Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

Inconsiderate Drivers (share your stories, etc.)

1337338340342343478

Comments

  • gogogodzillagogogodzilla Member Posts: 707
    Why would they? Are they in some sort of rush to get somewhere? Plus, as you know, driving slower is safer!

    I'm just helping the other driver enjoy a safer drive.

    I love recycling the LLC arguments against LLC'ers. It's amazing how now all the LLC supporters are switching to similar argument made by speedsters in defense of LLC'ers speeding up and passing me.

    :P
  • gogogodzillagogogodzilla Member Posts: 707
    If you are traveling at 65 MPH an something happens that is so close that you barely miss it you would have hit it if you were going 70.

    Yes, and if you were driving at 55 mph and something happens that is so close that you barely miss it, you would have hit it if you were going 65. And the same goes for 45mph, and 35mph, and so on, and so on, etc, etc, et al.

    The only way for anyone to be safe in an argument like that is to simply *not drive*. So the question really is why your standards should be the standards for all, as opposed to my standards.
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    Again you stated that you get infront of them and slow down slower than they were doing. You are just being inconsiderate by being a jerk on the road. I am not using speeder arguments nor am I a LLCer. Just stating that all they are doing is trying to get around a jerk that got infront of them and slowed down.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    Yes its true for a comparison of 45 vs 55 and so on. The point of the argument is to get people to understand the issues with increasing speed. All things being equal someone who understands that the faster you go the harder it is to control a car, you have less reaction time and its harder to stop will be a lot safer driving at high speeds than someone who proclaims that statistics show that driving faster is safer. (sorry for that long sentence)

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    That GTI is a very rare car--gets same FE at 55 as at 75. Every car I've ever driven and measured FE at those speeds got considerably better FE at 55 than 75, or even 65. Seems to taper off especially after 60-65.
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,675
    >"But, but, but... the speed limit is sancrosanct! You WILL NOT GO FASTER, EVER!" "So sayeth the LAW!" "in the mind of an LLC"

    Sounds like an example of floating anger. Someone is associating LLCs with their irritation about speed limits.

    >Of course, that means the LLC is now the faster driver who is now rapidly approaching my rear bumper. Should I follow the advice posted by the LLC supporter here and then tap my brake as many have stated they do?

    This sounds hypocritical: someone who disdains people not going as fast as the poster wishes in "his" lane is now slowing down intentionally becoming one of those for whom he expresses so much anger.

    But catharsis is good for most people, so keep on.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    That is true. So it a good point to start moving on in the discussion.
  • bobw3bobw3 Member Posts: 2,989
    If you're getting better MPG at 65 than 55, it may have to do with your gearing. Maybe at 55 you're running in 4th gear instead of 5th? Otherwise, if you're in the same gear, at 55mph the engine is running at less RPM and there's less wind resistance, so you will get better MPG. The question is how did you test your MPG at 55mph. How long a distance did you drive at 55mph and then how long at 65mph. If it's based on an instant readout from your trip computer, then there's your answer, because the instant MPG readouts aren't very accurate.
  • euphoniumeuphonium Member Posts: 3,425
    Bristol West is a Farmers Insurance Exchange company that specializes in high risk/sub standard drivers. Thus, they can't be faulted for not believing one of their sub standard insureds. Perhaps someday, a long way away you will qualify for a Preferred Risk Company. :sick:
  • euphoniumeuphonium Member Posts: 3,425
    More Radar Guns for use against Left coast drivers.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    In other words, more radar guns to speed trap, most of the time in areas with tenuous at best limits, so our crooked public sector can wallow in ticket proceeds, and the insurance cabal can use such tickets as a questionable excuse to raise rates, allowing their cowardly executive class to wallow in ill-gotten fortunes too. Got it. :P
  • ay50ay50 Member Posts: 11
    Took a 1 hour road trip to the casino today straight down I35 in the DFW area. I took note of 2 distinct groups of drivers on the road. Group 1 were in the right lane cruising along at more or less the speed limit (70 mph) and pretty much spread out. Group 2 were in the left lane moving along nose to tail at their own speed limit at about 80 mph.

