Subaru Crew Cafe

1227228230232233343

Comments

  • tsytsy Member Posts: 1,551
    Cool Ken. Thanks for the writeup. It sounds really fast. You'll have to tell us in a month or so how reliable it is. I guess I need (ok, want) a new Mac too!

    tom
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    We were on our way home from central NJ yesterday (with the snow storm on our tail), and being wild and crazy people, we made a few hour stop at Palisades Center in Nyack. They have a Kinokuniya Book Store, which is great because we no longer have to go down to Rockefeller Center to get to one.

    I always love looking at their automotive section, as they have publications that you basically cannot get anywhere else short of Shinjuku. They carry the HyperRev series that is heavily into Subaru mods. I cannot read a word of it (going to have to get Ken to translate....), but the photos are great.

    http://www.hyperrevusa.com/category.php?category_name=subaru

    Steve
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Steve,

    I didn't know that they opened up a Kinokuniya in Nyack. Another large Japanese bookstors chain is Asahiya. They have a location at 360 Madison Ave in Manhattan.

    The HyperRev series is an interesting read (for those who can!). I have one for the Forester that I bought a few years agto and it contains a bunch of information on mods as well as reviews/commentary from various driving editors.

    I'll need to pick one up for the Legacy -- thanks for reminding me!

    Ken
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    Speaking of Ken, are you going to be in town the week of Feb 28 - March 3rd?? Guess who is doing acceptance testing on a new FIB in your area (Sunnyvale) that week?? Jim?? Kate??

    Steve
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Is it time for me to schedule another business trip out of town? ;-P

    No travel plans that week -- should be around! Let's get together!

    Ken
  • bat1161bat1161 Member Posts: 1,784
    I am seeking some guidance on trailering with my OBW. I am looking into one of those utility trailers as a means of transporting my wife's recumbent trike. I am a bit confused though regarding differences between the 8" wheel and the 12" wheels. It's not the size, but the capability that I am questioning. Which would be better if traveling on an interstate? Are there any minimum requirements that you folks are aware of? I know the 12" trailer will hold about 300 lbs. more -something I don't really need.

    I'm just concerned as to what can be towed on a highway. I figure if we have the trailer for the bikes, then we can put other supplies on it as well and take the bikes with us when we go up to the Berkshires this spring.

    Thanks for any info.

    Mark
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    Hi Mark,

    Some possibilities for you:
    http://www.lightfootcycles.com/transporting.htm

    I have not seen a trailer with 8" wheels, but I would imagine it would not handle potholes or other road irregularities very well. I have a small landscapers trailer that I pull behind the OBW and it bounces around on it's 12" tires quite a bit.

    Steve
  • bat1161bat1161 Member Posts: 1,784
    Hi Steve,

    I've been looking into both the Hitchrider and the Draftmaster hitch racks already. One reason I am considering the trailer is the Hitchrider rack goes for $510; the utility trailer is around $249.

    I am going to look at some of the other sites they mention - look interesting.

    Thanks!
    Mark
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    Mark,

    Both methods have their issues. When I have the bikes on the hitch mounted rack, getting into the back of the wagon becomes a major pain. Plus loading and securing becomes an art - I took pictures once I figured out the best way to hang and bungee cord them so that they didn't clash.

    But owning and pulling around a trailer, even a small one, is more annoying than it might initially appear. For one, you need a sizable space in your yard to store it, and it needs tags and inspection each year, so the cost is not zero. Eventually I figure wheel bearings and tires, plus occasional electrical work as the wiring, fixtures & components are of decidedly low quality.

    On the road it bucks and jumps unless you have sufficient tong weight. When it is evenly balanced over its wheels it is very unruely. You need to go slower & increase your following distances, as it does not have brakes. Panic stops are definitely out, unless you want to see that trailer pass you! Not saying it is horrible, but it does take the joy out of driving.

    Just aspects to consider.

    Steve
  • bat1161bat1161 Member Posts: 1,784
    Steve,

    I understand what you are saying regarding a hitch rack. I have one for regular bikes and it can be a bit of a pain when opening the back of the wagon.

    The more I think on it, the more the Hitchrider bike-n-trike rack is looking better and better. The only thing is, I'm the type of person who likes to actually see the thing before I buy it. Hitchrider is only mailorder; they do have a 30 day return policy, but it's not exactly the same thing.

    Of course one other alternative is to have a roof rack for my DF bike, and a special rack for the trike in the back. I just don't want to go too nuts here.

