It looks just fine. Few automobiles are truly ugly anymore today. As a matter of fact, it'd be hard for me to name any truly ugly cars anymore there are fewer and fewer of them these days.
That said, here are three interiors that I do not care for:
Terrible!
And this--
And this:
All three look terrible--although the top one is a little old. The updated version it really carries now is still bad.
The Camry interior is not terrible. The Ridgeline is a truck, and not supposed to be pretty. But there is no excuse for the Malibu, except cost cutting.
The last thing Honda is doing is mimicing VW interiors. Also you're not gonna see anything like the Civic interior in the new Accord. What kind of nonsense is that?
Yea - I love the two-tone interior color scheme. Looks as good in the GM as it does in the Infinitis. Honda should adopt it. Its beautiful.
Add that color palette to typical aircraft quality fit and finish Honda interiors and they'll pull in even more buyers.
I just think that two tone interior in the Chevy is too trendy and will become outdated very quickly. I also don't like that shade of brown--again personal preference.
Two tone on the dash is ok by me, but not on the seats. It's just too much IMO. Not crazy about that shade of brown either. A little lighter brown maybe. Others seem to like it though.
I have no clue why you find that offensive. Volkswagen/Audi is the benchmark for industry interiors.
That's just the way it is. Does that make you feel inferior in any way? I sense you're bristling at this and I have no reason why.
If one's self-worth is wrapped-up in the brand of car that one buy so much so, admitting that they take cues from another brand's cars makes one feel inferior, then one has very serious problems one should have addressed.
That is simply the way the industry works, There's nothing else to it really. Some manufacturers are better than others at various things. Some are more consistent than others. The perfect car will never be made. So manufacturers benchmark one another at all levels. All of them do--every last one.
Anyways, Honda is moving toward a less plebeian design language in the future--both inside and out, and Acura is leading the way for them so-to-speak. The Civic won't be out on a limb alone after this redesign.:
Here is the Honda Accord Coupe Concept sketch from a while back--
That sketch looks a lot like the G-35 coupe my wife will be turning in in the next few days (end of lease). She just got a new Honda CR-V (lease)today.
And people used to complain that the '06 Sonata copied the Accord tail lights! LOL.
A lot of people are basing their feelings about the Camry on the last generation. Its worth repeating: I'm an 07 Camry owner who would NOT have purchased a pre-07 Camry.
I don't mean to offend anybody that did, but I dislike the styling of those cars (too bland) and I really hated the interior.
THIS is the Camry that I like (and it happens to be the same trim and color (Barcelona Red) as mine:
And since we are arguing about price, if you want a Camry V6, which is the fastest car in the midsize class, then its yours for $22,700, or $100 over invoice. If you want to go basic, you can get into a Camry for $18700 at the same dealer.
Lets not pretend every Camry costs thousands more than every Fusion. If you want a Sonata Limited you're looking at $22+ right now as well.
Until i get a "It IS the new accord coupe" from the boss of honda,I will look at it as being the new Acura CL. For the CL, its a more natural evo/revo-lution.
or even as the new prelude. It seems to be a transition for it also. It is just TOO sporty/good looking to be an accord. This picture puts me at un- accord.
ps:TOO MANY POSTS IN HERE!! A MINIMUM OF 40 POSTS DAILY MAKES IT DIFFICULT TO KEEP UP WITH THE POST I LEAVE A DAY BEFORE!! Not that too many posts is a bad thing ! Ok continue.
Have any of you guys seen it? Have any of you checked it out?
Test drove an XR two weeks ago. The one I test drove had a leather trimmed interior but not the Morocco Brown version. I did sit in one with the Morocco Brown leather and thought it way over the top. Anyway my impressions of the Aura XR are:
Interior is nice (except the Morocco Brown).
Exteriors of the 2007 Camry, 2007 Altima, 2006/7 Sonata, Accord, and Passat are more appealing.
Power trains of the Camry V6, Altima V6, and Sonata V6 (I have not test driven an Accord V6) feel more responsive than the XRs 3.6L with the six speed automatic.
The sticker price (which included some dealer BS add-ons) of the Aura that I test drove was over $27,000. Since it's a Saturn it's a no haggle price. For that much money, I'd rather have an Azera Limited with the Ultimate package, or Camry XLE V6.
mfletou1 wrote: "If you want a Sonata Limited you're looking at $22+ right now as well."
