Options

Chronic Car Buyers Anonymous (Archived)

1222922302232223422353236

Comments

  • oldfarmer50oldfarmer50 Member Posts: 24,217
    ab348 said:

    I always shake my head when these "how much to pay" discussions pop up here. Buy what you like and can afford. If you buy a car you can afford but don't like, you've made a mistake. Same if you buy a car that you like but can't afford. How hard can that be?

    What’s the option if you can only afford cars you don’t like?

    2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible

  • omarmanomarman Member Posts: 2,702
    wfh?
    A time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing.
  • oldfarmer50oldfarmer50 Member Posts: 24,217
    stickguy said:

    stickguy said:

    10+ is much more likely to get problems that need to be dealt with (even if taken care of, just old age wear). And of course, you need to check what you are buying.

    and it makes sense only for certain cars. Domestics that depreciate like a rock in the first couple of year? Good option. Stuff that barely moves in 3 years, isn't.

    But what is your at-risk investment? If you invest $8k in a 10 year old car you risk less than if you buy a 3 year old car for $25k. In the end it can be a crap shoot. I just like to have less money on the table.

    I’m not saying my way is better, it’s just better for my financial situation. I guess I hate putting capital at risk on a depreciating asset.
    of course, you can (well, should) only spend what you can afford. But in terms of getting old/cheap, even if that could be cheaper in total, it also depends what you want in a car, and how you will use it. if it is just a around town spare car, really doesn't matter. But if it is a primary car for commuting, travelling long distances, etc. I want something newer with more features.
    That’s why I always end up with either new cars or old cheap ones.

    2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible

  • oldfarmer50oldfarmer50 Member Posts: 24,217
    qbrozen said:
    The 2009 has truly outstandingly low mileage and the ad says it has the 4.6L 3 valve (same as the Mustang). Real reliable. It’s priced pretty high but aren’t they all. If it isn’t a rust bucket I’d go for it.

    The 2010 has the 5.4L so I’d pass.

    2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,740

    qbrozen said:
    The 2009 has truly outstandingly low mileage and the ad says it has the 4.6L 3 valve (same as the Mustang). Real reliable. It’s priced pretty high but aren’t they all. If it isn’t a rust bucket I’d go for it.

    The 2010 has the 5.4L so I’d pass.
    How did you determine it has the 5.4?

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,388

    stickguy said:

    stickguy said:

    10+ is much more likely to get problems that need to be dealt with (even if taken care of, just old age wear). And of course, you need to check what you are buying.

    and it makes sense only for certain cars. Domestics that depreciate like a rock in the first couple of year? Good option. Stuff that barely moves in 3 years, isn't.

    But what is your at-risk investment? If you invest $8k in a 10 year old car you risk less than if you buy a 3 year old car for $25k. In the end it can be a crap shoot. I just like to have less money on the table.

    I’m not saying my way is better, it’s just better for my financial situation. I guess I hate putting capital at risk on a depreciating asset.
    of course, you can (well, should) only spend what you can afford. But in terms of getting old/cheap, even if that could be cheaper in total, it also depends what you want in a car, and how you will use it. if it is just a around town spare car, really doesn't matter. But if it is a primary car for commuting, travelling long distances, etc. I want something newer with more features.
    That’s why I always end up with either new cars or old cheap ones.
    I am back at the point where it makes sense to have one of each. We already have the nice fancy new one, so good on that front for at least another 5-7 years. So the smart move is for me to get something cheap. It just seems so much harder now to find something that is actually worth buying, and also cheap enough to make sense. Which is why those shopping forays often end up with a cheapo lease coming home!

    though if there are still obscene (less than $100/mo) deals on lower level EVs when I am ready, that would make a lot of sense since realistically my car might never need to venture more than 50 miles from the house during the 3 year lease term.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,388
    qbrozen said:

    qbrozen said:
    The 2009 has truly outstandingly low mileage and the ad says it has the 4.6L 3 valve (same as the Mustang). Real reliable. It’s priced pretty high but aren’t they all. If it isn’t a rust bucket I’d go for it.

