Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
That’s right! The Mazda 3S is taking its place. Once again, the Mazda3 is a “European car”."
Regarding the cancellation of the SVT Focus:
http://www.detnews.com/2003/autosinsider/0311/23/b02-332341.htm
We're losing the current version but it looks like Ford will offer "special" editions based on the 2.3L Duratec starting in 2005. They also hint at a turbocharged Focus SVT sometime in the future along with a V-10 Mustang (probably the one MT featured a few months ago).
Maybe a turbocharged Mazdaspeed Mazda3 is in our future?
Dinu
bluong1 Nov 22, 2003 3:06pm
That's strange. Mind you my Mazda3 subscription feature was not activated this morning, so there might be a reason why I missed some posts.
Interesting...
Dinu
Edit: Yeah, I guessed I missed them. Weird!
Sorry, but this is my soap box (those not interested jump off now)...those studies are a bunch of bunk...
They list a higher percentage in deaths, but they don't account for several things. One, is what is the original number and how long ago was it counted? Are they saying one year before, while the speed limit was 55, the very next year after it was raised to 75 there were more deaths? Also, they give the percentage of more deaths, but of course they never mention how many more cars were on the road.
Theoretical...if there were 10,000 cars on the road in 1995 with 100 deaths, and there were 15,000 cars on the road in 2002 with 150 deaths, then IIHS with their insane study could start yelling that deaths increased by 100%. This is exactly what they do...(and it should be an outrage for any thinking person!)
Fact is, I have read other studies that take into account the increase in traffic and car registrations. Once you include the right statistical information in the study, you suddenly find that the percentage of deaths is actually lower after the speed limit increased. (I don't have time to find links to these, but find articles by Pat Bedard or Brock Yates in Car and Driver over the last 10 years, and you will find information aplenty.)
More cars on the road means more deaths...there ain't no way around that. But, with the increase in safety equipment, and the increase in speed limits, over the last 10 years there are fewer deaths per car on the road. This is a good thing.
Why they insist on making "speed" the Satan in all this is beyond me. I'm sure it makes them money somewhere.
A slow erratic driver doing their makeup, drinking their starbucks, or whatever other distraction you can come up with is much more dangerous that a driver exceeding the speed limit by 15 mph, but their hands are on the wheel, their eyes are on the road, and they are aware of what is going on around them. And frankly, attacking the speed limit is stupid...in snow or heavy rain in darkness, the speed limit is too high. Actually training drivers to know what speed to drive when...now that is something to spend your money on.
I'm jumping off the soapbox now...and looking forward to safely piloting my future Mazda3 at a proper speed (regardless of the speed limit.)
and send me your's I will email photos to you.
On the speed point: the real dangers on the road are the DWIs or on illegal substances and cell phone users. Especially the first, Driving While Intoxicated.
fowler3
fowler3
Meade
Meade
We'll manage to get him coming over on the limousine and red carpet if he has some photos. Otherwise he has to walk on his own. ;-)
Meade
P.S. He already posted some photos over there. Nyah nyah. Don't worry, I'll get him over here. I know you guys wanna pounce on 'im! He has been advised of his pending instant-celebrity status ...
Meade
- The idea that improved safety mechanisms have been developed in conjunction with improved performance, more drivers on the road, more distractions at the wheel (i.e. Cell phones), etc, etc.
- This SUV phenomenon and the psychology behind driving such a large car.
Dynamics of driving on roadways and highways are far more complex than "speed", though even in true scientific research, rarely can one research article thoroughly and wholly explain the functions of any complex/dynamic concept as is the case with the IIHS study and driving statistics. Funny though, that the IIHS is probably the most influential resource in determining automobile insurance rates.
Ok. Back to Mazda3 chat...
Well, yeah, shame for us who ignore your post. I think you must post in a middle of some hot debate here (weren't we talking about the interior quality?). That's was quite late also, I must be in bed at the time. I notice your post the much later, and also surprise no one give any feedback. Shame on us...
So please give us your review, and pictures when you can!
Oh, and thank you Meade to bring back petpat here!
Bruno
Edit: see your review now, cool!
How do you find the NVH (Noise, Vibration, Harshness) of the Mazda3 ride if I might ask?
Humble Meadeball
Believe me, the real p.o.j. is the reliable Suzuki Samurai that does the world's worst handling AND even ride comfort! At least the Yugo GV was based on the cuddly-riding Fiat 128.
Of course, the Mazda3 is reliable enough to compete w/ the Suzuki Samurai, yet advanced enough to ride on a Euro suspension to be the 1st Japanese small car able to compete w/ the Fiat 128? LOL
For now, it's our little secret.
Meade
Let's see, what can we do about this? How about putting down massive big-foot road-contact patches to weigh the steering down? May I suggest 205/65 or 215/60 on 16x7"?
Congrats, petpad, for being the 1st to drive a 3 home, and thanks for your review. Can't wait to be in a similar bliss. :-) Is yours the sedan or hb?
Now a couple of questions:
1) has anyone had any comments on the quality of the leather? Forgive me if I am bringing up an old topic, but I have tried to look for any old posts on this topic to no avail.
2) Any comparisons in acceleration/handling vs. Mazdaspeed Protege from anyone who has driven both?
Thanks for any help...
