By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
This article clearly shows that Sierra Club uses the word "MUSCLE" to refer to GM's false advertsing. It is PDF and may take a few moments to load but really worth reading.
http://www.sierraclub.org/globalwarming/FalseAdvertising.pdf
Be happy, the Sierra Club is not out to bash all of us HH owners
GM, Ford, Toyota and others sued California when we were fighting for emission control and reduction. If it were not for California's EV inititative, we may not be driving gas-electric hybrid today. Sierra Club was squarely in the middle of the EV initiative (had to say that
Toyota saw an opportunity in CA's EV inititative and appllied innovation to make the best of it. GM got fat, big and arrogant, so did Ford, so they sat and snickered until the fire burnt down their houses.
What does this have to do with the V6 HH? I believe Toyota needed to make a bold and impressive statement when it delivered the RX400H and the Highlander Hybrid. In one well-aimed shot, it addressed all the concerns skeptics have over gas-electric hybrid and showed that the technology
1. is environmentally responsible even in a 2-ton SUV!
2. can achieve high performance,
3. is appropraite for luxury and common-person models,
4. is capable of excellent MPG for a 2-ton SUV.
Toyota must come out with a bang and set the bar so high that there is no room for criticism of its technology and feasibility. This is common practice when introucing new technology. I have not heard GM, FOrd, Chevy, Mercedes, Acura, or anyone having anything to laugh about. Their silence is thunderous. They are all scrambling to figure out how to catch up.
While a V6 HH may be harder to sell, it definitely is a brilliant strategic move and a necessary one for Toyota if it is to lead the market and dominate.
It knows that with such high performance, it will also draw a wider customer base. People who do not care about gas mileage will buy it for its performance. People who want the roominess can buy the car for its hybrid efficiency. It is a masterful insight.
If Toyota had came out with an I4 gas-sipper in a 2-ton, it will target only the "green" crowd thus limiting its appeal. For people with practical needs like me, I will gripe about its power and likely will just buy a Sienna van.
GM will bash the I4 by claiming how gas-hybrid technology is just not mature enough yet for larger cars, that GM's own "fake insulting" hybrid technology that gets 19-mpg is the best we can have, that it will be 10 more years before gas-electric becomes feasible and by that time, we will all be driving hydrogen cars so GM will conclude that we should just all wait for the hydrogen fuel cars. The American consumers will bow our collective heads and bravely soldier on into more smoggy summer days.
I belive Toyota understands the purchase cost issue but it needed to make this "flagship" type product to bolster its green image and show off its technical excellence. The resulting enhancement to the Toyota brand is worth a lot more long term than criticism it may receive with an I4.
From here on out, Toyota can afford to use tune-up I4, may be a 210-hp Highlander that is a gas sipper. Toyota has taken the initiative in this offensive, it can now work to widen the gap by offering more choices.
I just wish wish wish an American company had done this first.
a choice. A cheaper fuel sipping I4 hybrid of
about 200HP but 40mpg to a power packed V6 Hybrid of
320HP but 25mpg. The consumer can decide which one
to buy.
If they offer an I4 producing between 200-hp to 215-hp in 2007 and we need another people-hauler and the price is right, we will buy it over the 268-hp version.
I also wish for an upgrade path so our current '06 HH can get plug-in capability and new batteries that can drive it even further on full-electric. Toyota should consider this seriously.
Say derating the engine using the Atkinson cycle? Or even an I4 with the Miller cycle. Miller cycle uses the Atkinson concept of delayed intake valve closure but with a supercharger.
Mazda Millenia S gained 23% in fuel economy that way using a 2.3L V6 and still putting out more than enough HP.
They probably couldn't use the Atkinson Cycle alone and still have enough energy in the exhaust to HEAT the catalyst to its optimum operating temperature, at least not quickly.
with 4wd mpg rated at 23/27. If the electric motors
are added to this it will create a 220 HP hybrid
with approximate mileage 40/33 (guess). This vehicle
will be more powerful than the original V6 non-hybrid
Highlander (215 HP). If you look at the reviews of this
vehicle on Edmunds, very few have complained that
this vehicle is underpowered. This can be win-win
combination for most people.
I have almost lost hope for a plug-in
option. No carmaker seems interested. I guess only
when 3rd party companies will do these
modifications for a fee and many people will start
doing this, then they will take notice. The excuse
that battery technology is not mature is totally untrue.
With a plug-in the above vehicle will easily get 80-90
mpg (sigh).
With E85 fuel it could get 400 mpg (gas only).