    The 2010 has the 5.4L so I’d pass.
    How did you determine it has the 5.4?
    this vin decoder says it is. Couldn't find it in the ad.

    https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/vindecoder.php?vin=1FTFW1EVXAFD06589

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • explorerx4explorerx4 Member Posts: 20,727
    @stickguy,
    If your wife still wants to move to upstate NY, have her check out the forecast for later this week.
    Start thinking big 4x4.
    2024 Ford F-150 STX, 2023 Ford Explorer ST, 91 Mustang GT vert
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,388
    edited December 2020
    we hear all about it. Our son lives in Albany and likes to send the weather forecast.

    it looks like PA and the Hudson valley is going to get a lot more snow potentially then the more northern part of NY.

    good thing about being WFH or retired. Can pretty much bunker down and ride it out!

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • oldfarmer50oldfarmer50 Member Posts: 24,217
    qbrozen said:

    qbrozen said:
    The 2009 has truly outstandingly low mileage and the ad says it has the 4.6L 3 valve (same as the Mustang). Real reliable. It’s priced pretty high but aren’t they all. If it isn’t a rust bucket I’d go for it.

    The 2010 has the 5.4L so I’d pass.
    How did you determine it has the 5.4?
    Well, I’m not sure. In the ad it says:

    “ ...alternator,2-ton jack,4-wheel drive,4.6L 3V EFI V8 engine -inc: electronic-shift-on-the fly (ESOF),5.4L 3V EFI V8 FFV engine -...”

    So I suppose it could have either.

    For what it’s worth, he whose name must not be mentioned, just put up a video discussing some of the problems with the 5.4L and why it’s a good idea to buy a 2010 F-150.

    2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible

  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,388
    you can search it on youtube and find a ton of people complaining about it. Car Wizard really roasted it.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • oldfarmer50oldfarmer50 Member Posts: 24,217
    edited December 2020
    stickguy said:

    stickguy said:

    stickguy said:

    10+ is much more likely to get problems that need to be dealt with (even if taken care of, just old age wear). And of course, you need to check what you are buying.

    and it makes sense only for certain cars. Domestics that depreciate like a rock in the first couple of year? Good option. Stuff that barely moves in 3 years, isn't.

    But what is your at-risk investment? If you invest $8k in a 10 year old car you risk less than if you buy a 3 year old car for $25k. In the end it can be a crap shoot. I just like to have less money on the table.

    I’m not saying my way is better, it’s just better for my financial situation. I guess I hate putting capital at risk on a depreciating asset.
    of course, you can (well, should) only spend what you can afford. But in terms of getting old/cheap, even if that could be cheaper in total, it also depends what you want in a car, and how you will use it. if it is just a around town spare car, really doesn't matter. But if it is a primary car for commuting, travelling long distances, etc. I want something newer with more features.
    That’s why I always end up with either new cars or old cheap ones.
    I am back at the point where it makes sense to have one of each. We already have the nice fancy new one, so good on that front for at least another 5-7 years. So the smart move is for me to get something cheap. It just seems so much harder now to find something that is actually worth buying, and also cheap enough to make sense. Which is why those shopping forays often end up with a cheapo lease coming home!

    though if there are still obscene (less than $100/mo) deals on lower level EVs when I am ready, that would make a lot of sense since realistically my car might never need to venture more than 50 miles from the house during the 3 year lease term.
    If you look at my list you see that I have TWO of each. While I like the security of having a couple of cars with under 20k miles, when I turn the key on my hoopties I feel good every time they start. Each mile makes them a better bargain.

    Under $100/month total cost for finance/repair is a tough goal. My van comes in at $24/month for purchase price and repairs for the last 50 months of ownership but it could blow up tomorrow. I get a kick out of tempting fate but most people should probably aim higher.

    2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible

  • oldfarmer50oldfarmer50 Member Posts: 24,217

    @stickguy,
    If your wife still wants to move to upstate NY, have her check out the forecast for later this week.
    Start thinking big 4x4.

    His chosen future home of Saratoga Springs will probably miss it. YOU on the other hand....it’s been nice knowing you.

