Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

Mazda - Does it have a good future in US?

1282931333440

Comments

  • cticti Member Posts: 131
    Nice looking Mazda 5 pictured in the article. Doesn't look anything like the Mazda 5 I saw at the local dealership, though. :P

    I also checked the AIDA site mentioned previously. Out of the 23 foreign nameplates listed, Mazda placed 18/23 for year-to-year sales change in 16/23 for July '05 to July '04 sales change.

    Maybe Mazda isn't as concerned if the sales problems are from essentially non-Mazda products (the B2300 and Tribute). The core sedans seem to be doing quite well.

    Jason
  • audia8qaudia8q Member Posts: 3,138
    Directly from the Mazda5 dealer launch guide...

    Demographics...

    -equally male and female
    -under 35 years of age
    -75% college educated
    -early career
    -median household income $65K
    -between first pregnancy to having two kids under six years

    Psychographics

    -cautiously optimistic - pragmatic, yet open minded
    -ambitious - attainable goals, not "dreamers"
    -experimental - likes to try new things/seek novel solutions yet not risk takers
    -creative - seeks outlets for individual expression and passion
    -social - hub of family unit "givers"

    Lifestyle

    -Time starved and sleep deprived. the target is leaning to juggle between being a new parent and spouse while trying to be an individual.
    -clearly focused on new child, which includes low key activities , park, zoo, picnics family outings.
    -Striving to maintain "adult time"
    -attempting not to lose sight of themselves

    key target insight

    -I need solutions that facilitate my new lifestyle.

    Vehicle Attitudes
    - suddenly my vehicle needs to be my taxi, work vehicle, limo, shopping cart and even my fun to drive car all in the same day.
  • autonomousautonomous Member Posts: 1,769
    ... amazing! Thanks Rich.
  • jc9799jc9799 Member Posts: 70
    Apparently, I have just bought the wrong car. :P
    That demographic profile is pretty much me...OK, except for the <35 year old part.
    :blush:
  • mdaffronmdaffron Member Posts: 4,421
    And I refuse SLIDING DOORS at the innocent age of 40!!!

    VELOCITY RED MAZDA3 HATCH ALL THE WAY!!!

    Zoomin' an' smilin,'

    Meade
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Interesting indeed.

    2 kids here and the oldest is 6. We would have fit that better a year ago, even the 35 part. :cry:

    Bad news, though, my wife saw one on the road, white, and while I liked it she did not at all. Said she would be embarassed to drive one. Ouch. :(

    -juice
  • jaserbjaserb Member Posts: 820
    1. Yup. We're definitely male and female
    2. Yup - we're 29
    3. Check
    4. Well, OK
    5. Got that covered
    6. My two girls are 3 1/2 and 11 months.

    Wow, Mazda built a car for me! Too bad we just bought an MPV last year ... If it wasn't for that, and / or my wife liked to drive a stick as much as I do (or at all, for that matter) I'd have to give the 5 some serious consideration. As it is it might be tough to give up the extra space now that I'm used to it.

    -Jason
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    besides me think that now that Mazda is so insistent on dropping the Miata name, people might CONFUSE the MAZDA5 and the MX5?

    I was in the tiny town of Brookings, OR this weekend (population 6000) and OMG! They had a Mazda dealership! This in a town WITHOUT a Toyota dealer (or either of the other Japanese big two). And right in front, proudly displayed, was a Mazda5. Took a quick look - seems to be slightly larger than my old Matrix, except with sliding doors on the sides.

    Mazda has such low targets for this model that I think it might just meet expectations, but a hot seller it will NOT be IMHO. I have friends with young families - fitting the target demographics perfectly - and they would all be cramped in this car. I am thinking childless couples might buy it - it gives you a little more room for friends and family to ride and significantly more room for STUFF vs the Mazda3 hatch, and of course the Mazda6 hatch and wagon are going away....

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Yes, I think the similarity in the names will confuse a few folks. Dropping "Miata" is a mistake IMO.

    -juice
  • audia8qaudia8q Member Posts: 3,138
    The Miata name isnt really going away. They will feature the name MX-5 on the car but everything they have sent us on the 2006 has the name Miata all over.
  • jaserbjaserb Member Posts: 820
    as a loyalty bonus, likely to clear out '05 inventory before the '06s come in. The only other incentive I can see is a $500 Mazda credit bonus, so unless there's some monster dealer cash I'm not too tempted. I almost bought one last winter, when you could get a Mazdaspeed for well under $20k.

