Subaru Crew Problems & Solutions

14748505253385

Comments

  • originalbitmanoriginalbitman Member Posts: 920
    So what is 1030KG in LBs anyway. They got bulkier in 69 or 70. I don't mind the neighbors its when they blab to my wife that I spent the afternoon out tooling around in her baby that I pay the price.

    bit
  • armac13armac13 Member Posts: 1,129
    1030 kg is 2266 lbs. The 1600 was very similar in size and general specs to the MGA & MGB. It seems to me that my MGA was also just about 1000 kg. Actually the Datsun 1600 was seen as a direct rip-off of the MG.

    Ross
  • originalbitmanoriginalbitman Member Posts: 920
    Its easy to see the similarity to the MG. One benefit is the reliability of being Japanese vs British.

    bit
  • armac13armac13 Member Posts: 1,129
    back then the Japanese cars were not any better for reliability than the British, with the possible exception of the electrics, at least IMHO. I had a '65 Datsun P311 (wagon) in 1968 and it was ten times the trouble of any of the 6 British cars I had (3 MGs, 3 Austins).

    Ross
  • originalbitmanoriginalbitman Member Posts: 920
    True. But at least now I have replaced most of the 70's electrical and hydraulic stuff with new parts. Hopefully they have benefited from more recent engineering.

    bit
  • mikenkmikenk Member Posts: 281
    Greg,
    My Subie dealer recommended strongly on my 01 VDC to change the ATF to redline synthetic as soon as possible and to switch the engine oil at about 15K miles. I did it for the transmission and so far it seems smoother and more responsive.

    I am surprised at the comments here that redline doesn't work for Subie transmissions; certainly, the mechanics at my dealership don't feel that way. Anyway, so far, so good.

    Mike
  • originalbitmanoriginalbitman Member Posts: 920
    I think the issue is with manual transmissions and not the auto.

    bit
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    The best part of the Miata is the reliability. I've had it since fall and not a single thing has gone wrong with it (knock on wood). That is despite it being 8 years old.

    Actually, my Subaru is pretty much the same way. 3 years now and a recall is the only blemish on its record (if you can even call that a blemish).

    -juice
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Ken - The i-clubber that sold me the Amsoil told me that the Series 2000 isn't recommended for a street driven car. Too slick I suppose. I have their standard 75W90 synthetic. I don't think I can shift that much quicker, just easier (especially in sub-freezing temps). Nothing is probably going to an OBS OEM shifter quicker. :-)
    edit: Looking on Amsoils web page, the Series 2000 would be better. Cobb Tuning's web page says it's not recommended for quick shifting drivers. ??? I'm curious now. Maybe do a search on the i-club and see if anyone has used it.

    Ross - Wouldn't it have been better to find a shop with a transmission fluid exchanger? That way you pay around US$60 (plus the ATF) and have 100% in one shot.

    Dennis
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Do a search in the i-club's Powertrain archives with "Amsoil Series 2000". There's a guy named Rich Eichelberger(sp?) (richeich) that's a dealer and I believe he uses the 2000 in his GT. I've emailed him before just about filter questions and he was pretty helpful. He didn't try to push any products on me. He also has a website that you can find through his i-club posts.

    Dennis
  • FrankMcFrankMc Member Posts: 228
    Subaru recalls 180,000 vehicles in 'Salt Belt'
    DETROIT (AP) — Subaru of America said Thursday it is recalling certain 1995-1998 and some 1999 Legacy vehicles, which may encounter problems with corrosion on their front springs.
    Because of improperly applied paint by a supplier, continued exposure to salt may cause the springs on 180,000 cars to corrode and eventually break, the company said.
    If the broken spring end is not contained, it could cause severe damage to the tires.
    There have been no reported accidents or injuries attributed to the problem, Subaru said.
    The problem is especially acute in states where road salt is used during the winter, and the recall affects only cars in those states.
    The so-called "Salt Belt" states are: Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.
    Affected owners will be notified by mail. Subaru said it will install a front spring guard on both front struts and replace any broken springs.
  • nygregnygreg Member Posts: 1,936
    when your dealer changed your ATF on your VDC, did they pump out all the fluid or did they just drain and replace 50% of it?? Did they change the filter??

    thanks,
    Greg
  • anibalbanibalb Member Posts: 193
    This has become a hot topic. I just called my Subaru dealer and asked on all this stuff. According to him, Subaru does not recommend any synthetics. Then he went on to say that on a manual gear box he did not see a problem. However he really did not recommend it on the Automatic. Furthermore, he said to wait until the 7500 mile service before changing anything to synthetics. Also, he said that the front differential shares fluid. Can anyone confirm this. Thanks.
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Yes, Subaru doesn't recommend synthetics. Patti posted a while back that FHI said they still saw a problem with the seals (or something like that). Most reputable oil companies will stand by their products though if you have a problem.