    2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible

  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,388
    can't really figure out a true cost per month until you sell and know depreciation. At least if you want to compare it to something like a lease.

    the volume plan makes sense. If one hooptie doesn't start, try another one. Hey, Hoovie has made a fortune off of that.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,934

    stickguy said:

    I used to have a 3 year rule for my car (the wife's car was buy new, keep it as long as reasonable).

    it worked well, for a while. But a 3 YO car, keep it 3 years, then sell and start over. I think price did not matter, but I would only spend what the old car sold for, + $300/month max for 3 years (unless I had extra cash to put down). After the first couple I was flipping in all cash deals at least.

    a pretty good plan IMO. Not spending tons of money, and not living with the same car too long. Plus, never really having an "old" or out of date car.

    but in the end, it really did work about the same as leasing repeatedly!

    My problem with buying a 3 year old car is that you’re still paying for a lot of depreciation but run the risk that the previous owner abused it. On a much older car you don’t have as much invested in case you get a clunker.

    That’s why my used sweet spot is 10+ years old.
    That's why I like cars that don't mind abuse, maintenance being the exception, don't want something neglected, but "abuse" doesn't worry me so much with the cars I like. Some would call lack of maintenance "abuse" though.
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,934
    edited December 2020
    ab348 said:

    I always shake my head when these "how much to pay" discussions pop up here. Buy what you like and can afford. If you buy a car you can afford but don't like, you've made a mistake. Same if you buy a car that you like but can't afford. How hard can that be?

    IF everything you like is unaffordable, does that mean you either walk or ride a bike? :smile: Public transportation is pretty lousy in the USA.
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
  • explorerx4explorerx4 Member Posts: 20,727
    @oldfarmer50,
    We could get up to 18 inches of snow but that can be dealt with.
    I'm sure I'll be pretty sore for a couple of days after moving it all.
    Not like I need to go anywhere, unlike in the past.
    2024 Ford F-150 STX, 2023 Ford Explorer ST, 91 Mustang GT vert
  • oldfarmer50oldfarmer50 Member Posts: 24,217
    stickguy said:

    can't really figure out a true cost per month until you sell and know depreciation. At least if you want to compare it to something like a lease.

    the volume plan makes sense. If one hooptie doesn't start, try another one. Hey, Hoovie has made a fortune off of that.

    OK, on the example I gave I’m assuming total depreciation to zero value from the original purchase price. Buying anything but junk would alter the equation but junk can be fun.

    2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible

  • oldfarmer50oldfarmer50 Member Posts: 24,217
    andres3 said:

    stickguy said:

    I used to have a 3 year rule for my car (the wife's car was buy new, keep it as long as reasonable).

    it worked well, for a while. But a 3 YO car, keep it 3 years, then sell and start over. I think price did not matter, but I would only spend what the old car sold for, + $300/month max for 3 years (unless I had extra cash to put down). After the first couple I was flipping in all cash deals at least.

    a pretty good plan IMO. Not spending tons of money, and not living with the same car too long. Plus, never really having an "old" or out of date car.

    but in the end, it really did work about the same as leasing repeatedly!

    My problem with buying a 3 year old car is that you’re still paying for a lot of depreciation but run the risk that the previous owner abused it. On a much older car you don’t have as much invested in case you get a clunker.

    That’s why my used sweet spot is 10+ years old.
    That's why I like cars that don't mind abuse, maintenance being the exception, don't want something neglected, but "abuse" doesn't worry me so much with the cars I like. Some would call lack of maintenance "abuse" though.
    Yeah, there’s degrees of abuse. Driving a car hard might not be abuse to some but never changing the oil because “this brand runs forever” certainly is.