    -Jason
  • jc9799jc9799 Member Posts: 70
    Meade,
    With my 3 yr old son, sliding doors are a godsend. At least I'm sure that's what my wife's Passat would say :)
  • autonomousautonomous Member Posts: 1,769
    As you are probably aware, a major share of Mazda is owned by Ford.

    For those of you who missed it, there is an article from last week about Ford's losses; it's in the Edmunds Inside Line NEWS section. Ford like GM is now desperately trying to fight off its junk bond status by getting itself onto a profitable and sustainable footing. The "everyone is an employee" incentives is bringing some relief now but will there be any customers once they turn off the program? One of the bright spots for Ford is their hybrid line; was it a coincidence that they called their first hybrid an Escape? :P
  • mdaffronmdaffron Member Posts: 4,421
    Ford owns 33.4 percent of Mazda. Here's my source and some interesting news out of Europe:

    http://www.just-auto.com/news_detail.asp?art=48979

    Meade
  • autonomousautonomous Member Posts: 1,769
    From: http://www.just-auto.com/news_detail.asp?art=48979
    "Perhaps some of Mazda's success will rub off on the products of Ford ..."
    Amen to that!
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I hope Ford leaves Mazda to build the small platforms and gives them autonomy (besides basic platform guidelines).

    Can you imagine if Mazda were just another Mercury? Yuck.

    -juice
  • smariasmaria Member Posts: 279
    I can't seem to get to that article without a subscription. Any chance you could post a few quotes on here?

    I've noticed that the inventory of Mazda5s near me (as shown on the MazdaUSA website) has been going down over the past few weeks, even though I thought dealers were still in the initial stock-up phase...looking good for Mazda!
  • mirthmirth Member Posts: 1,212
    The auto maker has sold some 730 Mazda5s through the end of July in the U.S., double initial projections.

    &#147;Originally we thought when we brought the Mazda5 to the U.S. it would be experimental, to see if the U.S. market was ready for this kind of vehicle,&#148; Munsey says.

    &#147;We were thinking 10,000 to 15,000 sales. Now it looks like 20,000-25,000.&#148;


    Meanwhile, Munsey says there is a &#147;possibility&#148; the Mazda MPV minivan will not return to Mazda&#146;s North American lineup once its current product cycle is complete in a year or two.

    The MPV is larger than the Mazda5, which is built on the Mazda3 platform, and doesn&#146;t quite jive with the auto maker&#146;s carefully cultivated &#147;zoom-zoom&#148; image, Munsey says. &#147;Minivans are really the domain of Chrysler, Toyota and Honda (brands),&#148; he says.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Good news, but forecasts were just so conservative that it doesn't mean a whole lot.

    -juice
  • pwimseypwimsey Member Posts: 16
    Given some of Mazda's TV ads (in particular, the protege ad that showed a bunch of 20-somethings driving around and acting like, well, stuck-up jerks), reducing their reliance on commercials is perhaps not a bad thing.

    Although a better plan would be to hire the company that makes VW ads...

    Or just photoshop Mazdas into VW ads (with the exception of the horrible Fahrvergnuegen ads...)
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Nah, just hire the guys that did the Mini Cooper campaign. Despite relatively tiny volumes, it's a car everyone knows and talks about. The ads are often hysterical.

    -juice
  • autonomousautonomous Member Posts: 1,769
    hire the company that makes VW ads
    The agency behind the revival of the VW Beetle TV ads several years back deserves special mention for creating a memorable ad. Otherwise there are no recent TV clips for any auto brand that grabs my attention. GM's approach seems quite sober with the employee pricing promotion; not offensive but also not memorable. Toyota seems to be promoting the company in an effort to convince North American drivers that it is not a foreign brand but part of the local community. In the category of stupid ads, ladies and gentlemen, we offer Land Rover, Kia and many truck ads. In the category of cute (but risking becoming aggravating) are the Echo and Mazda5 ads. Many commentators have noted that TV ads no longer seem to be the obvious "vehicle" :blush: for car ads. Maybe, GM execs should get together with the producers of Pimp my Ride to create the ultimate latte-coloured, tsunami-powered, tattooed-interior G8 1/2. :surprise:
  • jc9799jc9799 Member Posts: 70
    ...there is a &#147;possibility&#148; the Mazda MPV minivan will not return to Mazda&#146;s North American lineup once its current product cycle is complete in a year or two.

