Reports is the best auto magazine out there, but Japanese is so far ahead of domestic in terms of quality, it's not even in the same game.
>to each his own, and I'll concede that some people enjoy using their key (vs keyless
> entry), hate cruise control, power windows, etc. I just think those people are few and
> far between.
You were equating choice with poor quality.
[randy]
> But, to say that a new GM car is doing so much better than they used to compared to
> the competition, is just wrong.
I said that Toyota couldn't make a Solstice, except by charging 5k more. And if, at the end of the day that $5k gets me some sound deadening, softer plastic on the dash and less NVH, maybe I'll opt to save money, look as cool, drive as hard, and refrain from fondling the dash.
> I'm anxious to see the first reviews of the Solstice, especially the 0-60 and top speed
0-60 is 7 sec
> I'd love to see someone stuff a 6 or 8 cylinder engine
Mallett Cars is putting in a LS2
> I don't think Consumer Reports is the best auto magazine out there,
And you don't like JD Power. Both are consider industry standard benchmarks. So which auto mag is truthful to you? Import Tunerz?
ROFL. CR is an auto industry standard benchmark? I laugh in your general direction. I'll trust aggregated reports by Car and Driver, Road and Track, Motor Trend and Automobile Magazine. Consumer Reports is reliable when reporting back reliability, because it's based on owner reports over many years and many models. Their auto reviews always show how they're not automobile experts. Take a gander at their used car section they put out in the annual car issue. 99% of the recommended models are Japanese, and 99% of the not recommended models are domestic and European. Guess that is just a coincedence.
JD Power's new list of Most reliable used cars has over 61% of them being domestic. JD Power licenses their awards to the manufacturers to use in advertising. CR doesn't.
Randy: I was with you re the options, but I now understand better why the base model isn't loaded with options. I agree that this is not a $20,000 car. It is a $25,000 car. Because almost no one is gonna buy the base model. But that's OK. I don't care if GM IS trying to do what you are implying - I have every confidence in MY ability to determine whether I want to buy the car at the price WITH all of MY options.
Reliability? We won't know until the end of the first year. If it's as good as the Cadillac CTS it is more than good enough for me.
ps Your mother was a hamster and your father smelled of elderberries. ;-)
Yes we do. And as I said above, it is for the people who want to tune the car for club racing.
This will never be a refined tourer, and I don't think they care. They're competing against cars like the MX-5, which I think is a tough, tough, tough car to compete with, especially now that they just released an all-new version. Time will tell, we'll see.
You are going to have to better explain the point you are trying to make here. Roadsters are not meant to be what I think of when I think refined tourer. Roadster are supposed to be about goat cart like handling, immediate braking, good engine sound, nice road feel.
I'm anxious to see the first reviews of the Solstice, especially the 0-60 and top speed.
0-60 will be alright, but if you are looking for stop light to stop light mashing, roadsters are not your car anyway. Convertibles weigh more than hard tops. The best Solstice for this kind of driving will be the forthcoming Solstice Coupe with either the existing 210 hp supercharged 2.0 litre of the forthcoming 240 hp turbo 2.2 litre. The supercharged might be a little better for quick starts than the turbo.
the MX-5, which I think is a tough, tough, tough car to compete with, especially now that they just released an all-new version
MX-5 will not be released until September 1, 2005.
You started this discussion on reliability. Now you switched to performance car magaines.
I'll trust aggregated reports by Car and Driver, Road and Track, Motor Trend and Automobile Magazine.
All of which have run articles very positive about the first tests of pre-production model Solstice tests last year and which, I will predict, will have positive tests about the production Solstice next month or soon thereafter.
The Solstice. The topic of this thread. Not domestics in general. Not GM in general. The Solstice.
(By the way, if you look at the current long term testers in all those magazines, the GM vehicles have done just as well as any in the non-scheduled maintenance categories, and better than most in the cost to upkeep)
If you will look at the kappa frame, you will see the marked similarities with the Corvette/XLR frame.
Speaking of XLR, reviewers have in fact consistently gushed over the ride and handling characteristics of that and all the new sigma platform Cadillacs.
Loren
In the meantime, GM cannot make anywhere near enough Solstices to meet demand.
The sales person said that a wife ordered it to surprise her husband (what a dear), only if we were all that lucky.
I assume the automatic will be a sport-shift type? Is it expected to have better fuel economy than the manual (taller high gear etc.)?
I'm surprised that no seat or door-mounted side airbags are available.
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2006/pontiac/solstice/100529859/prices.html
Well, the Pontiac Solstice is so poorly-engineered that it is going to be raced in Grand-Am Cup and SCCA.
check the link
Grand American Road Racing Series
Some people don't care for electronic gizmos that add weight.
