Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

I spotted an (insert obscure car name here) classic car today! (Archived)

18658668688708711306

Comments

  • benjaminhbenjaminh Member Posts: 6,547
    The Pontiac "Bulgemobile" for 58....










    2018 Acura TLX 2.4 Tech 4WS (mine), 2024 Subaru Outback (wife's), 2018 Honda CR-V EX (offspring)
  • berriberri Member Posts: 10,165
    Personally, I always preferred the looks of the 58 Bonneville over the Impala and the mid 50's Pontiac Safari wagon over the Nomad. Might be a longer wheelbase and nicer interior to me.
  • explorerx4explorerx4 Member Posts: 20,723
    The infamous x-frame.
    2024 Ford F-150 STX, 2023 Ford Explorer ST, 91 Mustang GT vert
  • texasestexases Member Posts: 11,107
    But...but...it's "a more efficient, stronger foundation"...what could be wrong with that??
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    You could option those with FI and air suspension, I believe. GM had a wild side.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    berri said:

    Personally, I always preferred the looks of the 58 Bonneville over the Impala and the mid 50's Pontiac Safari wagon over the Nomad. Might be a longer wheelbase and nicer interior to me.

    I always thought the '55-57 and '58 Pontiacs had nicer proportions than same year Chevies...and I think you're right. It's the longer wheelbase that does it. IIRC, Pontiacs were on a 122" wb for the cheaper models and 124" for the nicer ones, while Chevies were 115" for '55-57 and 117.5" for 1958. So, you had a longer car overall, but the passenger cabins were the same size. The result was a car that looked sleeker, lower, and less stubby.

    Where Pontiac lost it though, in my opinion, was the details. I never liked the front-end treatment on the '55-56, where it looks like the tops of the front fenders are peeled back, and the headlights a little too jutting. The '57 is a lot more chromey and heavy-handed in some respects, I guess, but for me, the style works, and I find it appealing. The only thing I don't like about the '58 is, again, the headlights. They seem too far forward in relation to the grille, and a bit bulging and swollen.

    As for the X-frame, it was my understanding that with X-frame cars, they actually did beef up the body structure, to account for the lack of side rails. Interestingly, Pontiac/Chevy and Cadillac used an X-frame for '58, but Olds never used it. I don't think Buick did for '58, either. And, Pontiac went to a perimeter frame starting in '61, so maybe their designers knew something? Oddly, Buick held onto the X-frame, in the Riviera, through 1970!

    I know that '59 Impala versus '09 Malibu head on collision that NHTSA did a few years back went down in infamy, but I have a feeling that a Pontiac, Buick, or Cadillac that was X-framed would have fared better. A 4-door '59 Impala V-8 had a base weight of 3620 lb, while a 4-door '59 Catalina (standard V-8) had a base weight of 3955 lb. The Catalina was bigger, but not *that* much bigger. And while a 389 V-8 sounds huge compared to a 283, the Chevy unit was always considered to be quite heavy for its size. It always got credit for having low reciprocating mass, but historians conveniently forget that, for overall weight, it was actually a bit of a porker. I'd imagine that a '59 Catalina had some beefing up, compared to a '59 Impala.
  • benjaminhbenjaminh Member Posts: 6,547
    1959....








    2018 Acura TLX 2.4 Tech 4WS (mine), 2024 Subaru Outback (wife's), 2018 Honda CR-V EX (offspring)
  • benjaminhbenjaminh Member Posts: 6,547
    1960....








    2018 Acura TLX 2.4 Tech 4WS (mine), 2024 Subaru Outback (wife's), 2018 Honda CR-V EX (offspring)
  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,280
    Ah, those exaggerated long, low and wide illustrations by Art 'Fitz' Fitzpatrick and Van Kaufman are a sight to behold.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • texasestexases Member Posts: 11,107
    Kind of like when the 'picture format' settings are wrong on the HDTV...
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    Or maybe they are close to scale, and the people are all about 4'10".

    The wide Pontiac theme works with the flat top/vista roof anyway.
  • berriberri Member Posts: 10,165
    IIRC 1959 was Pontiac's introduction of the "wide track" and it sold.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Look at those tail lights!


  • berriberri Member Posts: 10,165
    ...afterburners and all
  • texasestexases Member Posts: 11,107
    edited July 2018
    Anyone here ever see a "Sportable Transistor Radio" from a Pontiac of that era?
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    I had to go out and run an errand today, and spotted this...