    Personally, I think it'd be a mistake to end the MPV. What about those folks who need something bigger than a Mazda5? Is Mazda just telling those (us) folks adios? I know the MPV is not a big seller in it's current 7/8 Ody/Sienna form, but I dont' see why it has to end.
    OTOH, I doubt that Ford would allow Mazda to develop an all new, full size minivan that would directly compete with the Freestar. Doesn't make financial sense in the big picture. And I don't want to see the next MPV as nothing more than a rebadged Freestar.
    OTOH (part II), I wouldn't mind it if Ford let the boys and girls at Mazda engineer and develop the next FoMoCo minivan. Then, if they wanted, they could rebadge the new MPV and sell it as the Freestar and Monterey as well. Isn't the Escape a Mazda design?

    Ah, wishful thinking, I know... :)
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Product placement is the latest trend, well it's always been there but it's just that it's exploded recently.

    They had 3 GTOs to trick out on this show on cable yesterday, some goofy reality show about sports agents. It was pretty blatant, they must have mentioned "Pontiac GTO" about 700 times.

    -juice
  • nedc2nedc2 Member Posts: 192
    I wouldn't worry too much about the next gen MPV being a "rebadged Freestar" the current Freestar is going bye-bye and will be replaced with either a Mazda derived model or a Volvo P1/D3 (XC90/Freestyle) derived model. I wouldn't be surprised if the Freestar name gets axed too, the Freestar/Monterey is the biggest failure in Ford's current product portfolio in NA. The plant where they build the Freestar/Monterey, Oakville, Ontario is being reconfigured to build new vehicles starting next year, crossovers, a Licoln Aviator and a Ford (tentatively called Edge) based on the Mazda derived CD3 paltform, Mazda, however is building its version in Japan.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    folks high up at Mazda are saying the MPV just does not fit the "zoom zoom" image very well, which (in addition to the fact of its very slow sales, I am sure) is what has them thinking of cancelling it.

    They're right.

    And did anyone see Chrysler's recent sales results for the T&C? Up something like 47% for this year so far? There are a few companies that own the minivan segment, and then there are some also-rans that would have such a hard time breaking into significant sales gains, it probably just isn't worth the trouble. I believe Mazda is in this second category, along with GM and Ford, perhaps Nissan too. And after all, Mazda isn't trying to be a full-line manufacturer, it is trying to be the zoom zoom company.

    What I can't figure out, and maybe someone can explain it to me, is how Mazda plans to keep both the Tribute and the CX-7 in the line-up: the CX-7 seems to make the Tribute totally redundant. (and to have much better style, and to not just be pretty much a clone of a Ford)

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • autonomousautonomous Member Posts: 1,769
    Mazda isn't trying to be a full-line manufacturer
    What gives you that idea, Stuart? Some Mazda press release? The fact that Mazda seems to be introducing products gradually could mean that eventually (within 5 years) we will see a Mazda1 to Mazda9 suite of products. A gradual release would allow them to sustain interest in the brand over a longer period; it also allows them to change plans.

    More importantly, let's hope that Mazda jumps on the eco-bandwagon in a big way in the near future. Their experiments with the RX8-hybrid, etc. need to start to result in machines with better mpg otherwise its future will be threatened. Imagine a new Honda SI and CRX with segment-leading power and fuel efficiency (example 200 hp and 35 mpg): will Mazda hope that we'll continue to support out-dated technology when their competition is raising the bar? Here's hoping that the Mazda3 or Mazda6 or maybe even a Mazda9 go hybrid in the near future.

