Subaru Crew Cafe

1223224226228229343

Comments

  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Take a look at that Koby Mandell Foundation link I posted. It's a very worthwhile organization.

    A little background:

    You may have read about this in the news a few years ago, as it made international news. Koby Mandell, a 13-year-old and a friend of his both living in Israel, were ambushed and stoned to death by terrorists. The owner of a PR firm that I doing a lot of design work for at the time knew the family very well. In fact they were so close that you could almost call them one big family.

    To make a long story short, this horrible event turned into something very wonderful. The parents of Koby (Seth and Sherrie Mandell) decided to set up a foundation to help support famillies who have also suffered from terrorism. They have set up camps for kids; counciling and support groups for kids, parents and relatives; and it's going worldwide. The PR firm owner that I know has closed his business to become the U.S. Operations Exectutive Director. There's also a branch in Canada, and it is certainly is very active in Israel.

    Bob
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    over on TOV that the new Civic Si 6-speed w/Navi will MSRP for $21,740.00. That's one nice package, and a great price. BTW, this car just won MT's Car of the year award too.

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    The Si requires premium fuel, though, plus mileage dips significantly for no gain in torque vs. the regular 1.8l engine. So you spend a lot more overall for a small gain only at high rpms.

    You can get an EX coupe with NAV for under $20 grand, at least with a manual. I think I'd opt for that.

    -juice
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    My mother was in town for 2.5 weeks and drove her new '06 Civic EX coupe 5spd automatic from Phoenix. She averaged 38.8 MPG at 80-85 MPH-- Mom uses a radar detector, hah! :blush:

    I drove it a few times for a total of maybe 75-100 miles. It's a great vehicle. It's far from fast, but it does make good enough low-end torque that the 5spd automatic's top gear keeps the rpm around 2400 when cruising at 70 mph. That explains the fuel economy!

    She had the top stereo.. "360 watts" with tweeter and midrange up front, whizzer cone coaxials in the rear, and a small (6.5" I believe) "subwoofer". Those are my quote marks because they are what Honda advertises but I believe they are all pretty generous usages of the terms; it's a decent factory stereo, but still a far cry from the premium gear in luxury vehicles and a competent aftermarket system. Of course.

    I liked the instrument panel. The over & under digital tach and speedo were easy to read at a glance and quite clear even in bright sunlight.

    Good car for my mum. I'd prefer a sedan for commuting however.

    ~Colin
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Too bad she didn't get a manual.

    Sounds decent for the price, though. When you consider how many cars hit $30k these days...

    -juice
  • twrxtwrx Member Posts: 647
    I wish the Nano had come out earlier. I have a g3 10 gig iPod and a shuffle. Love wearing the shuffle around my neck when I am doing yard work. Always fun to check out the ZDnet boards where there is always someone predicting the death of Apple. Heh, heh. I wish that the cable company I have would go with the new TIVO which transfers directly to the iPod. As such I have a generic DVR, not that I don't love it. (I can't imagine setting up and using a VCR again). My wife would buy a video iPod in a minute if we had one of those TIVO's. She flys to and from Portland Oregon each week from here in Indiana. She'd love to load one up with episodes of CSI, House, Vegas, etc.

    Didn't think that the video pod would sell but developments like that are chaning my mind.

    How soon till the stock splits again?
  • twrxtwrx Member Posts: 647
    There has been discussion here before but not lately on nav systems. I mentioned this on a chat about three weeks ago--I finally bought one. There are better ones than the Garmin Streetpilot i2 but it is more than satisfactory. Turn by turn nav for $250 including shipping. Crossed my fingers because it has only a 2" grayscale screen, two buttons and 128 mb memory card. Guess what? Its great. The screen is very sharp and bright both day and night and the "3d" view is awesome. Every street locally is on it even if you are not formally navigating to a destination. I was able to load 7 states into the 128 mb transflash and for abut $60 there are 512 mb cards available. There are a few rural states loaded, Kansas, Missouri and Colorado but right now the standard card is all I need with my area well represented: IN, KY, TN and IL.

    Voice commands are clear. Even though it is a compressed map format, it has every on ramp and every street locally. It gave me an accurate timing to the minute last week of the time it would take to get home from Clarksville, TN. It is no bigger than a baseball and is suction cupped to my dash and even with my bifocals I can read onscreen text OK.

