Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

Navigation GPS Systems

17810121347

Comments

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I worry about the factory radio being somehow integrated to all the hybrid equipment. Or is it the same as stock, i.e. non-hybrid radios?

    Given how complex the electrical system is on the hybrid, I might stick with a portable/external one, just to not mess with any of that.

    -juice
  • johndjrjohndjr Member Posts: 80
    Anyone know anything about this gps navigation aide?? I can't find any reviews or whay not on the web.
    Thanks.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Some funny stories in the news today.

    Fun on wheels (CNN)

    Steve, Host
  • bmwdougbmwdoug Member Posts: 248
    I am buying a new BMW 530, but I do not want to get the BMW Navigation. I don't think it is worth the $1800 option price. BMW's make great cars, in my humble opinion. But, they do not make great Navigation Systems.

    So, I would like to get a portable GPS Unit that I can use when I have the need. What is the best Unit?

    Are there any units that have Voice Command for instructions?

    For example, do any Portable Units let a user say "SBC PARK, and the unit then gives direction to SBC?

    Do any Units actually say the street name?

    All opinions welcome.

    Thank you.
  • kirkkempenkirkkempen Member Posts: 14
    I bought a Finedrive 400 one week ago. Basically it's a good unit. Bright screen; good voice prompts. It uses the NAVTEC maps that most of the major players use.

    Negatives are system software that crashes. (About 6 times in a week.) Another frustrating thing is that in rural areas, many addresses can't be found, so you can't navagate there. The incomplete map data is not a problem that's limited to Finedrive. Everyone who uses the Navtec maps has same issues, (and Navtec is the best mapping software available for GPS units.) I don't understand why Navtec is not as complete as your typical internet mapping site. Maybe it's a memory restriction problem.

    Anyway, I ordered a Lowrance 350c yesterday to replace the Finedrive 400. The Lowrance uses the same Navtec maps as the Finedrive, but the 350c allows you to just point to a place on the map, and navagate there. This feature will allow me to get by with a GPS until the map databases are more complete. The Lowrance also provides many more features than the Finedrive, and at a slightly lower price.

    The only problem with the Lowrance is that it won't be available for another week or two.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    That's funny. I think I'd want Jack Nicholson. Maybe as his character from One Flew Over the Cookoo's Nest. That would be hilarious.

    Or maybe Annete Benning, I think the movie was American President, because she keeps saying "AJ" to Mr. Pres and that's my name. :D

    Not sure about which portable NAV systems take voice input, but many give voice commands. The Garmin StreetPilot c340 uses text-to-speech to tell you street names, and the price is right, you should be able to find it for $600, maybe less.

    Check out Crutchfield, their web site has the best descriptions and comparison info, if not the best prices.

    -juice
  • mdchachimdchachi Member Posts: 275
    I don't think any aftermarket units accept voice commands but I could be wrong about that. Apparently the Magellan Roadmate 760 will say the street name but I haven't seen it in action.
  • zhelderzhelder Member Posts: 42
    This is something that has been puzzling me for a long time. Toyota and Honda have been offering navi systems in their mid range (Camry, Accord) sedans for years now and it seems that now they're even bringing it to lower-end cars (like the Civic). Meanwhile, the only midprice American car offering navi that I've seen is the Chrysler 300 (and it's debatable as to whether that's a midpriced sedan). American manufacturers seem to offer this as an option only on their super luxury cars. Why are American car manufacturers dragging their feet on this?
  • jimbresjimbres Member Posts: 2,025
    I'm not sure that most buyers in this segment want nav. While shopping for a Honda CR-V last month, I spent some time in a Honda store (Huntington Honda on LI, NY) that bills itself as the largest in the country, & I didn't see a single nav-equipped Accord on the lot. If you want nav in your car, these folks will be happy to take your order but they won't go out on a limb when it comes to ordering for their stock.

    I think that we're at least 2 or 3 years away from mass acceptance of factory-installed systems in popular-priced vehicles. Right now, nav is too expensive. It's one thing to pony up an extra $1500+ when you're buying a $40K car, but it's altogether different when you're shopping the $20-25K segment. The tipping point will come when the price of full-featured systems falls well below $1K. (My hunch is that $750 will turn out to be the magic number.)

