Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
We just returned from a 380+ mile trip from the SF Bay Area to Tahoe and back. The trip included about 5-10% city-type driving, and the rest was freeways and mountain roads. I drove and tried to be very conscious of smoothly accelerating & maximizing the opportunities to coast, but I didn't drive at speeds below the flow of traffic. We climbed up over the 8000 foot elevation pass that takes you to Tahoe, including passing vehicles as needed along the way. My combined mileage for the entire trip was 27 MPG per the Nav unit. I was extremely pleased.
One of the other posters very accurately stated that the 400H provides owners with the OPPORTUNITY to get superior gas mileage, but one has to consciously drive the vehicle in a manner that takes advantage of its unique capabilities. Driving it in a "normal" manner, you'll find it to be extremely smooth and VERY powerful. It's 0-60 mph times are very impressive for an SUV, and its passing power is phenomenal.
Overall, we wish that it could be mindlessly driven and would get mileage in the high 20s to low 30s, but it just isn't so. Nevertheless, we don't regret our decision to purchase it.
Driving mostly free&clear on a 75MPH road, the car rang up nearly 21 MPG outbound. At high speeds, the onboard indicator ran close to 30MPG and only struggled because the battery kept running out on some slightly inclined terrain. Net it seemed to do at least 24 MPG sustained during the highway portion of the drive.
The return trip was more impressive. The car netted 21.5 MPG, better than the outbound trip. What was impressive -- the car sat in traffic for nearly 1.5 hours and GAINED MPG!! Nice...literally the onboard indicator went UP as I inched along a clogged highway. Breaking it down, the car did about 23MPG excluding a couple gallons used very poorly in the city. Maybe others have insight on this, but I'd think the traffic jam would easily have put 98% of gas SUVs below 20MPG.
The onboard indicator, which seems accurate minute-to-minute but seems over 1 MPG optimistic when averaging up mixed driving conditions, predicted 23 MPG on the 21.5 MPG performance for the total inbound trip.
(Regular gas was used, air conditioning on..BTW, I have the AWD version too)
The moral I've gotten is this car does pretty well highway driving, but the idea of it doing better "city driving" with numbers topping 30MPG is a total fantasy of the EPA measuring process. Of course, that it also has the ability to accelerate its 5 ton load with the pop of just about any sports car is somewhat forgiving of this fact. I am also consoling myself with the fact that its emissions friendly and may require less engine and brake maintenance down the road.
Thanks,
Chintan Talati
Corporate Communications
Edmunds.com
15,608 miles driven.
597.564 gallons of fuel used for an average of 26.12 mpg.
$1,556.76 total fuel cost at an average of $2.61/gallon.
I live in the Seattle area where the summers are not real hot and the winters not too cool. I have taken 1 trip to South Lake Tahoe, 1 trip to Vancouver BC, and numerous trips to Portland. The rest of my driving is about 85% freeway and 15% city which are short trips (a real mileage killer).
Some observations:
The mpg drops when the temperature drops below 50 degrees fahrenheit as it does when the temperature goes over 80. In the warmer months I can exceed 30 mpg driving to Portland if I keep my speed at 65 or below. The drop off is significant as the speed is increased.
Maximizing coasting increases mpg while hard acceleration dramatically decreases mpg.
I tried a few tanks of premium fuel, but did not notice any measurable change in mpg. Likewise when I switched to synthetic oil.
I have two friends that drive the RX330 and I consistently get about 5 mpg better that they do. That is not enough to pay for the increase in price, but I am using less foreign oil and I like the fact that I meet the California emission standards. I did get some savings with the IRS allowable deduction.
I love my 400h and would not hesitate in buying it again.
first 400 miles - 28 mpg at first gas tank (filled early)
last 100 miles - 29.3 mpg so far
I believe this is due to learning how to drive the hybrid more efficiently over time. For example, there are times when you are going on a flat or slightly down hill road that you keep just a small amount of pressure on the petal. Once I was conscience of the hybrid capability, I would coast rather than keep that small amount of pressure. By doing this, you generate more energy rather than use it.
Also, I have noticed that when using the cruise control and again going slightly down hill, the SUV can go 65 MPH on battery power only for some distance. If you weren't paying attention and were driving with your foot on the petal, I would bet that the engine would kick in and you would use some gas rather than just electricity.
I also try to utilize the brake for longer slower stops rather than quicker faster stops. When you think about it, that light isn't going to change for awhile anyway, so why hurry up just to stop.
Has anyone else developed techniques for improved mileage?
My 3 previous readings before resetting the milege stats are in the 26ish range.
I did had a chance to drive it the past 2 days covering about 100 miles in 75/25 hwy - got it to 32mpg.
So far so good - actually more than good
Performance-wise, they're comparable, but different. The 350 has superior low-end torque, so it jumps off the line a little faster. It feels much lighter to steer, and it handles bumps much better.
But, at speed, the 400h is a smoother accelerator. I'm guessing that in a drag race, it would win zero-60, but barely, by coming from behind. Despite the annoying whine on deceleration, it's quieter on acceleration. The new 350 six-cylinder engine seems to my ears to be a noisy [non-permissible content removed].