    At a traffic light, I was able to get ahead of it, and get it in the mirror...

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    edited July 2018
    1986-1991, I can't tell much else. Assuming a LWB, it is either 300SEL, 300SDL, 350SDL, 420SEL, or 560SEL.

    And a MB beside you too, looks like a W212 E-class.
  • benjaminhbenjaminh Member Posts: 6,547
    On the outside seemed to me just like a beautifully restored Studebaker....






    2018 Acura TLX 2.4 Tech 4WS (mine), 2024 Subaru Outback (wife's), 2018 Honda CR-V EX (offspring)
  • benjaminhbenjaminh Member Posts: 6,547
    edited July 2018
    1961....Genuine leather and 300 hp.








    2018 Acura TLX 2.4 Tech 4WS (mine), 2024 Subaru Outback (wife's), 2018 Honda CR-V EX (offspring)
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    Wow, that Stude restomod. I wonder what lurks inside, GM or Chrysler?

    I've always liked the 61-62 GM A-pillar.
  • omarmanomarman Member Posts: 2,702
    edited July 2018
    6 round tail lights look better on the '62 Impala but Pontiac got there a year sooner!

    Chevy was working on a 6 nipple theme in '61.
    A time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing.
  • berriberri Member Posts: 10,165
    1961 has always been one of my favorite years for Pontiac
  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,280
    berri said:

    1961 has always been one of my favorite years for Pontiac

    Likewise. The triple taillights were very well done, with the only downside being the dual ones on lesser models automatically made them look cheap. When I was a kid we had a '62 Laurentian (Canadian equivalent to a Catalina trim I believe) that seemed to be a good car even though it was based on a Chevy and had a Chevy inline 6.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    fintail said:

    1986-1991, I can't tell much else. Assuming a LWB, it is either 300SEL, 300SDL, 350SDL, 420SEL, or 560SEL.

    And a MB beside you too, looks like a W212 E-class.

    I seem to remember a "420..." on the back. I still have the original on my phone, which is probably at a higher resolution, and was able to zoom in and at least make out that the number starts with a 4, although the rest is obscured.

    It seemed like it was in decent shape, for the age. It wasn't ultra-shiny and didn't "pop" like a brand new one would have, but it was also a bit dirty/dusty. With the 2019's already in some showrooms, it could be a 33 model year old car at this point. And heck, didn't that design first come out in 1979? Yet, it doesn't look "old".

    For perspective, my '57 DeSoto was 34 model years old, as the '91's were just coming out...and it looked like an old car at the time..not just "old", but more like "from a galaxy far, far away". Actually, even the 1980 Malibu my Mom gave me when I started driving, in early 1987, seemed "old" at the time. But, by that time the Taurus was out and it pretty much made everything seem old. In some ways, even the 1982 Celebrity made my Mom's Malibu feel old...at least, at the time. Now that time has gone by, and cars have advanced well beyond those, they don't seem so far apart, anymore.

    It's interesting how perspective can change, over time. I used to work with a guy, who's since retired, who asked me which of my two cars was older...my LeMans or my New Yorker. I told him the LeMans was a '76 and the New Yorker a '79, and he thought that was odd...to him, the New Yorker looked older! But, back in 1979, just about any new car on the market would have made a 1976 LeMans seem "old". At least, that's how they seemed at the time. My Mom had a '75, and as soon as stuff like the '77 GM big cars started becoming common occurences on the streets, it suddenly seemed outdated. And I can still remember when Mom bought the '80 Malibu...at the time, it made the LeMans seem downright ancient!.

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    edited July 2018
    Then definitely a 420SEL - we only got one W126 leading with a "4", 1986-91. It was the V8 for those who didn't want to pony up for a 560SEL (or maybe got a laugh out of "420", I've heard plenty of jokes). You're right, the design started production in 1979, with a light update for the 1986 model year. First sold in NA for the 1981 model year, but grey market imports (back when that was a thing) started immediately. The car was a hit, and even at high prices (in 1981, a 300SD was in the low 30s, and a 380SEL around 45K) they had no problem selling. The original design was so ahead of its time when new, it was able to remain in production for well over a decade, and inspired the original Lexus LS.