The $22K+ figure you quoted is not correct, at least at my Hyundai dealer it is not. I have a firm quote from them and it is as follows: $19,091, not including TTL here in Illinois. The total delivered price, including TTL, for a 2007 Sonata Limited is $20,574, a far cry from $22K+.
Fitzmall is not even close to being price competitive with Pugi Hyundai/Mazda/VW.
Well, "good design" is subjective. to a large degree--without doubt.
Build quality and "feel" (which is the issue here) are less so the further away you get from "perfection". So anybody making even a half-decent effort would benchmark. That's the only way you know if your own efforts really mean anything at all.
If you're going to do that, then VW/Audi is usually your "standard"--just as how BMW often ends-up as the benchmark for handling (something that can also be subjective at the limit).
To me, if you are going to call a car the "limited" version, then it certainly should have those options. Once I had a car with a sunroof, I could never go back.
Not sure what you're trying to say with this rambling mumbo jumbo, but implying that (somehow) VW/Audi sets some kind of standard for interior excellence is silly.....unless you're into the finer points of say...a German jazz band.
Once I had a car with a sunroof, I could never go back
I agree - but the term 'sunroof' has been suplanted by 'moonroof', at least here in the Southeast, where we try to avoid the sun a bit more. Balmy nights with the moonroof open are a beautiful thing.
It is not necessary for you to be so unkind. I should think it unwise to assume that one knows all there is to know about cars. One wonders what your reaction would be if I told you that Lexus was a benchmark for quality in the industry.
On second thought, perhaps it doesn't really matter. It is esoteric really.
"Where are you getting info that Acura is resurrecting the CL?"
I said by looks, the accord coupe concept looks to sporty/handsome to be the next american accord. But the shape of many lines reflect those of the 2003cl. Just look at the tail lamps, greenhouse (windows), and even around the rear bumper. If you look at those pictures back to back, you may or may not see it.
Also the CL was just a dressed up accord v6 coupe with some extra horses. The same as the Tl but as a sedan. And with the RSX gone, acura could use some good looking reasonably priced sporty coupes and convertible.
That coupe concept if made into just a hard top convertible and priced at $38k with acuras new 300hp 3.7l v6 and sh-awd, will put this car right there with BMW but for a few thousand less. Then theres the C70 and EOS (v6) that will both get blown away by those ideas in a comparison.
-Cj :P Sorry for any confusion ~*~*~MERRY CHRISTMAS!!~*~*~
everyone! Had a great Xmas with the family. Hope all you did too! Even the Honda/Toyota crowd . Just a bit of news that I need to dispell about the 3.0 put in the Fusion/Milan. In other chat rooms I am constantly having to correct Honda/Toyota fans.. Yes, the 3.0 in the Fusion/Milan are using variable valve timing. This is part of what gives it 21 more HP over the 3.0 used in the Escape/Trib/Mariner. Not sure if this engine is used in the Freestyle. Anyhoo.. just a bit of news u can use.. The Malibu looks great! Interior looks fantastic too!... Not really a huge fan of the Civic interior, I don't like the huge digital speedo.. VW/Audi have always had some of the best interiors, this is known throughout the auto world.
The Malibu looks great! Interior looks fantastic too!...
Finally! I do like the interior of the new Malibu - looks like they are finally taking enough of the good stuff from their Opel counterparts! Smart move Chevy... I really like the arcing curves in the new Malibu's interior.
Finally! I do like the interior of the new Malibu - looks like they are finally taking enough of the good stuff from their Opel counterparts!
I have to say I can't see it... the radio stack is plain ugly squarish. The basic steering wheel has those old style big clunky buttons (the wheel on the SS is how they should do buttons/controls on the wheel). Its not bad, but Detroit needs to get rid of those ugly squarish center radio/climate control stacks.
So what is lame about the Fusion or Sonata? Yes, a Sonata V6 can usually be had for the price of a Camry 4 cylinder. Then there is the Accord 4 banger. Too bad the V6 cost so much. They should be discounting the V6 Accords since their pricing is steep to begin with, the look is getting old, and a new design is on the way. This to me equates to around $4K off, yet I doubt Honda dealers feel the same way Looks wise, I am kinda liking the Milan, or even the Mazda6, though it should be changing soon. Sonata/Accords are OK, yet somewhat boring to the eye. The Camry looks interesting now, except for the odd nose on the poor thing. It needs a nose job - soon! Guess, if buying new, I would test out the Milan and Mazda6, as they seem about the most interesting to me at the moment. The Altima closet-outs may be good though. Used, I am still thinking of the CTS as a possible car, or perhaps another FWD Caddy of recent times. -Loren
The Canadian Automotive Journalists Assn. (www,caja.com) has posted the 2007 results. This award is as unbiased and objective an award as it gets!
