By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
sellaturcica: I think you have successfully insulted over half the posters on Edmunds! Congratulations!
===========================================================
I've been shopping cars for 45 years and talked to at least 50 sales people. Sales people run the gamut from horrible to fabulous, regardless of dealership of country of origin. I have three Toyota dealerships in my area - the same holds true there as well and depends on phases of the moon and day of the week.
============================================================
There are a lot of underemployed people, including those with degrees, working at the places your mentioned. It is more a reflection of the collapse of the American job market than anything about their abilities.
(↑ subtle allusion to the topic title)
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
Review your vehicle
The reason I say that is I think the "salespeople are terrible" argument cannot be applied more to Toyota than other brands. In fact, the division mostly seems to be between small local dealerships (friendly, informed, helpful salespeople and higher prices) and large corporate dealers (low low cutthroat pricing and a sales attitude to match).
The only dealerships where I can honestly say I have never been met by ANYONE who wasn't courteous and well-informed is Saturn. And I have shopped ALL the brands over the years. Kudos to Saturn for that, which is why they will now dominate North American sales once their revamped line-up (including Astra) is in place! :-)
A long-term difficulty for Toyota is that they are going to be spending a TON of money in the next five years building North American plants, based on the sales surge they have had in the last five, and if the economy stagnates as it seems like it will, or the sales surge slows down for some other reason, they could be over-extended. Given that they have pretty shrewd planners at the top of that company, I hope they have the worst-case scenario in mind so they do NOT become over-extended.
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
It hasn't worked out that way, so apparently many customers are willing to put up with a less-than-stellar sales experience to get the vehicle that they want.
A bigger problem for Toyota is the ad I saw on television the other night. It was pushing Corollas with...a $500 rebate, boldly flashed on the screen. Following Detroit into Rebate Hell is hardly a good idea.
All Toyota's have had incentives on them in varying degrees over the last 7 years. FJ's excluded they're still too new.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Nippononly's post was spot on. OTOH, a certain Buick/Cadillac owner will forever bewail the poor treatment received at the hands of a SINGLE Toyota salesman.
I only have to assume that Toyota has NO troubles if we keep on with these generalizations about their salespeople.
So you're trying to say that it didn't happen? Or are you just trying to minimize the truth? That would be a certan Toyota owner (multiple)...
As for No troubles, read the discussions here on Edmunds.
Just don't read my posts from now on. Your response made no sense.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
If a post is here, I'll read it (unless it's one of those really loooong single-paragraph ones).
Yes, I'm a very satisfied Toyota owner, thank you very much! But my 1977 Impala was fine when I owned it too.
And I do read about the "troubles," but the Edmunds hosts have repeatedly said the such boards can't be used as statistical indicators of reliability. Why? By their nature ("problems and solutions"), they will draw those with gripes (or grapes, as in sour). Like the people complaining about "thumps" from their Camry gas tanks, wanting to make a federal case of it (literally, by complaining to NHTSA).
In a similar vein, I don't think the pro-GM faction would like it if I cherry-picked some sad "dex clog" stories from disgruntled GM car owners.
The article goes on to say that since Toyota is trying to take GM and Ford head on, and since those automakers are so willing to liberally apply cash incentives to stay ahead in the game, Toyota has no choice but to follow suit. Being familiar with Toyota, what it hints to me is they invested too heavily in this Tundra project, so that now they have to betray their own values to make sure the Tundra is a sales success - there's too much riding on it to allow it to fail or slump, no matter the cost. I hope that is not the case, but that was always the peril of the thing. I still wonder why they are jumping in with rebates so early - there hasn't been full dealer stock for even two months yet...
Better to just cede the full-size truck market to GM and Ford and be done with it, than to let the Tundra become the rebate king of the hill after spending so much developing it. IMHO.
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
And I am not sure Toyota will ever get into the fleet game with the Tundra - they only built the San Antonio plant to produce 250K per year after all. But if the new model only makes the volume of the old model - 120K/year or so - I am sure this will be the first and last time Toyota tries to take on the domestics in full-size trucks.
And I REALLY hope it doesn't negatively impact the rest of the Toyota line-up, either in R&D dollars or in funding for future North American plant-building.
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
Although we've barely passed mid-February, Toyota has already recalled 533,417 vehicles this year in a mix that, according to http://www.AutoRecalls.us, includes Tundras Sequoias and Camrys.
That puts Toyota on track to recall more than the over 1.76 million autos they recalled in the U.S. and Japan in 2006, and the 2.2 million they recalled in 2005 when they recalled
more cars than they built.
What's more, the current recall related to the Turdra trucks and Sequioa SUVs is similar to the same defect in 800,000 of the same vehicles in 2005.
Maybe somebody at Toyota isn't paying attention?
