By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
That is a 3.5l straight 6 in a relatively small BMW. The later ones (e34) are considerably bigger. I think they are more responsive than a 300E of the era because IIRC the Benz used recirculating ball and chain as opposed to rack and pinion.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1969-pontiac-gto-catalina-wagon-WOW-NICE-CAR-400-- a-c_W0QQitemZ160112117741QQihZ006QQcategoryZ7244QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
That car was a piece of junk (moreso because of the way the previous owner, my cousin treated it than anything GM ever did), but I still miss it sometimes. It was a great handling car for its size. When it ran, at least! It tended to overheat, and had a ravenous appetite for starter solenoids.
I always thought it just had a 400 4-bbl under the hood, but then I heard later that the Bonneville came standard with a 428, and the 400 was a credit option. I'll have to look around and see if I still have anything with that Bonneville's VIN on it, so I can look it up sometime.
"I bought it from a elderly lady who checked herself into a nursing home."
Mint condition but $8,000?
Pretty, oh so pretty...
Now HERE'S a Salesman !
Column A or Column B or Column C
I lean towards Column A myself but it's your money or your time.
Is this thing factory?
No, not even $500
I do like these as convertibles
Nice if you like this sort of thing, but I'd prefer some fenders
'57/59 Dodge coupes--so he's asking top top dollar and has no pictures or model designations or options. AND he has an attitude already about everyone trying to cheat him out of his treasures. Keep the freakin' things buddy.
70 Mustang--what's with the weird striping? Kinda strange.
Model T Roadster--depends on whether it's all-metal or not. If not, who wants it? Hard hard sell if its glass.
94 Ford SHO---uh....try about half that asking price and be grateful to get it.
20" wheels on a 67 Camaro---that should hammer the chassis to smithereens....wear a raincoat and duct-tape the glass to the body. This body is going to flex like nobody's business.
'69 Ghia -- fair enough price if it's really show quality.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1966-Pontiac-Bonneville-Outstanding-classic_W0QQi- - - temZ220107595813QQihZ012QQcategoryZ6417QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
Value as it sits? Maybe $1,800.
2. Seller says it was repainted at some time. Then he says it is the original paint.
3. No photos of the passenger side exterior.
4. Trunk looks like it is hiding rust - somewhat surprising for a car that was garaged its whole life until a week ago.
I dunno, looks like quite a bargain to me! All i have to do is bring new rims/tires with me and I can drive it home! :lemon:
I don't know how much this guy wants, but this is an amazing looking classic tank.
This SL has my wife's name written all over it. its even in her color.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
It's just an old used car. Figure $3,500--$5,000 is all the money, same for any old Benz 4-door from the 60s.
380SL--nice, I like those....chrome bumpers, not so porky like the 450SLs. As long as everything works and there's no rust, try to low-ball it.
so what's a fair price on the 380? is that a reliable model?
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
As for rust, one thing that's always bothered me about Bonnevilles is all that pot-metal trim along the lower edges of the car. It can hide rust for a long time, until it's so bad that the trim falls off and there's nothing left behind it! Catalinas usually didn't have any trim down there, so there was less chance for dirt and moisture to get trapped, and when rust did start, you'd see it more quickly.
Also looks like some rust is coming through on the lower part of the front fender on the passenger side.
That SL looks great, I love the color too. It was called "China Blue", it is related to the color of my fintail. I can't recall ever seeing a 107 in that color, very rare. Nice.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/COLLECTORS-MINT-1969-MERCURY-MARQUIS-4-DOOR_W0QQi- - temZ220108321927QQihZ012QQcategoryZ6882QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
Where do people come up with these prices? Again, it's a nice car for what it is, but it's still a pee-green, low-option, '69 Mercury Marquis sedan; it's not low-production, interesting or rare.
MB 3.5 sedan -- it's just an old used car. Best thing to do with a 4-door V8 like that would be, in my opinion, to part it out and save that precious and shockingly high priced engine for a 3.5 coupe or cabriolet. It would sure beat a $16,000 rebuild.
Very risky car these 70s V8 sedans---one major component failure and the car (and your total investment) is gone. I call them "German Roulette" cars---one of these days there will be a bullet in the chamber when you turn the ignition key, and then...you're dead....well, your checkbook is dead. It's no fun when your car's engine is worth 3X what the car is worth. It's kind of a ridiculous situation.
I think the 6 would be better all around for a daily driver sedan. The high grille doesn't have the charm of the earlier slanted grilles and dual headlights haven't aged well....BUT...but they are comfy and good cruisers---certainly you could take one the freeways, no problemo....A 280SEC 2.8 six, with a sunroof would be a nicer choice I think--there's upside to value, better fuel mileage and cheaper maintenance costs---and they are reasonable attractive in profile at least.