The 2007 category winners are:
Best New Small Car (under $18,000): Winner: Honda FIT LX Best New Small Car (over $18,000): Winner: Volkswagen Rabbit 2.5 Best New Family Car ($22,000 - $30,000): Winner: Toyota Camry LE Best New Family Car (over $30,000): Winner: Toyota Camry Hybrid Best New Luxury Car (under $50,000): Winner: Lexus ES 350 Best New Prestige Car: Winner: Audi S8 Best New Sports / Performance Car (under $50,000): Winner: Mazdaspeed3 Best New Sports / Performance Car (over $50,000): Winner: BMW 3-Series Coupé Best New Convertible: Winner: Volkswagen EOS 2.0T Best New Pick-up Truck: Winner: Chevrolet Avalanche Best New SUV / CUV (under $35,000): Winner: Toyota RAV4 - V6 Sport Best New SUV / CUV ($35,000 - $60,000): Winner: Acura RDX Technology Package Best New SUV / CUV (over $60,000): Winner: Mercedes-Benz GL Class
whether the 3.0 uses VVT or not is not really the problem with the engine - it has to do with what it feel and sounds like at 4 grand or above. The Honda V6 is only SOHC and still is in a different neighborhood refinement wise, not to mention the Nissan VQ and the Toyota 2GR and even the Hyundai V6. And I still read reports of 'harshness' in the new 3.5, an engine that should apparently be better.
The primary thing that differentiates the interior of the 2007 Sonata GLS and the 2007 Sonata Limited, other than some options not typically noted by the eye, is the leather. Exterior is different, primarily by the 17" alloys and tires, and the dual exhausts due to the Lambda V6. Otherwise, they are almost analogous on a equipment basis.
Sure, the Sonata GLS interior pales compared to the Camry LE due to Hyundai's choice of the bath robe interior cloth material, but otherwise it is appropriate to compare the GLS to the LE.
Camry LE has cloth interior, 4-cylinder engine, steel wheels/wheel covers, as does the Sonata GLS, so why would you want to compare the LE to the Limited? If you did choose to do that, the LE loses, especially on price, equipment, and amenities.
Not only does the Camry need a new front end treatment, it also needs a new rear end. It looks like someone smashed it during the design stage.
Yea - the Camry grill is rough-looking with the engorged tick on the front end. The Fusion razor blade treatment also looks goofy, and the Sonata's 1980s look is an unattractive. Stark contrasts to good lookers like the Aura, the Accord, and the Mazda 6.
You gotta go up the ladder in stature to get to the real lookers like the TL, the G35, Lexus, the 335. Pay the $.
"Stark contrasts to good lookers like the Aura, the Accord, and the Mazda 6."
The only one that really stands out in these 3 is the Mazda 6. The Aura/Accord look very, very much alike. I have parked my Fusion side by side to a new Accord and when you do this the Fusion makes the Accord look plain frumpy... :shades:
"The only one that really stands out in these 3 is the Mazda 6. The Aura/Accord look very, very much alike. I have parked my Fusion side by side to a new Accord and when you do this the Fusion makes the Accord look plain frumpy"
Styling is subjective as I'm sure you will agree. I'm not yet sure of the Aura, but in this class the Fusion is at the bottom of the list, just plain ugly. I happen to like the style of the Accord. The Camry hasn't grown on me.
Kind of a pity now isn't it. Best small car is an ugly little thing I would not want to take on any freeway here in USA. Best new small car is the olf Rabbit, which may be a deal cost wise for a car built in Germany. But really, the look is so far from new. Best family car needs a nose job, and possibly an old transmission to be a hit to me. Best new convertible is the VW EOS? Have you seen what they look like? Best SUV - I am sure someone cares, they all look alike to me, and are best used as a point a-b appliance travel machine. The best they can come up with for sport is the Mazdaspeed3? Nice little overpriced car, but with all the cars made, nothing is really out there in fun RWD smaller cars for a reasonable price. Choice of coupes is really bad. Yeah, the BMW3 would be nice, but there are us poor people ya know.