    Mark
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    "Airbags save lives. AWD saves airbags."

    I like it.

    http://blogs.edmunds.com/.ee8f66f

    Bob
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Hmmm, now they are advertising a feature (AWD) also available on other makes/models? That is an interesting approach.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I'm hoping they will be showing why the Subie AWD is better than many of those other AWD systems.

    Bob
  • once_for_allonce_for_all Member Posts: 1,640
    and I am hoping that once they show why, we get a deeper discount on our auto insurance.

    John
  • bat1161bat1161 Member Posts: 1,784
    Does anyone have any idea how heavy the suspension on a 06 OBW is?
    The reason I am asking is I found a rack (http://www.draftmaster.com/t.html) that can transport the bike and trike I have. When I spoke with the company rep this morning, he was explaining they normally recommend a class III hitch (2"receiver). He was saying that he recommends a "heavy duty" type of suspension.

    Does the OB qualify for that? I mean you can take it off road- is that the same thing. The rack itself weighs approx. 70-80 lbs; the bikes weigh probably a total of close to 100 lbs.

    I appreciate any help on this.
    Thanks,
    Mark
  • jfljfl Member Posts: 1,398
    Finally checked my calendar...and right now, I'll be home.

    Jim
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    It would be interesting to read something like that, but I think it would be hard for Subaru to explain given that they really offer three different systems. One could argue that they always send some power to all four wheels, but that alone probably isn't enough these days.

    What would be interesting is if Subaru could show some objective data on the benefits of full-time AWD combined with their symmetrical layout. Things like response time, handling improvement -- anything to show a difference. And sometimes it doesn't even have to be objective like the Audi Quattro ad on the ski jump.

    Ken
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    That could be a problem.... I don't know specifically about the '06, but the previous generation using the class II hitch had a maximum tongue weight of 200 lbs (and towing capacity of 2000 lbs), according to SOA. Yet if you query the 'outside world', they say up to 300 lb tongue with a class II. Does that mean that Hidden Hitch builds a stronger unit, or that SOA underrates theirs? I believe SOA went up a bit on the max tow capacity with the '05 (2300 - 2500 ???), but still being a class II (1.25 x 1.25"), you may be still stuck with the 200 lb limit. When he said 'heavy duty suspension', he probably meant 'heavy duty mounting points'.

    Some sites list class III (2" x 2") as up to 600 lbs tongue. Now could you find one of these that would mount up to the OBW? Even if you did, it might not buy you anything if the frame rail mount points on the car are not up to the job. And they are heavy beasts! I just ordered one from Honda for my Odyssey so that I can get a larger rack with a 2x2" post, and almost couldn't lift it!

    Steve
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    Mark,

    I'm down in Lancaster County, PA for the weekend, and saw something you might be interested in parked in front of Tractor Supply Co. It was a 4'x6' open trailer (a mini landscaper design) made by Carry-On (same make as my 5'x8'), for only $349.

    Steve
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
  • bat1161bat1161 Member Posts: 1,784
    Steve,

    A little late on the reply, but thanks for thinking of me. I have to check one or two things before making up my mind. Just as an FYI, the 06 is rated with a 300# tongue weight and 3000# towing capacity. The hitch I installed was form u-haul, but it has those stats.

    Mark
  • subearusubearu Member Posts: 3,613
    I've always had good far vision, for as long as I can remember. Distant signs, license plates, etc. all have been easy to read. But, 12 years of sitting in front of a computer screen (I'll deny it has anything to do with me turning 33 last year) have finally taken it's toll. I now have glasses to wear when working on the computer.

    The prescription isn't that strong, but I'm amazed at how much clearer things are on the screen. Like someone adjusted the sharpness setting.

    I wonder if past posts of mine actually contained real words or were just letters that *looked* like words to me... :P

    -Brian
  • ladywclassladywclass Member Posts: 1,713
    no sympathy ... I've worn glasses since I was 10 ... and that's more decades than I want to admit to having!
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I never wore glasses till I was 40.

    Bob
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    I've been wearing glasses since halfway through kindergarten. At the end of high school I got contacts and they suit me well, so I very rarely wear my glasses.

    I don't know how close I am to being legally blind but I know that my prescription is super strong. It's -6.75 in my left eye and -6.0 in my right. I'm nearsighted like you wouldn't believe.. if I don't have my glasses on and I try to use my blackberry at night, I have to hold it about 6 inches from my face. :)

    I've thought about eye surgery but I'm going to wait a few more years for that to mature a bit more. My mother had lasik about 5 years ago and now she is already wearing glasses again. --Far weaker prescription than she originally had, but it's still disappointing.