    When I was a bit younger, I noticed that cars are aging differently as time moves on. I remember in 1996, I took a road trip in my uncle's reasonably nice 1986 Taurus. I remember thinking this is a 10 year old car, but it doesn't look or feel that old. I thought to myself that had I taken a similar trip in 1986, in a 1976 car like a Granada, it would have felt like a much older car. Design evolution is much more gradual since the late 80s, and maybe the last big shocks were the downsized angular cars of the late 70s, and the aero of the 80s. I have to imagine my mom's big T-Bird really felt like a bit of a dinosaur by 1985, when it suffered some kind of malady, and was retired. Even when I was a little kid, I could tell my dad's Horizon was more modern. Today, 10 year old cars generally don't look old to me at all, but part of it might be that I am getting older, too B)


    andre1969 said:



    It's interesting how perspective can change, over time. I used to work with a guy, who's since retired, who asked me which of my two cars was older...my LeMans or my New Yorker. I told him the LeMans was a '76 and the New Yorker a '79, and he thought that was odd...to him, the New Yorker looked older! But, back in 1979, just about any new car on the market would have made a 1976 LeMans seem "old". At least, that's how they seemed at the time. My Mom had a '75, and as soon as stuff like the '77 GM big cars started becoming common occurences on the streets, it suddenly seemed outdated. And I can still remember when Mom bought the '80 Malibu...at the time, it made the LeMans seem downright ancient!.

  • berriberri Member Posts: 10,165
    The 57 Mopars made everything look old, then the 59 GM's... It's consumerism in America. As for Taurus and Thunderbird, I always thought Jack Telnack was one of the best automotive designers toward the end of the 20th century.
  • benjaminhbenjaminh Member Posts: 6,547
    Not exactly a classic, but....



    2018 Acura TLX 2.4 Tech 4WS (mine), 2024 Subaru Outback (wife's), 2018 Honda CR-V EX (offspring)
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    That Caddy hearse might not be "classic", but I'd drive it with pride! What was it the Penguin once said on one of the Batman movies? "You flush it, I flaunt it!" Or something to that tune. Oh, while out and about today, I spotted a few more "gems".

    First, this bustleback Seville was residing in the driveway at a place one of my friends is renting a room at...


    I don't know the year or the engine, and neither does my friend. But, as soon as I showed an interest, he perked up and was like "want me to find out!?" I told him no...just curious about the car, I definitely DON'T want to buy it! It's kind of sad to see this car, which probably had a purchase price that would inflation-adust to a cool $60K or more today, just sitting there, rotting away, becoming a driveway ornament. But, truth be told, same thing is happening to the house. This model is called the "Country Clubber", and once upon a time, was the most prestigious home offered in Bel Air at Bowie, Md, back in the early 60's. The house, alas, is aging like the car. :'(

    Oh, and speaking of houses, I'm in the process of buying another one. I went through a walk-through today, with the seller, with her asking if there was anything on the property I'd have an interest in, so she didn't have to haul it away. Well, this was one of her lawn ornaments...


    It's a 1970 Cougar, that was a parts car for a 1969 they had. And, don't worry...it's already been spoken for, and I have no interest in it! Plus, I need the space for my own non-running cars! :p Still, it was kind of a cool old relic.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    berri said:

    The 57 Mopars made everything look old, then the 59 GM's... It's consumerism in America. As for Taurus and Thunderbird, I always thought Jack Telnack was one of the best automotive designers toward the end of the 20th century.

    Yeah, I think just the act of moving the headlights down into the grille (Chevy, Olds, Pontiac especially, although Cadillac still had some grille underneath, and Buick went off on their own tangent with the headlights) made the cars look much more modern.

    I wonder if the stylists at Mopar realized that was going to be the way of the future? They seemed to move them down a bit with Chrysler and DeSoto, although they also made the grilles taller, and the hoods didn't come down as far, so that made them a bit more flat-faced. And Imperial moved them pretty much all the way down, although it left a bit of a gap above.

    Oddly, Ford seemed to embrace that trend with the Edsel in '59, but not the Ford and Mercury. Ironic the the brand doomed to failure would be the trendsetter. Mcrcury and Ford sure caught up for '60, though. And the '61 Lincoln probably looked downright futuristic when it was new.