    2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,740
    Speaking of never changing oil... I went to change it in the John Deere. Wow. That was quite the sight. Took out the plug and... nothing. Stuck a screwdriver up there and got a drip. Moved it around a bit to dig through the gunk and then it started to slowly flow out. It came out in lumps. Lol. I threw 3 fresh quarts on top and let those push out the bad stuff. Guess that’s what happens when 1. You never change it and 2. An engine has no filter.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • corvettecorvette Member Posts: 11,297
    edited December 2020
    I think I'm two years in on the factory fill on my cheap Bolens push mower. No oil consumption and it still looks normal. Given that the first mower I bought had regular oil changes and only lasted four years, I'm considering it a lifetime fill!
  • corvettecorvette Member Posts: 11,297
    I like Wizard's latest video. This Jeep isn't for me, but it's extremely well preserved, and also a great history lesson if (like me) you weren't that familiar with AMC.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Og7Ycq2vmoE
  • cdnpinheadcdnpinhead Member Posts: 5,618
    edited December 2020
    qbrozen said:

    Oh I certainly know why cars get heavier. I’m complaining about the fact that most manufacturers put little to no effort in making them lighter.

    Making things lighter is nearly always expensive, especially in aerospace, but in cars also. It's a lot like healthful food -- the egg mcmuffin costs much more than the sausage biscuit.

    '08 Acura TSX, '17 Subaru Forester
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,388
    I just started that Jeep episode. I still have a fondness for AMC, having owned 2 back in my younger (college) days. A Gremlin and a Hornet. Both mid-70s (bumper vintage) units. Hornet was the 3 door hatch, so even kinda cool! Even on that Jeep I can still recognize a lot of the parts.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,740

    qbrozen said:

    Oh I certainly know why cars get heavier. I’m complaining about the fact that most manufacturers put little to no effort in making them lighter.

    Making things lighter is nearly always expensive, especially in aerospace, but in cars also. It's a lot like healthful food -- the egg mcmuffin costs much more than the sausage biscuit.

    Yes, but they spend millions trying to develop a more efficient injector. It is likely because they know, in the end, it is something they can use across the lineup, across 500k cars, and will cost pennies per vehicle. I think they fail to ever truly realize the R&D cost. Cutting large weight quickly, such as fabricating your truck bed out of aluminum, cost next to nothing up front but hundreds of dollars per vehicle and across only those that use that bed. So they see that per vehicle cost and scoff, but they’d save millions in up-front R&D.

    I dunno, just my opinionated rant.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • Sandman6472Sandman6472 Member Posts: 7,218
    Drove a few new 2021 Audi A5's today from our PDI area in Ft. Lauderdale up to the Audi dealer in West Palm Beach. Both drove very nicely but definitely prefer the size of our A3 to be honest. I'd get a CPO unit but part of me wants another hatchback next time. But an A3 for the right price in a decent color inside & out could work also. I will need to check out if our Audi store has any demos they want to sell once I get ready to purchase.
    Saw the new 2021 Kia Seltos up close today and really do like it except that it seems awfully big, like a real SUV. But it's on my short list as of now. I'm guessing I could live with a demo much easier than I could with a CPO unit. But nothing tickles m fancy yet enough to swap out of my Golf. The only other hatch I do like is the Toyota Corolla hatchback. Reliability is dead on and the size is perfect. Need to drive one and really see as I need some behind the wheel time to make a informed decision.

    2023 Hyundai Kona Limited AWD (wife) / 2025 VW GTI (me) / 2019 Chevrolet Cruze Premier RS (daughter #1) / 2020 Hyundai Accent SE (daughter #2) / 2023 Subaru Impreza Base (son)

  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,388
    if you like the VW/Audi and want a hatch, how about a nice Q3? 176.6" so not too long.

    this one is attractive.

    https://www.auditurnersville.com/new/Audi/2021-Audi-Q3-365e4cb80a0e0ae73f7cfa13cad5c58c.htm

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • corvettecorvette Member Posts: 11,297

    qbrozen said:

    Oh I certainly know why cars get heavier. I’m complaining about the fact that most manufacturers put little to no effort in making them lighter.

