Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options
Comments
Not to mention if a product is shipped 95% of the way via air, instead of truck, and then trucked in to its ultimate destination, that is going to increase the cost of the product. Consumers don't want to pay any more than they have to when they buy something. Just look at the average Wally World shopper....you think they will just offer up the extra bucks for a product because they know that it was shipped via air instead of truck? -- No way, they will complain about the increased cost.
Then there is rail. Last I heard they are pretty close to running at capacity. Imagine the stink that would be raised when a new rail line is added near a community, and the compliants people would have about trains coming by their house at 2am.
Ultimately, people do not want to be inconvenienced in their lives.
You are also probably right about them not spending a lot of time on the highways - or at least not enough for them to get too worked up over trying to find a way to reduce the # of semis. Not to mention people that live in a lot of inner cities (and work within the same city they live), and rarely venture onto highways at all. Now the people that do travel a lot (like yourself I assume), are the opposite of the type of person referenced above.
In WA at least, the 18 wheelers or any other vehicle towing anything is restricted from the inside lane, when three or more lanes in one direction.
Motor homes with a toad are being driven by inexperienced folk with a license they got for driving a Corolla. Too many of them as well on the road.
james
I drive in the inside lane until I need to pull over to let a faster car pass. Driving in the inside lane avoids rough pavement & onramp vehicles.
I have witnessed an 18 wheeler pull into a passing lane along side another truck enabling the 90 mph BMW to test his brakes. This is intentional according to my CB listening to the truckers plan their moves and sharing observations. They have their fun.
Legal, considerate and prudent are three different things. Just because its legal to drive continuously in the left lane, doesn't mean its prudent or considerate. Likewise, sometimes it is more prudent to continuously drive in the left lane than it is considerate (maybe the right one is filled with water).
The law mandates the minimum things you must comply with when driving on the road. As a driver it is your responsibility to assess the situation and see if you need to take action above the law.
Two wrongs don't make a right. RVs are slower, bigger and less able to react. They belong in the right lane and people coming down the on ramp should take caution.
Any time I am on a road with more than two lanes, I will take the rightmost middle lane (regardless of what I am driving) by default until there is a need to enter another lane. It unclutters the merge lane and provides quick access to the rest of the highway should a lane change be needed or to access the exit ramp I want.
I often see them moving slower than all other traffic. On three lane freeways I have on a few occasions seen the following:
- Right lane: 2 semis, the one behind closing on the other.
- Middle lane: 1 RV, speeding up and down but generally holding alongside the semi.
- Left lane: Now contains the other semi, passing all of 3MPH faster than the other two.
So now all three lanes are occupied and traffic is held up for miles.
Of course, if you limit the amount of time, then they'd just drive faster to make up extra time. But there must be a way to ensure safety. Better brakes would be nice.
That sentence doesn't compute... :P
In that case, I really don't care about the BMW driving wrecklessly. If the semi wanted to pass and the BMW was trying to stop him, then I think the semi had a right to the left lane.
In that case the semi didn't really want to go faster, it was just pulling a stunt. Shame on the semi for cutting off the BMW. Driving is not for playing childish pranks on other drivers.
Actually there are laws like this. I dont' know the specifics, but drivers have to keep detailed logs of hours driven and how long they slept. I think officers have the authority to request that log and take action based on it.
Driving requires discretion. Any driver who holds a practice (other than consideration) as universal in every situation is bound to cause problems at some point in time. Unfortunately there are far too many folks who drive as though they are in a vacuum... as if their actions do not have any effect on any other drivers. Or... those that want their actions to be heeded at all times. *sigh*
The new law which just went into effect increases the time a trucker can continuously drive from 10 hours to 11. It decreases the total number of hours driven in a day from 15 to 14. It also mandates that 8 hours of continuous sleep, under the old rules sleep could be divided up into two periods. Plus truckers have to keep daily logs of their activity.
Union drivers may have union contracts that reduce the number of hours driven in a day.
2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D
Ever seen cars that have had accidents involving semis?
