By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Mike:
You have the incorrect GVWR. If the Pilot were this heavy, the gas mileage would be 15 mpg!
All the manufacturers are making efforts to *reduce* the weight of the vehicle. This results in immediate payback in the form of improved gas mileage.
The Pilot EX's curb weight is 4431 lbs and the max load capacity is 1320 lbs, so the vehicle achieves a GVWR of only 5751 lbs, not 5954.
So anyway, armed with this knowledge, I think that one can safely say that it's unrealistic to assume that the '06 Pilot will be meeting the 6000-lb minimum. Sorry, ops1: even if the tax break is still in place, 249 lbs is just too much weight IMHO.
Mike
I'm sure a Toyota Camry LE 4 Cylinder gets much better gas mileage than a Lexus LX470...
I'd rather give up $5000 in deductions and get better fuel economy instead...
I need a vehicle with more seating and have decided to get an SUV (I will probably keep my 4 cylinder Camry for personal use). As far as fuel economy is concerned, the Pilot seems to get better mileage than most 7 or 8 seat SUVs.
I don't mean to get too far off topic, but if the 2006 Pilot has the 6,000 lbs rating and qualifies for the deduction (which I will double-check with my accountant before buying), then the Pilot definitely moves up to first on my list.
Mike
No, I'm thinking the same thing: at least an inch too small.
I haven't heard anything regarding this so far -- note that all of the disguised test mules have wheel designs identical to those shown above. If the Ridgeline is any indicator, however, then we could very well see 17" wheels standard.
I'll be on the look-out for 'em, though....
Mike
If this is it, what do others think?
I'm more concerned about what the changes are under the sheetmetal for '06.
As for weight, I would hope Honda would find a way to shave pounds off, given where gas prices are going...
It's my pleasure, Joe!
"Are you the source of the spy shots or someone else?"
No: these are from Autobild.de -- a German site (if Deutche isn't your forte, click here for an English translation). Note: to peruse through photo galleries, you must view the original (i.e., non-translated) webpage.
Mike
nowakj66, my wish list for the Pilot includes a telescopic steering adjustment as well. I feel that standard VSA is more important, though. Hopefully we'll be getting both, eh?
Mike
There are some new 3.5LV6 engines pumping out impressive numbers:
06 ML350: 268HP@6000 258LB@2400
06 Avalon: 280HP@6200 260LB@4700
Admittedly these are upper echelon cars, but the rumor is 3.5LV6 in Avalon will be put in Highlander soon.
What is the difference between the Ody and the Pilot Nav?
Of course I suppose the more relevant question is how close to invoice I could get on a 2006 versus a 2005. I don't imagine dealers will be willing to negotiate much on an '06 right out of the gate.
FWIW, the new Subaru B9 Tribeca can be had with both NAV and rear entertainment; or just NAV, or just rear entertainment. It's your choice.
Bob
Someone asked how to get a great deal. Another person mentioned negotiating with a dealer outisde of your home town. That is exactly how I did it. I called some dealers in a large metro area a state away (where I was planning to visit the next week anyway) and got them to tenatively committ on a great price (just under $29K) and then I went to my local dealer and told them, "I am traveling North next week and dealer there has a great deal on Pilots. I would really like to keep my buisness local, so I wanted to give you the opportunity to beat the price." I showed them the price, and said, "No suprises or extra fees (except TTL)." To my suprise, they came back with a much better price, with one stipulation: No special orders. I took a look at the inventory (they were only missing one color in the EX-L trim level) and found the trim/color I had been eyeballing for the last two months.
Everything went pretty smooth at that point. The only hiccup was when they tried to slap a $185 application fee on. I reminded them about no extra fees, and they quickly removed it without any fuss.
You are making an assumption that the 2006 model will command a "premium".
Friendly reminder: this is not 2003. It would not be an exaggeration to call this a buyers market for SUVs.
It will get even better in 2006 when the newly redesigned Hyundai Santa Fe hits the market.
If any Honda dealers do try to charge a "premium", I would yawn in their face and go the next dealer.
I am looking in my Honda Pilot rear view mirror and I can see the Hyundai Santa Fe catching up fast.
The all new 2006 Hyundai Santa Fe is looking very good in the Spy shots. The Pilot is going to have some serious competition. Here's why:
-Bigger dimensions: length and width.
-3 rd passenger row introduced.
-Conservative/toned down styling
-Standard safety features including side curtain air bag.
It will be interesting to see how "above invoice" the Pilot will sell for once the Santa Fe is on the road. My bet is that the Pilot will sell for Invoice + $500.
Any takers?
http://www.openroadhonda.net
Also, look at that Honda Truck, there are 4k to 6k in discounts on these units.- fgor a 2006!
I concur!
The 2005 sales figures for the Pilot are not impressive. In fact, if you notice, Honda has the biggest rebate being offered on the 2005 Pilot. Without this rebate dealers will not be able to sell these models.
Don't get me wrong, I like Honda products and have driven them for over ten years. I just don't see how you can restyle something, call it new, and then demand MSRP, for a vehicle that has been out for three years.
I just found out that the 2006 will not have adjustable front headrest. This and the 2005 seating in general bothered me. I hope the salesperson is wrong, but at this point, I have to rely on information he has. If someone has other information about the headrest for 2006 please advise.I think my '04 Accord LX's seating is way more comfortable.
If I go with a 2006, I will just wait until November/December. I may just go with the 2005, because I don't lilke the 2006 front end based on the one spy photo.
It won't command MSRP, thats for sure. Invoice + a few hundred should be the MAXIMUM someone should pay for any Pilot.
This isn't 2003, when waiting lists were long, Pilots were in hot demand and short supply, gas is cheap, and the Highlander didn't have a 3rd row seat. (then again, the Highlander's 3rd row is a joke)
That salesperson didn't know what he was talking about. Take a look at this new spy shot. It appears that at least the entire seatback has been redesigned. It definitely looks better!
Please note, however, that the vehicle will sport rollover-sensing side curtain airbags -- these are very important safety devices that the current model lacks. I still don't have word on whether stability control (VSA) will be standard or not.
The facelift has grown on me a bit, and I now actually think the '06 front-end looks a bit better (though I don't think it holds a candle to the new '07 Santa Fe in terms of styling). I am disappointed in the reports I'm hearing that the rear-end wasn't touched. Other than the front seats and some display revisions, the interior will change little overall. An all-new model should be out in 12-18 months.
Mike
This picture does look better than the other spy photo. However, I can't really tell the difference between the 2005 and the 2006, except for the headlights.
Another concern, is whether the hp figures will drop. Per another website, the Acura MDX will have 12 less horsepower in 2006 than in 2005. I wonder if this will effect the Pilot.
I am beginning to reconsider and just getting a 2005, but the lack of VSA on the EX sucks.
Finally Honda is developing a 4.2L-4.4L V8, which will be equipped in 2012 Pilot and Ridgeline, on sale in 2011.
Honda finally realizes it needs to beef up to compete with big boys.
I hope, if this is true, its an option. I DO NOT want a V8 in this vehicle. We are more than happy with the V6 as a balance between power and economy.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S