Subaru Crew Cafe

1226227229231232343

Comments

  • tsytsy Member Posts: 1,551
    Hey, does anyone have any experience with bluetooth headsets and handsfree car kits? I'm looking to buy something but I don't want anything permanently installed and I certainly don't want anything that doesn't work well!

    My phone doesn't have a headphone jack, probably to make you buy bluetooth headsets!

    tom
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Cool Ken! When you're all set to go, remind me to give you my weather software. I released a universal PowerPC/Intel binary last evening...

    Did Apple kill you on the memory pricing or was it decent? I usually get 3rd party memory to save money.

    Craig
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    TWRX
    I've read that the only accessible part of the new iMac is the memory slot. Everything else requires disassembly of the unit -- that's why I went ahead with the video card upgrade now.

    Some people have complained that the Rev B and later models don't have the very clean layout the original iMac had. Have you seen the below website? Some folks in Japan have taken apart a brand new iMac:

    http://mactree.sannet.ne.jp/~kodawarisan/imac_intel/imac_intel01.html

    tom
    Yeah, the Edu discount was a measly $100 off. My friend who worked at Apple was able to get about $250 off list.

    Craig
    Thanks for the offer -- will let you know as soon as I'm up and running. I'm hoping the file transfer process is as easy as Apple makes it to be.

    With respect to memory upgrade pricing, surprisingly Apple's prices are very competitive. Their 1Gb upgrade lists at $100 and the 2Gb upgrade for $300. When I checked, it was very close to what 3rd party resellers like OWC and Crucial were listing.

    In my case, my friend's employee discount extends to memory as well and I was able to get the 2Gb upgrade for about $250.

    Ken
  • rob_mrob_m Member Posts: 820
    Hey all! Just set myself up with a Hitachi 26" flat panel HDTV and Comcast HD cable. Connected TV to cable box with a DVI cable.

    Perfect picture, especially on hi-def channels. However, every once in a while, the image 'freezes' for 1-2 seconds. No tiling or pixilation at all.

    Tech showed up, and found a strong signal. In the next 3 hours they sent a signal to the box. Hard booted the box. Replaced the box, and basically rewired everything between the TV and the street. Not resolved.

    I'm guessing at this point it may be a timing issue between the TV and the cable box. I'm going to replace the DVI cable with RGB Component cables.

    Has anyone else delt with this? TIA. Rob M.
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    I have not dealt with the particular issue that you're talking about, but I do know about DVI and component video. The generally accepted best practice is to buy both cables (and HDMI if you've got that) and try them out. If you can see a difference, use the one that you feel is the best. If they are the same, then use the least expensive cable or the one that works best in your whole system. --For me, that would be component; my Yamaha RVX-2500 receiver upconverts and combines on component, but not DVI and doesn't have HDMI at all. But it sounds like you've got a simpler setup.

    The component cable might resolve it but honestly I would guess that it will not. I'd suspect something is wrong with the tv.

    ~Colin
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    Dang new fangled technology! Guess I'll keep my rabbit ears and 9" B&W round screened vacuum tube TV a little while longer!

    Truth is, I'm still shopping for a 'modern' set and feel frozen with fear and uncertainty. In the mean time, our 1987 Panasonic 27" set chugs on. Leaning towards a 42" HD plasma, but we are in the boonies, so my cable company cannot deliver an HD signal. May have to consider a dish in order to get the most from the set.

    Steve
  • rob_mrob_m Member Posts: 820
    Colin, component cables solved the problem!

    Steve, once you step into hi-def, there is no going back.

    I personally don't watch much TV, but I was glued to the set watching the x-games in hi-def in full surround sound last Saturday. Rob M.
  • hondafriekhondafriek Member Posts: 2,984
    Steve that's my dilemma, when I read all the technical questions and answers here regarding electronic equipment like Ipods and all the rest of it my head just spins.