  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    fintail said:

    Today, 10 year old cars generally don't look old to me at all, but part of it might be that I am getting older, too B)

    Y'know, that brings up another good point. While you and I might not think of some of these cars as being "old", I wonder if they feel old to the younger set? My real estate agent drives a 2011 Regal, and they looked like that up until what? 2017, even early '18 maybe? Parked behind my Dad's 2003 Regal, I just didn't see a massive amount of evolution. The main thing was that the beltlines are higher, and there's less glass area, but to me, those are retrograde design features, not "modern" ones. The roof pillars were also a bit thicker, and some of the styling features just seemed a bit disproportionate...too large of a grille, headlights, etc, making it look like a smaller car than it was...stuff like that.

    But, I wonder if an 18 year old, for example, would pick up on the differences, see my Dad's '03 Regal, and think it's "ancient"? One thing that might tip them off is all tech that's common these days. Nav systems, touch screens, the sophiticated sound systems, and so on. Heck, my old man's Regal still has a tape player! Oddly, no CD. I figured they would've been pretty much standard by 2003, but apparently not. My '00 Park Ave had a tape player and CD, but it was a high-end car in those days. My '00 Intrepid just had a tape player standard, but I had the dealer throw in a 12 disc CD changer, with remote control...seemed pretty futuristic, back in November 1999...

  • omarmanomarman Member Posts: 2,702
    Oh, and speaking of houses, I'm in the process of buying another one. I went through a walk-through today, with the seller, with her asking if there was anything on the property I'd have an interest in, so she didn't have to haul it away. Well, this was one of her lawn ornaments...

    Hmm...did she have anything else from the 70s dressing up the place? :)

    A time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    Actually, the rest of the house is pretty modern. It was originally built in 1968, by her father. But then he passed away and she inherited it in 2007, and pretty much leveled it and rebuilt it. The basement is still c1968, but the first and second levels are all new, as of 2008. Heck, in some ways it's almost too blue for my blood...I'm not used to having anything this nice. I'm probably gonna feel like the Clampetts did when they first moved to Beverly Hills. "Jed, them stairs is moving!! We must be having one of them Californy Earthquakes!!"
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    As for that '75-76 Caddy hearse above, that looks like a pretty mean thing to do to it, especially considering it was a relatively new car at the time. Running through the fruit crates didn't do much, but I'm sure barreling into that parking lot like that and the bounce couldn't have been good for it. They probably had to do multiple takes, too.

    I wonder though, if it might have been a situation where the studio bought the hearse, and kept it on hand and used it for a variety of roles and tv shows, whenever a script called for one? I know movie studios, even with big budget movies, will cut corners to save costs whenever they can.

    For instance, in the 1974 movie "Earthquake", most of the cars that get smashed up were older, like 5-6 years old, if not more. But, I remember them having a '74 Caprice that had damage...and that would have been a brand-new car at the time, so it seemed a bit out of place, seeing that one. But, according to the IMCDB, there was a Six Million Dollar Man episode around the same time that used a '74 Caprice, same color, and it got banged up pretty good. So, they might have still had that on hand, and used it as a prop.
  • sdasda Member Posts: 7,579
    andre1969 said:

    Actually, the rest of the house is pretty modern. It was originally built in 1968, by her father. But then he passed away and she inherited it in 2007, and pretty much leveled it and rebuilt it. The basement is still c1968, but the first and second levels are all new, as of 2008. Heck, in some ways it's almost too blue for my blood...I'm not used to having anything this nice. I'm probably gonna feel like the Clampetts did when they first moved to Beverly Hills. "Jed, them stairs is moving!! We must be having one of them Californy Earthquakes!!"

    Sounds exciting, hope all goes well. Are you keeping your current home with the garage for your many cars?

    2021 VW Arteon SEL 4-motion, 2018 VW Passat SE w/tech, 2016 Audi Q5 Premium Plus w/tech

  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    edited July 2018
    sda said:

    Thanks! If everything goes as planned, settlement is September 7. The only downside to the new house is that there is no garage, although it does have a one-car carport. Actually, it's a bit better than a carport. There's a workshop where they keep the lawnmower and tools and such, and they put a building on the side of it, that's closed off on three sides. It currently has a c1999 Mustang in there, but it would be enough to at least store one of my cars, just under a cover to keep the dust, mist, and rain, if it blows the wrong way, off of it. I'm going to have to have a garage built, which will take some time.

