We are aware of the login problems affecting the forums, and appreciate your patience as we work on a fix.
Did you recently purchase a new Tesla, Rivian or Lucid vehicle directly from the manufacturer and willing to share how your experience compared to previous vehicle purchases made through a traditional dealer? A reporter would like to speak with you; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 2/19 for details.
The Growing Divergence Between Horsepower and Speed Limits
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Now those may be overkill as you say under normal circumstances. But is life always normal? No. Pickup the newspaper or look back over your life and review how life can often throw curves at people. Now consider any sort of power - is it better to have more power or less?
My personal goals everyday of my life is to be become faster, stronger, smarter, and wealthier. If I can afford an 8-wheel drive amphibious 2,000hp vehicle with armor plating that can fly I'd take all those features.
Anyone who does not know what enough is can never be happy.
No, that's not philosophy or zen, it's just logic. Think about it.
And of course, the same question arises that is posed by this thread. Where you gonna use all that power, or even 25% of it? What a waste of your money!
Everyone is spurred on by the "professionals" of course. They think the Chrysler 3.7 is "overmatched" in the new JGC. Even with this base engine, it is faster in a straight line than half the family sedans out there, and even a lot of the entry lux models which are in its price range. Full-size pick-ups that "only" have a V-6 as the base engine, or a V-8 under 250 hp, are "wimpy". Absurd.
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
Nor will anyone who allows others to define what constitutes "enough."
Most of the advances and breakthroughs that have allowed us to enjoy life were brought about by individuals who were perpetually dissatisfied with things as they found them.
Now that we've reached that point, where high speeds feel slow and comfortable, it's a lot more difficult to convince people that a 65mph speed limit makes sense.
"Now that we've reached that point, where high speeds feel slow and comfortable, it's a lot more difficult to convince people that a 65mph speed limit makes sense."
Yes, that's also correct.
The refinement of many popular new cars, not to mention the luxury ones, both enhances and detracts from the driving experience, by making long drives more comfortable and less tiring, while at the same time isolating drivers and passengers, and diminishing the sensory connection with the road that existed when cars were less refined and reliable.
Nobody needs 500 hp, there is absolutely no justification, reason or logical reason other than the artificially created I WANT!!
Since the desire is artificially created, "enough" is never achievable. It is not an outsider who is defining enough, it is the obvious dissatisfaction of the wanter that proves the point.
Or to put in in crude terms, if you don't know what enough is with say food or drugs, you will probably die. So really knowing "enough" can be discussed as common sense, too. It needn't be viewed as an encrouchment on freedom.
I thought long and hard about it, and debated between the WRX and the larger Legacy GT. The WRX won out (besides being cheaper) simply because it's more fun to drive—especially now that it's got a 2.5 turbo motor.
It's a smaller car, and is simply a hoot to drive on country roads. A bigger car would certainly be more comfortable, maybe even faster, but not nearly as much fun. "Fun" won out here.
Bob
As an alternative, Subaru could have built a 2500-pound WRX (there are "normal" cars in this class at around 2300 pounds, I am presuming the AWD adds a couple hundred pounds) using the NA 2.5, preserving all the performance characteristics of the existing WRX and accomplishing markedly better fuel economy.
Both cars would be capable of well over 100 mph (far above the speed limit anywhere in the United States) and 5-6 second 0-60 runs. Something they could never practically perform anywhere in normal usage, except perhaps for the occasional clear freeway ramp.
Or Sube could have stuck with the NA 2.2 they used to have in this model (updated with 2005 engine management and valve timing technology), lightened up the car for superlative handling as described above, and reached 40 mpg highway while creating a car that while not exotic-car fast, would be tons of fun to drive. And much more realistic given the conditions it is likely to be operated in.
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
me: I hear what you're saying about "normal usage" and likely conditions - which I agree is adequate for MOST situations. But since there are life-threatening situations that we enter occasionally and people who actually do experience those situations - pickup any newspaper, I for one want a vehicle that is MORE than adequate. I want a vehicle that gives me the best chance to survive any abnormal/accidental/dangerous event. In such a situation MORE power is better than less; and if you're wrong you can be dead or severely injured.