    When it's below freezing outside and I get in my car, it's next to impossible to shift with conventional gear oil. With the Amsoil, I get in my car and go no matter what the temp outside is.

    I agree on the waiting until 7500 miles or so. The front diff. shares fluid on the 5MT only.
    Last winter on the i-club, someone posted that their dealer used a special "winter blend" gear oil because they were having problems shifting. They didn't get specific on what it was though but I suspect it was at least a semi-synthetic.

    Dennis
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    So it sounds like Dennis is saying that the regular AMSOil 75w90 works great, but he doesn't know about the more expensive Series 2000... Trey's comments on the Cobb Tuning site do indicate that if you're going to use Redline he actually recommends the MT90 fluid. This makes sense, seeing as how the 75w90NS is too thin and slippery which causes gear grinding as the synchros need friction.

    -Colin
  • mikenkmikenk Member Posts: 281
    They did pump out the old oil, but did not change the filter. They were so strongly in favor of it for the VDC that I did not really challenge them or do more research. I am surprised and a little concerned that there seems to be a lot of discrepancy even among the dealers. Again, they also strongly recommended going to synthetic engine oil at (but not before) 15k miles.

    Patti, does SOA have any position here on the best approach and why such a variance between dealers?

    Thanks
    Mike
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    that the MT-90 is a GL4 and our cars call for a GL5. Funny though, because a lot of i-clubbers swear by the MT90 and haven't had a problem. I guess they'll find out later on if there are any negative effects.

    A couple of i-clubbers have also put ATF into the front diffs and said it works great.

    Dennis
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Dennis: I didn't realize our tranny and front diffy share the same gear oil. Cool. One less compartment to worry about.

    Dealers operate independently. Though Subaru can make a recommendation, so can the synthetic oil distributors.

    -juice
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    Oh heck yeah the front differential and transmission share oil-- the diff is IN the transmission!

    Look at this image from www.b-specusa.com:
    image

    That's not a stock gearset, but the idea is the same. The front diff is directly driven by the main shaft. The spline you see sticking out of the differential (pointing up in this image) connects to the right cv joint, and there's one out the other way too for the left cv joint. The front of the tranny (far right) is directly underneath the black box at the center rear of your engine bay. (the torque chamber)

    -Colin
  • nygregnygreg Member Posts: 1,936
    what I have so far is that I will go with synthetics on the engine and diffs, but, not for a while yet (I have 5000 miles on the car). Maybe between 10K and 15K. As for the ATF, hmm......... so I call my dealer while writing this. They don't push the synthetics, but, they will use them if asked and recommend staying with them once changed. For ATF they led me to believe they don't recommend it "unless you are racing the car". They use Mobil 1 for ATF, do not pump it out - only drain and fill. Didn't give me price though. Oil change with synthetic is $45. The saga continues.

    Greg
  • nygregnygreg Member Posts: 1,936
    Colin. Thanks.

    Greg
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    A picture is worth a thousand words. Seems like pretty clever packaging.

    -juice
  • mikenkmikenk Member Posts: 281
  • mikenkmikenk Member Posts: 281
    Don't hit enter accidently on the title; it will send the message without futher adieu. What I was trying to say that at least I don't have to debate whether to use synthetic ATF, since I have already done the deed. Unfortunatly, or fortunatly, I will probably never know whether it helped or not.

    Mike
  • jregen7243jregen7243 Member Posts: 91
    I have a 2000 Outback Limited Sedan. At about 18000 miles, I noticed that when I hit the accelerator about 1/2 to 3/4 of the way down, the engine starts to make a very low moaning noise until I lay off of the gas a little bit. I read a post a while back where someone had the same problem but I didn't see any replies to it. Anyone else experience this problem??? It hasn't affected power or mileage. Thanks.
  • mrdetailermrdetailer Member Posts: 1,118
    Wow, a passionate subject.