    True bargain if you can dispense with color (i3) which cost $80 more from GPS City online. If you are a Mac person like me ( I had to borrow my wife's PC laptop to load maps) there is an i5 with a preloaded hard drive for $400.

    Believe it or not it is easy to use even though there are just a back button and a scrolling wheel with a selection button built in. Can't explain it but it is really easy.

    Downsides are few but, I wish it would toggle its 2 data displays. In map mode it is mph and compass direction and in nav mode it is arrival time and distance to next turn. Other down side is that locally it tries to take me on some pretty strange routes that get you there but really are not logical. I wish it could go into a mode like my Garmin Legend where there are 6 displays of about 40 possible data fields. I love the elevation, GPS accuracy, vertical speed as fun things to keep you from getting bored on the highway. As small as they both are, on vacation I will probably use the Legend too. I bought topos for it but Susan's XP laptop can't find the legend to connect to it. I am going to try to find an older PC to experiment with. Love to have topos to use in Colorado next summer.

    TWRX
  • njswamplandsnjswamplands Member Posts: 1,760
    in-laws car is dieing. need a new cheap set of wheels that will hold its value, seat 4 comfy and have room for 2 wheel chairs inside the vehicle. looks like the mazda 5 might be that. any other ideas?
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Bruce - we just hopped on the bandwagon, wifey ordered it and we've had TiVo for maybe a couple of weeks. It's great. Hard to imagine going back to regular TV. It's like gaining 30% in productivity - no more commercials! Ever!

    So you did get the i2, eh? Price is great, that's amazing. Basically you bought maps and they threw the device in for free, almost.

    I don't like the 3D view, though. I like it set to Direction-oriented (as opposed to North being up), but not the 3D. It shows less info.

    Not sure if I'd miss having color. I have the c320, it's basically the same thing with a 4" screen. Mine uses an SD card. The c330 has a pre-loaded hard drive (Dennis had that one, and Hutch just ordered one).

    Does the i series have a touch screen? Or do you use the scroll (sounds like my BlackBerry)?

    I wish it would toggle its 2 data displays

    Same here, mine does the same thing. It's like a heads-up display with speed/compass on it.

    How do you see elevation?

    -juice
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    They're fun, too. Very roomy and I bet the sliding doors would make it really easy for them.

    Forester X ain't a bad choice, or an Outback Sport maybe (not sure if it'll take 2 wheel chairs, though). I also like the new Civic and Mazda3.

    -juice
  • njswamplandsnjswamplands Member Posts: 1,760
    yeah those sedans are nice but dont work on wheel chairs. how about a honda element?
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I'd say no, engress/ingress would be really hard for that back seat.

    You have to climb in, turn, then sit down in the back seat of an Element. Anyone not very agile will positively struggle with that.

    You want user-friendly. Good seat height. Wide doors (or sliders). Grab handles. Look for stuff like that.

    -juice
  • twrxtwrx Member Posts: 647
    Hey Juice, I can go North up or direction up too. have noteven tried it that way. No there is no touch screen. Also there is no elevation. That is why I am looking to clutter up my dash the next time we are in Colorado with my eTrex Legend which reports that among other things. i have never had color so I don't miss it since my Legend and 2 RINO nave units are grayscale. Button work like this: left one toggles back one screen view. Scroll wheel does just that but has a select in it like a scrolling mouse wheel. Right button is strictly power off. BTW, when plugged into the cig lighter it comes on auto when ignition is turned on and counts down 30 sec to off when ignition is off. Nice, you can catch it by pushing a button and it goes onto its AA bateries so you can set it up with the power off.

    TWRX
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    Whatever happened to your life long relationship with "Becky"??
  • njswamplandsnjswamplands Member Posts: 1,760
    juice is a player obviously.....
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I'll fix my hair and take a shower, but I'm gonna keep the ear-ring 'cuase I'm still a Play-AAAH!

    Name the movie.

    Becky had a more sensual voice, I still miss her. But the Garmin has a better personality. LOL

    -juice
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    Becky had expensive tastes, anyway... she wouldn't be seen in a car under $35k.
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    Becky had expensive tastes, anyway... she wouldn't be seen in a car under $35k.

    So will the nav in the Legacy/Outback feature her wayward sister whose voice sounds like she drank a fifth of Jack and had a pack of Luckies before lunch every day for the last 10 years??
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    Yikes - that sounds more like nav in an Olds Omega to me.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    At least it's not Mr. T's voice.