    p.s. can you tell that I'm reacting to gas-price shock? :cry:
  • jaserbjaserb Member Posts: 820
    I've driven recent versions of the Caravan, Freestar, and of course our MPV. The MPV certainly looks the sportiest, and handles very well, especially considering its narrow width. Out of those three it's the athlete of the bunch, in spite of its mediocre power. I haven't driven the Odyssey or Sienna - I didn't bother, since they were 4-5k more than an equivalent MPV - but I don't think they're even trying to be sporty. Nissan tried to turn the Quest into a "sporty" minivan and got the engine right but the looks so very wrong. I think Mazda could build a slightly bigger MPV (not S.S. Sienna sized) on the Mazda6 platform, put a Mazda massaged Duratec 3.5 in there, and work their magic on the handling. That would give them a decently sporty big brother to the Mazda5 that would fit the corporate image and maybe pull a few buyers from the Odyssey / Sienna juggernaut.

    If Ford decides to use the Freestar as the basis of a new MPV I'm going to cry. That thing is a miserable excuse for a van and needs to die a quick and ignominious death.

    -Jason
  • z71billz71bill Member Posts: 1,986
    I wonder how big a market there is for such a creature?

    Isn't that what the Mazda5 is designed to be?

    Seems like this is the same segment of customers that the so called CROSSOVER (between a car and an SUV) vehicle is designed to attract.

    I think the crossover segment is about to see major competition - maybe Mazda should be thinking about this type of vehicle rather than trying to develop a sporty mini van.

    I think many people would never even consider a mini van - just because ITS A MINI VAN.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    well, if Mazda is trying to be a full-line manufacturer in the long term, it needs to spend half of its R&D money on buying up some dealerships that will give it a network that can support a full-line manufacturer.

    I agree with some other posters here that of just about every type of vehicle you could POSSIBLY think of, short of a heavy-duty pick-up, consumers are LEAST likely to want a sporty version of a minivan. They want "sporty" 2-1/2 ton truck-based SUVs more than they want sporty minivans.

    Now if Mazda can and wants to build a "zoom zoom" MPV and still compete on price with the lower echelon (Kia, soon Hyundai, GM, and Dodge) then I say go for it. If not, I wouldn't bother if it were me.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,345
    Mazda does have a new sporty crossover coming out next year (the cX-7). Hard to argue about the turbo engine not being sporty!

    As to the van, I thought that they were coming out with a new platform off the 6, that Ford would adopt, not the other way around.

    Sproty minivans probably do have to be on the smaller side. An Odyssey is about as sporty as most people want to get on a full size mini (hows that for an oxymoron).

    besides, most people idea of sporty is some decals and alloy wheels. maybe throw on a spoiler if you are a real performance freak.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • gee35coupegee35coupe Member Posts: 3,387
    For a minivan. I own one. It can out accelerate many "sport sedans" that can't keep up with it's 250 hp on the interstate. (At least til it hit the 118mph limiter) I mean for all the "sporty" handling that's talked about, most traveling is done on the interstate. The Ody has a relatively firm suspension for a minivan, probably about as firm as you could put in a mass market people mover.

    If Mazda can build a van of the Ody's size that handles as well, with the same power, and class leading gas mileage...Naa Ford wouldn't let em.
  • jaserbjaserb Member Posts: 820
    but I think it's probably there. I don't think anyone claims that a Pilot is sportier than an Odyssey just because it doesn't have sliding doors. Is there any 7 passenger vehicle out there that even tries to put any emphasis on being "fun to drive"? V8 versions of the Caddy SRX and Volvo XC90, but I've been in both and the wayback seat is a joke. The new Benz R-class, maybe? Euro wagons, ala Volvo V70, Audi A6, MB E class? The back seat is facing the wrong way in each of those. Although MB does make an AMG E-class wagon, if you have a spare 90k sitting around. Chrysler Pacifica? Way too much weight, and not enough motor.

    My point is that all those sporty family haulers have utility limitations compared to the good old fashioned minivan, and nearly all of them are way above the $40k mark. Right now the current MPV and Odyssey are as good as it gets for family haulers that aren't boring to drive. If Mazda's new van could come in positioned just to the sporty side of the Honda - which is where Mazda is trying to position the rest of their lineup - I think there would be a few buyers there. An affordable sporty crossover is a nice step, but in my opinion crossovers have inherent disadvantages compared to vans, and don't offer any real advantages. Except, of course, the lack of a mini-van "stigma".