    This more or less worked okay for everyone until someone who belonged in Group 1 decided to cross over and mingle with the Group 2 people. Orderly movement up until that point turned somewhat chaotic with tailgating, brake lights going on, sudden swerving from one lane to another and with both groups getting bunched together. Order was restored eventually when the misguided groupie moved back to where he belonged.

    Personally, I'm a Group 1 type since I'd rather cruise along by myself without the worry of impeding anyone else s progress but to each their own, just be aware of the type of driver you are and your effect on others around you.
  • hammerheadhammerhead Member Posts: 907
    Move over. You're breaking the law.
  • gogogodzillagogogodzilla Member Posts: 707
    Just stating that all they are doing is trying to get around a jerk that got infront of them and slowed down.

    And the speedster argument is that anyone going slower than they are is a jerk, and so they go around them. Which is exactly what you're saying in defense of LLC'ers.

    Funny that. How it's 'being a jerk' to go slower than you. The only difference is that you'd like to go 55/65 mph... and the other person wants to go 75 and up.

    It ain't so fun seeing the LLC argument now, is it?

    :P
  • gogogodzillagogogodzilla Member Posts: 707
    Well, it's more due to good aerodynamics and engine gearing than anything else.
  • gogogodzillagogogodzilla Member Posts: 707
    This sounds hypocritical: someone who disdains people not going as fast as the poster wishes in "his" lane is now slowing down intentionally becoming one of those for whom he expresses so much anger.

    Actually, it's more of a 'do unto others as you would have them do unto you' deal. Others have spoken how they brake for tailgaters. So having engineered a situation where those that act in such a manner (LLCers) are now faced with actually *BEING* tailgaters, should they not wish others to unto them what they do to others?

    Of course, the answer is usually no.

    Which makes it a hypocritical position. Of which my sometimes dickish actions highlight.

    (Though, in this case, I've never actually brakechecked anyone. I'm asking the typical LLCer if I should start, as they do. Simply an exercise in seeing who will advocate doing as they do.)
  • gogogodzillagogogodzilla Member Posts: 707
    edited August 2011
    Tested it on the average 15 mile daily commute on MD-32 (back in 2009). Set the cruise control for 55 mph. Result was 27-28 mpg.

    Next day, same commute - same distance. But now the cruise control was set for 65 mph. Result was 31 mpg (well, anywhere from 31 mpg on up to almost 32).

    Each time, the cruise control was never deactivated (it was early enough in the morning that there wasn't enough cars on the road to interfere)

    This was tried for twice a week for a month, on the same stretch of road, going the same direction. Each time, the results were nearly the same. Plus, I tend to frequent the same gas station on a regular basis, so there was no change in the type of gasoline used (Shell - premium unleaded).
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,675
    edited August 2011
    >So having engineered a situation where those that act in such a manner (LLCers) are now faced with actually *BEING* tailgaters, should they not wish others to unto them what they do to others?

    It's my observation now that after watching how some admitted speeders are aggressive at trying to twist the statements of posters into strange justifications for being an aggressive driver, and now admitting trying to bait people into situations they should not be put into such as making them into tailgaters, we can see the strange mind's warps of the people who speed and are aggressive drivers. :D

    We see here aggressive to the point of paranoia -- because most people in a hurry who are wanting to speed and get somewhere don't slow down and try to cause an accident by forcing people who most likely don't intend to speed to speed up to try to get away from someone who slows down in front of them, intentionally, and tries to make them race with him. Is the racing result an attempt at psychological satisfaction in some way? Or just a sign of insecurity on the aggressive tailgating speeders' parts? :cry:

    Those people in a hurry find an opportunity to get around and go merrily on their way down the pike speeding and getting somewhere in a hurry.

    Comparing the posting twists and the twists of morality and safety on the roadway gives a clear parallel. :surprise:

    May God protect the victims on the road who end up in the left lane belonging to a speeder who is having a bad day and wants someone on whom to take out the stress of the speeders' insecurities. :sick:

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • ronsteveronsteve Member Posts: 1,234
    Whether we like it or not, speed limits are part of the law. If a driver chooses to drive at the speed limit, that is their right, and they should not be pressured to drive over the speed limit (e.g. tailgating) by those who wish to ignore speed limits. But those who choose to follow speed limits must realize some drivers won't abide by speed limits, and it's best to stay out of their way by staying out of the left (passing) lane as much as possible and moving back to the right lane after passing as quickly as possible, when it can be done safely.