    We have a couple of RCA 27" regular TVs and until one or the other gives up the ghost they will stay.

    I am a big fan of the KISS theory, keep it simple stupid.

    Cheers Pat. :)
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    Rob,

    I went Dolby 5.1 about 8 years ago, but the picture remains low tech!

    Steve
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    Leaning towards a 42" HD plasma

    I only recently joined the HDTV club myself. My dad forced me ;) to because he bought one and I watched it a few times and suddenly had a change of heart. Though I don't watch that much television, I was drawn by INHD, Discovery HD and definitely ESPN HD. He bought a Panasonic 42" plasma. He has an oddly shaped and furnished living room and plasma has a huge advantage over anything except a tube (CRT) tv.. it looks great at odd angles even in a brightly lit room.

    I did a lot of research on my own and I decided that if I bought a plasma that it would definitely be either a Panasonic or Pioneer. They're so far ahead of the competition and each of them has their strengths, but the Panasonics are a fanastic value because of their price / performance ratio.

    But unlike my dad's setup, my living room is a nice rectangle (14'x22') with the tv right in the center of the short side. No seat is more than 20 degrees or so off the center axis and there is no natural light as it's in the basement, so I felt that in that environment a DLP would be able to perform well. I spent a lot of time looking at demo material and brought in some of my own DVDs. One salesman at Ultimate Electronics put up with my antics the best, was pretty informative and in the end gave me a good deal on some cables. I bought a Mitsubishi 52" DLP because it supports 1080p. The 1080p demo material UE runs on their compatible Sony and Mitsubishi is remarkable. Admittedly, getting ahold of 1080p source material right now is a pretty tricky proposition-- but being able to support it something I considered a big selling point. The two other tvs I nearly bought were a 50" Pioneer plasma and a 50" Panasonic plasma. The Pioneer had more features and seemed to have a bit smoother/softer image, but was about $1000 more. In the end I'm positive I would've been happy with any of them, but I spent the least on the Mitsubishi and felt it would have the longest useful life due to the 1080p support.

    ~Colin
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    It's better than spending money advertising rebates and financing incentives.
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    Agreed.

    It's just nice to see Honda as something other than an invincible sales juggernaut. :)
  • tsytsy Member Posts: 1,551
    The big 3 should learn something from Honda.

    tom
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    Colin,

    If you like rear projection units, and they certainly have a distinct price advantage, I think DLP was the right choice as an engine. I have sat in on several technology and reliability evaluation presentations by the TI folks at conferences, and their implementation of MEMS micromirrors is quite incredible. While LCD microdisplay projector engines can also be quite sharp, the high intensity illumination required in order to get a bright image on a 50" panel literally cooks them, making life expectancy and color rendition an issue over time.

    My family room is 16' x 13', with the entertainment unit in the center of the longer wall (fireplace dominates the short wall). This makes the viewing angle rather large from the sides, making off-axis brightness one of the priorities. This is one area where plasma seems to do well.

    LCD is fine in flat panels, and tech improvements in manufacturing are allowing them to grow beyond 32" (37", 42" and larger). Still, the relatively slow refresh rate can lead to some strange effects during faster action. But I am sure this will be addressed as well.

    Bottom line - too much change in the marketplace for even a techie like me to be comfortable with, keeping me from jumping just yet!

    Steve
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    Yep-- I would definitely buy a plasma for your viewing room, Steve. Plasma is getting better and smoother (hard to imagine) over time but the main component of change for them is price. MSRP on the 42" Panasonic my dad bought is $2999, and it has fared well in reviews against competitors costing much more.

    Slight change of gears--

    I bought an HD antenna last night at Radioshack because I keep hearing that Cox won't be given the HD signal for the Superbowl; apparently, this happened last year as well but you can receive the digital signal over the air. I don't know the fine details of the problem, but maybe it's a disagreement over money. :confuse:

    Anyway, I was pleasantly surprised to see that I was getting 90% signal strength or better with the antenna placed on top of the tv! It's small square roughly 7"x3" and less than 1" thick. However it is AC powered and has 20dB gain. :shades: I completed the hookup by taking coaxial digital audio from the tv into my receiver.