This is the same logic I'd give someone about why I would carry a gun. It's unlikely you'll ever need a gun, but if you're wrong and trouble comes your way (which you can't control or anticipate), you are better off having more power than less.
And if I'm hiking in bear-country do you know what size gun I'd carry? The biggest, most powerful one I could carry.
"And if I'm hiking in bear-country do you know what size gun I'd carry? The biggest, most powerful one I could carry."
The gun won't cost you an extra $10 grand. And many if not most cars these days are equipped with many safety features like ABS brakes and stability control, features that can help you swerve out of the way of a collision, or stop before one. Why is it that so many supposed safety mavens here at these boards feel that the only solution to every impending "dangerous event" is a healthy dose of throttle? I genuinely don't understand the widespread view that hitting the gas will solve all problems, so we need to have as much engine under that right foot as possible.
carlisimo: I dunno. But consider that Hyundai, Kia, Honda, and Toyota ALL make 4-cylinder 5-doors with A/C that come in around the 2400 pound mark. So why couldn't Subaru come in around 2600 pounds in the AWD Impreza? And in a $25K car, they could probably afford to use more aluminum and other lightweight materials, if they took out the turbo. Anyway, that was kind of a side point. :-)
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
They did, about 10 years ago. Along with everything else, the Impreza is larger and heavier these days and Subaru has decided they don't need to sell anything smaller here.
Bob
As Subaru's current models move up market, they do need something new to fill the bottom of the range. Honda's doing that with the new FIt, to fill the slot the Civic used to have. Subaru will need to do the same.
Bob
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
Remember, many of these light-weight materials are also expensive. Subaru, as any carmaker, is constantly walking the fine line between content and costs.
Bob
But I bet that most of the people who would appreciate that light weight... would put a turbo back in =].
Weight-saving isn't magic, and I don't see why it has to be costly. The Toyota Matrix, far from a costly model, weighs about 2850 pounds. It is notably bigger than an Outback Sport, yet the OBS weighs 200 pounds more. Given the relative size of the two and accounting for the extra weight of the OBS's AWD, I think Subaru should be able to get the OBS down at least 200 pounds. From there, they could use some of the cost savings from taking out the turbo to knock perhaps another 100-150 pounds out of there by using lighter materials. A 2700-pound AWD Impreza WRX with the NA 2.5 would be quite fast (that would give it the same power-to-weight ratio as the last-gen Civic SI, but with more torque than the Honda). And they could also put some bigger tires on there to improve handling over the base model, to increase the model's value for the customer, and to partially compensate for the long-travel suspension.
carlisimo: there will always be the F-n-F crowd, but it would be a fairly fast car as I have described it, and would already be at the limit of the amount of performance potential one could realistically enjoy on public streets.
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
Bob
Of course, my original idea is still my fave, go back to an updated 2.2L, you would still have a decently fast car and then you might have great fuel economy!
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
Maybe the Impreza is just over-built? I'd imagine that they'd have to do some beefing up of the structure to handle the added weight of the 4wd, not to mention the power of the stronger engines.
And cars these days are taller than back in the old days. The Impreza's almost 59" tall, where your typical 80's car like what I mentioned earlier was only around 53-55" tall. So even if they're no wider or longer, a lot more material and weight has been added in making them taller.
The boxer engine should be a little bigger than an inline; you need two heads. But it's not that much of a difference. The AWD is much more significant. It's a much stronger and more useful (in racing) form of AWD than most cars use.
The relationship between the Impreza and rallying is important too. In Group N rallying, the cars have to remain almost stock. Or better put, the stock cars have to be close to the Group N cars. That's why the stock STi and Evo have intercooler sprays and stuff. Obviously, the body has to be very strong too, and my guess is that most of the weight comes from there.
(Doesn't mean they shouldn't make a lightweight version, but it might be harder to justify economically.)