    All states have speed limits. Most states have some kind of law against LLC'ing, be it "keep right except to pass" or "slower traffic keep right."

    My fiancee prefers to drive in the left lane. But when someone wants to go faster than she does, she will move right at the earliest safe opportunity and let them pass. No claims of superiority by breaking one law to enforce another, just give and take.

    Can't we all just get along?
    2015 Acura RDX AWD / 2021 VW TIguan SE 4Motion
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Well, it's more due to good aerodynamics and engine gearing than anything else.

    Gearing maybe. Certainly not good aerodynamics. My wife's 2007 Sonata "mommy car" has better aerodynamics (.30) than your GTI (.32). And it gets a lot better FE at 55 than 75 (or at 65 for that matter).

    What are the GTI's RPMs at 55 vs. 75? For what you say to be true, the RPMs must be lower at 75 vs. 55. Significantly lower in fact, to overcome the greater wind resistance at 75.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Can't we all just get along?

    No, unfortunately it appears we can't, because some drivers feel they are more important than other drivers. Whether than means riding someone's bumper, honking, flashing lights, making obscene gestures etc. at someone because they are driving at the speed limit, or camping in the passing lane with the intention of blocking others from getting by them.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited August 2011
    That is not necessarily true. I do not say this to be contrary, but it an observation of the factors of any one particular vehicle are optimized. For as much hot air and emphasis that is put on higher FE, most American market cars are really not optimized well. This is of course just fine with the American regulators and all up and down the proverbial food chain. I would agree that they are optimized as well as can be expected, given parameters, albeit LOOSE.

    I hope this does not sound confusing. Here is an example, 03 Jetta 1.8T vs 1.9 TDI. I think you would agree that in terms of the aerodynamics, they are EXACTLY the same. Fuel economy.gov pegs the 1.8T (premium gasser) @ 27.5 mpg real world. It pegs the 1.9T TDI (ULSD) @ 46.5 mpg. The TDI posts 69% better fuel mileage. Now I have not done this with the gasser, but @ a steady (freeway) 75 mpg with bursts to 80/85 mph, the TDI can post 59 mpg. There is no doubt in my mind the same Jetta model only 1.8T will almost certainly post far less mpg.
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    It ain't so fun seeing the LLC argument now, is it?

    Please don't put words in my mouth since I have never defended LLCing. All I have done is tried to mitigate some peoples reaction to the left lane being blocked (legally or not). The actions you describe are undefendable.

    I do find it ironic that you are defending LLCing (your actions of slowing down to block the lane) all the while complaining about others doing it.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • bobw3bobw3 Member Posts: 2,989
    Comparing diesel to gas MPG is different than comparing MPG at 65mph vs 55mph. If you get a 59mpg at 75mph, what do you get at 65mph?
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    edited August 2011
    Exactly. Here's what I think: if you compare FE at 55 and 75, with all conditions exactly the same except for speed, you'll get better FE at 55 than 75. "Same conditions" means exactly that--car is in same gear each time, road grade is the same, wind is the same, temperature is the same, etc.

    Now, if some car had a super-tall gear that would kick in at 75 and not at 55, allowing the engine to turn at about the same RPM at 75 vs. 55 or maybe even slower, then yes, it might be possible to get better FE at 75 than 55. Although there is greater wind resistance at 75 to overcome.