    I then obsessively switched between HD stations on the antenna which were 720p and those on digital cable which are upconverted somewhere (or perhaps fed that from the originator) to 1080i. I couldn't tell a difference, but I did watch my first episode of Lost. LOL

    C'mon in Steve, the water's fine!

    ~Colin
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    It's just nice to see Honda as something other than an invincible sales juggernaut.

    Actually I'm suprised. Pilot sales were up 13% in Jan 06 vs Jan 05 and were up 12% for all of 2005. Perhaps they forecasted higher and now need to cut production.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    They may cut Tribeca production temporarily, too. Gas prices are taking a hit on the segment, possibly.

    -juice
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    Anyone else still having problems using/accessing the forums? I'm using Internet Explorer now as a backup to get my Edmunds fix, and it's working (slowly), but my primary browser, Safari, keeps getting stuck in some URL redirection loop.
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    Ah, did my own troubleshooting. All better now. I had the receiving of cookies disabled in Safari, which apparently Edmunds needs. Mmmm... I think I need some cookies now too. Goin' to grab a couple Oreos. :)
  • hammerheadhammerhead Member Posts: 907
    I've been having a little trouble logging on to the Edmunds site lately - seem to get stuck in a loop that keeps cautioning me about remembering me or something - I click on it, it goes away & then repeatedly comes back, although the next time I access Edmunds, I'm logged in as usual. No trouble gaining access to the forums once I get that far, though. Same thing happened on the old computer, so I'm guessing it's a glitch on the server side vs. the user end.

    Home today with a sick kiddo (the big one), which is nothing compared to having to deal with a parent with a fractured pelvis last weekend. If it rains, it pours!

    Cheers!
    Paul
  • tsytsy Member Posts: 1,551
    Hey, no responses. Does that mean none of you 'techies' has any experience with Bluetooth?

    tom
  • ladywclassladywclass Member Posts: 1,713
    we got the BIG screen DLP last summer .. and added the HD tuner at Xmas ... now the DH doesn't want to watch if it's not available in HD ... Talk about SPOILED ! :P
  • snowbeltersnowbelter Member Posts: 288
    Colin and Steve: The March issue of CR reviews the latest in tvs and discusses the pros and cons of each type (leaving me very confused). Martin
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    Hey Martin,

    Yeh, picked up the new issue off of the island when I got home, and ran around the kitchen yelling "I want, I need!!!". I think the family thinks I am crazy. Then I ran off to the bathroom to read!!! (Ok, maybe too much information that you didn't need to hear in that last line).

    Steve
  • snowbeltersnowbelter Member Posts: 288
    Steve: I'll be interested to hear what you end up doing about a tv (what you buy or if you wait). We added onto our house a year ago, and built what we thought would be our media room and put extra supports in the wall to hang a tv, and prewired so we could add "in the wall" speakers. We waited for plasma/lcd prices to drop, as they are now doing, and for us to decide what we wanted. Now, our son has taken over the room for music practice and my wife likes to read there because the light is so good. so, we are hanging out with our eight year old 27 inch set in another room, and we're still not sure what to buy. Martin
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    It is tough, Martin. I just don't spend that kind of money (probably a solid $3k when all is complete) easily. I am a pretty conservative, 'researchy' kind of buyer. Hell, it took me how long to finally buy an MP3 player???

    You first!

    Steve
  • snowbeltersnowbelter Member Posts: 288
    You better not wait for me. We could probably argue all night about which of us is the more "conservative 'researchy' kind of buyer'. I don't even own an MP 3 player (although our son is hooked on his ipod.) And I ca't forget that college tuition is coming up in four more years. Martin
  • jfljfl Member Posts: 1,398
    Not that I would have ... but the money that could have gone to the HDTV will now be spent on head gaskets. :cry:

    Jim
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    Ah, Jim, say it isn't so! HGs???

