Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Sorry, but being a chauffeur is going to get old very fast. In my opinion, this would be very high on a list of the "stupidest vehicle design quirks" of all time.
I also find that things are much quieter, and there's less fighting if the kids are crated and strapped to the roof. The added roof weight seems to help quell the resonance, as well.
I find it interesting that it takes a Japanese car company to design a vehicle to accomodate larger Americans, while the American car companies seem to be designing their cars for someone under 5'8". Maybe the American companies are planning on selling alot of cars in Japan.;>)
Overall, I am more pleased with this vehicle than any I have ever owned.
I do believe Nissan has some work to do, there are some definate issues, i'm just glad I seem to have been blessed with an Armada that was put together on a day that the bosses were watching LOL
Good luck to you,Chazman, hopefully Dodge got their stuff together on the New Durango, and you can drive in A peaceful resonance free environment.
-Tigger
ps. -had a chip in my trade in's windshield too LOL didn't tell maybe we are all going to jail
Top 10 Vehicles for Taller Drivers
Steve, Host
I'm not convinced that there ever will be a TSB for the resonance, it's been "coming any day now" for months. The sad thing is, I actually like the rig, other than the constant assault on my hearing either from the resonance or the sonar beeping, it is great. My wife is the primary driver and the resonance is not even noticeable to her so maybe I should stop the rant. 4 kids (4-9) and no problem with the door handles. We always help them in the back anyway to make sure they are strapped/buckled properly but I know the older ones can operate the handles with no problem. I too wish for a split seat but knew that going into it that there wasn't one. Shopped the Durango too but the ultimate deal maker was more spacious second row (although 3rd row is better on the Durango for headroom), one extra occupant (8 vs. 7) and the vehicle stability control which Durango did not have (there was a great post on this months ago). Please Nissan - nix the darn sound torture and I'll sing your praises to anyone who will listen.
2. Helicopter sound under hood at idle. Purge Control Valve on order.
Everything should be in by tomorrow and I should have it back. I'll verify that everything is fixed.
Have had three problems with the truck -- airbag light began blinking -- corrected by resetting fault code. No biggee but hassle nonetheless.
The day after returning from the dealer for the airbag problem, I noticed small pit type rust spots all over the rear hatch door -- cannot see any indentation in the paint but the rust colored spots cannot be removed.
Lastly, and most troubling, the windshield leaks!!
Washed it last nite and had a streak of water come down the drivers side. Very disappointing in a vehicle with less than 1k on it. Sickening!!!
Seems by previous posts that vehicle was released before it was fully "baked". I owned a 94 Maxima and had absolutely no unscheduled service calls for it in over 100k miles. I am very concerned about the previous posts with the various problems with this truck. This is a shame as I do like the vehicle overall. The styling is "polarizing" but it is nice to at least evoke some type of feeling from others.
I feel the leather seats are uncomfortable. Not enough side bolstering to keep your legs from spreading. I am 6'2' and find the seat bottom too short and the front of the seat bottom does not tilt back far enough to hold me in position. I am constantly bracing my knee under the column to keep from sliding around. Wife does not have this problem however - and she is almost 6' herself.
Purchased the vehicle to pull our new boat that weighs in at over 6k. If the Sequoia had more grunt, I think I would have purchased one over the 'mada.
I'm not meaning to be as negative as it seems, i swear. Just a little concerned... Paying cash for an SUV to have long-term flaws that will bring down resale dramatically is, (select a word).
Thanks Nitemask for the updates. Now I am hoping to take mine in after getting some direction on all of the things mine needs. Including the clicking sound when I take off at low speed. I will print the posts to show them so they know what I am talking about.
I have the Silver Plan (5 yr 75000 miles). What would be concidered "normal" wear and tear on an Armada? If these vehicles are going to have rotor issues, and the MSRP has already dropped a few thousand in the past few months, I would rather sell it now than be stuck with a paid off vehicle that I am continuously replacing rotors every 3-5K miles...
Blower motor did not take care of the drone when fan going. Supposedly Nissan has something coming out for that, but we'll see.
Rotors on order. They are replacing instead of turning them. It's not real bad yet, so I'm fine. They will call me and replace them when they get in.
Also I suspect that it is a requirement of lemon laws that you demand a certain number of attempts to fix the problem from a dealership before heading to arbitration.
Really concerned about quality control. Keep reading and test-driving and hoping to discover it's all been fixed. Doesn't look like that is about to happen.
Salesman the other night told me a customer bought an Armada that had 8000 miles. (Wonder where that one came from?) Nissan bought the vehicle, gave the customer a new one, helped him pay down new financing. They tore the used one apart to study. Said that was an example of Nissan's QC commitment. Yea, right. Sounds to me like an indication that Nissan knows it has a big problem and won't stand up and fix it.