    Consider the history of factory-installed automotive A/C. In 1958, fewer than 2% of all new American cars were shipped with it. By 1968, that number was nearly 40%. During that 10-year period, A/C units got both better & cheaper, while the base price of new cars climbed. Folks who wouldn't consider spending an extra $650 to cool a $2K car were willing to add $525 to the price of a $3500 car. Something like this has to happen to nav.

    For buyers at this price point, the aftermarket nav units are a far better buy. Suppose that Honda offered nav as an option for the CR-V. (It doesn't, of course.) Would I have ordered it? Absolutely not; my Garmin c330 set me back $550, & I can move it among our 3 vehicles.
  • rwisemrwisem Member Posts: 96
    Jimbres, you are exactly right. I've wanted an aftermarket system for some time and finally got a Garmin C320 when the price got down to around $400. It's easier to use than a factory unit and just as accurate. Cheaper to update, too. Works in all my vehicles and rentals.

    I was also influenced by reading an article about GM offering a Tom Tom unit on the Opel Astra as part of a promotion in Europe. Nav units are all the rage in Europe, but dash units are too expensive for cars in the Astra class.

    Eventually factory prices will come down so that they are common options.
  • bat1161bat1161 Member Posts: 1,784
    There was also an interesting article over at CNET that talks about how todays in-car NAV systems are about two to three years behind in technology. I believe they equated it to going out and buying a 486 based computer rather than the Pentium 4 that is out there now. Just one more reason to hold off on the $2000 in-car system. And one more reason to go for a portable unit.

    Mark
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Honda and Toyota enjoy economies of scale with volume-leaders such as the Camry and Accord. So even it the take rate is low, they're still selling enough of them to make a profit.

    Now take a smaller volume maker, and it's much harder to make a profit, because they'll probably only sell half as many, if that.

    Having said that, you can also get NAV on the Mazda3 and Mazda5, but that's probably because Ford had to engineer a solution for the Volvo S40/V50 and basically the Mazda3 inherited it from those.

    -juice
  • jimbresjimbres Member Posts: 2,025
    Good point, Mark. Most of the geek web sites take that position: the current systems are laughably primitive, & if you must have one, you should spend a few hundred bucks on a throwaway rather than $1.5-2K on a built-in.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Since I'm a computer geek I love the carputer. I'm still tweaking it on a weekly basis. Latest is that we'll be uploading movies to the HD to have a library :)

    -mike
  • bat1161bat1161 Member Posts: 1,784
    Hey Mike,

    Is that what you are taking on the 48hrs? We'll know what you're up to if you are not driving:-).

    Mark
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Nah, I think i'll take the legacy. :)

    BTW, if you can post up and try to get some of the folks on Edmunds to come that would ROCK!

    I got Sunday the 8th off so I'm good to go. I'll be rested by friday afternoon too.

    -mike
  • mazda6iguymazda6iguy Member Posts: 365
    How acurate are the nav systems, like when you need to find a bank or restaurant in an unknown area. Your experiences?
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    My Garmin is pretty good. I have seen it say "arriving at destination, on left", when in fact it's on the right, but it's never gotten me lost.

    You gotta update them, for instance an exit near me changed and it still thinks I'm off route when I take it.

    But for roads it knows, it's very, very accurate, down to the city block even.

    -juice
  • fenris99fenris99 Member Posts: 16
    Are they sturdy enough to leave in your vehicle overnight in the winter? Or will the cold weather do bad things to them? :confuse:
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    That's where mine has been all this time, since summer. It powers right up.

    -juice
  • pathstar1pathstar1 Member Posts: 1,015
    The LCD display will be slow when cold but it shouldn't harm anything. I don't leave it in the car because it invites a broken window (thieves). The window will cost more than the GPS to replace!
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I believe you can call Garmin with a serial number and they can disable or even help Police track the stolen GPS/car, but of course only if it's powered on.

    Thieves may not know that, though, and steal it anyway.