    ~Colin
  • bat1161bat1161 Member Posts: 1,784
    Last month I went for the LASIK surgery, and what a difference! Not having to reach for my glasses, or worrying about contacts is great. The only thing I was told is I may need reading glasses in the future. Funny thing is I had already gone out and bought a pair at the local drugstore because I felt I needed them.

    Once you have the surgery, it's amazing how many people I work with keep coming up and telling me they have had it as well.

    As far as age goes, working with computers affects everyone. One of my co-workers who just turned 25 is looking to get a set of reading glasses! Welcome to the world of technology.

    Mark
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I'm under the impression, once you have had LASIK, you can't have it again; and should you find your eyes have changed over time, you may need glasses again. Is that correct?

    Bob
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    I'm right behind you, Colin, at -4.75, -5.5, with a +1.75 graduated bifocal lower, otherwise I cannot read anything short of arms length. Started when I was in second grade?

    A few years ago I consulted on a problem with a major maker of opthalmic keratomes. The metalurgical sharpening techniques were leaving burrs on the blade end, and of course they were breaking off and being left behind under the lasik flap. FIB was one of the possible solutions. I also work with excimer lasers, and know how damn finiky they can be. Zap, zap, splat! Needless to say, as much as I want eye surgery, I know way too much about the problems, and that scares me to death.

    Steve
  • bat1161bat1161 Member Posts: 1,784
    Bob,

    According to my doctor, once you have it some people do require an "adjustment procedure" a few years down the road. That may be for people who had the surgery a few years ago. The only glasses I was told I may need will be reading glasses. Although all the material give you does say there is a small percentage (2%-5%) of people who will need an adjustment later on.

    A friend had the surgery 10 years ago, and now has to go for the adjustment surgery.

    Mark
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I guess the real question/issue is: The younger you are, when you have LASIK, the greater the chance of needing an adjustment later in life. If you're older when have it, the less chance of needing that, simply because you won't be living as long.

    Bob
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    I'm in a similar boat as you. I started wearing glasses around 4th grade and my prescription is now -5.25 and -5.75.

    I've also been interested in eye surgery, but there always seem to be reasons to wait. Techniques are still constantly improving and most importantly, the long-term effects are just starting to be known.

    Also, contact comfort continually improve narrowing the reasons to switch. I've been using the new Acuvue Oasys lenses now and they are incredible comfortable. I found that with these, I can travel on international flights, doze off and wake up without the lenses being glued to my eyes.

    Ken
  • hammerheadhammerhead Member Posts: 907
    I've been old since April 4, 1968 - my first pair!
    (don't ask how or why I remember stuff like that - it's a curse!) I'm a -6.75 left eye, half of that in the right, but a BIG astigmatism factor as well.

    I'm not eligible for LASIK, etc, (scar tissue on corneal surface) nor contacts (same, and thin corneas as well), so glasses it is. I, too, was amazed at the difference when I got my first pair of bifocals. My biggest hangup now is the darn things fogging up under my ski goggles - going to fix that with Rx goggles for next season. $165 (ouch) but worth every bit if they work as advertised!

    Cheers!
    Paul
  • jfljfl Member Posts: 1,398
    Paul, one of my worst "investments" was a pair of prescription Oakley sunglasses, that I used primarily for skiing. Very expensive but eyes change with time so now, as I've aged, they are less effective.

    I mainly use the Smith Anti-Fog cloths to reduce fogging. I also have some ancient Apollo Anti-Fog that's fantastic.

    Jim
  • tsytsy Member Posts: 1,551
    Paul, I have a pair of Rudy Project Ekynox sunglasses with prescription inserts. When my prescription changes, I just change the lenses in the inserts just like glasses. I use them skiing, bicycling, and hiking on glaciers. Also, since the lenses are interchangeable, I can use dark ones for sunny days and my yellow ones for overcast days. They work great. They also have a ski goggle conversion if you really need it, but I haven't yet.

    Wow, you guys must be blind without your glasses! LASIK has become much cheaper over the years, but I can't imagine having my eyes messed up and am quite content wearing glasses. Besides, they make me look smarter! ;)

    tom
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    A friend of mine is mulling over a GTI or a Legacy GT (I know, two quite different cars and it puzzles me too) and I joined him on a test drive of the new GTI.