    If someone wants to think that their car gets better FE at 75 than 65 or 55 to help justify going faster, that's their business. It hasn't worked that way for any car I've owned or driven in the past 40 years. But I've never owned or driven a VW turbodiesel, either. ;)
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    Its not about aerodynamics or engine gearing your drag coefficient doesn't change as you go faster and unless you are driving at 55 MPH in a lower gear (in which case maybe should drive at 55 in a higher gear) car gearing is the same at 55, 65 and 75 MPH. The laws of pphysics cannot be changed, at 75 MPH you are facing a lot more wind resistance that nees to be overcome. You should get much better gas mileage at 55 than at 75.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • bobw3bobw3 Member Posts: 2,989
    I think maybe the calculation might have been at fault if it was being measured on only a 15 mile stretch. On that basis, it was only a fraction of a gallon being used, so if you drove 15 miles on a full tank, then filled up again, the amount could vary widely. It's better to calculate the next long road trip, where you can drive 55mph for a couple hundred miles and then 65mph for a couple of hundred miles and calculate that way.

    Or do your entire tank of commuting going 55mph and then another tank going 65mph and see how it goes.
  • euphoniumeuphonium Member Posts: 3,425
    Dozens of tickets were issued during a recent speeding patrol emphasis by police in Cowlitz County.

    Officials conducted the emphasis patrols between July 15 and Aug. 7 — and issued 63 speeding tickets, according to a press release from the Washington Traffic Safety Commission.

    In addition to speeding drivers, officers also arrested three people on felony warrants, seven more on misdemeanor warrants and made one arrest for driving under the influence. Officers also issued a reckless driving citation, four for cell phone infractions, five seat belt tickets, and identified 12 uninsured motorists and six suspended or revoked license infractions.
    No citations were issued for driving in the Left lane.

    Officers from the Castle Rock, Kelso, Longview and Woodland police departments, the Cowlitz County Sheriff's office and the Washington State Patrol took part in the emphasis patrol. The extra patrols were paid for with a grant aimed at reducing traffic accidents and fatalities.

    According to the traffic commission, more than 40 percent of all traffic fatalities involve a speeding driver. :mad:

    Daily News 13 Aug 11
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    As he said, move over, you are breaking the law :mad:

    "According to the traffic commission"

    According to my mother, when I was little, santa claus, the easter bunny,and the tooth fairy would on occasion leave me gifts...

    Public funds wasted by overpaid enforcers who are in cahoots with our crooked insurance cabal...
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    Had the fintail out on the highway today. It's a different experience to the E55, which is hyper and wants to go fast. The fintail is happy to dawdle along in the right lane, although I did pass people now and then as some still think 50 on I5 or 405 is sensible. Didn't get above 65-70, myself.

    Had one guy give me the finger as I was on an on-ramp...Suzuki Forenza...merged onto 405 at about 40 and then got into the middle lane where traffic had to dodge him and whizz by on both sides. I think he was mad as I was following closely and motioning him to move on. Note to Suzuki driver: if a nearly 50 year old Mercedes is being held up by your driving, you are going too slow. You are supposed to merge onto a highway at a speed comparable to the flow of traffic, not 20 under the limit. Such people need to be sent to re-education camps...

    Also saw an old guy in a DTS who was loafing along in the right lane about 1/4 mile ahead of me. He made a random lane change into the middle lane, and dozens of cars had to pass him, and he too was being passed on both sides. Even I passed him. I don't see the logic behind such driving, other than being on a suicide mission perhaps.
  • hammerheadhammerhead Member Posts: 907
    Which has absolutely nothing to do with "Move over. You're breaking the law".

    Move over.
  • euphoniumeuphonium Member Posts: 3,425
    Stay under the Speed Limit at all times when driving to Pullman. ;)
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    The car is not actually optimized for 65 mph. My guess for 65 mph is that mpg would probably fall off. I actually got the best mpg at 70 mph and it was 62 mpg. In fact if lower speeds were truly returning the best fuel mileage, the most ideal situations would be (for example) rush hour in LA, driving in NYC, etc. Any to every body will tell you that is far from the truth.
  • hammerheadhammerhead Member Posts: 907
    Never said I speed, did I? The trick is to drive so as to not draw attention to yourself. Not enough 4 lane between here and Pullman to worry about LLCs anyway.

    So what does that comment have to do with the topic?

    Quit changing the subject. Move over. Its the law.

    http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=46.61.100

    http://www.wsp.wa.gov/information/video/Keep_Right.asx
  • gogogodzillagogogodzilla Member Posts: 707
    It's my observation now that after watching how some admitted speeders are aggressive at trying to twist the statements of posters into strange justifications for being an aggressive driver, and now admitting trying to bait people into situations they should not be put into such as making them into tailgaters, we can see the strange mind's warps of the people who speed and are aggressive drivers.