    Making things lighter is nearly always expensive, especially in aerospace, but in cars also. It's a lot like healthful food -- the egg mcmuffin costs much more than the sausage biscuit.
    I prefer the Sausage Egg McMuffin - you get all the greasiness of the sausage, while at the same time, feeling fancy because you're eating it on an English muffin.
  • tifightertifighter Member Posts: 3,786
    I've got a rental Pathfinder at the moment. Blue, loaded Platinum model. Ugh is it awful. Visibility is ridiculous, buttons are vomited all over the dash in random groupings (audio controls are foot away from the screen, heated steering wheel button is at your knee, etc) and the infotainment is the same as the Leaf we had in 2014. Oh and the steering, so sad. I suppose the 23mpg it is showing is pretty solid for it's size, but to benefit from that, you'd actually have to drive it.

    Okay, back to the breakfast sandwich discussion.

    25 NX 450h+ / 24 Sienna Plat AWD / 23 Civic Type-R / 21 Boxster GTS 4.0 / 03 Montero Ltd

  • roadburnerroadburner Member Posts: 18,340
    edited December 2020
    corvette said:

    I think I'm two years in on the factory fill on my cheap Bolens push mower. No oil consumption and it still looks normal. Given that the first mower I bought had regular oil changes and only lasted four years, I'm considering it a lifetime fill!

    I guess I really AM OCD- I run synthetic oil in both of my ZTR mowers.

    Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport-2020 C43-1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica
    Wife's: 2021 Sahara 4xe
    Son's: 2018 330i xDrive

  • roadburnerroadburner Member Posts: 18,340
    I normally post my Internet Idjit award on FB, often because the recipient hails from Edmunds. In this case the idjit is from FB. He posted on a Stinger page that he had traded his Stinger GT for a new Silverado because he "needed" a truck. I asked about the particular "need" and his response was, "I bought a house."

    Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport-2020 C43-1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica
    Wife's: 2021 Sahara 4xe
    Son's: 2018 330i xDrive

  • MichaellMichaell Moderator Posts: 262,495
    corvette said:

    qbrozen said:

    Oh I certainly know why cars get heavier. I’m complaining about the fact that most manufacturers put little to no effort in making them lighter.

    Making things lighter is nearly always expensive, especially in aerospace, but in cars also. It's a lot like healthful food -- the egg mcmuffin costs much more than the sausage biscuit.
    I prefer the Sausage Egg McMuffin - you get all the greasiness of the sausage, while at the same time, feeling fancy because you're eating it on an English muffin.
    That’s my breakfast go-to, as well.

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and let us know! Post a pic of your new purchase or lease!


    MODERATOR

    2015 Subaru Outback 3.6R / 2024 Kia Sportage Hybrid SX Prestige

  • corvettecorvette Member Posts: 11,297
    edited December 2020

    corvette said:

    I think I'm two years in on the factory fill on my cheap Bolens push mower. No oil consumption and it still looks normal. Given that the first mower I bought had regular oil changes and only lasted four years, I'm considering it a lifetime fill!

    I guess I really AM OCD- I run synthetic oil in both of my ZTR mowers.
    Fair enough! In this instance, if I'm wrong, the worst that can happen is that I'm out about $200 for a new push mower. I'd take better care of it if it were a more expensive rider. When I had a larger lot to mow and had a rider, I bought a very much oversized and superior oil filter for it, although I can't remember whether I used synthetic.
  • corvettecorvette Member Posts: 11,297
    tifighter said:

    I've got a rental Pathfinder at the moment. Blue, loaded Platinum model. Ugh is it awful. Visibility is ridiculous, buttons are vomited all over the dash in random groupings (audio controls are foot away from the screen, heated steering wheel button is at your knee, etc) and the infotainment is the same as the Leaf we had in 2014. Oh and the steering, so sad. I suppose the 23mpg it is showing is pretty solid for it's size, but to benefit from that, you'd actually have to drive it.

    Okay, back to the breakfast sandwich discussion.

    The only car I've had with a heated steering wheel was my 2012 Murano, and the button was next to my knee, so I have no context for where they are supposed to go. I do remember the seats took a while to warm up, but the wheel would get scalding hot within about a minute. I think 22 MPG was the most I ever got on a tank, and 20 MPG or below was common.
  • au1994au1994 Member Posts: 3,708
    tifighter said:

    I've got a rental Pathfinder at the moment. Blue, loaded Platinum model. Ugh is it awful. Visibility is ridiculous, buttons are vomited all over the dash in random groupings (audio controls are foot away from the screen, heated steering wheel button is at your knee, etc) and the infotainment is the same as the Leaf we had in 2014. Oh and the steering, so sad. I suppose the 23mpg it is showing is pretty solid for it's size, but to benefit from that, you'd actually have to drive it.