    Steve
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Sorry, tom, missed your question while hurrying to catch up on this thread.

    I have a BlackBerry 7100T phone with T-Mobile service. I picked up the basic, cheapest Bluetooth headset, about $80 or so, I think it was a Motorola.

    It doesn't have noise cancellation, so it did not work too well in a convertible with the top down, as you can imagine. It does work well in quiet and non-windy environments, though.

    The pain, to me, is that you have a 2nd item to charge all the time, and that's a nuisance.

    Since my phone does have a headphone jack, I end up using the corded ear phones instead.

    -juice
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    Seattle 27, Pittsburgh 16

    Let 30 years of mostly misery be put in the past with one victory today! :)
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    Wishful thinking, I'm afraid... Went to a party tonight, and was the only one cheering on Seattle. While they played with spirit, they had several bad breaks early on, and the rest, well, was history.
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    Is it too late to edit my original post? :) Oh well. Seattle could move the ball on the Steelers, and they could stop their offense, too. Untimely (and according to the partisan crowd I watched with, questionable) penalties and non-calls hurt, and there were what, three potential TD catches where the receiver didn't get both feet in bounds? And two missed (albeit very long) field goals. Oh so close. In this game of inches, the Seahawks couldn't get a centimeter, or a call, when they needed it. I think they showed they have the tools to win, though.

    If Seattle had to lose, I'm glad it was to Pittsburgh. Sorta reduces the sting for me. I have family in western PA, so the Steelers have always been my #2 team. This was a dream matchup for me.
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    :confuse: I'm glad it wasn't just me that was feeling funny about the officiating:
    http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5310192

    Also, Fox poll online asks what you will remember most from Superbowl XL. Nearly 60,000 responses, with 42% answering "Questionable calls", far outdistancing next answer "Steelers' trick play TD" with 24%. I'm not sayin' the officials cost Seattle the title ('cause that sounds like whining!), but it certainly could've been anyone's game with a few different calls.
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    I do. I have a GN Netcom bluetooth headset that I use on my desk phone and Blackberry.

    It works well. When I first discovered my devices it found a lot of bluetooth components within range but it wasn't too hard to get everything setup. It works great, requiring about 3-4 seconds to switch affinity from the desk phone to my blackberry. About 10 seconds after I end a wireless call, it automatically drops off and reconnects to the desk phone.

    The one thing I wish it had is mute. :cry:

    But it's much better than nothing!

    ~Colin
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    I thought that the refs blew a few calls in the first quarter and over-officiated in general. They settled down and were less intrusive by the second quarter for the most part, but yeah, I think it would be hard to argue that Seattle didn't get the short end of the stick. However, I still believe that Seattle was in control of their own destiny and that they squandered their chances with poor play calls and poor execution. They should've had a touchdown on the second interception and their last drive before halftime was just plain sad.

    I figured Pittsburg was going to win but I was glad to see a game of it, even if it was a bit boring. The conference championships were largely over after the first 15 minutes, so I was glad to see this one was up for grabs in the last quarter.

    ~Colin
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Our host won $50 in one of those pools, so that was cool. I was with mostly Pitt fans, so it was pretty loud.

    -juice
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    Seattle had more yardage, more first downs, more time of possession and was +1 in turnovers... usually a recipe for victory. Just couldn't make the plays when it counted. Felt like Pittsburgh was destined to win.
  • tsytsy Member Posts: 1,551
    It didn't help that the refs called the big plays back when they did make them. Also loved the acting job done by Rothlisberger for the TD.

    It wasn't a game that was a satisfying win or loss because you wonder 'what if' the officiating was better.