    So, I'll keep the current place for a bit, at least...at least until I can get a new garage built, plus, start going through stuff, to downsize. It's actually a bigger house than what I have. However, my uncle will probably end up coming to live with me. He's living in my deceased Grandmother's house, and we have a lot of crap to go trhough in that house, as well. Her house has been in the family since 1950, and mine has been in the family since 1916. The property has actually been in the family since before the Civil War (sometimes to be a jerk I'll call it "The War of Northern Aggression"...but people tend to get more offended by that, as time goes by), but the current structure just dates back to 1916. Still, throw in a bit of Depression-era hoarding mentality, that I inherited a bit of from my grandparents, and it adds up to an awful lot of stuff!

    One thing that's a bit sad, though, is that when I do finally sell, there's a good chance my house and garage will simply be torn down, and the property subdivided. It's 4.28 acres, and can be subdivided, so there's a lot of value in that. The house is old, needs work, and is really close to the road. When we do finally pull up our roots and sell, the old saying "you can never go home again" will really ring true.

    Our neighbors went through a similar thing when they sold, back in 2000. Property had been in the family since probably the 1920's. The husband was into classic cars, and was probably a big factor on getting me into them. He helped me with some stuff on my '57 DeSoto, and helped me repaint my '69 and '68 Darts. I remember the wife saying she would feel "wealthy" when she finally had a paved driveway and a red Cadillac. Well, they had some land down in Southern Maryland and, in the late 90's had a house built on it. WITH a paved driveway. And, she got her red Cadillac...a 2000-2005 generation...I still call it "DeVille", but by then it might have been "DTS"?

    Anyway, once they ended up selling the place up here, the husband said he never wanted to see the area again. I guess it changed so much over his life, that it burned him. In a lot of respects, this area has taken a turn for the worse...increased crime, low-income housing, crowding, traffic, and so on. The icing on the cake was probably in 1995, when a 17 year old girl named Julie Ferguson was murdered, and her body was dumped about 500 feet up the road from my house. And that murder, as far as I know, was never solved.

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I just saw another Cadillac hearse today! It's a rather rare '64, but these things aren't worth much in this kind of condition. You can buy really decent ones ready to roll for $10K.


  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    I suspect that's true. I recall a younger co-worker called my 2002 MB an "old school" car - and that was when the car was only 10 years old (but a 1996 style design). I think to a certain point, old is in the eye of the beholder. Although the slow progression of modern design might slow it a bit, too. Not much going on lately other than higher beltlines, aggressive faces/gaping maw grilles, and faux floating C-pillars. Your idea of tech being a determinant is probably a factor, too. A car without bluetooth, no aux input, no USB, etc? Old. A tape player will eventually be quaint like an 8 track. New generation MBs don't even have a CD player anymore.

    I remember I rented a Regal back in 2011, pretty nice car, and I remember I got a compliment on it from a random stranger.
    andre1969 said:



    Y'know, that brings up another good point. While you and I might not think of some of these cars as being "old", I wonder if they feel old to the younger set? My real estate agent drives a 2011 Regal, and they looked like that up until what? 2017, even early '18 maybe? Parked behind my Dad's 2003 Regal, I just didn't see a massive amount of evolution. The main thing was that the beltlines are higher, and there's less glass area, but to me, those are retrograde design features, not "modern" ones. The roof pillars were also a bit thicker, and some of the styling features just seemed a bit disproportionate...too large of a grille, headlights, etc, making it look like a smaller car than it was...stuff like that.

    But, I wonder if an 18 year old, for example, would pick up on the differences, see my Dad's '03 Regal, and think it's "ancient"? One thing that might tip them off is all tech that's common these days. Nav systems, touch screens, the sophiticated sound systems, and so on. Heck, my old man's Regal still has a tape player! Oddly, no CD. I figured they would've been pretty much standard by 2003, but apparently not. My '00 Park Ave had a tape player and CD, but it was a high-end car in those days. My '00 Intrepid just had a tape player standard, but I had the dealer throw in a 12 disc CD changer, with remote control...seemed pretty futuristic, back in November 1999...

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    I think badge placement makes it an 84-85, which seems to be the years where one has a better chance of finding pimptastic accessories. Maybe not cool to admit I have studied bustlebacks enough to notice emblem placement B)

    Good luck with the house. I can kind of live vicariously through people living in less insane markets, but then again, maybe not having access to land and a large garage is a good thing, last thing I need is my own junkyard.
    andre1969 said:


    First, this bustleback Seville was residing in the driveway at a place one of my friends is renting a room at...