One thing they've improved markedly since I got my 400h in May of '05, at least in the 350, is visibility from the driver's position. I absolutely hate the 400h in this regard. My RX300 was fine, but I find myself getting more drivers in my blind spot with this vehicle, and nearly changing lanes unsafely, than with any vehicle I've ever owned. I may trade it in just to get rid of this, and I'm going to ask Lexus if they can upgrade the mirrors. I don't know exactly what they've done, but it's improved.
I haven't checked in here in a long time. I was getting in the low 20's on my vehicle and initially rather unhappy. Over approximately the second 5000 miles I had a computer calculated 22.5, which was slightly better. I reconciled myself to that, but recently I've tried using the 91 fuel since prices have eased. It may be coincidental, as I've been doing more highway driving than normal, but for two tanks now I'm up around 25.5. I do feel the engine is more responsive with this fuel, so I may continue to use it.
Anyway, since the weather cooled down a bit, mileage as reported by the computer is slightly up, now 20 MPG...better than the summer low 18s.
If you assume that premium gas is 20 cents (or 8%) more expensive than the super unleaded, this 5% cash back justifies filling up with premium to achieve the benefits in MPG. Just wondering what the community thinks about this kind of math and if anyone else has similar cash back programs.
Here's the link to the Pen Fed CC --> link
This is a current limitation of Verizon, not Lexus. Verizon bluetooth support only allows one contact download at a time. Verizon is "thinking" of opening up the software to multiple transfers, but who knows when that will materialize.
I have been tracking mileage carefully and have an Excel spreadsheet to show both total and by tank mileage. My total mileage is 27.65 MPG. The by tank mileage varies from a low of 22 to a high of 30. The mileage readout in the car is almost always overly optimistic, by as much as 2 MPG. Of course all this data is not statistically significant without a few facts on conditions.
- Primary location is South Florida, so a lot of flat ground
- Air conditioner running almost all the time
- 2 wheel drive
- Regular gas only
- Combination of stop-and-go, regular street, and highway driving
- A lot of driving too fast, 80+ MPH
- Driving conditions around Miami do not encourage slow starts and moderate speeds.
Bottom line is that I know I could do better if I drove slower, started slower, and did not run the A/C ALL the time. But if I just wanted to save gas I would have bought a Prius. I enjoy the comfort, luxury features, and power too much. And I really like driving in the HOV lane!
My biggest concern is future maintenance support and trade-in value. I don't see any advertising by Lexus about the 400h but a deluge of advertising for the other cars. I think that is a very bad sign for us owners.
1. During the cold month of February, I was averaging about 24 with regular gas. With premium or midgrade I was getting 26.4.
2. Since temps have risen above 60 F, I am now averaging 29.5 with midgrade gas.
I'm very happy with the MPG.
-Mine 2007 manual is recommending premium gasoline (91 octane or above). I've been reading the 2006 suggested regular gas.
Since I assumed they are the same engine - does it matter?
-is there a "master" button to show the overall MPG since new?
Thanks in advance.
I have a 2002 LS430. The owners manual indicates that 91 octane is appropriate. Of course 91 Octane fuel in not available at the pump, at least where I buy fuel here in the Mid-Atlantic. So at every fillup I merely compute the number of gallons needed, divide this by 3 and pump the 87 first and then top it off with 93. While this might sound strange for the owner of a $60k car to do this to save a dollar or two at a fillup, I ask you this. If you saw a dollar one the street would you pick it up? If so this is how I find a dollar in the street at least once or more a week. There is usually a 20 cent difference in 87 and 93 gas. So pumping 5 to 7 gallons of 87 at 20 cent less per gallon equals $1 to $1.40 per tank full.
I think if you read the owners manual for you Lexus RX400h you will find out that 91 octane fuel is recommended.
maybe you recall we bought our RX400s on same day, same dealer.
No surprise, but driving styles can make a big difference. My wife likes the feel of G-forces, so she gets about 26. I try to ease into it - I use the visual of not trying to smash marshmallows if they were on gas pedal. whimpy i know, but i get 29+ combo hwy/town. a few times i have tried to really go easy to keep it on electric only as long as possible (and took battery bars down to purple). that experience gave me 32 mph around town. so lesson is, mileage varies by driver, and yes, cold weather did lower mileage.
unscientific, but if i had to peg a 'real world' number under 'normal varied conditions, with avg driver' i would put the rx400 at about 27 mph.
glad you enjoing the RX400.
You should not allow the tank to become empty, and then add 50% of lower octane, followed by 50% of higher octane. The fuels may not completely mix immediately, especially if there is a density difference. You may get a slug of low octane that causes severe knock. You should refill when your tank is half full. In general the octane response will be linear for most hydrocarbon and oxygenated fuels e.g. 50:50 of 91 and 95 will give 93.
I tried premium one time and the mileage actually went down, so I won't do that again. :-) This is still about a 20% to 30% gain on fuel economy, so its not negligible in my mind. The car will range over 300 miles on a normal size tank of regular fuel.
(this is the second occurence since August of last year).
As far as the side-view mirrors, I find that pushing the driver's side mirror further out to your left will make it easier to see the car
coming up in the lane beside you. It takes getting used to, but I believe it really helps.
This may involve pushing the mirror out more than you would expect to. Good Luck. I will be calling Lexus today regarding my rattle problem.