By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Also, is it just me or do these images look Pshopped? The car doesn't seem to really occupy that space. One second it's moving by the same building it's photographed parked near?
Interested in what the convertible and 4 doors look like...
-juice
Then again it's still a station wagon and that's why I'd love a peak at the 4 door or convertible. Station wagon = soccer moms of 20 years ago.
I thought only sedans are going to the US.
1- I hope they don't screw up the interior (I'm not a fan of the X3, Z4 and to a lesser extent the new 5 interior); and
2- if we get the 5-door (which I don't mind; like the versatility), those rear doors look ridiculously small! I say it's better not to have them at that point.
SMG on the flagships, yuck. What's wrong with regular MTs?
-juice
BTW, in my eyes an SUV is nothing more than a station wagon with a lift kit. SUVs just seems so matronly to me.
Those old wagons had live axles, RWD, and gas hogging V8s.
Come to think of it, that's what many new SUVs are now! You have a point!
But look at modern wagons, like the WRX wagon, the E-class wagon, the Audi S6 Avant, the V70R, not much to complain about there.
-juice
It sounds like he has personal issues with wagons for whatever reason. I don't think it's even long enough behind the rear doors to be considered a real wagon. More of a 5-door hatchback.
We can move on.
Is the Kia Rio Wagon a real wagon? ;-) Some short-deck cars just love to claim to be wagons.
Like the Z-3 hatch, the 1-series sure is long enough to look like the 2-dr Vega & Pinto wagons.
But fastback hatches have structural problems. That's why the new Z needs another "hidden rear deck" that defeats the purpose of a hatchback. So that's why the Protege5/Mazda3 hatch became wagons & is no longer like the sleek-looking foreign-market pre-'99 323 5-dr fastback hatch, while the new Mazda3 sedan had to take over the previous hatch's styling instead in order to satisfy the fastback customers.
I remember reading that the BMW 3 series wagon is actually more stiff than the sedan, though it does weigh more. Properly executed the body style can be very solid.
-juice
-juice
Except that they're dowdy station wagons.
When the kids in SUVs grow up, they're going to call SUVs "dowdy". It's a trend, I mean, look at them, most are just 2 box shapes, hardly stylish.
-juice
just like the yellow school bus we had for decades -- big wagon/SUV w/ extended wheelbase?
-juice
I said, "The wagon can be stiff, but the fastback hatch can't."
The fastback on the 911 does not hatches from down there to haul cargo & has a cross-structure engine-fire-wall bridging the rear wheel wells.
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
Review your vehicle
I actually think the wagon in the 4th pic looks better than the hatch. Doesn't look so stubby.
The convertible looks too Kia.
-juice
By the way, that picture is also in the April R&T, I think.
The steel blue wagon is longer and has better proportions. I see more resemblance to the X3 with the D pillar like that. Nice color paint, too.
-juice
I have to think that BMW is not willing to damage their image in the US with another version of the 318ti, a car I owned and enjoyed but was not well-received.
Honestly, with the c230 cranking at 200 hp, a sub 180hp BMW at the same dollars would be a waste of time in the power hungry states. While the comparisons are tough to make, paying 7-8k more for a fancy 1-series only to be smoked by Focus SVT and Neon SRT4s is a bad way to go about your business.
Any V6 Altima can smoke the 325i in a straight line.
They have to make the 1 series sedan look more sleek. Right now it looks like a Toyota Echo, by that I mean tall and stubby.
-juice
I must be the only one who feels this way, but I was looking forward to a 5-door hatch in this car. This apparently isn't going to happen, as noted in one of the posts above, precisely because BMW has trapped themselves in the US market with the "image" they have chosen for the brand here. Everywhere else in the world, they are a full-line maker with a "sporting" bias - here they have positioned themselves as some sort of holy grail. Having owned four of them, including one of the first 1600-2s on the West Coast in 1967, I find this marketing direction misplaced, and more than a little silly. But from the comments on this board, it sounds like they've managed to convince everybody that this is who they are. Anyway, I wanted a small rear-drive car with good ride and handling, no more than $25k, and real utility in space utilization. Looks like the latter requirement is too much for them to manage in this market...
http://www.autoweek.com/cat_content.mv?port_code=autoweek&cat- _code=carnews&loc_code=index&content_code=08700284
Small
Good ride and handling
rear wheel drive
real space utility
under $25K
I can't think of one.. So, expecting BMW to be the first, and at a low price point is not really realistic, IMHO.
regards,
kyfdx
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
Then again, the 1 series might change that.
-juice
I wasn't sure I was correct, that there weren't any, but the more I think about it.... Can you come up with any?
regards,
kyfdx
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S