    -juice
  • fenris99fenris99 Member Posts: 16
    Thanks, guys.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Just ordered an extra mount for my Garmin c320.

    It comes with a spare charger, which we'll use in my wife's car, plus a tripod mount that's supposed to stick on the dash. I prefer the idea of a suction cup mount, so I'll use that if it comes with one.

    I'll share impressions once we get it.

    -juice
  • navguy1navguy1 Member Posts: 181
    The Garmin units do not feature a tracking device.... i.e. a transmitter.
  • navguy1navguy1 Member Posts: 181
    The newest OEM units from either Toyota or Honda are far superior to any portable navigation device (PND) available to consumers.

    First the database is much larger on OEM units. The DVD based navigation units feature 4.7Gigs of information in comparison to the Megs on some units. Second, the touch-screens on the portable units are much, much smaller. Most PNDs feature a 3.5-4" screen while Honda/Acura features an 8" on some vehicles and 7" on Toyota/Lexus. Newer cars will incorporate even larger displays that are extremely bright and vivid. Lastly, the embedded navigation screen collaborates with other devices. Unlike the stand alone units the OEM versions work with other components. For example, when voice-prompts are provided the stereo will mute one or more speakers. The PNDs don't do that unless you buy an integration kit. Plus most OEM systems incorporate a gyro and speed pulse inputs to continue guidance in the absence of GPS signal which commonly occurs in tunnels, urban jungles and areas of high-intensity electromagnetic fields. Simply, you get more for your dollars.

    I do not want anyone to consider this bashing of the PNDs. They are an effective low-cost alternative in comparison to expensive navigation systems found in some OEM vehicles. There are several benefits to either system which each user must decide which is best suited for their needs. However, I cannot stand by and listen to people disseminate bad information.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I'll take my Delorme Street Atlas Plus 2006 with my carputer any day over an OEM unit. It has the entire yellowpages and white pages in it! Upgrades cost under $100/year. And I drive in NYC daily and with my GPS antenna INSIDE the car (not even outside mounted) never lost a signal!

    Yeah OEM ones are cool if you want to fork over a ton of cash to the dealer or you aren't a car-person and want it all just installed and forget about it.

    I would say the only advantage the OEM units have over the aftermarket ones is that you can get car data on them, and you can also control some functions of the vehicle via the screens.

    -mike
  • jimbresjimbres Member Posts: 2,025
    I haven't seen any misinformation, navguy. The OEM systems certainly get points for screen size, although my Garmin's smaller screen gets the job done. The other advantages you cite in your post don't mean much to me. I bought my Garmin because I wanted a navigator - not because I needed voice prompts to turn down the volume on my car's sound system. I have yet to lose my signal or bang my head against the limitations of the Garmin's built-in map database.

    The portables really shine when it comes to bang for the buck. I can use my Garmin in any of our 3 cars. Consider the cost of replacing each of those 3 with a new vehicle equipped with factory nav. Moreover, we keep our cars for at least 8-10 years. An OEM system will be obsolete long before the rest of the car wears out. Replacing it will be either impossible or ridiculously expensive. But an obsolete portable unit can be replaced in minutes for a few hundred dollars.

    Bottom line: the factory systems are 3-4 times more costly than the portables but don't provide 3-4 times the functionality. The future may belong to the OEM systems, but not until they come down drastically in price. As I said in an earlier post, the tipping point is probably somewhere around $750. At that price point, the OEM systems will make more sense than the portables. Until then, the portables will be far more appealing to the value-oriented buyer.
  • mdchachimdchachi Member Posts: 275
    No, as jimbres mentioned there are several advantages with the latest OEM systems including bigger screen and use of speed pulse & gyro for more accurate positioning. For example, in San Francisco w/ a late model Garmin 2720 the thing frequently lost its GPS signal -- even when it didn't, it would jump around showing the vehicle on a completely different street than the one I'd been traveling on. My OEM Toyota system doesn't do that. Once it decides you're traveling on a certain road, it won't all of a sudden place you on another.