    In a game that was basically won not by consistent play, but 3 'big' plays by the Steelers, not giving Seattle some big plays of their own is definitely a moral crusher. :cry:

    tom
  • tsytsy Member Posts: 1,551
    Thanks Juice, Colin

    I didn't have too much luck with my first bluetooth headseats (one of the older Motorola ones) but am going to try it again!

    BTW, do you know if your blackberry is still going to be working? Bummer if they shut them down!

    tom
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    Yep my blackberry will be fine. RIM has software for the devices (hmm, maybe that's firmware.. well,whatever) that doesn't use the infringing code but it is quite a challenge getting that distributed to a few million devices.

    We're not going to bother to push it out until the injunction is finalized. If it never happens, then we don't waste any time updating. :)
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    Martin,

    If you're feeling overwhelmed about the tech specs or pro/con of various technology types, maybe you should just visit some local retailers and sample some units.

    You'll see which ones are within your budget and what it costs for various features. Some things will start to eliminate themselves. With luck, you might even find a good salesperson who can fill you in on some of the details.

    ~Colin
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Not only that, the plaintiff does not manufacture competing hardware. They want money from a settlement. They would get zero if they shut down RIM.

    -juice
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    Not only that, the plaintiff does not manufacture competing hardware. They want money from a settlement. They would get zero if they shut down RIM.

    NTP doesn't really want to shut RIM down. They just want RIM to pay them a royalty for using their patented technology. The possibility of an injunction is a negotiating tactic.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Even then I bet the gov't would interfere because a shut down in service would cause them a major headache.

    -juice
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Well, it's here! I'm writing this on my new 20" iMac.

    All I can say is that I'm one happy camper. Transferring files and has been one chore, but using the Mac has just been one great experience so far. Everything from opening up the box (love their packaging) to booting up for the first time -- they've done a great job in understanding the touch points of a customer.

    Ken
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    Somehow your post has this glowing aura about it. Must be the Mac. :) Congrats! I bet that 20" screen's a beaut.
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Awesome Ken! I agree -- they have a great out-of-box experience. I'll be interested to hear your impressions over the next few days.

    Craig
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    So far the overall experience has been great. It's been 10 some odd years now since I last really used a Mac so I've basically have had to re-learn how to do stuff.

    My initial impressions:

    - Form factor is just oh-so sexy. It's actually not very heavy and so today I unplugged the unit and carried over to another room that I wanted to use it. The built in power supply and Airport make it a psuedo-portable.

    - The iMac is quiet. In a completely silent room, I just barely hear the fans in the unit. I really appreciate how Apple designed this unit with air intakes on the bottom and a thin strip along the top to vent.

    - It's speedy as advertised. I'm coming off a 5-year old PC so it's great how applications just pop right up. Also, I'm able to run multiple applications and the iMac doesn't even break a sweat. I don't think I've ever seen the visualized on iTunes render so quickly and smoothly.

    - The display is awesome. Bright and clear, no dead pixels that I can see. The wide format really lends itself to watching DVDs. Only one nit is that the image is just a hair off to the right and could use a tiny, tiny keystone adjustment.

    - The built in iSight camera has exceeded my expectations for a built in camera. I loved how it takes a photo of you when you are first launching OSX and it registers you as a user.

    - The remote is actually a neat feature. It's kind of cool to be able to run Front Row as well as put the iMac to sleep using the remote.

    - One OSX feature I'm really loving is Expose. Combined with the 20" screen, it's awesome how you can quickly sort through open applications and windows and zoom into what you want.

    - I'm liking the Mighty Mouse. The scroll button works great and I can still use right and left mouse clicks.

    The only problem that I've run into is with Front Row itself. There currently seems to be a problem with the latest build of OSX that for some reason causes lines and other artifacts to appear while using Front Row. The problem affects only 20" iMacs with the enhanced video memory. Apple is aware of the problem and it looks like a new patch is on it's way.

    Ken
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.