In summary, it seems like a great idea on the surface, but it's not as simple as it appears. I hope someone takes this conversation one step further and calculates the actual monetary cost benefit and environmental benefit to recharging a hybrid's batteries with a household electrical supply.
it turns out cheaper (about 1/2) to charge overnight
with 1kwh of electricity at 10-15 cents.
Anyway it does not matter for me as all my electricity
is generated from solar panels on my roof. I am
willing to add more solar panels to offset the extra
electricity needed for charging plug-ins. Now if
only somebody will give me that option.
- using off the shelf components that are not
mass produced or tailor made for hybrids
- adding a new system on top a prefectly working
existing system that already needed 4K extra
to build
If hybrids are mass produced with plug-in in mind
the cost will come down to 3-4K extra (on top of
a normal hybrid) or even lower.
Now the point is many people see value in many
things. From pure gas point of view it may take
long to break even, but there is also an evironmental
impact and if I may say now a national security impact
by not using gas. Some people spend 10K more to
get that 100 HP more engine on the same model that
goes from 0-60 mph in 0.5 sec less. Some people may
spend 3-4K extra just to burn less gas for the above
reasons.
I would love to live in a time when no fossil fuels
are burnt. I am willing to spend money on it but I
do not want to compromise my lifestyle for it. This
technology coupled with renewable energy and bio-fuels
can get us there.
I think biodiesel is the most logical way to weaning ourselves off fossil fuel. Other biofuels such as ethanol make more problems than they solve. I don't see hydrogen being useful in my lifetime. Probably not in my children's lifetime. CNG is useful though still fossil fuel.
I really think you are off price on batteries for hybrids. You should calculate how big the battery would have to be for you to drive 30 miles at say 35 MPH in a Highlander. I don't think you would want that much weight added to an already overweight vehicle.
There's a local professor who does a lot of work with biodeisel. at one point he admited if all of the soybeans grown in the us were used to make biodiesel, that supply would only feed 5% of our gasoline needs. I don't have any references to back this up other than hearsay, but it sounds somewhat reasonable as even W has stated we have an addiction to oil.
anyway let me steer this post back on course. Supposedly that company that retrofits hybrids to plugins can apply the technology to the HH. Yes it will be expensive but this is always the price the early adopter has to pay. Maybe if they're saavy enough, they can buy "white body" hybrids from toyota, sans battery, and other components and sell "brand new" plug in hybrids.
Soybeans are not the best crop for biodiesel. The University of New Hampshire study says we can produce 100% of our fuel needs with biodiesel. It will not happen till we run out of cheap Middle Eastern oil.
FT-SX Concept
I think if Toyota decides to go ahead with this concept into production it will probably be a Lexus first then T will tone it down to a next gen Highlander because of the sloping roof line in the current concept that would limit it to a 5-seater. Otherwise this design looks good to be the next gen HiHy.
Any comments?
Using some baselines: ( mpg )
Prius over 4c Corolla.. 47 vs 35
HH over 3.3L ICE HL.... 25 vs 18
TCH over 2.4L ICE Camry 35 vs 27
In perfect City driving conditions, not doing silly things just driving the same way the EPA does it's tests...
The Prius can regularly get FE values in the 70's
The HH can regularly get FE values in the 30's
The TCH will likely be able to get FE values in the 40's
1) Short trips and cold weather when combined will essentially negate all the FE benefits of a hybrid. You are driving an ICE vehicle.
2) On long trips, with minor variations you should easily get near EPA values.
Did you have to do anything special (besides slowing) to keep car on road or did the car just drive normally straight through the ice storm?
We are packing up to leave on a long trip to see family in Michigan next week, so any good handling hints will be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Cal.
I'm shocked actually that a dealership is actually installing a Navi post-sale. I was lead to believe it was an FIO only. How much did they charge for it?
By the way, the "standard Nav" that they installed, it is possible to connect it to an external CD changer. I read about that in the manual that came with it. If you really want to have a CD changer and don't really care about the consumption screen, etc. you could ask them to install a changer. There are sites on the internet that sell rear view camera and other accessories that interface with the Toyota standard Nav.
To make the story short, we wanted the power and consumption screens but could not have it due to our Canadian version so we returned it and got the original stereo with the 6-disc changer back and saved some $. The Nav was not entirely accurate anyway, we tested it out for a week (not because of the Nav limitation but because of the GPS limitation in general)
I'm new to the forum... so hopefully I post at the right place. I'm trying to find other's experience with purchasing a Hybrid Limited. Since 2007 will be a new model, and we all know there's a dealer holdback offer so we should be able to bargin to get the absolute bottom price.
Being in So-California, Hybrid is still quite hot on the market. I think anything below 5% markup would be hard to get. So I am shooting for a 5%...