    The advantages of aftermarket is primarily cost and, perhaps, higher frequency of (& cheaper) updates.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Honda's NAV screen on the Pilot is 5", last I checked. My Garmin is 4", and I can mount it closer so it's less of a reach. I'd call that a draw.

    in comparison to the Megs on some units

    False.

    I have a 1GB SD card in my c320 and it does not fit the entire country, so it actually takes about 2GB of data to include all the Garmin info (roads and points of interest). Plus, a DVD has a capacity of 4.7GB, but that doesn't mean it's full.

    Considering I paid about 1/5th as much, I'd say my PND is a *much* better value than the Pilot's.

    When you consider that I use my Garmin in all 3 cars, well, the $404 I paid is a lot cheaper than the $6000 it would cost me on all 3 cars in my fleet.

    OK, to be fair, the extra mounting bracket was $33. So I paid $437. That's slightly less if my math is correct. :P

    PNDs don't do that unless you buy an integration kit

    Not true, the latest ones do. And act as MP3 players, and can even receive Sat. Radio, XM traffic and all, just like the RL only for less than half the cost.

    Simply, you get [a little] more for your [5 times as many] dollars

    Fixed that for you.

    One last thing - Acura's NAV excludes competing dealers from its database, i.e. a BMW dealer is not listed. So if you own an Acura and want to take your wife to pick up her BMW for service, you're NAV is useless.

    Acura is not alone, Audi's MMI was not able to locate Miller Subaru in PA when a buddy and I took a road trip up there. Basically, they discriminate and limit the information available to you. Big Brother, anyone?

    While built-in is harder to steal, that is perhaps the primary advantage, and you didn't even mention that. Yes the gyro keeps it accurate in tunnels, but so what? My Garmin positions you in the tunnel and pick up where it left off as soon as you get out. Since there are not too many turns inside of tunnels, that's probably OK for most folks. :surprise:

    -juice
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    How big is your laptop screen? 14" maybe? That makes the OE screens seem pretty puny. I think the biggest are just 7", 1/4 the total screen area of yours.

    -juice
  • mdchachimdchachi Member Posts: 275
    One last thing - Acura's NAV excludes competing dealers from its database, i.e. a BMW dealer is not listed. So if you own an Acura and want to take your wife to pick up her BMW for service, you're NAV is useless.

    That's odd. My Toyota allows you to input an address as a destination even if the address leads to a BMW or Acura dealership. I'm surprised Acura doesn't allow this. Wow, that is useless.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    MMI could not find the dealer or the address (if anyone in this thread has MMI, try it!). We had to enter the name of the road, which is a long one, and the city. When we got there we had to *GASP* stop and ask for directions.

    Defeating the entire purpose of NAV. :mad:

    -juice
  • jimbresjimbres Member Posts: 2,025
    I think you're confusing me with navguy. He prefers OEM systems for the reasons that you give. But I believe that portables represent better value than the OEM systems at this stage of the game, although that may (& probably will) change in 2 or 3 years.

    My Garmin c330 has not exhibited the misbehavior that you experienced with your 2720. In fact, it's been faultless.
  • mdchachimdchachi Member Posts: 275
    Oh, you're right, sorry. I agree with you. Portables are a better value right now but OEM has a number of advantages (cost not being one of them).
  • pathstar1pathstar1 Member Posts: 1,015
    If you really want "dead reconning", which is one term for what some of the OEM units do, you can get that on portables (with some installation complications required). The Garmin 2650 and 2660 do it. I doubt many (if any) of the OEM units actually have any kind of gyro. Those things cost A LOT of money if they have accuracy - last I checked they were in excess of $10,000 for the gyro unit only. What most of the OEM units do is watch the odometer pulses and steering direction to estimate motion. The Garmin just uses the odometer pulses.

