By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
3 in the back would not be comportable at all. 2 should be ok, still not great tough. It's a coupe, can't have everything.
You mean like this?
Not sure what you mean here. The defendent company pays for its negligence, and attorney fees are a part of that. The class members are the group of plaintiffs that bring the legal action, therefore they do not bear the expense. It is indeed the company that is held liable that ultimately bears the expense.
Unfortunately, in the real world, these cases rarely go to trial. Due to the high cost to defend such cases, many defendant companies simply pay up and deny negligence at the same time. In these real situations, the attorneys still collect their fees, companies continue to deny responsibility, and consumers say "what happened?"
And the price of a product includes the legal costs described above.
Our legal system is overloaded as it is. And American consumers are quick to sue when they see a headlight flickering for a nano-second, spill hot coffee on their own laps, blame the tobacco company for their cancer, McDonalds for their obesity, and on and on.
Some of these posts do not make sense.
Thank you Honda Accord for giving your life for me.
I only put on 1,300 miles so far, it sucks when things like that happened.
Come on USPS!!
all the best, ez....
Thanks (..left coast must be last in this quadrant of our society also....)
After the dust settles, please post your impression of how the 6M clutch has improved over your Gen7 version.
best, ez....
But anyone that has a V6, only adds to the fun!
Every extra MPG or 2 will make a difference in 5 years from now. Imagine the worst case scenario of fuel prices.
Given that, does anyone know what benefit ANC could possibly have for the 4 cyl. models, such as the EX-L that I'm considering? Are there some harmonics with this new 4 cyl. that need to be canceled out?
Also, for those of you who already have a 4 cyl., is there anything peculiar about the ANC, or do you feel it just works as advertised?
I'm driving an 04 4 cyl., and am getting ready to test drive an 08 EX-L. I'll be interested to see how the 190hp feels compared with my current 160.
IMO, it is a cheap subsitutue for sound deadening material & doesn't work very well.
You will not see an appreciable difference in road noise between your '04 & the '08.
Every extra MPG or 2 will make a difference in 5 years from now. Imagine the worst case scenario of fuel prices.
I'll second that. My last car was a V6, loved the power but really didn't need it and the fuel bills only get worse. I ONLY wanted a 4cyl this time around. Very happy with my LX's power (for my needs).
The only time I "miss" the V6 power is big hills + highway speeds + wanting to luckily move out. That's nothing witha V6 but requires a quick downshift in the 4cyl. Accord.
Is the problem so bad that if you had to do it all over again, knowing ahead of time, would still purchase the Accord?
Thanks for that information.
I'm okay with the road noise in my current 04 LX, even though it's a little worse than my previous two cars -- a Regal and a Camry. Besides, I have my own Active Noise Cancelation system -- it's called the Eagles or Fleetwood Mac, cranked way up.
With regard to ANC, I have had no issues at all. In the 4-cyl models, the ANC is designed to simply try to cancel some portion of the engine noise (which is more noisy in a 4-cyl model than it would be in a 6-cyl). It certainly does not cancel all the engine noise - but I assume it is canceling some and I am happy with the engine noise levels in my new Accord. The road and wind noise issue is a little less pleasing. With regard to wind and road noise, I would rate my new Accord as "average." Its not unacceptable -- but neither is the noise level impressive!
I doubt you will notice a big difference in the new 190 hp engine. I went from a 1998 4cyl. accord to my 08. Although the 08 is slightly more powerful, it is a much bigger car and the difference isn't really very noticeable until I reach the 4500 rpm range. Of course, my 98 was a manual transmission which I MUCH prefer to the automatic. There is no problem with the automatic in my 08 Accord, I would just MUCH MUCH MUCH rather have a manual when dealing with a small engine with relatively little torque at low RPMS.
I think you will love the EX-L. I sure do. Just remember, its a Honda not a Porsche and its a $25,000 car -- not a $40,000.00 car. If you stay realistic, I think you will be very impressed with what you get for your money! I certainly would buy the same car again -- I would just hold out for a manual transmission :-)
Good luck!
Thanks for all that feedback. Your experience is encouraging. My 04 LX is my first Honda, and I've been pleased with it overall. I drove an 08 EX-LV6 briefly in September when they first came out, and really liked the feel of the interior, the driving position, and the roominess. I was thinking I might switch to the V6, but the discussions about VCM are a little off-putting. Maybe the issue is limited to a few cars and maybe it will be resolved, but it's really not my ideal situation. I'd prefer a straight V6. As someone said on that post, it seems like a lot of engineering for not a real great benefit.
Anyway, I'm going to give the EX-L 4 cyl. a try, probably this weekend, and I'll post my thoughts next week. I'm with you on the low torque at low rpms, though I've adjusted to it in my current Accord. I guess the availability of the manual was an issue, and you settled for the automatic? I drove a lot of manuals in my youth, but I'm going to stay with automatics from here on out. I'm also with you on what you get for your money with an Accord. I paid $19,500 for my plain-Jane LX four years ago and consider it a real bargain. It continues to be a very solid car. I'm looking to move up to leather this time, plus a few more extras.
I also have an '08 Accord and get used to the front seats. It's federal requirement to protect driver/ front passenger's necks & heads in case of accident.
Anyone looking for a 3k 08 EX. I've got a real :lemon: Stick to Made In The Good Ole JAPAN!
Anyone looking for a 3k 08 EX. I've got a real :lemon: Stick to Made In The Good Ole JAPAN!
btw, take your service manager for a ride in another '08 accord and "show" him that they don't all do that!!
It's not drive-by-wire causing the vibration. My 03 has drive-by-wire and is vibration free. You either have a motor mount problem, or an engine that vibrates excessively. Maybe you need to find a better service department, with better technicians.
It's sad that something like this can and is ruining the ownership experience of an otherwise outstanding automobile.
How about going to drive one before spouting nonsense. The new Mustang is so much better than the previous ones that they are literally incomparable in every way, from drive dynamics to the stereo. I know. I've owned both (GTs). It would do any BMW short of an "M" proud. Of course, I'm speaking in terms of the GT. I've never driven a V6 Mustang. But from what I hear, even the V6 would run circles around an Accord coupe on a technical road coarse. RWD > FWD.
Having said that, I do have to ask (since you brought it up) --- wouldn't you prefer to have an independent rear suspension, rather than a solid rear axle, on your GT? If it performs well now, imagine how it would do then . . . .
Now I've seen enough of them on the road to admit that this new 08 is really a good looking car, almost kind of pretty...even from the back.
Sorry Pat -- I'll get back on topic. . . . Where were we? Ahhh yes -- the Honda Accord . . .
Well, that's one opinion...mine differs.
I noted a difference between our 2005 EX 4 and my 2006 EX 4. I'd imagine the 2008s are even quieter.