    Hey Fool, you best make a right before I knock you out!

    -juice
  • tsytsy Member Posts: 1,551
    Hmm, who would be the ideal Nav voice?

    How about Darth Vader? (James Earl Jones) Or I would like someone with a British or Australian accent (Do their nav's get voices with accents?) Maybe one with a cute little Japanese voice too!

    tom
  • jfljfl Member Posts: 1,398
    How about Paul Hogan for all you OB owners?

    Jim
  • rob_mrob_m Member Posts: 820
    or Spongebob Squarepants for those with children addicted to Cartoon Network. Rob M.
  • hammerheadhammerhead Member Posts: 907
    How about the voice of HAL in 2001: A Space Odyssey?
    It's already programmed for a lot of Subaru Crew members:
    "Turn right at the next signal, Dave"
    :)

    Cheers!
    Paul
  • bat1161bat1161 Member Posts: 1,784
    Tom-

    I use the British female voice on my Garmin 2610. It defintely sounds better than the default American male.

    Mark
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I wonder if it's the same as mine - I actually don't like the British voice much at all. The US English voice is OK, but still not as sexy as Becky from the Tribeca.

    -juice
  • tsytsy Member Posts: 1,551
    Hey Mark

    I have the same unit. I just wish the accent was a little stronger and more pleasant. Definitely better than a male voice though. I think of my cars as female. (dont' tell my wife!) ;)

    Maybe you could buy voices like buying cell phone ringtones! :D

    tom
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    Well, a GPS voice is a lot more sophisticated, but maybe some systems will allow you to select from a few available voices in the future.

    speaking of ring tones: a co-workers personal phone went off the other day. it was a female diva-style voice singing “the phone is ringing… phone is ringing.. PLEeeeease pick it up” :P

    ~c
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Where will it stop?

    Anyone catch Access Hollywood last night? Where she downloads a re-run of a TV show for $1.99 and plays it on the tiny 2" screen?

    I'm not convinced people are dumb enough to pay $2 to watch a re-run on such a tiny screen. It would be one thing to get TiVo, network it with your PC, and download first-run shows for FREE, but re-runs for $2? That's nuts.

    I think they're trying to squeeze out every last dollar from the electronics consumer but it's getting to be a bit much, no?

    -juice
  • bat1161bat1161 Member Posts: 1,784
    "I'm not convinced people are dumb enough to pay $2 to watch a re-run on such a tiny screen."

    I bet you that for a while at least, you'll see people doing it jsut so that they can be hip with the latest technology. I know a couple of co-workers who upgrade their cell phones about once a year so that they can have the "newest and hottest" phones.

    Mark
  • dstew1dstew1 Member Posts: 275
    http://www.vwvortex.com/artman/publish/article_1622.shtml

    Not really Subaru-related but nonetheless interesting for enthusiasts.

    For some reason the GTI has always held a bit of mystique for me and I'm looking forward to see the new one. And with a 5-door version coming next summer, we're looking at a potential competitor for WRX buyers - especially those who prefer a hatch/wagon.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Looks a lot like the Golf they've had in europe for the last two years.

    Oh yeah, that's because it is! LOL

    -juice
  • dstew1dstew1 Member Posts: 275
    Touché! :D
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    Firstly, TiVo's not free. Secondly, I watched a downloaded Lost episode on a co-worker's laptop - looked TV-quality when filling the 15" screen. No reason to limit yourself to the 2" iPod screen unless necessary. (I do think they still need to offer a larger or higher-res format, though.)

    And keep in mind the iPod still has the same capabilities everyone loved in the past... now it just adds video capability without adding to the price. Seems like a good deal to me. I don't think the video will take off like the music portion, but I don't have a problem with it. *shrug*
  • grahampetersgrahampeters Member Posts: 1,786
    G'day

    Funnily enough I was reading a VW magazine today and harking back to how much fun my 1990 Golf GTi Mk II was. Red three door and ideal for London and the lovely country lanes nearby. The blast of driving it hard through the beech hangers across the South Downs up and down through tight twisty lanes is one of those wonderful memories. i really regretted handing the car back at lease end and have regretted not buying out the lease ever since.