For fun, I think perhaps in a smaller sedan the Mazda6 is the choice, with possibly the Milan being a fairly good ride. In coupes, I guess I would have to buy an older Mustang. I am not sold on the New Stang. In luxury, any used Cadillac would be fine. Enough prestige for me, and they are not too bad for reliability and number of dealerships. If I was throwing my money around, I doubt it would be for an Audi, though possibly the A4 as good little sport in snow county. I live on dry road country land. -Loren
Actually, on exterior styling alone, out of these, I'd put the Mazda, Accord, and Aura all about the same, with the Fusion above them. The Mazda just looks "Japanese" and not particularly stylish in its shape. The Ford looks much better because it doesn't fall into mainstream rut with its basic shape.
And since we are arguing about price, if you want a Camry V6, which is the fastest car in the midsize class, then its yours for $22,700, or $100 over invoice. If you want to go basic, you can get into a Camry for $18700 at the same dealer.
Lets not pretend every Camry costs thousands more than every Fusion.
Who's pretending? 2007 V-6 Fusion can be had for invoice minus $1000 rebate...which comes to undeer $19K. The base model invoice, less rebate, would be under $16K. So in both cases price is $2700+ lower. On top of this, discount financing is available, which would save most buyers another $1000+.
Most rebates are an either/or choice with the bought down interest rates? But, in any case - check the current values of 3-5 year old Camrys vs. the same for the Taurus (the Fusion is too new and there is no indication yet that it will or will not be any different that any other Ford product from a depreciation perspective) - the value difference approaches 5 grand on comparable 03 models - kind of makes the $2700.00 money well spent doesn't it? Less money up front will almost always also mean less money later. A logical reason to spend the extra money on what the market perceives as more desirable cars, a difference that, of course, does shrink with time.
"The best they can come up with for sport is the Mazdaspeed3? Nice little overpriced car, but with all the cars made, nothing is really out there in fun RWD smaller cars for a reasonable price."
Are you serious? For 22k you get a whole lot of performance. Go out and drive one- maybe you'll change your tune.
Well, it's a lot less "mainstream" looking than the Accord in my opinion, without resorting a bangle-butt. The only thing is that rear visibility wasn't too good relative to my Honda.
Comments
As a matter of fact, it'd be hard for me to name any truly ugly cars anymore there are fewer and fewer of them these days.
That said, here are three interiors that I do not care for:
Terrible!
And this--
And this:
All three look terrible--although the top one is a little old. The updated version it really carries now is still bad.
Yea - I love the two-tone interior color scheme. Looks as good in the GM as it does in the Infinitis. Honda should adopt it. Its beautiful.
Add that color palette to typical aircraft quality fit and finish Honda interiors and they'll pull in even more buyers.
Oh, I just assumed it was a Camry (it's a Tundra interior). Not bad, but kind of delicate looking for a truck interior.
Volkswagen/Audi is the benchmark for industry interiors.
That's just the way it is.
Does that make you feel inferior in any way?
I sense you're bristling at this and I have no reason why.
If one's self-worth is wrapped-up in the brand of car that one buy so much so, admitting that they take cues from another brand's cars makes one feel inferior, then one has very serious problems one should have addressed.
That is simply the way the industry works, There's nothing else to it really.
Some manufacturers are better than others at various things.
Some are more consistent than others.
The perfect car will never be made.
So manufacturers benchmark one another at all levels. All of them do--every last one.
Anyways, Honda is moving toward a less plebeian design language in the future--both inside and out, and Acura is leading the way for them so-to-speak. The Civic won't be out on a limb alone after this redesign.:
Here is the Honda Accord Coupe Concept sketch from a while back--
It should show up at NAIAS 2007.
And people used to complain that the '06 Sonata copied the Accord tail lights! LOL.
I don't mean to offend anybody that did, but I dislike the styling of those cars (too bland) and I really hated the interior.
THIS is the Camry that I like (and it happens to be the same trim and color (Barcelona Red) as mine:
And since we are arguing about price, if you want a Camry V6, which is the fastest car in the midsize class, then its yours for $22,700, or $100 over invoice. If you want to go basic, you can get into a Camry for $18700 at the same dealer.
Lets not pretend every Camry costs thousands more than every Fusion. If you want a Sonata Limited you're looking at $22+ right now as well.
http://www.fitzmall.com/carfind/resultsb.asp?Search=NEW&ID=T024228&photo=TO07255- 2&loc=FTO&mall=CH&year=2007&mk_code=TO
www.fitzmall.com is the place for real prices if you want GM, Toyota, Hyundai, Chrysler products, Subaru, Mitsu, etc.
I think that's referring to Audi interior's superior fit and finish and not necessary meant that they have a better interior design.
