Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
I spotted an (insert obscure car name here) classic car today! (Archived)
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
No idea of mileage or condition.
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
I think those 126 coupes were very pretty cars. Almost a little too much so...the stereotypical driver of one in my head is some fur-wearing 80s trophy wife...but still a nice looking car, especially for its size. The 126 was a great platform, especially given the period in which it was made - the dark ages. It must have seemed like a car from the future back then. And yep, that window would go all the way down.
380SEC would be 82-85...not the strongest engine. Even pristine it really shouldn't do more than 10K or so, and you can easily go half that and less for a worn car. It's a lot of machinery for the money...but a lot of potential repairs for the money. With MB, it is certainly the best idea to buy the best you can find.
I recall the cheating drunken yuppie woman in 'Creepshow II' has a 126 SEL that she hits the hitchhiker with...I haven't seen that in years..
Saw a new Lotus Elise. It was a terrible orange color and had the top on. Looks funny with the top on, I think.
Saw a G500 on the way in this morning.
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
ca. late 70s/early 80s vintage, crapped out, missing wheel covers, sitting forlornly in a gas station.
Then I saw a Citroen DS-21! It had shiny black paint, looked straight and was going down the interstate at 65 or 70 with just a little bit of smoke coming out the tailpipe. I don't see those more than once every five years but they are something to see.
Oh, and I saw a pretty nice Eagle Vision TSi, remember them?
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
A great car for its time, I believe. Shocking styling, performance, etc, for 1993.
The whole Eagle division was just a brand to give the Jeep dealers a way to sell Chrysler cars..
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
I thought they sort of made a mistake getting away from AWD wagons - that was their niche back when they were part of AMC....they could have been like an American version of Subaru if they stayed with the AWD niche... would have fit better with Jeep, too.
It's hard to believe today just how revolutionary these cars were when they first hit the streets in 1993. They really did breathe some new life into the domestic car market, and suddenly made bigger cars exciting again. When you figure that they got 214 hp out of a 3.5 V-6, and put it in a mass-produced mainstream sedan, that was nothing short of astounding for back then! Just for comparison, The Taurus was only putting out 140 hp from the 3.0 AND the 3.8 V-6. You could get the SHO, but those were very limited-production. And the typical non-supercharged GM 3.8 was only doing around 170 hp. There was the 3.4 DOHC that was pretty potent, but also troublesome. Unfortunately, the reliability just wasn't there with the earlier models, which had transmission failures galore, air conditioning problems, and the 3.5's tended to have water pumps that failed early. From around '93-95 they also used plastic front fenders that would warp and distort. GM used plastic front fenders in the C- and H-bodies around that timeframe too, but I think they were much more successful at it. I think electrical problems and issues with sensors, valves, etc...all that fun stuff that makes the car run like crap and stall out, and is hard to track down, were also very common.
If the quality had been there, Chrysler would have really had a winner on their hands with the first-gen LH cars. They improved them considerably, quality-wise, for the 1998 redesign, and for a few years they seemed like they'd be another winner, but then everybody else improved, too. New Impala and more mainstream looking Taurus for 2000, and as the Camry, Altima, and Accord redesigned and grew larger, they were suddenly competing almost directly with the LH cars instead of with the smaller "cloud cars", as they used to.
My real estate agent, the one that sold me my condo in 1994, had an LHS. It already had a rubber seal or two coming off in the rear door area...and it was a brand-new car!! At least my Intrepid waited until it was about a year and a half old before a door seal shrunk up! :P
Before I bought my Saturn, I really thought about getting a 300M with the 250HP V6. Unfortunately, it was just outside of my price range, but I really liked the looks of the 300M.
I'm pretty sure there was a New Yorker the first couple of years of the LH..
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
So for 1994, a more high-spec version of the LH came out. It rode the same 113" wheelbase as the Vision/Intrepid/Concorde, but was a few inches longer: around 207", versus around 203 for the others. Inside it had a bigger back seat and a larger trunk. It's styling was more formal, with a more upright C-pillar vertical taillights, and a more upright grille, but still, it didn't come off as stodgy. At this point, the execs at Chrysler probably didn't know if a sporty car this size would sell, so they basically offered it in two flavors: sporty LHS and more mundane New Yorker. the 5th Avenue and Imperial names were retired. Both the LHS and NYer had the same 3.5 V-6, but the NYer had a bench seat, chrome grille, column shift, and was probably sprung more softly. The LHS had buckets, console, stiffer suspension, and, IIRC the grille was either grayed out or body color. Well, the LHS sold well, but the NYer didn't, so it was pulled after 1996, while the LHS was sold through 1997, seeing the first-gen LH to the end.