    I don't think you need to pump it out, just do the normal drain and replace. True it will be a blend, but many motor oil "experts" on this site recommend a blend for a while to allow it to become accustomed. A normal drain and replace service will do exactly that.

    Are Subaru Transmissions different? On every automatic transmission service I have done the technician would remove the oil pan, drain the fluid, and the put in a new seal.

    The synthetic oil causing leaks is a 20 year old, not a modern argument. Especially if seals are replaced during the normal service.

    I still believe in 30,000 mile changes even with synthetics. It's worked well on my old dodge that had a definite transmission shudder. Adding synthetic minimized it.

    Most manufacturers still don't recommend synthetic oil. Then last year Mercedes recommends it for exactly the reasons the manufacturer's have been touting: longer live, better cold weather startup, extended intervals, and resistence to thermal breakdown.

    I don't know a car manufacturer who doesn't recommend their own products most of the time.
  • evilizardevilizard Member Posts: 195
    Note: This applies to the older model engine which does not have an external filter.

    >Are Subaru Transmissions different? On every >automatic transmission service I have done the >technician would remove the oil pan, drain the >fluid, and the put in a new seal.

    The old Sub engines had a filter inside the pan. In the normal course of operations that pan does not look like it was meant to be removed as they used some type of silicone sealent on it act the factory in addtion to a bunch of screws. If you REALLY need to get at it you could but then you have to spend an hour trying to scrape goop off the lip of the pan and where it attaches to the car or your not going to get a good seal when you put it back on. To do this task properly without damaging the pan takes at least an hour (its stubborn stuff). Somehow I don't think the dealership devotes an hour of mechanics (or mechanics flunky) time to such a task and still charges less than $100. On the plus side I don't think its ever going to leak. Also when I went through this proccess at 30K miles I discovered that the filter was in perfect condition, no grit, no clogs, nothing. I didn't even have to change it. At the bottom of the pan was a magnet which had a bunch of fuzz on it (very small metal particles) but still had plenty of carrying capacity for several times that amount.

    So it is my understanding that when the dealer does transmission service they do a reverse flush. They hook the hose into where the drain plug and then tube into the fill port and force fresh ATF in the system (I might have the direction backwards). The result is that you get a flow of fluid in the opposite direction it normally travels. This washes debris off of the mesh screen that acts as the filter and takes it out of the transmission. It also serves to pull fluid that would otherwise remain static in the system. Hence a cleaner system.

    When you do the manual drain and refill routine you only get half of it out.

    This is my understanding, somebody correct me if I am wrong.

    For myself I switched to synthetic at 30K (I got the car at 20k). I drained the fluid, poured in Redline, shifted around to get the mix, drained and poured in more redline. So I had a 75/25 Redline/Regular ATF mix. I did a 5q drain and refil at 45K. At 60 I took it to the dealer for a reverse flush because it was time for fluid service and I was about to go on a long trip and had numerous complications in my life (getting married and buying a house) that left me with no time to do it myself. But when 75K rolls around I will be going back to Redline
  • woodykkwoodykk Member Posts: 4
    Hi,everyone..
    I'm a new member of this Subaru community board.
    I bought The Outback 2.5 in 1999 but rarely used.

    I would like to seek some kind advice for my problem on oil change,normally ,I did by myself for my other cars with no problem.
    Yesterday,I tried to change the oil & filter at
    the milage 11,000 but found out that the recommend oil filter "FRAM" # PH3593A is a little
    bit bigger than the one which had been change at dealer(at milage 7500).Also,the current oil filter had been firmly tightened,too tight so that I can't loose by my existing tools.
    Any advices for me please ,since it's not convenience for me to go to the dealer
    Thanks for any kind advice ,
    Woody
  • gatorbandgatorband Member Posts: 12
    I'm getting ready to take a 2K mile vacation in my 01 OB (w/10,200miles) & was wondering what you experienced Soob owners think about using generic fuel injector cleaners? I've used the STP brand (in the black bottle) in my past vehicles (Fords, Mazdas, Hondas) about every 3-4 months or so, & never had a problem. I usually try to put a bottle of it in the tank when I'm going on a long highway trip and will be burning the entire tank of gas with little stop/start driving. Is there anything special about Soobs that might make me want to think twice about continuing this practice with my new vehicle?