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    While waiting for my keys to be found yesterday, I walked around the shop, which takes in specialty cars along with MBs. Several Aston-Martins, not surprising as they have a franchise. Saw a couple 2 door G wagens, one with noticeable rust of course, a trio of 230-250-280SLs, a W115 diesel, R129 SL600 with pano, XJ6C driving and making a noise like a dragging brake, and a couple of 55-57 T-Birds.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    I always found it curious that Caddy used 59-60 windshields on limos and service cars until 64.

    XJ6 too, you gotta rescue that one.


    I just saw another Cadillac hearse today! It's a rather rare '64, but these things aren't worth much in this kind of condition. You can buy really decent ones ready to roll for $10K.



  • explorerx4explorerx4 Member Posts: 20,723
    It looks to me like something falls off the red car in that clip. I wish it as a second longer.
    2024 Ford F-150 STX, 2023 Ford Explorer ST, 91 Mustang GT vert
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023

    It looks to me like something falls off the red car in that clip. I wish it as a second longer.

    Watching that clip again, it looks like the passenger side door started to open, and then closed, as the Torino bounced.
  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,280
    fintail said:


    I remember I rented a Regal back in 2011, pretty nice car, and I remember I got a compliment on it from a random stranger.

    When I had my 2011 Regal its tech was limited to built-in Bluetooth for phone calls, nothing else (no music streaming). I think you could get more tech if you bought the top-line model but I didn't have that. That car was new around the time in-car tech was just starting to take off so there was lots of stuff changing then.

    I always thought the styling of the Regal then was pretty good, as it had a hunkered-down look to it and a good overall stance and design. I remember not long after I got it I was leaving the office at lunch one day when a group of ladies that worked there were coming back in, and one of them commented on it by saying to me "I like your car, it looks like it just wants to put its arms around you and give you a hug", which I took as a compliment coming from her (she was quite attractive and fun).

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • berriberri Member Posts: 10,165
    Good luck with the real estate Andre and hopefully it doesn't get too messed up and stressed out closing on it. I grew up in an unincorporated for a long time area in the western suburbs of Chicago. The lots were a little bigger and the houses relatively small, with many vacant lots. It became a city in the mid 60's and things changed. Nowadays, if I'm in that area I'll occasionally drive around. Many good memories, but the place has changed a lot. There are no more vacant lots or woods, and teardowns replaced with big homes are all over. Always feel mixed emotions going through there and recalling my youth versus today's reality.

    As for the 57 Mopars, Virgil Exner led the design on everything from 1954 into 1962, when he took the fall for screwed up mahogany row decisions. He was involved with the early postwar Studebakers too, which are always credited to Raymond Loewy. Very creative, but I think also restless designer.
  • sdasda Member Posts: 7,579
    andre1969 said:

    sda said:

    Thanks! If everything goes as planned, settlement is September 7. The only downside to the new house is that there is no garage, although it does have a one-car carport. Actually, it's a bit better than a carport. There's a workshop where they keep the lawnmower and tools and such, and they put a building on the side of it, that's closed off on three sides. It currently has a c1999 Mustang in there, but it would be enough to at least store one of my cars, just under a cover to keep the dust, mist, and rain, if it blows the wrong way, off of it. I'm going to have to have a garage built, which will take some time.

    So, I'll keep the current place for a bit, at least...at least until I can get a new garage built, plus, start going through stuff, to downsize. It's actually a bigger house than what I have. However, my uncle will probably end up coming to live with me. He's living in my deceased Grandmother's house, and we have a lot of crap to go trhough in that house, as well. Her house has been in the family since 1950, and mine has been in the family since 1916. The property has actually been in the family since before the Civil War (sometimes to be a jerk I'll call it "The War of Northern Aggression"...but people tend to get more offended by that, as time goes by), but the current structure just dates back to 1916. Still, throw in a bit of Depression-era hoarding mentality, that I inherited a bit of from my grandparents, and it adds up to an awful lot of stuff!

    One thing that's a bit sad, though, is that when I do finally sell, there's a good chance my house and garage will simply be torn down, and the property subdivided. It's 4.28 acres, and can be subdivided, so there's a lot of value in that. The house is old, needs work, and is really close to the road. When we do finally pull up our roots and sell, the old saying "you can never go home again" will really ring true.