It is a problem that's never going to be solved. It's always the other semi driver that doesn't know how to drive. Over the last few years some who have had traffic accidents in this interstate crossing area have been skewered in the courts for their lack of responsibility and for having caused deaths and injuries.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
On these nearly deserted 2-lane roads, I'm not even sure if they're really more dangerous than the crowded interstates.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
I have often wondered about the move where a trucker will swing over into the left lane just as I'm about to pass him and if they do this deliberately. To say the least it's just plain rude when they do this: Speed limit's 70, I'm running 75 and about to pass in the left lane. I get to about 50 feet behind the trucker's rear bumper (he's in the right lane) and I see the trucker look in his sideview mirror and see me coming up to pass. He swings over in the left lane anyway. He's doing 65, and the truck he's passing (it's always another truck they're passing) is doing 64.5, so the pass takes roughly 2 minutes to complete. Now it would've taken me about 5 seconds to pass him. He couldn't have waited the 5 seconds before he made his pass? Why do these boneheads do this? Do they get a charge out of it? It just makes me want to kick their [non-permissible content removed].
Yes, and it is not a pretty sight. The one I saw on I-40 in my area involved a semi and a Chevy cavalier. The Chevy driver died on the scene. Acoording to highway patrol, the semi was following too close and when the Chevy had to stop rather quickly due to traffic backup (construction) , the semi could not react in time. The semi driver was charged with manslaughter.
I-70 a few years back had construction. Two trucks with pickup truck commuting to work in morning traffic. Second trucker didn't bother to stay alert or notice the construction ahead signs. Imagine the pancake. The trucker was an independent driver who seem to be renegades on rules more often.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
As you stated, they would only have to wait a few seconds until I pass them, and usually there is light traffic, so it's not like they have to wait until 5-10 cars pass them. Any truckers out there want to comment? I promise we won't bite :shades:
Lets use your example. If the two truckers in front are doing 72 mph and the 3rd one is doing say 60 ish, from a cars' point of view pull over !!! It is clearly an impediment!! With a truck it is even more of an impediment. At this point he looks to be engaged in what I call "elephant races" So this 3rd and sixty ish mph truck is laboring to pass (probably up a hill). Clearly frustrating!
However if you study his power ban, if he does not try to pass at 60ish and pulls back into third position over the long haul he will lose a lot of average mph. Again if he pulls back and does not pass he will in all likelihood drop to 60,55,50, 45,40 mph!! While this becomes the GIB's problem (guy in back) the much lower speed problem reenacts itself. The only difference now is as a one who just passed, you are not involved. That is until you catch the next upcoming one!!???? Usually just further ahead. And so on and so forth.
I just recently did this across Texas on I 10 E. Some of those tractor trailer rigs can run as high as 85-95 mph. So some yay hoo in a pick up truck gets right smack in front of a passing tractor trailer rig at those speeds and of course taps out himself. DAH! Then seeing he has app 80,000 plus #'s 6 feet behind his bumper, he pulls right, as the sign on the interstate ACTUALLY sez: left lane is for passing only!!! So again if this yay hoo just waited for this trucks' power ban to tap out, he could easily pass just like I did pass both of them multiple times. My power ban was better than both of them, but I was not wanting to do 100-110 to put some distance between these two dualing inequities. Besides it kept me awake and entertained !!??
SHARE the road!!!!!!
What did the speed limit sign ACTUALLY say?
I am sorry. We've beaten this dead horsepower before in terms of LLC and LLD (sorry I mentioned those terms again folks), but I just had to point out the trucks might be speeding...
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Please refer to #6613 posted yesterday.
If it's a semi shouldn't it follow more than three seconds back based on the longer braking distance required?
It would cost money but if it decrease the number of accidents it might be worth it.
I remember before the 55 mph speed limit was mandated back in 1974 when cars almost always passed trucks. Ever since, it seems it's often the other way around, even with speed limits raised as high as 75 mph (I personally haven't been in a 75 mph state since pre-'74).