And where are the ads for this flagship vehicle? I get the impression that Nissan plans to off load this year's inventory with minimal advertising to limit exposure to lawsuits. I wouldn't bank on an '05 since as a solution since this one looks like it needs a complete overhaul. I think it generally takes 2 years from first sketch to showroom, assuming Nissan plans to fix it.
I still remain really interested in this truck. Would jump to get one if not for the rotors, seatbelt sensors, seat motors, axles, eardrum-popping resonance, rattles, creaks, stripped seatbelt bolts, wobbling DVD units, and now, leaking windshields, rust pits, etc., etc., etc.
I've only experienced the resonance, since I don't own one -- but I've experienced it in almost every one I've driven, plus some rattles and creaks. The Armada is beginning to remind me of such fine vehicles as the first run Jeep Cherokee, Ford Taurus wagon, and the '68 Opel Cadet. Too bad. Nissan had a very good reputation once.
Alternatives: Durango interior quality seems cheap. Don't like the PT-Cruiser-Peterbilt hybrid look and the low front end. Who's supposed to be able to fit on that rear bench - Barbie and Ken? Difficult to trust Dodge after the engine-sludge problems in the previous Durango.
Expedition and Sequoia have those weak engines, and lack the footing of the Tahoe and Armada. Add Ford QC issues, and that gets lined out. Chevy -- Great engine, great feel on the road. I had hoped the Armada would be the Tahoe with dependable quality. Chevy QC too predictably poor.
Looks like I'm headed back to look at an SR5. Don't like the sway, especially without curtains in every row. But at least I'll get dual zone climate control standard and won't have to make weekly visits to the service department.
Bob
you said: "Sounds to me like an indication that Nissan knows it has a big problem and won't stand up and fix it."
and: "rotors, seatbelt sensors, seat motors, axles, eardrum-popping resonance, rattles, creaks, stripped seatbelt bolts, wobbling DVD units, and now, leaking windshields, rust pits, etc., etc., etc."
and yet you say this: "I still remain really interested in this truck."
i dont get it. either these problems arent REALLY problems, or you dont care about them. if it is the latter, then why on earth would you even post about it?!?! what a waste of time!
it seems you are saying: "i dont really care about these things...i just want to worry other people with no first hand information."
get a life, man.
I heard they were overpriced around here, but that is rediculous. I mean come on! that is by far completely unfair for those of us who have already paid ours off!
I might be setting myself up for more heartbreak, but does anyone have any idea if the new pathfinders will retail for the same price the current ones are? if so, I might think about trading it in for one of those. I don't think Nissan would ruin their rep. with their normal Pathfinders, that would completely waste the public's respect for Nissan SUVs...
I've also read this board since inception. Earlier you opened the possibility that some with negative posts might not be accurate. No, at that point you didn't say anyone was. An initial challenge to negative comments? At the time I gave it no further thought. Thinking about that now I can't recall bringing into question the group that praised. I mention this for the sake of balance. Personally I see no reason to bring into question the validity of either group.
Later you challenged a poster's truthfulness. Could it be that bad, the dealer did take it in trade, was the dealer that stupid, did you hide some things from the dealer, etc. This to a man who had repeatedly posted his suffering for all to know and possibly help. Neither he nor most of the others with these problems have had them resolved. Seems like even his ethics were questioned along with a lesson on what he SHOULD do.
Wherever "trade in" rates in the decision to purchase, indicating one should not purchase some vehicle and/or hold on to a Nissan because of a supposed trade in loss does not seem sympathic or address that person's problems. Why on earth would someone who can deal with the loss of a few grand suffer for months and not have the use of a vehicle hold on to it? The problems may have been that bad.
Maybe the resonance problems will cause structural damage. Then the best that could happen to trade in value would be a buy back. Maybe resonance will eventually afects all Armadas, making them dangerous. Maybe it will all be straightened out and some might regret not holding out and enjoying what they could have had. Aren't these more important considerations than trade in loss? There are two sides. If it was me and I had gone through what chasmanz28 and maybe others have gone through I'd want that nightmare out of sight and mind. However, that's my bias.
The person who just posted resonance problems also mentioned "other squeaks and noises" for going back four times. NOW he knows it couldn't be fixed. So he shouldn't have gone there in the first place? Do you know the dealer didn't say he would try? Or is this just one more counter to a negative post?
Earlier I interpreted your posts as valuable information from one caring enough to take the time. Now I'm wondering if there's an agenda to challenge and distract from negative comments and the problems people are having. Why has a respected poster gone to the extent, IMHO, that you have, of questioning ones motives, rights, and truthfulness?
tidester, host
If it wasn't for this board I'd own an Armada. No doubt about it. Especially when my Sub. started to have some serious issues. New engine now so can wait another year or two for the kinks to get worked out. I like everything about the Armada. Well except for the 3rd row. It took a great deal of will power to not buy one. Haven't felt this way about a car since my old 240z. Anyways, I really appreciate people taking the time to post about their vehicles. Good, bad, and the ugly.
Any other questions let me know. Good luck, Brian