    Thanks for your opinions/recommendations.

    Stephen
  • subearusubearu Member Posts: 3,613
    woody: You could try poking a screwdriver through the filter and using the handle to turn the filter out. Personally, I've never had to do that (whew!). Perhaps someone will chime in with the proper 'technique' for it.

    stephen: I've used Techron after each oil change in our '00 OB with no problems.

    -Brian
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    My worthless two cents:

    bit: Very few people I know have used synthetics in Studebakers successfully unless they've done a complete rebuild of whatever it is that the synthetic's going into. Causes more leakage of their already notoriously leaky seals. I still have to replace front and rear main seals on my Lark but am hesitant due to cost/time/buddy commitments. Quart of oil once a month and a big bag o' cat litter helps too. There's no Studebaker owner's club in Edmund's or else I'd have posted there.

    juice: I kind of have to lean your way on use of synthetics in my Subaru. SoA doesn't recommend it - probably more due to products liability issues than anything else - and I don't see myself subjecting it to severe conditions so I imagine I'll stick to all dino lubricants for as long as I own it. I'm pretty fastidious when it comes to fluid changes so hopefully that won't pose a problem.

    Ed
  • tlimatlima Member Posts: 124
    I've always heard that it is best to add injector cleaners 1 or 2 tankfuls BEFORE an oil change.
    The reasoning here is that it eventually finds it's way into the engine oil, diluting it.

    I don't know how much truth is in that. I generally do not use injector cleaners, but am considering the Techron brand before my next oil change (15k).

    -TonyL
  • jimmyp1jimmyp1 Member Posts: 640
    I thought those of you discussing Gear Oil, etc. might like to see this page from COBB Tuning, in Dallas, TX. They are widely considered (particularly by the i-club guys) to be knowledgable tuners/mechanics for Subarus....


    http://www.cobbtuning.com/tech/gearoil/index.html


    For what it's worth,


    Jim

  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Tony- I'll be the first to admit that my understanding of all things mechanical is poor at best. However, I'm having a really hard time figuring out a plausible scenario to explain how a bottle of fuel injector cleaner could contaminate the engine oil (other than the obvious ones like someone adding it to oil instead of the fuel tank).

    Am I missing something?

    -Frank P.
  • rayfbairdrayfbaird Member Posts: 183
    10,000 miles is too early for a real fuel multi-stage injector cleaner that you can get at your mechanic's or Jiffy lube. That should be done every 15,000. A bottle of Techron, Castrol, Valvoline or equivelant brand should be all you need.

    No matter how you argue about new gas not needing fuel injection cleaners there are three arguments against this.

    1. The FTC has not sued any fuel injector cleaner manufacturer for misrepresentation. Look at the pictures. They show dramatic differences.

    2. They contain the same additives as in gas, only in greater quantities.

    3. I remember Petro companies never recommending anything even when their gas didn't have any injector cleaners. They will defend past behavior, even if proven wrong.

    Don't exceed the cleaner interval however.
  • rayfbairdrayfbaird Member Posts: 183
    My legacy sedan transmission service was much cheaper than on my other cars. Because they didn't have to replace the filter. They said they don't except in unusual curcumstances.
  • rayfbairdrayfbaird Member Posts: 183
    My Subaru Mechanic, and dealer both use Standard Transmission fluid when servicing my Subaru. Honda and Ford often require special fluids. Subaru doesn't. Both happy to put in synthetic. I like it. It shifts smoother, and I hope will last better. This is the only automatic that I have enjoyed driving.
  • bigfrank3bigfrank3 Member Posts: 426
    Stephen - I too have always used the STP in the black bottle, at every oil change, in all my fuel injected vehicles. Since I have never had ANY problems I have continued this practice in our Soobs.

    Frank P - One of the cautions with Techron based cleaners is their reaction with oil. Through normal leakage and interaction around the rings, some of the Techron gets mixed (as would any cleaner). The problem is that Techron can thicken the oil if the concentration is too high.

    The article I read (a while ago) said that 1 application between oil changes would never be a problem, but 2 or more could be a concern in some cases. It said if you mixed enough with the oil you could turn it into a jello-like blob.