    I think that's the basic point your trying to express, but I could be wrong. Yet it holds the core of the speedster philosphy, ie: putting people into situations they should not be put into. Every speedster argument is usually about how LLCers put speedster into situations they should not be put into. Whereas the LLC argument is that the speedster should obey the speed limit and stay behind them (as the LLCer is going the speed limit).

    And we all recognize that the speed limit is only the maximum allowable speed. So going 5 under it in front of a LLCer puts them in a situation where they must now choose to follow their professed ideology or betray it. And in my experience, most LLCers will betray it.

    That's, in my book, makes those LLCers that I've observed doing this rank hypocrites.
  • gogogodzillagogogodzilla Member Posts: 707
    I don't claim to get better fuel economy at 75 vice 55. I'm claiming the same fuel economy for both, but with better (peak) fuel economy at 65.
  • gogogodzillagogogodzilla Member Posts: 707
    edited August 2011
    Nah, I'm not defending it. I'm playing devil's advocate against LLCers by being the uber-LLCer to LLCers. It drives them *MAD*, for it creates a situation where the LLCer has to contemplate become a speedster if they want to maintain the speed they are accustomed. And in my experience, most abandon their LLCer rationalizations to pass at speeds above the speed limit.

    No aggressive driving was used to pass *them*, no tailgating, no cutting them off, nothing. Simply a quick pass - far enough out not to tailgate, and waiting long enough to move back over afterwards with good distance. But the kicker is that sometimes I'll take my foot off the gas and gradually slow down to a speed slightly slower than the LLCer I passed.

    And that, suddenly, is highly inappropriate. For now, the LLCer is in a situation where someone is blocking their ability to drive the speed they want.

    Egads, the horror! How evil! With that said, now the LLCer speeds and passes on the right.

    I get a grin at seeing the rank hypocrisy inherent in that. And considering the number of posts generated about it, methinks it's causing some heads to asplode.

    :lemon:
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited August 2011
    "Comparing diesel to gas MPG is different than comparing MPG at 65mph vs 55mph. "

    Indeed I said that from the git go. Indeed @ lower speeds (lower than 70 mph) in a commute I get WAY lower mpg aka 48-52 mpg vs the 62 @ 70 mph.

    Again keep in mind the aero dynamics are completly the same.
  • bobw3bobw3 Member Posts: 2,989
    "In fact if lower speeds were truly returning the best fuel mileage, the most ideal situations would be (for example) rush hour in LA,"

    There's a difference between rush hour traffic going 55mph because it's not consistent, as compared to a consistent 55mph on open road. However on open road I think the couple of folks posting here that like to speed wouldn't be able to go 55mph on open road for a couple of hundred miles to really test it...I think they'd go crazy watching the speedo showing 55mph and having folks pass them :P
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Regardless of whether they go crazy or not, everyone is free to go 55 mpg or LESS in a 65 mph speed zone. !?
  • bobw3bobw3 Member Posts: 2,989
    That's a good post that indicate that many of the folks caught in "innocent" speed traps aren't innocent at all. Since I don't speed on the highways, personally I love highway speed traps because it bring in additional revenue for the police, which means less taxes for the rest of us. Personally I'd be in favor of doubling every speeding fine on the highway and reducing overall taxes, plus catch all these other illegal activities as indicated in your post.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    Wouldn't a better way of having less taxes be for the irresponsible public sector to cut expenses? Maybe these revenue collectors could modify their healthy salaries, heavy benefits, and insane retirement schemes rather than simply wasting man hours on speed traps of dubious nature.

    It's funny that some in a nation founded in opposition to unjustifiable and reckless taxation would later support said taxation when their faculties diminish to the point where 60mph seems scary fast.

    Law enforcement leadership and highly paid "traffic engineers" alike need to be called before a public tribunal to defend their policies.
  • xwesxxwesx Member Posts: 17,681
    Hahahah - unbelievable! There is no rank hypocrisy, irony, etc., in any of that. There are only two drivers who insist on creating "situations" where none ever need exist.