Personally I'll take Accord, Camry and Mazda6's interior over Passat's and IS350/250, TL, G35's interior over A4's.
I think it looks very similar to the 06 TL rear. I find it hard to believe the license plate will be that low. It's only a sketch.
or even as the new prelude. It seems to be a transition for it also. It is just TOO sporty/good looking to be an accord. This picture puts me at un- accord.
ps:TOO MANY POSTS IN HERE!! A MINIMUM OF 40 POSTS DAILY MAKES IT DIFFICULT TO KEEP UP WITH THE POST I LEAVE A DAY BEFORE!! Not that too many posts is a bad thing
~*~*~*~HAPPY HOLIDAYS~*~*~*~
-Cj
Have any of you checked it out?
Test drove an XR two weeks ago. The one I test drove had a leather trimmed interior but not the Morocco Brown version. I did sit in one with the Morocco Brown leather and thought it way over the top. Anyway my impressions of the Aura XR are:
Interior is nice (except the Morocco Brown).
Exteriors of the 2007 Camry, 2007 Altima, 2006/7 Sonata, Accord, and Passat are more appealing.
Power trains of the Camry V6, Altima V6, and Sonata V6 (I have not test driven an Accord V6) feel more responsive than the XRs 3.6L with the six speed automatic.
The sticker price (which included some dealer BS add-ons) of the Aura that I test drove was over $27,000. Since it's a Saturn it's a no haggle price. For that much money, I'd rather have an Azera Limited with the Ultimate package, or Camry XLE V6.
The $22K+ figure you quoted is not correct, at least at my Hyundai dealer it is not. I have a firm quote from them and it is as follows: $19,091, not including TTL here in Illinois. The total delivered price, including TTL, for a 2007 Sonata Limited is $20,574, a far cry from $22K+.
Fitzmall is not even close to being price competitive with Pugi Hyundai/Mazda/VW.
Build quality and "feel" (which is the issue here) are less so the further away you get from "perfection".
So anybody making even a half-decent effort would benchmark.
That's the only way you know if your own efforts really mean anything at all.
If you're going to do that, then VW/Audi is usually your "standard"--just as how BMW often ends-up as the benchmark for handling (something that can also be subjective at the limit).
a clutch...alas I was wrong...Merry Christmas All
Fitz has a "base" Limited for $20452.
http://www.fitzmall.com/carfind/resultsb.asp?Search=NEW&ID=H234930&photo=HY07254- 62&loc=LFO&mall=GA&year=2007&mk_code=HY
But if you want a sunroof and a 6 disc changer (like, for instance, and Accord EX), then you are looking at $22k, which is a little over $3k off MSRP:
http://www.fitzmall.com/carfind/resultsb.asp?Search=NEW&ID=H210869&photo=HY07254- 62&loc=LFO&mall=GA&year=2007&mk_code=HY
To me, if you are going to call a car the "limited" version, then it certainly should have those options. Once I had a car with a sunroof, I could never go back.
I agree - but the term 'sunroof' has been suplanted by 'moonroof', at least here in the Southeast, where we try to avoid the sun a bit more. Balmy nights with the moonroof open are a beautiful thing.
Merry Christmas.
One wonders what your reaction would be if I told you that Lexus was a benchmark for quality in the industry.
On second thought, perhaps it doesn't really matter. It is esoteric really.
After reviewing your previous posts....it seems like that, in fact, is what it appears YOU were doing.
This benchmark thing is all in your mind. Perhaps there's a different term you should select and not sound so absolute.
I said by looks, the accord coupe concept looks to sporty/handsome to be the next american accord. But the shape of many lines reflect those of the 2003cl. Just look at the tail lamps, greenhouse (windows), and even around the rear bumper. If you look at those pictures back to back, you may or may not see it.
Also the CL was just a dressed up accord v6 coupe with some extra horses. The same as the Tl but as a sedan. And with the RSX gone, acura could use some good looking reasonably priced sporty coupes and convertible.
That coupe concept if made into just a hard top convertible and priced at $38k with acuras new 300hp 3.7l v6 and sh-awd, will put this car right there with BMW but for a few thousand less. Then theres the C70 and EOS (v6) that will both get blown away by those ideas in a comparison.
-Cj :P Sorry for any confusion
~*~*~MERRY CHRISTMAS!!~*~*~
Just a bit of news that I need to dispell about the 3.0 put in the Fusion/Milan. In other chat rooms I am constantly having to correct Honda/Toyota fans.. Yes, the 3.0 in the Fusion/Milan are using variable valve timing. This is part of what gives it 21 more HP over the 3.0 used in the Escape/Trib/Mariner. Not sure if this engine is used in the Freestyle. Anyhoo.. just a bit of news u can use..