    By the way, ever notice that Chrysler, Honda, and Toyota never talk about minivan stigma? Maybe because their minivan offerings are designs that people actually want to buy...

    -Jason
  • z71billz71bill Member Posts: 1,986
    Since Chrysler, Honda, and Toyota (combined) have the lion's share of the mini van market they define the term mini van stigma. Do really think this stigma comes from Nissan or Kia or some other bit player?

    If you could list the top 5 things that mini van buyers want would "sporty handling" even be on the list?

    I doubt it would.

    Smooth comfy ride - yes
    Good MPG - yes
    High quality/reliability - yes
    Roomy cabin -yes
    Good value - yes
  • audia8qaudia8q Member Posts: 3,138
    I would swap out something and add safety.....Safety ranks near the top for mini-van buyers.....much higher than sedan buyers.
  • z71billz71bill Member Posts: 1,986
    Good point - mini vans = kids - and that makes safety important -

    So sporty handling would not even be in the top 6!
  • PF_FlyerPF_Flyer Member Posts: 9,372
    Hope that everyone's been having a great summer! Now that we're getting past all that summer driving (1200 miles on this years vacation...LOL) it's time to get back into the swing of chat. Stop in to say Hello!

    PF Flyer
    Host
    News & Views, Wagons, & Hybrid Vehicles


    The Mazda Mania Chat is on tonight. The chat room opens at 8:45PM ET Hope to see YOU there! Check out the schedule
  • jaserbjaserb Member Posts: 820
    Most people couldn't care less about sporty handling in a 4 door sedan. BMW, Audi, Mazda, and a few others cater to the demographic that does, and they do very well leaving the bulk of the market to the Camrys / Accords / Buicks of the world. The Mazda5 is a good test case - do people automatically stop liking to drive just because they want / need more than 5 seats? I don't think so. Mazdas forte is building fun to drive cars that handle well without beating up the occupants. I don't see any reason why they couldn't sprinkle a little of that magic dust on a bit bigger minivan than the MPV. If they're going to keep building vans they need to find something that's appealing without aiming right into the teeth of the Minivan Big 3. They tried to become Toyota once and it nearly killed them.

    -Jason
  • nornenorne Member Posts: 136
    What could mazda build that would be appealing to DC/Toyo/Honda minivan buyers? MPV is smaller than the big three and its not working. Mazda tried and failed promoting MPV as an alternative to the big 3 with their zoom zoom promotion.
  • z71billz71bill Member Posts: 1,986
    First you say most people don't car about sporty / good handling 4 door sedans - then you name several (successful) companies that sell sporty / good handling 4 door sedans. So if no one cares about this type of car - how do all of these companies sell so many of them?

    Now compare that with all the successful sporty / good handling mini vans that are being sold. Oh wait - there are none.

    Just a guess on my part - but I would bet that many (not all) families that own a mini van also have another car. Maybe the husband (how is that for being PC) uses it for their daily driver - but they also have a RX-8 a Mustang GT or a Mazda3 in the garage that fills the need to have some fun behind the wheel.

    The mini van is something they NEED because it allows the whole family to go on vacation / church or the game - being sporty is not that big of a deal. Since MOST of the time sporty handling comes at the expense of a comfy ride - it just would not sell.
  • autonomousautonomous Member Posts: 1,769
    What could mazda build that would be appealing to DC/Toyo/Honda minivan buyers?

    Actually, there's lots of room for improvement and creativity in the minivan segment. Imagine a vehicle that could be converted from a people-hauler to a workshop/studio or a camper/mini trailerhome or you name it. VW created a wild movement in the 60's with theirs. Scion and the Honda Element illustrate some of the possibilities.
  • isda65isda65 Member Posts: 74
    When I was looking at minivans before one thing that made me rate the MPV the lowest in my list is it's reliability, fuel economy and the price that it came with. MPV just doesn't compare to Honda Odyssey and Toyota Sienna in terms of product quality. Worse is it's fuel economy compared with these two including the Caravan. I admit the I wouldn't choose the Caravan over the MPV. But the Caravan has a size the North Americans are comfortable with and with it's price and incentives it's easy for people to overlook it's quality issues.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    is down to $15K and change with the employee pricing. The Sedona, another non-sporty entry, can be had under $20K very easily, and it is a LWB model.