    There is, however, no doubt the OEM units should perform better. They are "engineered" to be integrated into the car they come in after all, and are much more expensive. Whether they do perform better or not remains to be seen. If they continue to "mess" with them (as denoted in above messages) the manufacturers may kill their desirability and leave the market to portables!
  • katzjamrkatzjamr Member Posts: 146
    the toyota OEM systems are CD based, updated yearly and do not become obsolete.
  • mdchachimdchachi Member Posts: 275
    Actually they're DVD-based, not CD, which is probably what you meant. Certainly they will become obsolete over time. Sure maps are issued yearly (not sure how many years they issue disks before end-of-life) but the old systems won't pick up new functionality. For example in the near future we will probably see traffic information become standard or additional info such as Zagat ratings or Bluetooth handsfree telephone, etc. Older nav systems will not get the new functionality. So in that sense, they become obsolete. That doesn't mean they will be useless, however.
  • meyerwebmeyerweb Member Posts: 15
    I've only read the fairly recent messages, but I haven't seen anyone mention the biggest advantage of the Garmin, Magellen and some other aftermarket units: ease of use. With the exception of Honda and Acura, none of the built in systems come close to being as easy to learn and use on the fly. Toyota's isn't horrible (as many others are), but it's still not as good as any current Garmin.
  • fblackfblack Member Posts: 26
    I have a loaded Prius which has the NAV/Bluetooth feature. I use the override feature so that I can use the NAV while moving. I also have a Garmin Quest which I love. I used to have a Garmin 2620 but I sold it on eBay. I don't like a one pound projectile sitting on my dash. I like the Quest for its size and the fact that it adheres right to my windshield with suction cups. Obviously I love the portability of the Quest when I travel or go in a friend's car without NAV. I have to admit that I prefer the built in NAV just because of the convenience. Garmin makes excellent units and each has their positive an negatives. One problem with the portables is programming them while enroute. A bit difficult with the smaller buttons, but doable. I think built in OEM Navs are a ripoff, but since I bought a loaded Prius, it is hard to separate what the NAV actually did cost.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    We had a Tribeca for about a week, the integrated NAV unit was easy to use.

    Our Garmin is, too. With one advantage - it doesn't deactivate some features when you're in Drive like the built-in one does.

    The Garmin c series is touch-screen, very easy to use. The suction cups hold so tight I can't really remove them unless I pop the retaining clip.

    -juice
  • lmacmillmacmil Member Posts: 1,758
    I have a Garmin 2610 which stores the detail data on a compact flash card. One the standard 128 meg card, I was able to store maps for a trip from San Francisco to Indiana via the interstates. The point is unless you are going to criss-cross the country on a multi-week trip, you probably don't need more than 256 or 512MB of storage. I saved $400 on the 2610 vs the 2620 which has a 2 gig drive and comes preloaded with maps for the whole country.
  • meyerwebmeyerweb Member Posts: 15
    I've got a 2610, too. With 2 GB CF cards down to about $99, you can put the entire US and Canada in your 2610 now, too. 2610s are selling for a bit over $500, so for not much over $600 bucks you've got a tremendous bang for the buck.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,729
    actually, there is one reason I like the OEM better (in honda/acura, for example), and I don't believe anyone mentioned it. That is the ability to change other settings in your car simply by talking to it. I'm sure alot of folks will say its just a novelty, etc, but I think being able to change the radio station and climate controls by your voice is damned cool and does add an element of safety to the vehicle for alot of folks. How many times do you see someone swerving on the road because they are reaching for the radio? I know I see it at least once a day in my travels.

    I would also mention bluetooth phones, but the portables are starting to get in on that, too, so that is no longer a distinct advantage.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • bat1161bat1161 Member Posts: 1,784
    I have the 2610 as well and did the 2 GB CF card. Definitely makes it easy for never having to change cards again.

    One thing I am using my 2610 for now is an annual trip we do every year, with a different route. The convenience factor is I can plan the trip ahead of time, lay in all my waypoints,then download the route to the Garmin ahead of time.

    I do not believe you can do that on a built in NAV unit.

    Mark
  • jfranksjfranks Member Posts: 9
    The Magellan RoadMate 720 and the Lowrance iWAY 500C have been brought to my attention.

    I see most mentioned here is Garmin. I don't require use of a notebook, just finding my way from pt.A-B with an easy to use unit. I would like one that is easy for old eyes (62).

    Any thought on these two units?
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I use the "portability" a lot, too. The c series has a built-in battery that lasts 8 hours.