They could have easliy had a delete package for hardcore autocrossers and tuners.
This is not a main stream car. It is a roadster.
Roadster people have different priority than mainstreamers.
Sooooorrry! Thought the idea was to generate discussion topics about cars
that we are excited about. If the Solstice can't compete with it's only competitor it's sunk.
I suppose you are right about the Cadillacs though in it's only C&D comparo the XLR came in 3rd with comments about it's "weird" steering. Came in 2nd in MT.
Speaking of reading, I've read both those comparos. And in both, the XLR actually did quite well in ride and handling (as have the CTS, STS and SRX). The XLR was found less plush than the significantly more expensive SL.
Please respond to rhoman@edmunds.com no later than August 31, 2005.
I would wait for the hard top. A good little hard top for say $18K :shades:
Loren
-"The sleek new Pontiac Solstice is the best-designed (and most affordable) American roadster in decades."
-"The new Solstice is, in fact hot."
-"(The Solstice) has what may well be the most beautiful trunk in the history of two-doors."
-"The Solstice is a throw-back - a rear-wheel drive , five-speed stick - with a sport-minded stiffness that makes the car not so much macho but fun to drive, not an Autobahn car but a backroadmobile."
-"In Milan, the Solstice made a triumphant entrance down the Corso Buenos Aires pas the Porto Venezia. I felt like Caesar back from the Gallic campaigns."
I'd expect the early reviews to be typical self-congratulatory gushing. The real facts come out some time later. With such limited production, and the early adopters looking to make a killing selling one for 100k, it might be a while before we get accurate news.
I know that if I bought one of the first 1000 with a mind toward resale, there's no way I'd be telling you that it had any warts. But I know you guys have more integrity than I do.
Hopefully the magazines will be accurate. If they can get their hands on one.
Maybe we'll have to wait for Consumer Reports. (better than nothin)
The Lutz Blog entry following the press test drives was about 2 months ago. Stories in the buff magazines usually take 2 to 3 months to get to press.
I am not sure why Edmunds and the local news papers wait until about the same time as the buff magazine articles to publish their reviews of new cars. There must be some type of marketing arrangement in the business.
Grand American Road Racing
Keep this thread posted with racing pics when they come! It'll look the part, IMO!
2021 Kia Soul LX 6-speed stick
I saw nothing there that would indicate the Solstice would be raced in Grand American Racing.
Would it be in the Rolex Series or the Grand-Am Cup Series (I'm guessing the Grand-Am Cup series in ST class)? Any idea on when they would start?
the fact that there are two Mazdas available for you to drive today and no Solstice for 12 months means they are sold out for at least a year. Sounds good for GM here.
GTO.R wins in Grand American Rolex Sports Car Series
Would it be in the Rolex Series or the Grand-Am Cup Series (I'm guessing the Grand-Am Cup series in ST class)? Any idea on when they would start?
check this link
Solstice in racing
That verifies a couple of things: first, not only will it not compete with the GTO.R, but it won't even be in the same series (GTO.R competes in the Rolex Series, the Solstice will be in the Grand-Am Cup series). Second, the Solstice that WILL be competing will be a coupe version, not the convertible (why? BMW Z3 and Z4 roadsters compete in the ST class; why not a Solstice roadster?)
so what if they sell 10 or 20,000 Solstices. That ain't gonna save the company.
I'm glad they are offering the car. I'm hopeful that all the reviews are good. But it doesn't mean all that much, by itself. Now if they could translate some of the Solstice good ideas into a mid-size sedan, etc. (that might sell a few hundred thousand units) then we are talkin'
of course, THAT's a discussion for a different thread
ps I am THRILLED that the Mazda is a great car. The more competition the better for all of us. If not for the Miata, the Solstice, if it were ever even introduced, would likely be a complete dog.
I was especially intrigued with the ride more firm than the new Miata, total lack of cowl shake, and responsive steering.
Also, put the top up, and there apparently is room for weekend luggage for two.
All very exciting news!
There is a limited market for this segment. Just because you produce more, does not mean they will well. GM is smart by holding production at 20k.
Side note - the issue of Autoweek that goes on sale has the Solstice on the front cover with a first drive review - very positive. It is already on the net if you look on some Solstice forums.
You better get with the program. They can only build so many units so fast. That 10,000 units number you spit out were units"ORDERED" before it even hit the streets!!!!
We all realize you love the Miata that you drove...but...then... you criticize the Soltice that you "NEVER EVEN HAVE DRIVEN""". Give it a break, slack off.
In any event, even the most successful roadster is only going to sell in the area of 20k per anum.
The true benefit to GM from this car is positive press on its quality and fun to drive characteristics. A mindless effort to crank out numbers would most likely harm both.