Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options
I spotted an (insert obscure car name here) classic car today! (Archived)
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Oh, and Mr. Speedshift, there is another Town Hall room for you. It is called "I Don't Like SUV's, Why do you?" There are tons of people THERE who would love to here your sentiments.
"I don't like SUVs, why do you?" Nov 1, 2002 11:46am
Steve, Host
Other obscure cars I've seen in the past two weeks: Plymouth Caravelle from the 80s, Datsun B210, Datsun 200SX, Fiat Strada, and a 1970s Toyota Crown coupe that was really sharp. One car I haven't seen in a long while but wish I could have today would be a Mazda Cosmo coupe from the 1970s.
But the most obscure car I saw yesterday (since it officially does not exist in the US) was a brand new Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII driving on Michigan MFR plates. Looks like Subaru will have to import their STi version of the WRX to keep pace with that Lancer.
Unlike the A8, though, this adaptive headlight system was 100% mechanical...
How reliable were those hydraulic systems? I take it there were no Renault engineers on the design team...
But may God have mercy on your soul if you let some uninformed mechanic monkey with these systems!
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
The Citroen system, IIRC, makes the headlights 'swivel' in the direction of a turn while driving.
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
Duesenberg? Cord? I think they called them Pilot Rays (auxiliaries mounted below main headlamps).
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
It did have Citromatic (automatic clutch, shift-by-wire manual box), and that was an unexpected nightmare. The way it worked was pretty simple, in principle. The shift lever, which stuck up out of the dash, worked valves in the hydraulic system to pressurize/depressurize cylinders attached to the transmission case. When pressurized, a cylinder pushed on a shift fork. One fork for 1 & 2, another for 3 & 4, and third for reverse. So far so clear?
Well, on the 1=>2 shift, the cylinder for 2 pushed the fork out of 1, through neutral, and into 2. On the 2=>1, things went the other way. Similarly for 3 and 4.
Reverse was different. The R cylinder pushed the fork against a spring that butted on a pad, part of the gearbox casing. When R was depressurized, the spring pushed the fork back to its disengaged position. The pad stuck out from the side of the gearbox casing. So far so clear?
Well, one day after I'd put the car in reverse the pad that the 'get out of reverse' spring butted on broke off. And there I was, stuck as could be.
Cheers,
Dan
-Andrew L
PF Flyer
Host
Pickups & News & Views Message Boards
Another obscure car I saw a few months back was a VW EuroVan. Yep, they still make 'em. And I was lucky enough to see 3 of them that day... there must have been a VW owners convention, or something. When was the last time you saw one of them, either?
I have a friend whose parents are die-hard Eurovan owners. They had a 1993 model, and traded that for a 2001. Eurovans seem kind of overpriced to me, but I guess there isn't much else like them out there.
-Andrew L
Also, during my WE in Belgium, I saw a Chrysler 300M, a Cadillac Seville, a Maserati Spyder and a... Trabant.
Finally, yesterday on the highway I saw a GMC Sierra and Mitsubishi L200.
Is it a 73 or 74?
Ouch! What fun would that be? Driving around in bad weather, that is. Those early 2nd gen F bodies are some of the worst as far as body integrity go.
I stopped to see if I could help, but the guy (not the owner) had already called for a tow truck. The car WAS absolutely beautiful.
Steve, Host
Wheelbase had to be increased, and the car, while not much slower than the 6 cylinder cars, handled badly in comparison. Understeer was ferocious. They aren't nearly as much fun to drive as the earlier E-Types, which are lighter and much more tossable with the 6 cylinder engine. But the V-12 was fitted for emissions reasons. The 6 cylinder just didn't have the power to keep up in the 1970s.
So shocking as it may have looked to you, there is a logic in having an automatic Series III. It fits the V-12, which is a big, heavy, very relaxed high torque engine.
Anyway, the Jag was a big red coupe with a black (perhaps removable) hardtop.
If it's a '69 Coupe 2+2 automatic it is a very unloved E-Type that you can buy much cheaper than any other E-Type, not only because of the auto trans, but because it is decidely homely in comparison to the other Es.
.