By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
-------- I always thought and practiced checking the transmission fluid level with the engine always ON, no?....
*Think hydraulically controlled manual transmission (mainshaft, secondary shaft, yolk actuated sliding transfer gears, and real synchronizers) with a torque converter instead of a manual clutch, and you've just conceptually summarized Honda's automatic transmission design philosophy. When several American auto manufacturers in the '30s began playing around with the notion of semi-automatic and automatic transmissions, they all tried the approach that Honda uses, but couldn't get it to work reliably. GM tried something different. They dusted off the old Ford Model T dual range planetary gearset transmission (two levers controlling internal brake bands and the clutch only had to be used to get the tin-lizzy off from a dead stop - "Any damned fool can drive a Model T" went one advertsing slogan.), added a third range for four speeds forward, and bolted a fluid coupling to it in place of a manual clutch. That's how the Hydramatic transmission was born. (Well, that and a lot of development blood, sweat, and tears . . .) After WW-II, other makers substituted a torque converter for addded efficiency (dropping at least one gear range in the process for simplicity and cost savings) and that's where the majority of automatics worldwide stand to this day, though now the minimum number of forward gears is back to at least four or more, and some Mercedes automatic transmissions go to seven.
I do know what's the DISADVANTAGE.... Hard shifting, and more jerky driving.
..circa 27 consistently in/around the state capital.......
..best ever was just over 39: big-time flat-[non-permissible content removed] Arizona desert: 2200 rpm(65), cruise, 6th gear overdrive, fuel stops adjacent I-8 - - - Gila Bend to Yuma last month.
..at odo 5500, I regret not buying Honda sooner (two prior Toyotas)
all the best, ez........
I was just wondering, what is the significance in the way Honda has been building its own transmissions, what's the practical advantage for us, drivers, or what is Honda claiming it to be -- longer lasting (doesn't seem so), smoother (not)... What, then?
I really have to check into it. Problem is, the one who rides the new car is my wife... I drive the 10 years old car.
Isn't life beautiful (for the wife or sucker husband)?
29 miles to a gallon 60%highway 40%city
Tow ratings are given partly due to the way the engine and transmission can handle pulling said weight. Another problem you need to consider is frame damage...the unibody Honda Pilot has more horsepower than the Explorer or old Blazer, yet is only able to tow 3,500 pounds, versus 5,000 + lbs for the body on frame trucks. The Accord's unibody frame is not made to handle such stresses under towing, even if the engine could handle it. This is why you used to see old "body on frame" Crown Vic and Vista Cruiser station wagons with big trailers. It isn't due to the engine as much as how the frame of the car is designed. Most cars today (exception of Crown Vic/Town Car/Grand Marquis and the like) are unibody cars, like the Pilot, and cannot tow such heavy things without causing problems.
It won't be safe to do so in ANY unibody car with a tow rating of 1,000 pounds.
Hope this info finds good ears!
thegrad
The tires have 40PSI in them. I still have the original tires on the car as well. I haven't had tires last so long on my prior vehicles. Has anyone else experienced this?
I am sure I could help you improve on the mileage front a bit but you have to want to change your driving habits. There is no free lunch unfortunately
About the OEM Michelin’s. I run at 50 #’s and still have 7 - 8/32 left after 33K miles on an 05 EX-L w/ NAVI.
Good Luck
Wayne R. Gerdes
the grad
The simple answer is no. Burst pressure for today’s 44 #’s max sidewall tires are in the 125 + psi range.
Good Luck
Wayne R. Gerdes
..seriously now, isn't your ride quality - at 50 PSIG - pretty much degraded? To my way of thinking, you must be a foamer....using TP like that.........
..but your posts ARE interesting....
..ez..
:P
No, I hate riding around on sand. I have shorter stopping distances, longer tire life with a superior wear pattern, and better turn in. I have a harsher ride but I am generally riding on Interstates, local arterials, and local roads through subdivisions. She does not get taken off road.
It’s only gasoline. How you want to consume it is up to you
Good Luck
Wayne R. Gerdes
___Since you have no idea and have never been there, leave it up to those that have hundreds of thousands of miles at 20% above MAX sidewall to tell you differently. Is it worth 2 - 3 mpg’s? It is to me but obviously not to you. After all, it’s only gasoline from crude, CO2 or GHG emissions let alone more NOx, HC, CO, and PM
___Good Luck
___Wayne R. Gerdes
BTW, you are obviously not aware that the Accord is a low emissions vehicle.
Ridiculous. Here is the proof, for all to see, that the internet is a fount of misinformation from self-styled "experts".
What???
BTW, you are obviously not aware that the Accord is a low emissions vehicle.
Is that why I picked up my PZEV based Accord (only LX/EX I4 Auto’s from the 5 Clean and some bordering) from MA. vs. the std. LEV-II that was available at the Honda dealership just 1.5 miles down the street here in IL.? Did you know the PZEV based Accord’s and HCH-I’s are Tier II/Bin 2 rated vs. Tier II/Bin 3 and 4 for most other PZEV’s? I must not have known about this before I purchased the cleanest smog emissions based, non-EV automobile on the continent
You don’t want to know what her lifetime FE is as that would scare you
Good Luck
Wayne R. Gerdes
...I think you get my drift. Let it go, Joe.
..best, ez..
Another reason your FE will always languish by comparison. Unwilling or the inability to learn
Good Luck
Wayne R. Gerdes
..seasons best (to foamers/non-foamers alike) ..ez..
:P
Happy holidays...good will towards men...and all that stuff.
Trip back was disastrous... horrible headwind all the way back... and I was driving 80 instead of 70... average was 31.5.
So... looks like highway mileage could vary from 31 to 45... WOW
Excellent stats and nice job!
Good Luck
Wayne R. Gerdes
Driving condition: 60%-40% mixed city-highway driving; 70% flat, 30% mildly hilly terrain
1st full tank:
MPG -- 23.9
2nd full tank:
MPG -- 24.3
Disappointed, ramida
I can conclude that any 'break-in' effect is only 1 mpg. That effect is dwarfed by all the other factors affecting mileage.
These factors are:
- ambient temperature/seasonal factors /winter gas formula
- average trip length (% of miles driven on cold engine)
- Traffic situation (highway/city, stop and go/light traffic)
- Driving style / heavy acceleration, driving 70 mph or more
- vehicle maintenance / tires / gross vehicle weight
http://home.comcast.net/~icepax/Isblog/Graphics/AccordMileage50K.gif
Here is another chart from a 2004 V6 M6 over the first year showing the seasonal variation in Michigan totally dominating any break-in factor.
http://home.comcast.net/~icepax/Isblog/Graphics/Michigan_Accord.gif
Ramida, I would believe that the mileage you computed from the 2 tanks is representative of the mileage you get under the conditions.