By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I looked at Mustangs of this vintage a few years back (in my last toy phase). I also was looking at cheaper ones, and drove a few that frankly scared the crap out of me. Not nice driving at all. That, and knowing that the rust you see is only the tip of the iceberg..
I decided that if I got one it would be a later model (Mustang, Camaro, etc.). Something like a '71 -'72, with some padding in the interior, a few (minimal) safety features like shoulder belts, etc.
Of course, I ended up with a Miata...
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
Also, he conveniently eliminated the 20% deduct for 6 cylinder engine off the value chart.
One would have to put the car on a lift to see what's what underneath. With a rotted out exhaust manifold and exhaust system, one has to wonder what's going on under there.
The 6 cylinder isn't that slow really. The V8 was certainly no powerhouse, although it made a lot of noise.
Simple car to work on, and if it's really solid, it might be worth $5K. You should be able to buy a very very nice 6 cylinder car for $10,000 all ready to go inside outside and under.
I would put it at $2500, top dollar. And I don't believe the mileage. After all, in one statement he says two owners, in another that it has only been titled to one owner.
hmmm.
The seller's claims of low mileage are reckless, as he could be held to it by the buyer and be up the creek on this sale.
"GREAT INVESTMENT CAR"....uh no
Speaking of Mustangs...I know the 65-66 is more desired, but this looks decent
as shifty said, the 6-cylinder isn't that slow. it can hold its own against today's 4-cylinder family cars. they had good torque and it is a relatively light car.
i think i've told this story around here before, but that 6-cyl 3-speed auto combo is the one I drove through 3 states at "over 110 mph" (and i can only say it was somewhere over 110 because that is as high as the speedo went and i had the needle buried). So it has no trouble keeping up with today's traffic. heck, if nothing else, it would be quite a bit faster than my Alfa.
Anyway, wife said no to the stang.
she's no fun.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
You wouldn't believe the junk people call me to appraise after Uncle Fred dies and leaves the 'classic' in the back yard. Right off they want to kill the messenger, as if somehow I was the one who bought a brand new 6 cylinder Mustang coupe without power steering in 1965 rather than the K code 4-speed convertible.
I know he spent a long time restoring it, and now a few years later rust is bubbling up already. I don't know if it's the sheetmetal or the bodywork that was done.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1954-A6-GCS-CONVERTIBLE-MASERATI-REPLICA-7-OF-7-M- ADE_W0QQitemZ200101912970QQihZ010QQcategoryZ7251QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1994-Honda-Accord-Wagon-JDM-H22-swap_W0QQitemZ170- 106872639QQihZ007QQcategoryZ6254QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1991-ACURA-NSX-actual-miles-15-790-Mint-extras_W0- QQitemZ230123505786QQihZ013QQcategoryZ5337QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1G4CW5133H1411640_W0QQitemZ170106864903QQihZ007QQ- categoryZ6139QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
Could you please stop this? Or at least wait until I've had breakfast? The Honda wagon was the worst.
Mercy.
The Lucas mobile is sorta interesting... I like how they call it "a 'used' car". What SHOULD we call it? An 'unused' car, since it wasn't used much in its 17 years of life?
I don't think Andre does old front drivers..
-Mathias
What year was it that GM started to really boost the reliability on these cars? IIRC, the 1985-86 models were pretty bad, but by 1988 they got a lot of the kinks worked out. But I can't remember what side of the fence, reliability-wise, the 1987's fell. Thinking back though, my ex-wife's mother had an '87 LeSabre, which is mechanically identical, and she never had anything major or expensive go wrong with it. Last I heard, which was awhile back now, was that it was up to around 120,000 miles. She was running into financial problems though, and wasn't able to take care of the car, so she couldn't afford to get the little problems fixed that could potentially turn into big ones.
Lemko bought an '88 Park Ave not too long ago that looks like a close color to that '87. I think he's had pretty good luck with his.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Volvo-Amazon-122s-1961-Personalized-Vintage-Car_W- 0QQitemZ130104755859QQihZ003QQcategoryZ6458QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
Good if you own an oil company
Not a project or anything too odd...just seems like a really decent used car, this style Accord has grown on me over the years, sound design
Whale
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/V-4-dr-Sedan-Manual-5-7L-V8-SFI-Red-Line_W0QQitem- Z160109995740QQihZ006QQcategoryZ43903QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
This has to be the slowest and worst handling car suggested yet
You wanted a money pit how about two
now this one tempts me
The momo steering wheel would be the FIRST thing to go if it were in my garage.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
I felt that they were a clean, functional design with just enough Accord styling-cues to look like a proper Honda. It is the clean designs that age well, while the trendy ones soon become dated.
To me, the 1992-93 models are far more desirable than the 1991 posted, because the automatic seatbelts were deleted when the driver-side airbag was introduced in '92. Although I don't need a second car, I would be sorely tempted by a clean, unmolested, low-mile, 5-spd 1993 Accord Wagon. Fortunately, such a vehicle has become practically non-existent. :shades:
james
I think one criticism of the 1990 Accord at the time was the loss of the hidden headlights. I always liked the style of the '90-93, though. There's something a bit BMW-ish in the C-pillar shape, and I like the ultra-low beltline and generous use of window glass. I guess overall, the car was a bit reactionary to the 1987-91 Camry, but overall I thought it was nicely done. I think it's a style that's aged nicely, too.
As one book on classic British cars put it,(written in the UK by the way) about people who buy them and restore them:
"Current owners have saved a whale".
They were a well-built car, but vastly overweight and pitifully underpowered.
Next to a Jaguar XK120 of the same period, it was no contest whatsoever.
If you own an Alvis in America, you might as well epoxy the tires to the garage floor, because you're going to either give this car away or own it forever.
Mercy.
As if the wagon was not bad enough, there was an ATV painted the exact same color in the last photo! :surprise: *runs screaming*
My '88 Park Avenue hasn't let me down. Maybe this car is my car's older sister? Heck, it's even got the same Duralast battery as my ride.
Buick Grand National GNX
Going to CarMax if not sold
Matalic orange with gold flacks and two black racing stripes with gold flacks The custum paint cost $5,000 A must see car And, of course, no pics.
This is very cool, but what's the market for decal-deep replica of a car that won a race 47 years ago?
Hate the paint, hate the wheels, but what a CAR
"Rare car"
You are right though, the market for Alvi is small, even here. Though they still bring a reasonable value here (That one was cheap, if only I had the money)