    Selling sport to minivan buyers is a very hard sell. Sure, Dad might wish for a sportier drive to Grandma's house, but the rest of the family will complain about the firm, even punishing ride, and no-one will like the low fuel economy numbers.

    I agree with the above that there are lots of ways you could improve on the DCX/Toyo/Honda minivans, related to interior flexibility and equipment packaging, storage and passenger space, and the list goes on. I just don't think Mazda, the zoom zoom company with an unheard-of minivan model, should be the one to try.

    laugh: speaking of Grandma's house, I was on my way back from lunch just now, and on the freeway next to me there came up a BEAUTIFUL, stock mid-90s twin turbo RX-7. They should have paid admission for viewing. Anyway, I draw level, expecting to see some young hardcore guy, and there is Grandma herself, gripping the steering wheel with her driving gloves and grinning like she is possessed. She was 75 if she was a day. She was enjoying herself, and I got a kick out of the spectacle too. Bet you couldn't talk HER into an MPV no matter how sporty you made it! :-)

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • audia8qaudia8q Member Posts: 3,138
    You make a good argument but one thing you didnt mention is financial resources. Would Mazda be better off spending their limited funds on something that they can sell in volume like a larger sedan or crossover or should they focus in on a tiny market like a minivan with heavy mazda DNA? Would the dealer council support another niche car? If Mazda had unlimited developement funds like Toyota I think your idea might have legs.
  • jaserbjaserb Member Posts: 820
    Kind of like they did with the Mazda5. There's nothing like it in the market, so bring it over here with low expectations and maybe you get a hit for little investment. I guess where it falls down is that the 5 was developed for the Euro market, where mini-minivans are big business, so the investment was already made and there were minimal development costs involved in bringing it here. If the development costs for a people mover all went to the crossover then it's probably a moot point. And now that I think of it, three 6+ passenger vehicles is probably too many for Mazda. Even Honda only has two.

    I dunno. If the crossover is sufficiently sporty that would be OK. I'm just not too fond of them, as they give up the two most useful minivan features - interior volume and sliding doors - just to look like an SUV.

    It's too bad they're killing the MPV. It's really a nice little package, as the interior flexibility and packaging largely make up for the smaller size. I recently rented a SWB Caravan on vacation, and the same luggage and people that fit comfortably in our MPV had to be absolutely crammed into the Dodge. In 2002 they added a 5-speed trans and bigger engine, so the power and fuel economy are better - still not class leading, but not bad - and the price is cheaper than all but the most stripped down domestics and the Kia. They got a bad reliability rap from CR due to the tranny recall, even though it was just a software issue, but they're very well built - the only minivan you can buy that's actually made in Japan.

    But I guess if Mazda can't get anyone to buy their van they're better off punting and building something else.

    -Jason
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,345
    just copy the powertrain and suspension from the Speed 3 into the 5. If 240+ turbo horses and a 6 speed stick don't register as sporty, nothing will.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • z71billz71bill Member Posts: 1,986
    On the drive home tonight I stopped at a red light - if front of me was a Dodge Mini van -

    It had "GRAND CARAVAN" in big chrome letters across the top of the rear door

    "DODGE" on the left side of the rear door - and to my surprise - in chrome letters on the right side of the rear door "SPORT"

    So I guess Dodge already has the market for a sporty mini van covered - chrome letters and all!
  • nornenorne Member Posts: 136
    I believe the MPV sells well in congested narrow streets in Europe and Asia but in NA, people prefer roomy comfortable minivan. Sales of ody and sienna both increased dramatically after they were upsized. If mazda wants to stay in the minivan market in NA, than they need to upsize the mpv at least for the local NA market.

    I really don't think mazda brought over mazda5 as a replacement for the failed mpv. The mpv was already a poor seller due to small size and bringing over vehicle thats even smaller than mpv is not the answer.
  • jc9799jc9799 Member Posts: 70
    If Mazda had unlimited development funds like Toyota I think your idea might have legs.

    That was kinda my point earlier. Mazda may not be able to afford building a new, larger MPV alone. But if FoMoCo provided Mazda the funds to develop a new MPV which could then be rebadged as a new Freestar/Monterey that would be different.
Sign In or Register to comment.