    Basically I carry the unit inside, in my house, and sit on the couch to enter several addresses before I head out on a road trip.

    I did this with our mailing list - basically entered every address we have. Boom, all set, now every place we go in on there.

    When I got the school directory, I entered all my child's friends names and their addresses. So if she goes some place after school, all I need to know is the child's name, I already have all the addresses.

    I guess you could do this in your car, but it takes a while and you'd need the key in the ignition. It's much more convenient doing it on the couch.

    -juice
  • redbluesredblues Member Posts: 1
    The problem you are having with your Alpine N852A unit is that the VSS lead was improperly connected. The quick fix is to cut the wire, although it would be better to have to dealer who installed it check their installation and have the wire properly hooked up.
  • navguy1navguy1 Member Posts: 181
    Wow I set off a fire storm! As I mentioned in my post the PNDs have good and bad points.... as do factory installed units. I was simply hoping to illustrate the differences which were left out by some individuals. Even at the end of my post I simply stated that it depends on the user's needs. You must accept that everyone is different else you miss the whole reason of why a company even approaches a certain market.... but no marketing lessons today.

    I wanted to review the following with all of the current and future forum readers.

    The DVD map disc is completely full - the map disc is loaded with lots of POIs. Whether it's from Pioneer, Alpine, Honda, Jaguar or Toyota... the content is vastly superior. In fact the PNDs (with 2GBs of memory)hold less than half of a DVD map disc - something to consider when evaluating your options.

    OEM units are covered by the vehicle's insurance. If something should happen to the vehicle (vandalism, accident, etc.) your automotive policy will cover the loss less your deductible. PNDs are not covered by the auto policy since they are not bolted the vehicle or occupy the space of a factory component. Some additional insurance is availble to cover extra stuff from various companies. Additionally, your home owner's insurance policy may cover the loss. I would definitely consult your insurance policies for specific details.

    As mentioned previously in another post PNDs are much more attractive for thieves since they are portable. Just look back to radar detectors when they were all the rage in the early 80s. They used to call cars with a radar detector stuck to the windshield a "BMW" or..."break my window." Be sure to move them out of sight after use to prevent un aggravation.

    Lastly, the OEM navigation units are more expensive but offer a greater value. As some users have mentioned not having to deal with taking the unit in and out of the car is a benefit as is the integration of other functions such as: climate control, radio, CD-changer, automotive diagnostics, back-up camera, XM ,MP3 players (iPod), etc. Unfortunetly, due to the stand-alone nature of the PNDs interfacing to the vehicle isn't possible except through the use of some interface devices. While some PNDs (like Clarion's N.I.CE.) do incorporate media input/output they aren't truely integrated with the car.

    Some people don't mind and even like programing the unit inside their home... that is a preference I wouldn't even argue with; after all it is a preference! As is evident from the forums some users like to program their trip route at home while others prefer to do it on the go! It really depends on how the product is being utilized. A hybrid of this can be found on Cadillac's STS and some Audi vehicles . They allow users to 'beam' their information from their PDA which is pretty cool too.

    In summary users must decide which system satisfies their needs! What is more important... the portability of the device or it being fixed? Is the longer warranty worth more money on OEM units or is one-year okay? Is the larger database (POIs) a positive or negative? Is the ability to collaborate with other devices an important feature? And the list goes on!

    If we look beyond PNDs or OEM units installed aftermarket navigation units can bridge some of these gaps between these devices. This statement, I am sure, will lead to even more debate which I look forward to! ;)
  • navguy1navguy1 Member Posts: 181
    I can't speak for Audi, Honda, Acura, Jaguar, Ford, Chrysler, but GM, Mazda, SAAB, Toyota, Lexus, Kenwood, Eclipse, Pioneer and Alpine navigation products all incorporate speed pulse and a gyroscope in addition to map matching (dead reconing) for superior positioning performance.

    They simply want exceptional performance during normal driving conditions in any environment. Whether that be in a large (above or underground) parking structure, urban canyon or forrest which could inhibit GPS reception. Like telecommunications services, they also seek 99.9% reliability when offering route guidance.
Sign In or Register to comment.