Of course, you could probably sell a 3.5 convertible in boxes for double a completely restored sedan, sad to say.
So as a cheap daily driver, sure why not? As a "project"? There absolutely no upside to fixing up a car like this. This breed will disappear to make pieces for the 3.5 coupes and convertibles.
Where's the accelerator pedal?
He says leather, but I'm pretty sure you could only get vinyl back then (besides cloth of course).
Yeah, that Bonneville just has vinyl. I notice that mistake a lot with old car ads though, where they mistake vinyl for leather. Pontiac used something called "morrokide", but I dunno if that was just their marketing term for vinyl, or if it really was a higher-quality vinyl?
Real leather was offered in the Bonneville for awhile in the earlier 60's, but I think it was phased out by 1966.
I wonder how many miles it really has on it? It looks good, but I notice the seller says 18,500 miles on it since "complete rebuild". I imagine "complete rebuild" is open to interpretation.
Looks like it's covered by the floor mat, which raises the question-Why did the seller do that? What the floor mat covering? Hmmmmmm...
That's exactly what happened to my parents' 300D. Granted it was no V8, but because older MB are known for having not the most accurate gauges, the oil leaked out (without them knowing, the oil gauge didn't show anything)and the engine seized up. The estimate was about $5k for a motor rebuild.
And it was the same China Blue as the SL in the ads.
Just a little off topic here, I went to an importer's website (they import 15 year old BMWs and MBs from Japan to Canada) for quite cheap, and noticed some of the 89 up SLs had rear seats. I always thought those were two seaters, unless this was some kind of aftermarket option. Check it out:
These cars seem like bargains as well with decent kms (this one is about $11k CDN).
However for the mileage they look quite worn (especially driver's seats).
2016 Audi A7 3.0T S Line, 2021 Subaru WRX
Yeah, that's just a shelf under there...if you had a real padded seat your head would be sticking way up over the windshield...like the Pope...
Did you know that W107s raced in the Trans-Am series in 1981-1982. Needless to say, the Camaros and Mustangs killed them...
SL rear seat
The one in that pic is early too, note the W126 style steering wheel.
However for the mileage they look quite worn (especially driver's seats).
Having lived in Japan and driven extensively there, I would caution you to drop your normal association of milage and wear when considering Japanese cars. Although the country is small, it's very crowded and traffic moves slowly.
Instead of milage, you'd be better off knowing 'hours of operation' as they do in airplanes.
I owned a used car with 40,000 Kilometers on it at one point. The turnsignal switch wore out. It didn't break; the contacts wore out from thousands and thousands and thousands of signaled turned in those 40K.
So your worn seats are saying exactly what you think they're saying. "I'm tired!"
Last year a friend of the family bought a 96 (I think) SL320 with something like 40K miles on it for under 20K, a one owner Seattle car from a very well to do individual who maintained it by the book. It's a nice ride for the money.
I saw the car last weekend...the owner is someone I have known since I was a child. She's getting older now, around 70 maybe, but has always liked to have a special car, I remember she had an Alfa Spyder and a Porsche 914 when I was growing up, among others (and her husband had a 1950 Caddy convertible). She loves this MB roadster, and I took her for a ride in the E55, which she was impressed with as well.
speaking of which, my wife had an interesting conversation with a mechanic this past weekend. She's feeling a bit guilty that I don't get to work on my spider, so she called this mechanic not too far away who specializes in italians. I asked that she just get a quote on replacing the rear springs so I can get an idea of his costs (and of course see the quality of his work and knowledge). Anyway, he told her he won't even discuss the car until he can see it in person. We'd have to bring it over so he can assess if he will work on it. If it is in poor shape, he won't.
I kind of look at this from both sides. On one hand, I can probably understand his position. I mean, I can imagine folks like this may have been burned in the past when they present a customer with a bill and the customer walks out, leaving them with a car worth less than the labor. On the other hand, he's immediately put me in a defensive position. My car has to go for an audition??! Just HOW expensive are you??! Is my money not good enough for you??! OK, so you've had problems, but don't tell someone these things on the phone. Give me a quote, ask me to come down, and if my car doesn't meet your "standards" THEN turn me away. Ya gotta get the business in the door before you can pick and choose what you want to do, ya know?
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
2016 Audi A7 3.0T S Line, 2021 Subaru WRX
But it's cheap enough...
Here we go again
"Very Rare"
Run away
Ford Skyliner---rough rough car but as sick as it makes me to say it- he may get close to his price. It's a $30K car when you're done...(that long road ahead....cue music). My offer? If I wanted one, and this thing actually does what the guy says it will do---maybe $6,500. But it's a complete tear down no matter how you look at it and so, no upside in the near future at any rate. You don't see many people worshipping the year 1954 for some reason.
LOL.
Boz
'76 Spider
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S