    Okay, back to the breakfast sandwich discussion.

    I’ll echo your thoughts. We had a newish one as an Uber pre COVID and the outside was fine I thought, pretty typical CUV styling. We had a crowd so I sat up front and man, the dash was like a flashback to the 90s. Silver with orange backlighting and lots and lots of buttons and knobs.

    Seemed to drive decently well. We got out on the highway and it was smooth, didn’t seem to struggle with power and was decently quiet.

    2024 Jeep Grand Cherokee L Limited Velvet Red over Wicker Beige
    2024 Audi Q5 Premium Plus Daytona Gray over Beige
    2017 BMW X1 Jet Black over Mocha

  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,292
    The ATS has the button for the heated steering wheel on the wheel, near the cruise control buttons.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • ventureventure Member Posts: 3,168
    Here's the heated wheel switch for the Subaru's.


    2025 Forester Limited, 2024 Subaru Legacy Sport

  • oldfarmer50oldfarmer50 Member Posts: 24,217
    edited December 2020
    qbrozen said:

    Speaking of never changing oil... I went to change it in the John Deere. Wow. That was quite the sight. Took out the plug and... nothing. Stuck a screwdriver up there and got a drip. Moved it around a bit to dig through the gunk and then it started to slowly flow out. It came out in lumps. Lol. I threw 3 fresh quarts on top and let those push out the bad stuff. Guess that’s what happens when 1. You never change it and 2. An engine has no filter.

    There are some YouTube video horror stories showcasing cars which have gone extreme miles without an oil change. Oil comes out like honey and they have to scrape the sludge out everywhere. That, and driving a car hard are what I worry about when buying a used car. In one respect, a much older car probably wouldn’t still be running 10 years down the road if it was treated like this:

    https://youtu.be/GjwNoLyr3SM

    2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible

  • oldfarmer50oldfarmer50 Member Posts: 24,217
    corvette said:

    I think I'm two years in on the factory fill on my cheap Bolens push mower. No oil consumption and it still looks normal. Given that the first mower I bought had regular oil changes and only lasted four years, I'm considering it a lifetime fill!

    My previous lawn tractors had no pollution controls and the oil had to be changed every 25 hours of running time. It was really black when it came out. A few years ago I bought a cheap replacement and it came with some pollution gizmo on top of the motor. I was worried it would cause the same performance problems as the 1970s car equivalents but to my surprise the thing always starts and the oil can go the whole season.

    2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible

  • oldfarmer50oldfarmer50 Member Posts: 24,217
    edited December 2020
    stickguy said:

    I just started that Jeep episode. I still have a fondness for AMC, having owned 2 back in my younger (college) days. A Gremlin and a Hornet. Both mid-70s (bumper vintage) units. Hornet was the 3 door hatch, so even kinda cool! Even on that Jeep I can still recognize a lot of the parts.

    My older brother owned a Gremlin and later a Javelin. He ruined the Gremlin by never changing the oil and the Javelin got stolen, vandalized and dumped in the river. The insurance paid it off and even gave him the car back. My younger brother then drove it for about a year after even though it smelled like a swamp and had flies buzzing around inside. It was a 3 speed stick so it was fun to drive at least until it went swimming.

    2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible

  • tjc78tjc78 Member Posts: 16,974
    Heated steering wheel button on the Volvo’s are with the heated seats on the main screen. You press the button and a sub menu pops up for either the seat or wheel.

    Our Enclaves had them right near the cruise buttons on the wheel.

    2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic

  • nyccarguynyccarguy Member Posts: 17,507
    Doug DeMuro posted an extremely positive video on the Ford (Mustang) Mach - E.