4WD 3.3 L, 268 HP Highlander Hybrid Limited
Dealership Invoice Price $34,021.00 from invoice
Edmunds Invoice Price $35,198.00 3.46% markup
KBB Invoice Price $35,803.00 5.24% markup
Toyota Published MSRP $39,290.00 15.49% markup
My target price $35,722.05 5.00% markup
Floor Mats Invoice Price $126.00
Navigation Invoice Price $1,700.00
Dealer Holdback -$785.00
Final Total Price $36,763.05
Sale Tax $3,032.95 (8.25 %)
Destination Charge $605.00
Doc Fee $45.00
Tire Tax $8.75
DMV Fee $306.00
Out-the-door Est. $40,760.75
Am I dreaming or not? I was able to find some other thread claiming that he/she got one from Carson Toyota for 34.6k?!?!?!
Any advice would be greatly appreciated!!
The park is beautiful this time of the year and with this season's rain and recent snow, spring bloom will be spectacular. As another mid-west poster (Gaz) suggested for mid-west owners, we can hold an informal, come-as-u-can SF Bay Area HH "rally" up in Coe park
We were just up there this past weekend and got caught in a storm. The instant torque, the CVT and the handling response really made it easy through the rain, sleet, hail and then snow flurry as we gained elevation. We have the Goodyear SA Fortera tires, they probably helped too.
I asked spousal unit if this looked good and he said not for us because we get both our home and auto insurance from same company which adds up to a savings of about $1,000/year. But for some people, maybe this deal is worth it. I "googled" Travelers Insurance for hybrids and lots popped up. Just wanted to pass this along.
mmreid
Interesting if they can get the price MUCH lower.
Jim
http://www.hymotion.com/products/index.htm
At 4-5K with volume production,
I would buy one tomorrow.
1. the anticipated $5k price tag. Being from missouri, I guess I'll beleive it when you showme.
2. there was a link to a BMW engine that included a heat cycle steam engine. I thought that was incredible. as most of us have heard, the ICE is only about 30% efficient due to heat loss. Imagine the improvements if we could utilze some of this "lost work."
2b. as a secondary point, I once asked why the catalytic converter wasn't placed closer to the exhaust manifold because I had been reading all this talk about how the ICE engine must run to heat up the cat to a certain temp. The response I got was that the exhaust was only 200 degrees F. While I found that hard to believe, I took it as true. If you look at the diagram provided there, the temp coming out of the engine is 800C or over 1400F. So I ask the question again- why isn't the cat placed closer to the engine?
So can anybody please tell me:
1) Why I see so few HHs on the road. I live 60 miles south of Chicago, but am in the city and suburbs a lot. Plus, since last summer I've been to Austin, Dallas, Milwaukee, and the Sacremento area. Total HHs (and LHs) spotted since last July (I identify them by the wavy-blue-striped tag on the rear door): two. Like Pete Seeger says, where have all the hybrids gone?
2) About cooling problems. A mechanic I trust told me that HHs have some considerable unresolved cooling system issues, and so I should not buy but lease one for the next couple of years, until those bugs are worked out. I've read or at least scanned every posting on this forum since 12/09/05, and found not a thing about this. Can anybody reinforce, or discredit, this notion?
3) What kind of gas the HH uses. Is it premium?
4) What the best dealer is within 50 miles of Bourbonnais, Illinois. Well, I'll go further, if the deal is really great.
Thank you. Happy motoring.
If stellar gas mileage is a must, Prius and Insight are the best choices, not the HH.
Most writers love bringing up the silly point of "getting your money back". I certainly would like to get the Hybrid premium back in gas saving but that is a wrong reason to buy the HH. Do people who buy $75000 Mercedes or BMW or HUMMER look to get their money back from their...what?... return-on-investment in luxuries and vanity???
I think of the HH as a clean (SULEV) V8-like SUV that gives me V6 gas mileage without any work on my part. When I do practice gas-saving driving techniques, it is capable of achieving good gas mileage for a 2-ton car. It is just a cleaner burning large car with a different engine technology.
1) Why I see so few HHs on the road.
I read somewhere last May that Toyota is allocating only 15000 HH for the US. If that number is correct, and they are spread out all over the nation... In the SF Bay Area, I have seen 2 in San Francisco, 2 in Cupertino, 2 in San Jose area. Counting ours makes 7. I have lost count of how many Prius are on the road.
2) About cooling problems.
We drove ours in 90F-110F heat last summer all over CA with A/C blastng to keep us cool at 68-F inside. Coolng problems???
3)) What kind of gas the HH uses. Is it premium?
Toyota recommends Premium for best performance. We use permium.
Happy Hybriding....
No indication from the HyMotion people as to when the kit for the HiHy will be available.