    Ahhh, memories

    Graham
  • njswamplandsnjswamplands Member Posts: 1,760
    what is new here that caused the 24 hour time-out? it is faster but they maybe because juice and bob are clearing their driveway and thus not taking up both squirrels efforts.
  • bat1161bat1161 Member Posts: 1,784
    Has anyone had a hitch purchased and installed by U-Haul? How neat a job did they do? I'm looking for an after market hitch and am considering going to them. They gave me a quote of:

    Hitch (installed) $189
    Wiring (installed) $41.95
    Uhaul Lifetime warranty $5

    Does this sound right?

    TIA
    Mark
  • hammerheadhammerhead Member Posts: 907
    Mark: I've not had one done myself, but I see enough of them on friends & associates vehicles that I think they do a credible job. That having been said, I'd check with the local welding shops in your area for a better price. I know there's one here that does a ton of hitches & really nice work. Perhaps there's a similar shop in your neck of the woods. Worth a look, anyway.

    Cheers!
    Paul
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    No, it's not free, but the Guide really spoils you and the Season Pass feature is well worth the price, IMO. Plus you use it all the time, every day for us. And it's cheaper than downloading one single $2 episode per day, even if you only count working days.

    Guess the better value would depend on how you used it. My point was you could combine TiVo and an iPod, network it all to your PC, and have as many programs as you wanted for the cost of your subscription. It's only $15 per month, or $17 with a free DVR (that was the deal we got).

    swampy: sorry, we forgot to feed the gerbil. He went on strike.

    Mark: seems OK given it includes the install. The OE hitch cost me about $180 and came with the harness, so figure they're charging about $50 extra for labor. Took me a couple of hours (but I installed the skid plate at the same time) so that's fair.

    -juice
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    Mark,

    I do think that is kind of funny... We embraced the concept of cell phones fairly early (got them in 1996), but typically keep each model 2-3 years. Only change when technology dictates (like AMPS to TDMA), or until the battery becomes an issue. Now contemplating going to GSM as TDMA is going down.

    Our phones even have basic black text! I keep reminding the store guy that it is a telephone (well, radio actually...), and not an entertainment device. Call me old fashioned....

    Steve
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Noone guessed, but the movie was Money Talks, with Chris Tucker. Hilarious if you like that type of movie.

    -juice
  • bat1161bat1161 Member Posts: 1,784
    I remember there being a discussion a while back ( I think it was when someone lost their digital camera someplace) about digital cameras. I'm curious if anyone here has a Digital SLR, and if so, which model?
    I currently have a Canon A40 digital camera, but have been looking into the Canon Rebel XT. They have some decent rebates in effect until the begining of Jan if you buy the XT and one of their lenses, and even a printer. I want the capability of having different lenses for both distance (decent zoom lense) and wide angle.

    Any opinions, or suggestions? I have read the reviews at Digital photography Review, and the different Electronic sites, but I always appreciate first hand experience.

    Thanks,

    Mark
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    I'm a Nikon D70 user and I highly recommend digital SLRs for people who want to get a little more out of their hobby. A compact point-and-shoot simply can not match up to the control, responsiveness and overall image quality of an SLR.

    The Rebel XT, Nikon D50 and D70s are all aimed at a similar market segment and offer very competitive price/feature combinations. Here are some good websites that provide in-depth reviews of camera models:

    http://www.dpreview.com/
    http://www.steves-digicams.com/
    http://dcresource.com/

    Quite often, the question comes down to which brand. It really depends on if you had any lenses/accessories that you want to leverage and just your own preference. In my case, I had both Nikon and Canon film SLRs in my arsenal. When I was shopping, it was between the D70 and the original Digital Rebel. In this case, the D70 provided a few more features as well a more solid "feel" than the Rebel.

    Since then, the entry-level market has heated up and Canon revamped their Digital Rebel as well as Nikon refreshing the D70 and introducing a D50. Lots more choices today to better fit exactly your budget and needs.

    Whatver you do, don't get sucked up into the megapixel war that has plagued compact cameras. Most entry level digital SLRs as well as compacts have far more resolution than most people will ever need. It's more about the quality of the glass and camera's ability to translate analog to digital. The websites above all have extensive comparision shots.

    Read through the reviews, go to a local camera shop and play around and let us know if you have any questions!

    Ken
  • tsytsy Member Posts: 1,551
    As an avid amateur photographer and one who resisted switching to Digital (I still love my F100) I also have a D70 and do love it. It's simple enough to use and the images are pretty good (still not up to film, though). But when chasing my kids around I can snap off 100 pics straight (2.5 fps for the whole 100 pics!) which I could never do with a film camera. Doesn't do as well in low light, which is digital's major drawback.