    Those of us reading your posts noticed this the very first time you posted it, let alone the tenth.

    If both of these hypothetical drivers were more interested in driving (and being considerate while doing so), there would be no situation... ever. Actually, if even one of them had this mindset, there still would not be an issue.

    I am glad it amuses you so much, but it sure doesn't make a whole lot of sense to the rest of us, regardless of the lane in which we prefer to travel. ;)
    2018 Subaru Crosstrek, 2014 Audi Q7 TDI, 2013 Subaru Forester, 2013 Ford F250 Lariat D, 1976 Ford F250, 1969 Chevrolet C20, 1969 Ford Econoline 100
  • xwesxxwesx Member Posts: 17,681
    Wouldn't a better way of having less taxes be for the irresponsible public sector to cut expenses?

    Blasphemy!!! What the.... Fintail, do you actually work for a living or something? :P
    2018 Subaru Crosstrek, 2014 Audi Q7 TDI, 2013 Subaru Forester, 2013 Ford F250 Lariat D, 1976 Ford F250, 1969 Chevrolet C20, 1969 Ford Econoline 100
  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,928
    That is dumb and IMMATURE.

    I didn't say WHAT kind of hand gestures. I might be doing something as kind as a peace sign!
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,928
    So by definition to on any given segmrnt of road all but one person is going to slow.

    Not necessarily true. The top 100 "speeders" might be all driving exactly the same speed of say, 80 MPH. Therefore no one is passing anyone in the passing lane. However, if the guy behind me decides to go 85, that's my cue to move over to the right or speed up, I regularly scan my rear view mirror and can easily and readily identify when I'm being caught up to and gained on ahead of time.

    Why should they break the law in order to get out of your way.


    Well, they will be breaking the law if they are camping out in the left lane impeding traffic or if they simply are passing with too little authority and taking too long. In this case breaking the speed law is the lesser of two evils because LLCing and Impeding traffic causes anger, resentment, frustration, road rage, traffic congestion, more danger, more accidents, and generally a lot more chaos than does breaking the speed limit momentarily, which is done routinely anyway.
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,928
    You mean general rules like speed limits?

    Speed limits are not a general rule unless set my accepted methods and standards such as a traffic engineering survey and setting the limit according to the 85th percentile measured speed.
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
  • Kirstie_HKirstie_H Administrator Posts: 11,242
    I disagree. Anger, resentment, road rage... those are all caused by a driver's inability to contain his or her emotions. Road rage is not caused by others. It's a character flaw.

    MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
    Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
    2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
    Review your vehicle

  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,928
    And while speeding may decrease you chances of being rearended it does increase your odds of rear ending someone, or ending up in a ditch."

    If you concede that speeding decreases your chances of being rearended, I'll concede it MAY increase your odds of rear-ending someone. However, that is with the caveat that other people don't drive like me. If everyone drove like me then no one would get rear-ended, period, end of story! :)
    Part of that has to do with LLC's and impeders, and part of that has to do with slow pokes on the road. I'd never be caught dead LLCing. My ego isn't harmed if some fool in a Camaro thinks he's faster than me. I also never find myself being a complete and utter slow poke on the road, although I'm not always in the top 20%. This is why slow drivers pose a big threat and danger on the road, and tend to get in MORE accidents than the fast drivers. Statistics do back this up. There's a lot of reasons slow drivers might get in more accidents besides being rear-ended a lot. Slow drivers tend to be the one's on their cell phones, texting, doing makeup, or generally distracted or zoned out. The cars I see weaving in and out of traffic getting around LLC's are the ones paying attention to what they are doing, and are therefore safer. Distracted driving is the problem, not speeding.
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,928
    those are all caused by a driver's inability to contain his or her emotions. Road rage is not caused by others. It's a character flaw.

    Agree it's better not to let emotions get involved in your driving, but although you might not call LLCer's the cause, they are certainly the aggravators. No reason to aggravate people simply because you think your Johnny Law. LLCers tend to like to escalate the situation rather then diffuse it.
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
Sign In or Register to comment.