Congrats petpad (sorry - I'm not the first to congratulate you on this board )
And about the electroluminescent gauges and dimming them - if its like the Mazda 6 with Sport pacakge (I don't have it, mine is non-Spor) - then you will have a lever poking into your gauge pod on the left (same shape and size as the odometer reset/cycle button above the odo). Pressing this either dims or powers it off or leaves it on or something. Check out the Mazda 6 threads here or elsewhere and you'll get confirmation and an exact description of that button's purpose. Assuming the 3 has it too
Keep us posted, while we drool and wait for shots of an owner's live MZ3
So you should know that if you have your headlights on during the day, the wrong setting on the upper button will make your dash really hard to see.
Pet
Urban Legand above, see www.snopes.com
Latin Americans are not that dumb. Sure, "no va" means "No go", but the single word 'Nova', relating to outer space, exists in the Spanish language. The Chevy Nova was a popular car in Mexico for years and was sold there after the RWD one was dropped in the USA.
This myth is perpetuated by Marketing types as another "Look how bad GM is.." story.
Some of the interior materials do feel a bit on the cheap side, especially once you start folding seats and opening things up, but overall it seems to be a very solid little car.
Well, Edmunds doesn't have this feature. So my site
http://groups.msn.com/BrunoLuong/
is created more or less to overcome this drawback. There are many pictures from members here, and it's also a place where I gather essential Mazda3 information for the Mazda3 community.
So please send your pictures to my me <brunoluong@yahoo.com>, I'll upload them ASAP.
Thanks,
Bruno
has anyone had any comments on the quality of the leather?
I haven't seen the Mazda3 leather, but I did saw the Mazda6 with leather in the show room. I'm not sure they are the same quality, but the quality is nice, nothing to worry
Any comparisons in acceleration/handling vs. Mazdaspeed Protege from anyone who has driven both?
Again, I haven't drive the MazdaSpeed, but I have read many reviews, from professional drivers as well as owners. My impression is these two cars have completely different characters.
- ProtegéSpeed: suspension very firm, large stabilizer bars. High performance Low profile but harsher tires (Potenza uni directional 215/45R17). Very communicative steering wheel. It will be hard to beat the ProtegéSpeed on the handling department. Until the Mazda3 Speed come out, I doubt the Mazda3 handling can top the ProtegéSpeed. Engines will be also completely different in characters. With the turbo, the low end torque of the MazdaSpeed is larger 160 ft-lb @ 3500 (vs 150 @ 4500). I heard that the turbo lag is really minimal, and the power will come more brutal. The MZR 2.3L will be too civilized in comparison. It will be a much more refine engine that willing to rev. The lighter Mazda3Speed will be faster than the Mazda3 for sure.
Bruno
I own a 6i manual, and I've driven a MazdaSpeed. That thing is quite a monster. And the 3 with the 2.3l I4 is not THAT much lighter than my 6, that it'll feel more than a little peppier. It doesn't have a chance.
Of course, the ride in the MSP is TERRIBLE, and you will complain! Until of course, you take a corner hard (thrice the recommended speed for ramps, for example!) or AutoCross it
If the Speed Mz3 engine goes over 200 hp, then Mazda should put it on an AWD platform.
1. 280 HP+ turbo'ed I-4
2. 19" wheels (I think)
3. AWD
4. No side mirrors - but cameras and a display on the headsup/nav or something of that sort.
So the block is capable of it (I'm pretty sure it was the 2.3l I-4 block)
Here's looking forward to good times ... cheers! I'm just hoping they make the parts available as a bolt-on upgrade to the 2.3 - have you guys seen how much empty space there is in my engine bay? :-)
Dinu
Yugo - sometimes Yu-go and sometimes you don't.
Pet
I too have been looking at both the Ralliart and the 3. I had a chance to drive the Ralliart last week, and I was very impressed. The suspension is firm but not bouncy (very little body roll) and the 2.4L Mivec has got good power and low end torque. They have also added some nice out of the box performance additions, including front and rear sway bars, a 3-piece strut tower brace and a short throw 5-speed swiped directly from the Evo VIII.
As far as appearance goes, the Ralliart looks much better in person than it does in photos; the 3 is still a better looking car. The front end of the Ralliart looks too much like a Sunfire for my tastes. The interior is definitely a step down from the 3, except for the exceptional seats in the Ralliart, which beat the 3's hands down. The Ralliart front buckets were taken from the Japanese spec Evo GTA, and have by far the best bolstering in the class.
I have yet to drive the 3, so I can't compare performance characteristics, but I would definitely give the Ralliart a chance before you make your decision.
can you confirm the 15" rims won't fit the GT? Thanks.
Reliability:
1. PRO/3, Corolla, Civic
2. Sentra, Lancer (Ralliart)
Quality:
1. PRO/3, Corolla, Civic
2. Sentra, Lancer (Ralliart)
Value:
1. PRO/3, Sentra, Lancer (Ralliart)
2. Corolla, Civic
Fun to drive:
1. PRO/3 (haven't driven the Lancer, but based on specs I would put it here)
2. Sentra
3. Civic
4. Corolla
Quality of Interior (I prefer sporty over luxury)
1. 3,
2. PRO, Sentra
3. Corolla, Civic
4. Lancer (Ralliart)
Styling
1. 3/PRO, Lancer
2. The rest are too generic to stand out
Since I haven't driven the Lancer, let's assume it drives and handles as well as the 3 - so let's say "fun to drive" is equal. I would still go with the Mazda based on the quality of PROs, styling, interior, the little touches they put on the 3 both mechanically and cosmetically.
Dinu