    It depents on what you plan to do with the camera. If you are a 'manual' person vs 'auto'. Also would you actually change lenses.

    There are some High end ZLR's (non-interchangeable lenses- but good range from Wide to Zoom) which are less expensive than SLRs, although not much less than the new D50 or Rebel.

    The Rebel is an excellent camera (I've used one) it takes good images and is easy to use- my only objection with it is the LCD screen is kind of dim.

    If you don't have a backpack full of lenses from one company or the other, I would go with whichever one you can get the best deal on. If you are a serious photographer who wants a camera you can grow into, they might be a little lacking. But you could use this one now and keep it as a backup camera and buy something better when it comes out.

    Good luck. Sorry if this is confusing.

    tom
  • jfljfl Member Posts: 1,398
    As a former photographer (who hasn't owned a camera since 1999), I'd echo Ken's and Tom's comments. That is...if you already have lenses and accessories that will fit a new digital, you should clearly leverage that in your choice of camera. There are also lots of used lenses available for both Canon and Nikon.

    If you are starting from scratch, I really like the Olympus E-series. They are designed for digital, not film cameras adapted for digital.

    Finally, I have a friend with an extensive 35mm system who shoots film, scans the negatives and prints digitally. It would have cost him thousands to get a digital camera with equivalent resolution.

    Good luck ... it's a complex decision!

    Jim
  • bat1161bat1161 Member Posts: 1,784
    Thanks Ken, Tom, and Jim for all your insights. Thanks also for the different sites for more info.

    Some answers to your questions:
    - The only lens I have from a previous SLR is from my old Canon T-50 lens. Some how I don't think it will work for the Rebel XT.
    -I enjoy taking pictures where ever I go. A lot of my shots wind up being scenery shots. There are times that I wish I had the capability to change lens in order to get the detail shot, or the full feeling of the scene. I think only a SLR can give me that by offering the ability to change lens as needed.
    -I figure that in order to do this correctly, budget wise I am going to have to spend around $1000, give or take a hundred or so. With that I will get into the Digital SLR field with something decent, without going to the professional level.
    - Jim, you are about the third person to mention the Olympus E. The new e-500 sounds like a decent camera.

    I guess I am going to have to find a good camera shop in NY to see and handle each one. I'll keep you folks up to date on it.

    In the mean time, if anyone else has an opinion, please speak up!

    Mark
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Mark,

    Many of the newer digital cameras rely on additional features of the lens so unless you have some very expensive glass, it probably makes sense to start from scratch.

    Based on your interests, a digital SLR will make you a very happy person. Not only is the ability to switch lenses there, but you just simply have more control over the shot with easy to reach controls. Some high end compacts provide lots of manual control, but you end up having to dive into menu after menu to chase them down.

    New York has many camera stores, but be careful of which one you buy from. B&H is very reputable and often has the most competitive prices. I'd recommend them.

    Yes, you'll probably need to budget about $1000 for body+lens+accessories, even with some of the more attractively priced models. Another reason why I went with the D70 is that their body+lens kit offers an excellent value. The 18-70mm lens that comes with it is a very solid performer on top of having a very usable zoom range (multiply by 1.6 to get the film equivalent).

    Ken
  • jfljfl Member Posts: 1,398
    Mark,

    You are correct that the T-50 lens (FD series) is not compatible with Canon's EOS cameras.

    Jim
  • lilbluewgn02lilbluewgn02 Member Posts: 1,089
    Every now and then, I think about selling my Nikons and buying a digital slr, but I just can't do it, at least for now. I have a black body 1969 FTN with 50mm, 24mm (MY FAVORITE!!!) and 150mm lenses as well as a black body 1983 F3 HP with 85mm and MD4 motor drive. I've had both since new and have run many rolls of Ilford B&W thru them. They are like my children; both need some work, but I love them anyway.
  • bat1161bat1161 Member Posts: 1,784
    Serge,

    I can understand your feelings. When my Dad passed away, his camera collection was put aside for the time. My youngest niece has shown some real talent in photography where she will probably get at least one of the cameras. We're talking an old Leica, as well as some other "classical" cameras. There is something about working with film at times that digital just does not cut it.

    Mark
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.