Hopefully the American consumers are.
Recall numbers by domestic companies (GM and Ford) so far this year are as follows: Ford, 128,163; Chevrolet,4,829; and Pontiac, 1,602. Chrysler - a German company masquerading as an American company with plans to start importing cars from China in 2008 - has recalled 77,432 vehicles so far in 2007.
Lets keep things in perspective.
Here are the actual figures from a report in the Detroit News. Link:
Maker : GM ... DCX ... Ford ... Toy
2004 .. 10.8 ... 5.8 ... 5.8 .. 1.1 ( Millions of vehicles )
2005 ... 5.0 ... 1.1 ... 6.0 .. 2.2
2006 ... 1.6 ... 2.4 ... 1.7 .. 0.8
Totals 17.4 ... 9.3 ... 13.5 .. 4.1
There is really nothing that can be gathered from these stats because recalls all relate to vehicles made in the past. One bad year ( GM ) skews all the figures.
Here's an explanatory link: ball joint recall
:P
then some finance guy
Finance guys don't come out to the showroom floor or the lot.
then the GM and two other dudes standing behind him
GM usually sits at the "Tower" and doesn't really interact with customers on the showroom floor. At least in the high volume dealership that's the case. I couldn't imaging the Toyota dealership that lemko went is a "low volume" dealership.
Hey, I was there.
Hey, it maybe the truth but just highly unlikely according to common sense and my own experience with several Toyota dealerships (5 to be precise).
Chevrolet: Excellent! The guy was laid back, personable, and went out of his way to help my girlfriend. His name even was Mr. Nice.
Acura: Young guy. Really professional and courteous and took his time to explain everything even though he probably knew my girlfriend wouldn't buy that day.
Nissan: Pretty much the same as the Acura dealer.
Honda: We were pretty much ignored. My girlfriend was pretty dismayed by the high prices of the cars that didn't seem too special to her.
Chrysler: Guy was nice and let her take out a Chrysler Sebring. She didn't like the car.
Buick: Guy was professional and seemed honest. Didn't seem as personable as the Chevy guy.
If you go on the salesperson boards in Smart Shopper, you'll find sharks like that aren't limited to whatever manufacturer's name happens to be on the sign outside.
Along this line, have you read the "confessions" story where an Edmunds reporter goes undercover as a salesman?
It all adds up to trouble if corporate Toyota does not set some standards for the dealers to follow.
One other anecdote on dealerships. I spent over $800 with the El Cajon Toyota service department trying to get the grinding noise out of the front brakes on my ex-wife's 1990 Camry. They never fixed the problem. A local Firestone store fixed it for $150. I did report it to the proper agency in Sacramento. I am sure you know how far that got. Toyota claimed their usual story, "The brakes are working as designed".
Can you imagine being "mobbed" at a Ferrari dealership?
If I am really buying a Ferrari and mobbed at the dealership I'll have that store manager fired the very next day.
I can say this because I'm of Italian descent.
Toyota is hardly in the same class with Ferrari. Toyota & Honda have had a good run. That is what breeds the arrogance more prevalent in their dealerships. When you have cars that sell themselves you do not need a sales person. Toyota has stumbled a bit in the last few years and will have to keep an eye on the store or they will fall victim as the Big 3 have. Toyota becoming number one is not written in stone. It is scratched out on a sandy beach.
Not to mention there is the link to PROVE it eh?
Or are you going to throw MORE bafflegab or a salespersons
spin (aka excuse) on it????????
To me GM doesn't deserve the top spot IMO. When Toyota steals it from them, it'll finally be a long overdue end to a chapter in Automotive history...
Then the GM came over to talk to me nicely and chat me up and about coming back when I am ready to get another car. I felt he was trying to see if there was any chance I would buy that day.
Yes, this was one person one visit.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Let's get off this kick of trying to prove which is better and stick to the topics please. This discussion is about the direction of Toyota, and while that certainly will involve mention of how things are going for them in the marketplace, we need to try and stick to the subject here.
We keep winding up with the same "Is not, is too" from the same group of people. You've all made your point to each other repeatedly in multiple discussions. In case you hadn't noticed, nobody is apparently going to change their minds and suddenly agree with your side of the arguement.
So can we PLEASE get back to discussion of the subject and get away from this endless traffic circle we seem to get stuck in at the slightest provocation?
If any of you doubt this, try to import a turbo diesel Toyota Landcruiser (one of my dream machines) from any world wide market!?
I picked up a brochure at the GM dealer about Toyota and employees and manufacturing. It's disappeared. I'll stop and see if they have another one.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
http://www.nummi.com/vehicles.php
Gloat if you wish...but be careful it could be a double-edged sword. If it makes your day and keeps you warm and fuzzy inside, enjoy the feeling now.