    Our neighbors went through a similar thing when they sold, back in 2000. Property had been in the family since probably the 1920's. The husband was into classic cars, and was probably a big factor on getting me into them. He helped me with some stuff on my '57 DeSoto, and helped me repaint my '69 and '68 Darts. I remember the wife saying she would feel "wealthy" when she finally had a paved driveway and a red Cadillac. Well, they had some land down in Southern Maryland and, in the late 90's had a house built on it. WITH a paved driveway. And, she got her red Cadillac...a 2000-2005 generation...I still call it "DeVille", but by then it might have been "DTS"?

    Anyway, once they ended up selling the place up here, the husband said he never wanted to see the area again. I guess it changed so much over his life, that it burned him. In a lot of respects, this area has taken a turn for the worse...increased crime, low-income housing, crowding, traffic, and so on. The icing on the cake was probably in 1995, when a 17 year old girl named Julie Ferguson was murdered, and her body was dumped about 500 feet up the road from my house. And that murder, as far as I know, was never solved.

    What a great history of your family and homes. Many properties around here have been owned by families for genrations, some back to the American Revolution and are now being pieced out for new neighborhoods, apartments, shopping centers. Traffic, congestion, over crowded schools have resulted. I hate to see the growth, but they call it progress. Some families are now $$ wealthy vs land wealthy.

    2021 VW Arteon SEL 4-motion, 2018 VW Passat SE w/tech, 2016 Audi Q5 Premium Plus w/tech

  • berriberri Member Posts: 10,165
    You know sda, we like some of the convenience of commercial development and its stores, restaurants, etc, but hate the new congestion - six of one, half dozen of the other I suppose.
  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,280
    berri said:

    Good luck with the real estate Andre and hopefully it doesn't get too messed up and stressed out closing on it. I grew up in an unincorporated for a long time area in the western suburbs of Chicago. The lots were a little bigger and the houses relatively small, with many vacant lots. It became a city in the mid 60's and things changed. Nowadays, if I'm in that area I'll occasionally drive around. Many good memories, but the place has changed a lot. There are no more vacant lots or woods, and teardowns replaced with big homes are all over. Always feel mixed emotions going through there and recalling my youth versus today's reality.

    From 1967 to 1975 we (Mom and Dad that is) owned a lovely lakefront property about 20 miles out of town. It was 7 acres, about 2 of them cleared sloping down to a cove in the lake, with the rest mostly evergreen forest. Very quiet, with a nice bungalow that dad insulated and made into a 4-season place along with a large garage building. The structures appeared to date from the late 1940s. Spent a lot of time there growing up, learned to drive a tractor, a pickup and a "woods car" my older brother acquired. The only downsides were that it was a lot of work to keep 2 places up, and it started getting expensive when extended family and business associates of dad's started showing up, often unannounced, and expected to be entertained and fed/watered. Once I (the youngest kid) went to university they decided to sell, knowing that it would likely be developed. Shortly thereafter it was.

    Last year I took a drive looking for it and it was totally changed. Not only was our old place gone but so was the little private road that gave access, along with most of the forest. In its place was a late 1970s subdivision layout filled with split-level bungalows on a couple of different streets. I suppose from a boat on the lake I could have spotted our old property but not from land. It made me really sad to see.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    edited July 2018
    As a rental spec one, this one was modestly equipped, but I think it had leather or a good imitation of it. Nice car in the premium class, you can do worse. That is a point when tech changed - bluetooth was new, and streaming maybe wasn't on the radar for some. Some factory nav systems from that era look quite primitive now, and backup cameras were just becoming a thing.

    As luck would have it, I have pics from that trip on this machine, here's my rental:



    ab348 said:


    When I had my 2011 Regal its tech was limited to built-in Bluetooth for phone calls, nothing else (no music streaming). I think you could get more tech if you bought the top-line model but I didn't have that. That car was new around the time in-car tech was just starting to take off so there was lots of stuff changing then.

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    MB Museum posts nice content on FB, today's material is a lovely lineup from ~1983. I wonder how many of these are still on the road:

    image

  • benjaminhbenjaminh Member Posts: 6,547
    Pontiac for 1962....






    2018 Acura TLX 2.4 Tech 4WS (mine), 2024 Subaru Outback (wife's), 2018 Honda CR-V EX (offspring)
This discussion has been closed.