Bob
People will go for smaller, less powerful cars when their pocketbooks are affected significantly enough to discourage buying size and power. That is the ONLY thing that will do it. Then people with money will be the only ones buying large or powerful vehicles.
Power is no good if you can't use it. There is a point where the the combination of the car's design and the driver's skills reach their limit, and power beyond that point is money flushed down the toilet. Proportionally, there are a lot more wrecked Vipers than Miatas.
Power is no good if you abuse it, I agree. Driving 100 mph in a 40 mph suburban zone is probably an abuse, and more easily done in a Viper. Pointing a gun at others is an abuse of power. What I am talking about in more power being better is the person who does not abuse power.
More power, is better. A person is better off having a gun when threatened, and a person is better off having a more powerful vehicle if threatened on the road. I do not advocate abusing power. I believe you are talking about people who abuse the power they mauy have.
Every auto maker in business loves you at this minute. In fact, most auto industry journalists do too. :-)
I disagree. The V-8 is wasted in a Ford GT. The car handles like crap at speed. The incredibly huge 6.1L engine is wasted in the 300C SRT.
There are only a handful of cars over about 250 hp that don't waste their power in a chassis that can't handle it - they would include the BMW M-cars, the STi/Evo, a Porsche or two, and perhaps the Corvette. Barring exotics of course, but I don't think ANYONE buys exotics purely for love of the car - they are always to some extent showing off. And even the exceptions I mentioned are overpriced baubles, as their talents can NEVER be exploited on the road. Obviously, if you are a weekend track racer, like regularly, my remarks do not apply to you.
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
I don't get it. So if you are applying 1/10 throttle somehow being able to push the pedal to the floor would provide some enjoyment. I drove a Fiat 128 in high school, rated at around 50 hp. That throttle never left the floor. In fact, when driving up a grade in 3rd gear I felt like I was trying to push the pedal through the floor. There is something a little boring about knowing that there isn't anything left.
Regardless, I agree that nobody "needs" a car with over 300 hp. So what? Is there something about these people that waste their money on excess power that is bothersome? Is anyone suggesting that they should be able to dictate to others what they need and what they should be able to buy? I find that mentality far more bothersome than the idea of people choosing to spend money on horsepower.
The 128 was Fiat's counterpart to the original VW Rabbit (Golf outside North America). Like the Rabbit, it featured FWD, which made it technically innovative for its time, but, unlike the Rabbit, the 128 featured a conventional trunk.
Well I'm certainly not, if that's what you're implying.
1) Frequently I drive on roads where the lanes converge or reduce down - from 2 lanes to 1 lane. I like having the power to decide whether I will go first or 2nd relative to the car that may be next to me.
2) On those same rural highways, it is mostly 2 lane undivided, with the white dashed passing zones. The safest pass is the fastest pass, which is a function of power. I like to have power to pass safely, and if I miscalculate or the person that I'm passing speeds up, I prefer to have "more power" so as not to be left hanging out in the oncoming lane.
People are judged by what they look like and what they have. Plain and simple. This isn't rocket-science.
I don't buy into that personally, but I suppose we have come rather far afield from hpmctorque's main point, which was that if you DO buy the most powerful vehicle on Earth, it is mostly wasted power because there is nowhere short of the track you could ever exercise it.
Or maybe this discussion is right on point: it's NOT silly to buy extra power we can never use, because we are buying it more for image and social standing than for actual USE, and therefore it serves the purpose we spent 10s of thousands of extra dollars for?
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
Whether because of geography, resource abundance or history, we're a nation of straight-line speed freaks. Sure, there are types like us here who prize handling, but we're not the majority.
To show how ingrained it is, I've always thought it interesting that the "import tuner" craze centered on trying to make econo cars fast, rather than trying to capitalize on the cars' inherent handling prowess. Yeah, I know the serious types *did* do this, but as the hobby became a mass-market fad, it became all about "I live ma life a 1/4 mile at a time," to quote that inane movie.