    The model we tested had the new 2.0 FSI turbo plus the DSG tranny.

    The DSG was just incredible. I could not believe I was driving a tranny with a clutch. Shifts were quick and seamless in both auto and manual modes. In fact, I thought the DSG had less drivetrain shock compared to the 5EAT on my LGT wagon! I was thoroughly impressed at how this unit performed.

    The GTI has a great connected feel to the road. The suspension was firm yet compliant. The steering, nicely weighted.

    The 2.0 FSI has an impressively flat torque curve that starts at 1800RPM. There was no lag at all and it felt more like a NA engine. We drove a 5MT LGT back-to-back and we agreed that past 3000RPM, the LGT did pull harder.

    It was a rainy day here in the Bay Area today and on uphill starts, we spun the front tires all too readily. Too bad this car doesn't come with AWD.

    Things I didn't like about the GTI were mainly cosmetic. The front grille and wheels were not to my taste. Also the cloth seat material and pattern as well as the dash plastic felt a little cheap.

    Ken
  • hammerheadhammerhead Member Posts: 907
    Jim: I actually just bought a pair of Smith Goggles yesterday that had the no-fogging cloth. I'll try anything!

    Tom - I'd be interested in finding out more on those Rudy's.
    Can you e-mail me details or share them here? Thanks!

    Cheers!
    Paul
  • tsytsy Member Posts: 1,551
    Hi Paul

    Here's a link:

    http://www.e-rudy.com/pages/sunglasses/ekynox.htm

    They're not cheap, but I figured since I could use them for several activities, it was still better than buying multiple Rx sunglasses!

    Ahh, but I just noticed the max it will do is -4 diopters. I don't know if they can do better with these newer high index lenses. (My lenses are incredibly thin!) I'm sure there are places local to you you could try them on and ask about the Rx inserts.

    Is it snowing there? We got some snow last week and now it's just raining.

    tom
  • tsytsy Member Posts: 1,551
    The VW DSG is a neat tranny. Makes you wonder if the manual tranny will soon be obsolete? Aparrently the new 911 turbo tiptronic is faster to 60 than the 6 spd! (although this could be just gearing) But clearly these computer controlled trannys are quite impressive.

    But I think there's just something fun about clutching and shifting- I will be sad if manuals disappear altogether. :cry: Next thing you know, we won't have to drive either!

    I would think the GTi would be similar to the WRX, not the LGT. Maybe your friend is living out his teenage dreams when GTis were popular? :D

    tom
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    I would think the GTi would be similar to the WRX, not the LGT.

    My understanding is that the GTI will also be offered as a 4 door. Might be a nice balance between family and sport.
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    What's the asking prices of the two vehicles your friend test drove, Ken?

    Seems to me that a GTI with DSG would be a lot more than a Legacy GT...

    ~Colin
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    The GTI with DSG stickers at about $23,700. It's not cheap.
  • hammerheadhammerhead Member Posts: 907
    Snowing in them thar hills last night, but down here in the valley at the moment it's 52. Warm enough to go outside & change the oil in the wifemobile. Not bad for February, but I wish it was cooler just to extend the ski season - although Lookout has about 13 feet at the summit!

    Cheers!
    Paul
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Colin,

    The sticker price on the GTI w/DSG was around $28K. That's with cloth seats and no navi system.

    A LGT sedan 5MT invoice is around $28K also but you also can get a $1500 rebate.

    He's seriously considering a Spec B, however. There's one on a local dealer's lot that's sat there for three months and they want to get rid of it. Without any haggling, they already offered invoice+$250, or around $33K.

    Ken
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    I wouldn't question that the DSG is quicker than manual shifting. But yeah, you do lose that feeling of working the left foot. Some of them come with a launch mode too -- that would be interesting!

    My friend who turns 40 is definetly trying to dream out his teenage years. I told him the bright red GTi we drove is screaming mid-life crisis. ;-)

    Ken
  • hammerheadhammerhead Member Posts: 907
  • jfljfl Member Posts: 1,398
    Paul: Their Anti-Fog cloth is sold separately. I think it's about $3.00.

    Jim
  • hammerheadhammerhead Member Posts: 907
    Thanks, Jim. I've found the goop-smear anti-fog stuff doesn't work as well as I thought it might. I'm going to end up with something that works, I'm sure. :)

    Cheers!
    Paul
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    It hasn't for me. I wonder if it's because I use Opera.

    Ken
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I'm still having problems, and I'm using Safari and/or Firefox.

    Bob
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.