The Malibu looks great! Interior looks fantastic too!... Not really a huge fan of the Civic interior, I don't like the huge digital speedo.. VW/Audi have always had some of the best interiors, this is known throughout the auto world.
Finally! I do like the interior of the new Malibu - looks like they are finally taking enough of the good stuff from their Opel counterparts! Smart move Chevy... I really like the arcing curves in the new Malibu's interior.
I have to say I can't see it... the radio stack is plain ugly squarish. The basic steering wheel has those old style big clunky buttons (the wheel on the SS is how they should do buttons/controls on the wheel). Its not bad, but Detroit needs to get rid of those ugly squarish center radio/climate control stacks.
I really miss the days when they had nice velour and cloth instead of soulless and sterile plastic.
Compare the base Camry to the base Sonata, the GLS 4 cyl.
When comparing on prices, yeah, that's about right.
-Loren
The 2007 category winners are:
Best New Small Car (under $18,000): Winner: Honda FIT LX
Best New Small Car (over $18,000): Winner: Volkswagen Rabbit 2.5
Best New Family Car ($22,000 - $30,000): Winner: Toyota Camry LE
Best New Family Car (over $30,000): Winner: Toyota Camry Hybrid
Best New Luxury Car (under $50,000): Winner: Lexus ES 350
Best New Prestige Car: Winner: Audi S8
Best New Sports / Performance Car (under $50,000): Winner: Mazdaspeed3
Best New Sports / Performance Car (over $50,000): Winner: BMW 3-Series Coupé
Best New Convertible: Winner: Volkswagen EOS 2.0T
Best New Pick-up Truck: Winner: Chevrolet Avalanche
Best New SUV / CUV (under $35,000): Winner: Toyota RAV4 - V6 Sport
Best New SUV / CUV ($35,000 - $60,000): Winner: Acura RDX Technology Package
Best New SUV / CUV (over $60,000): Winner: Mercedes-Benz GL Class
Sure, the Sonata GLS interior pales compared to the Camry LE due to Hyundai's choice of the bath robe interior cloth material, but otherwise it is appropriate to compare the GLS to the LE.
Camry LE has cloth interior, 4-cylinder engine, steel wheels/wheel covers, as does the Sonata GLS, so why would you want to compare the LE to the Limited? If you did choose to do that, the LE loses, especially on price, equipment, and amenities.
Not only does the Camry need a new front end treatment, it also needs a new rear end. It looks like someone smashed it during the design stage.
You gotta go up the ladder in stature to get to the real lookers like the TL, the G35, Lexus, the 335. Pay the $.
The only one that really stands out in these 3 is the Mazda 6. The Aura/Accord look very, very much alike. I have parked my Fusion side by side to a new Accord and when you do this the Fusion makes the Accord look plain frumpy... :shades:
Styling is subjective as I'm sure you will agree. I'm not yet sure of the Aura, but in this class the Fusion is at the bottom of the list, just plain ugly. I happen to like the style of the Accord. The Camry hasn't grown on me.
For fun, I think perhaps in a smaller sedan the Mazda6 is the choice, with possibly the Milan being a fairly good ride. In coupes, I guess I would have to buy an older Mustang. I am not sold on the New Stang.
In luxury, any used Cadillac would be fine. Enough prestige for me, and they are not too bad for reliability and number of dealerships. If I was throwing my money around, I doubt it would be for an Audi, though possibly the A4 as good little sport in snow county. I live on dry road country land.
-Loren
What'd they do - put names in a hat and pulled out the winners?
c'mon - a Chevy Avalanche?
Lets not pretend every Camry costs thousands more than every Fusion.
Who's pretending? 2007 V-6 Fusion can be had for invoice minus $1000 rebate...which comes to undeer $19K. The base model invoice, less rebate, would be under $16K. So in both cases price is $2700+ lower. On top of this, discount financing is available, which would save most buyers another $1000+.
What?
They're all in the mainstream rut bro. You gotta go to the TL, a Banglecar, an RX8, a Subie etc. to get out of the stream.
Really? Even if somewhat stripped, that ain't bad. Doesn't the Fusion fall short in the safety arena tho, where all these others have a big advantage?
Are you serious? For 22k you get a whole lot of performance. Go out and drive one- maybe you'll change your tune.