Seems as long as we have open spaces and relatively reasonable fuel prices and incomes, we're destined to be power-junkies that won't be able to pass up big-engined vehicles, even if they're just sitting in traffic most of the time and dreaming of the strip... :confuse:
me: And that's pretty much true, when you have to obey speed limits. However as I pointed out if you are in some sort of emergency situation, which I assume would be unexpected and unplanned, it is best to have more power. that is my argument. If you want to assume a Mayberry RFD world exists, encountering no criminals, drunks, , emergency maneuvers, or need for emergency room ... then yes your basic Kia Rio is all you need to maximize your safety.
But it's that sort of Blue Sky thinking, that contributed to the follies of the Titantic, the Hindenburg, and the space shuttle (to name the more popular), which were designed well for normal conditions, but failed miserably when confronted with the frequently occurring exceptions.
Plan for the "worst", and not "normal" and you'l live, not to regret it.
That means I should train myself, but I'm not that good. Case in point: I still lock up my wheels now and then, even though I've practiced braking.
I wouldn't want 500hp in a small fwd car. And I think a Miata is more fun with 200hp than it would be with 500hp. It should be an option for those who disagree, but I want my option to be available too.
Well, OK, but there comes a point of diminishing returns. In 25 years of driving I have never, repeat NEVER, had an emergency situation in which having more power would have helped me in any way. ABS brakes? Oh yes, which is why I look for those now when I am buying a car.
I would also like to reiterate that there are not many emergency situations where having a ton of extra horsepower is what is needed to avoid the collision. And in some of the ones where you think that might be the case, it might be that without sophisticated stability control you would only make matters worse. Or the car's computer would just shut you down if you did have stability control.
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
me: Well in the last 15 years I have had 2 cars go by me that were being chased by the police. If either of those cars that were being chased side-swiped me and didn't knock my car out of commision, I would have run chased them, rammed them, and run them off the road or whatever necessary, and then showed them what I thought of endangering others. I don't tolerate criminals. They didn't touch me, so I let the police handle it.
I also believe in stability control and ABS. Did you think I'm against that? The more power a vehicle has the more important those are.
You're joking, right? You better hope you have lots of life insurance...
Maybe we should all drive those dopey big International trucks - lots of obese overcompensating size and power (albeit not speed)
Power without compromises is good. I'm not sure any of us disagree. But in reality, there are: price, fuel consumption, emissions (some of us care), balance, control, laws against "gross displays of speed" which are very open to interpretation, tire limitations, driveability, car and cabin size, etc.
They cause power to give diminishing returns, and for every person and car there's a level that's "enough" and a level that's "too much."
me: certainly not! I'm not a pacificist. As you can see from carlisimo's reply, there are a lot of people around who will assist law enforcement, as the police can't be everywhere. Too bad on 9/11 that only 1 of the 4 plane-loads of people realized (too late) they needed to be responsible, active participants in life. Our culture seems to falsely teach/train people that only police have the morality to enforce the law, despite the fact the chances of them being there to prevent a crime is very, very low.
I drive a black Firebird w/4" exhaust, and if people are intimidated by that a little, and think I might be dangerous, that's good. And if I could be 6'8" and 325Lb, I'd take that too.
Maybe I'm different...the only Firebird that would make me think twice would have a light bar on top
Very very scary.
Still, it does address the original question: clearly for some, the purchase of surplus horsepower is important in case of the opportunity of executing vigilante car chases.
and kernick: just for the record, it appears you have never had an emergency situation arise in which extra power would have improved your odds of staying safe either. And in fact the situation you do describe is one in which you would supposedly chase someone, the only definite outcome of which would be that you would damage your car and potentially injure yourself MORE than the original accident did.
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
me: it depends on what we define as an emergency. As I said before having more power makes passing on 2-lane roads much safer. It lowers the odds that you will miscalculate the distance or speed of an oncoming vehicle, and have a head-on crash.
But whether or not I have used "more power" in an emergency or not, and whether I shhould have it, is the same as arguing to me that most cops don't need guns because most of them don't use their gun in their whole career. Or should I not wear my seatbelt because I've never had a severe accident?