    Regards,
    Frank
  • sibbaldsibbald Member Posts: 106
    Jon - Have you or a mechanic opened the engine air filter housing. I had the same problem with my 2 K Outback after inspecting the air filter. There are three tabs on the bottom of the removeable cover and they have to be inserted back into the bottom of the housing. Otherwise, the tabs will hold the bottom partly open which will allow air to be sucked in, accounting for the noise.

    Cheers, Tom
  • tlimatlima Member Posts: 124
    Just what bigfrank3 said, although I didn't know that the Techron cleaners actually thickened the oil.

    If you have a link to that article, I'd like to read it.

    Thanks,

    -Tony
  • evilizardevilizard Member Posts: 195
    Anyone had experience with the "Autotap" diagnostic scanner. Will it work with 2001?

    Will it provide useful information?


     http://www.autotap.com/

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Woody: I'm with Brian on that one - poke a screw driver through the old oil fiter and get it out.

    Though some say Fram filters are not very good. An oil filter study pointed to some of its weaknesses. Pennzoil filters are also made by Fram, though at least they are cheaper.

    Stick with Purolator (the OE supplier for Subaru) or Car & Driver (made by Champion Labs and found at Target stores), since both had good reviews in that study.

    -juice
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Jim - Thanks for the Cobb link. Just an FYI, those are gear oils for the manual tranny.

    Woody - Welcome to the board. You can also try an oil filter wrench for any auto parts store to loosen it. Personally, I use OEM filters. You can find them for $4-$5 through wholesale on-line.

    Tom - at the next service for my wife's car (auto OB) I'm asking if they do the flush. Thanks for the info.

    Ed - When you drain your oil, stick your pinky finger into the oil pan and look at the sludge. Yuck! I'll invite you out to the house one day for a synthetic demonstration. :-) My wife's OB is noticebly quieter and smoother with synthetic. Not to mention the autocrossing and rallying done on Central NJ highways. I also had a conversation with the shop foreman at Flemington regarding synthetics. He's seen an engine that used Mobil1 and said it was spotless. Although my Dad has ~170,000 miles on his pick-up and uses Castrol GTX and tows and hasn't had any engine problems.

    Dennis
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Dennis: have you tried the pinky finger test since you've switched to synthetic? I'm curious to see if you noticed a difference, given the contaminants would still be there.

    Also, is the oil pan easy to remove? I wonder because how else to get rid of the old sludge in the first place.

    -juice
  • evilizardevilizard Member Posts: 195
    No the oil pan is not easy to remove. Not only is there the matter of the screws but it is also glued on by some type of sealent. After my Tranny pan experience I declined to go for that one.

    If your worried about sludge you can always buy some of that oil cleanout chemical. Its basically a specialized solvent that attacks oil. I'd imagine a Quart of two of that dumped through your system followed by some fresh oil would clean things up fairly well.

    If your are really into it you could seal up the drain plug, pump some of that stuff in there and let it sit, then drain it. Pump some more in, drain it etc
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Yeah, but then the problem is making sure all the solvent gets out.

    I just check the oil pan for level, adjust, and make sure the engine is hot before I start.

    -juice
  • evilizardevilizard Member Posts: 195
    I wouldn't worry too much about the solvents. They are voletile organic compounds just like gasoline. Whatever is left will quickly burn off once the car is started. I'm sure their designed with this in mind.

    Also their volume (maybe 1/4 cup after draining) compared to the 5Q of fresh oil is not
    significant.

    If your really worried go get some really cheap Dino oil to flush your system with.
  • miksmimiksmi Member Posts: 1,246
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    juice - I'm using synthetic only in my wife's OB since I probably won't keep my car longer than another year or so (need..more..power).

    I haven't tried the pinky test in there but I would guess that after a couple of changes, the synthetic should be getting rid of the sludge.

    Where's Colin? He recently switched to synthetic a while ago and is selling his Cobb Cams soon. Colin, let us know how the oil looks.

    Dennis
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    That's what I was thinking - I'd flush with dino oil afterwards.

    Wow, Mike double-posting? I must be in the Twilight Zone.

    Costco has Techron cheap. They sell them in two packs. You have two cars. :-)

    -juice
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.