    2001 Prelude Type SH, 2022 Highlander XLE AWD, 2025 Camry SE AWD

  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,292
    The ATS has the button for the heated steering wheel on the wheel, near the cruise control buttons.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,740
    I am going to have to remember to change the oil in my ZTM come spring.

    On another maintenance note, I noticed this morn that the X2s front tires are in REALLY bad shape while the rears look like new. Huh..I guess getting them rotated maybe didn’t actually take place? I’ll have to do it my damned self, as usual. Can’t trust anybody.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • laurasdadalaurasdada Member Posts: 5,185
    Heated wheel (virtual) button is on the home screen of the Jag's infotainment screen. So, one touch. Unlike heated seats, where you have to touch seat icons, bringing up a second screen where you can choose one of the three heat level (Very, Nuclear and Liar Liar).
    On the redesigned '16 XF, button moved to steering wheel.

    '21 Dark Blue/Black Audi A7 PHEV (mine); '22 White/Beige BMW X3 (hers); '20 Estoril Blue/Oyster BMW M240xi 'Vert (Ours, read: hers in 'vert weather; mine during Nor'easters...)

  • tjc78tjc78 Member Posts: 16,974

    Heated wheel (virtual) button is on the home screen of the Jag's infotainment screen. So, one touch. Unlike heated seats, where you have to touch seat icons, bringing up a second screen where you can choose one of the three heat level (Very, Nuclear and Liar Liar).
    On the redesigned '16 XF, button moved to steering wheel.

    I honestly don’t know what I prefer... hard buttons everywhere or having all virtual buttons on the touchscreen. At the end of the day as long as you learn it and can pull up things quickly that is all that matters.

    2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic

  • laurasdadalaurasdada Member Posts: 5,185
    Yes, I've become quite accustomed to the much maligned Jag infotainment system. Haven't really had any issues with it, but if I had my druthers, I prefer logically laid out buttons (or toggles! Love toggles!). I actually like the cascade of buttons on the Porsche Macan console, if I get a high $ litany of required maintenance work (might need front brakes, at least) from today's oil change/tire rotation/inspection on the XF, the Macan (used) is on my list of potentially mad, end of the year car shopping.
    I almost pulled the trigger on a loaded 2020 XF S, $17k consumer cash plus $8k off MSRP, so a real good starting point for negotiations. I figured it would remain on the dealer lot post today's inspection review. I was wrong.
    I remain the anti-breld.

    '21 Dark Blue/Black Audi A7 PHEV (mine); '22 White/Beige BMW X3 (hers); '20 Estoril Blue/Oyster BMW M240xi 'Vert (Ours, read: hers in 'vert weather; mine during Nor'easters...)

  • breldbreld Member Posts: 6,922
    nyccarguy said:

    Doug DeMuro posted an extremely positive video on the Ford (Mustang) Mach - E.

    I am actually watching that right now. Throttle House and Straight Pipes also posted their reviews.

    After seeing it in the flesh last week, I will say that I like it a lot (but I’m also a sucker for new designs). It’s a nice size, competitive with that compact SUV market. The sloped hatch of course intrudes into the cargo room, but that’s becoming more and more common with modern design. The interior was nice looking - it has the obligatory large touchscreen, but with some knobs and buttons thrown in there.

    Unlike the Leaf and Bolt, and Kia/Hyundai offerings, it’s certainly trying to appeal to the buyers’ emotional aside at least as much as their practical side.

    If they had simply borrowed the design elements of the Mustang for the exterior, but refrained from using the name - would that have been less offensive?

    2024 Audi Q8 e-tron - 2017 911 C4S - 2025 BRZ - 2023 A6 Allroad - 2024 Genesis GV60 - 2019 Cayman

  • 28firefighter28firefighter Member Posts: 9,834
    The Mach-E is on my list for the future, but I want (1) the initial hype to wear off and standard Ford rebates to come into play, and (2) would like first/second year issues worked out. I find it way more compelling than the VW ID4.
    2025 Jetta GLI Autobahn, 2024 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xE
  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,292
    I suspect the Mustang name will go away sooner or later on this if the traditional Mustang remains in production. Just the Mach-E name alone isn't a bad choice.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

This discussion has been closed.