In 1998, when the LH cars were redesigned, initially they only offered the Intrepid and Concorde. I think they were in the process of converting the 3.5 to an aluminum block, but it wasn't ready yet, so they had to delay the launch of the replacement LHS, and the 300M to 1999. IIRC, the 300M was originally supposed to have been the Eagle Vision replacement, but since Eagle was being phased out, they decided to make it a Chrysler.
This time around, the 300M sold very well, but the LHS wasn't a strong seller. The LHS was discontinued in name after 2001. However, for 2002, Chrysler put the LHS fascia on all the Concordes, and what had been the LHS was now called the Concorde Limited.
Mid 70's Eldo convertible for sale. This one was sitting in his yard last fall too.
Saw two gen 1 Firebirds last weds. on the road.
I wonder if a '75 LeSabre would have the same problem? Or maybe, since it's a smaller car (not by much, though), it might not be as bad...less unbraced expanse of hood, maybe?
(Maybe DaveyM or Andre can tell us the difference
We forget how handy the a/c is when it comes to conditions like that. I didn't even have to adjust the ACC on my car :P .
Nice 'Vette though, I always enjoy seeing a C1.
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
I think the sight of that car, in the condition that it was in, has disturbed me so much that I may have to spend a year or two talking to my friendly neighborhood shrink in an attempt to come to terms with the single question that has been on my mind ever since. I mean, "Why bother?" :confuse:
Best Regards,
Shipo
Today I parked next to a Northstar Allante..pearl white as most seem to be.
http://www.kcclassicauto.com/large/76plL.html
I wonder what the rear spoiler came off of? The guy that sold me my LeMans said he thinks it's off of an early 90's Firebird. Love the groovy 2-tone interior!
Have to admit that I was tempted to look at one that was for sale.
Best Regards,
Shipo
Regarding this car: Hmmm, $12,500? What is that, twice what it cost brand new? Geez! And judging by the blue smoke coming from the left exhaust pipe, its "Fresh Ground Up Restoration" didn't even include a rebuilt motor.
Best Regards,
Shipo
-Jason
For some reason, I hated that car when I was a kid. Although I always loved the '76-77 style with the quad headlights. I'd imagine it looked pretty sharp in black!
I guess the seller of that '76 is jacking the price because it's a GT model. I think all the GT was, though, is a graphics package with bucket seats, applied to the Sport Coupe. The Sport Coupe gave you the set of dummy lights on the trunklid, and came with louvered rear quarter windows standard, although buyers could spec the little opera window if they wanted. All the "good" stuff though, like a bigger engine and such, was still optional. I think I read somewhere that a handful of these GT's had a 455-4bbl and a 4-speed stick shift. Now that might be worth something. And I think the '73-75 Grand Am, and the 1977 1/2 Can Am are minor collectibles. But I dunno if any of them are worth $12.5K!
This GT is a bit basic, too. Crank windows, no a/c, manual seat adjust. It'd be really cool if it had T-tops!
Parked, forever I imagine, a Ford Courier. I had forgotten they existed, I can't imagine when I last saw (noticed) one. Or a Chevy LUV (how 70's a name is that).
But he was absolutely mum on the magazine picking the Dodge/Plymouth Neon the next year (early '95s that came out in spring 1994). In hindsight, I think that's the single worst choice they made. (Kind of like Motor Trend picking the Chevy Vega in '71!)
Also, a bone stock red '65 Ford Falcon 2-door, in good condition, apparently unrestored.
I remember when the Neon came out, and I have to admit, I actually liked 'em. They were the first economy car that could actually move out of its own way with some authority, even with the base engine, and they were roomy little suckers, too. Even to this day, I still have some degree of respect for the Neon, because it's one of the few small cars that I can really fit comfortably in, both front and rear. Doesn't mean I'm gonna rush out and buy one, though! :P
I think the single biggest problem with the Car of the Year award is that they don't look for reliability. But then, how can they? The award is limited to cars that are brand-new, and most cars aren't going to start showing problems until they're at least a few years old. They also tend to pick cars that they think are significant, forward-thinking, and unique from the rest of the masses. Unfortunately, those are the cars that usually get foisted on the public without enough testing for reliability.
Have you noticed on those early Neons how badly their plastic headlight lenses get scratched and yellowed? I bet you can't see much at night with those. Chrysler should have just used glass sealed beams if they were going to be so cheap!
I'm guessing that the deterioration is also gradual enough that most driver's don't notice. For example, I haven't noticed any deterioration in my headlights...yet!