By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Unless the Ford being slightly more American made carries a lot of weight.
That might be fine for Joe Public, but when i put my transmission into manual mode, i expect it to stop thinking for itself and do what I tell it instead. And if I tell it to roll along just short of redline, it'd better do it. :shades: Mazda makes such a transmission. In a hatchback. With a bigger gas tank. In a car that actually gets 40 MPG highway, despite being rated at only 39.
Granted the Focus is a nice car. For someone not concerned with the issues I'm concerned with above, it's a great choice. But if they're looking to tap into the sport compact market, at the very LEAST they need to fix the DCT to have a true manual mode. I realize replacing the toggle with something better would be harder, as would the tank thing.
SkyActiv deserves major kudos, Autoweek tested a whole bunch of the 40mpg clubbers and the 3 did amazingly well. You can break 40mpg on the highway at speeds up to around 70mph.
IIRC only the Golf TDI did better, and only slightly better. Plus regular gas costs less than diesel.
But could you imagine an Alfa Romeo chassis with a SkyActiv powertrain? Or a FOCUS with it? Ooh man....
GM, being GM, will not use it. Probably because Americans don't buy hatchbacks and it's used in a hatchback or something like that. Then they'll release a new 2.0L engine and 6 speed that does almost as well, proclaim themselves to be world class, and then sell them to fleets. :shades:
The next gen 3 should be very interesting. Diesel even more so.
Would be nice if Mazda could shift production here.
The next Mazda3 probably won't be around until MY2015. I can't wait that long. On the other hand, I'm thinking of buying a 2013, and would have no problem trading it in in 2-3 years.
I've noticed that the 6 and the CX-5, with their full 4-2-1 header implementation, have REALLY long hoods comparatively.
Spent 34 in the supplier game, and went thru several "leveraged buyouts by venture capitalists", all failed... The original owners got tired of the game and wanted to pocket the money of which I have no problem understanding..I suffered, but moved on, got tired of it all and decided to become a self-employed sales rep with 3-4 suppliers..Lots of safety in numbers and eliminates the worry of relying on a single entity..
Our auto game is no longer interesting and the transplants are eating Detroit's lunch.. People get upset when they see that the Camry has a higher local content % than any Big 3 model..Believe me the content % sticker is nothing more than a game..It started back in the early 80s with the Asians and the pass-thru of components from offshore to a final assembly point and it was declared all-American.. Everybody looks the other way..
I will let you young geniuses decide the future of the real American car, for I have lived in the "fun" times and I hope you at least realize that the "greenies" are running the show..Nothing wrong with wealth, offshore bank accounts, and capitalism, the "greenies" do it every day..however they don't want you to do it..
The "happy days" on the "Autobahn" back in 1957-1960 with the 2 Porsches were memorable times, not a care in the world..I didn't always win the race for I got smoked a few times, but they can have Europe/Germany in it's present political climate..We are getting close to becoming a "mirror image" of their lifestyle..
Good Day!!!
If it was the "Greenies" that built that lovely Mazda3 SkyActiv setup, I say let them keep running it, thank you. They're doing a bang-up job, and I'll take a Mazda3 and smoke your 50's Porche in half a heartbeat. :shades:
This isn't about the fun being over, this is about American cars needing to become competitive. And they can. The Focus proves it. Ford went to Europe, where they know how to design small, lightweight, fuel-efficient cars that are still fun to pilot. They took the design and brought it back here to build. Smart.
Granted I would put the Mazda3 over the Ford Focus, that's my own tastes. I would put the Focus right near the top with the Elantra and Dart though, and above, the Civic, Corolla, Sentra, and Cruze. Americans can do it all quite well, thank you. It's GM that seems to have a problem. Everyone else seem to manage to create fuel efficient cars that people seem to like an awful lot.
You mean like actually trying to retain some living wage jobs, less crime, better health, less poverty, better drivers, better infrastructure, less aid to the 1%, better primary education, letting someone else provide defense, etc? Sounds like hell!
To think, those fun times back in the occupation days were enabled by taxpayer dollars too, that evil government at work...
Most cars today (American included) are better than back in the high earning years of the silent generation, too.
At least until Chery starts selling cars here.
If we ever do make the mistake of allowing in Chinese cars, they will likely by that time have copied/stolen/reverse engineered enough to make it tolerably reliable.
I think the real barrier to chinese cars here is not copyright laws, but rather crash testing.
Here's how you break a Brilliance in half (fake Daewoo Leganza):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mbe5ILICT4M
Side by side with a BMW 7 (not fair, but fun anyway):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ULm6QrC428&feature=fvwrel
And a fake Rodeo:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vx5JpY9DM_k&feature=related
I remember Simcas at the AMC dealer too though.
So it took more than 20 years for them to be taken seriously. And really they've only been seen as par with Toyota/Honda in the past year or two, so maybe even 25.
If China Motors has a similar false start, by selling cheap knock-offs here, then they will have to sell at a discount for at least a decade.
If they're smart they will launch in the US only when they have new, unique designs that have their early issues worked out. This is probably the market that is least tolerant of poor reliability.
Even then, I don't think they are seen as on par with Toyota / Honda just yet.
Are their resale values equivalent or better? The market speaks with their wallets on resale value and perceived reliability is a huge factor.
This is probably the market that is least tolerant of poor reliability.
Because we've been burned with the worst cars ever made in the world already. I challenge anyone to make something more unreliable than my Dodge was.
You get one of those and your next car will most certainly be a Toyota or Honda, no matter how boring their cars might be!
Where have YOU been? Not even Honda and Toyota are in a par with Honda and Toyota anymore. :P
The top tier is now Ford, Honda, Toyota, and Hyundai. And arguable VW and GM and Nissan.
I mean come on, EarthDreams? This from the company that released the Civic Si and the CRX? That's not Honda, that's Nega-Honda.
Admittedly, Toyota standing too pat and Honda being too conservative has probably helped the Detroit Three more than many other things.
However, that just means they've put out undesireable, but still reliable products. The cars might be stale and lack innovation or desireability, but they will still get you from A to B better than most out there.
Their reliability and durability hasn't been hurt by this funk; just the designs and engineering.
Not sure, but their incentives are among the lowest in the industry, and certainly that will help improve residuals.
I'd never need a new car bad enough to buy one from there. I wonder what kind of poisoning could be put into interior plastics and seating materials.
Doubtful. Classmate of mine got one for a HS graduation present in '70 and promptly crashed it and died. Simcas were tinny too though. I drove mine like an idiot all too often too. :sick:
One guy who always pushed the limit kept crashing his '57 Chevy, including one turtle episode, and never got too banged up.
There's a great looking convertible Super Beetle around here that I'd love to have, but I'd be afraid to drive it out of town. I might live a bit dangerously for a Karman Ghia though.
Speaking of which the state of our roadways and interstate freeways is in disrepair, dispicable smoothness, flatness, and conditonal quality.
I know most of the roads in CA are in poor condition. Can't anyone build a flat smooth road anymore?
Perhaps we need to sub-out our road and interstate construction to the Europeans and Japanese, since their roadways appear to be superior to ours, just like the cars! :P
If we will allow Mexican trucks which are uninspected for safety and uninsured into the US, Chinese cars are right behind...not only can we not keep out illegal Mexicans, we cannot, or will not, keep out their substandard vehicles...all so we are at risk if there is a collision...
I wonder who profits the most from those trucking risks.
Chinese vehicles are a different story, though. Hopefully, nobody will need a new car that badly.
All for agrand total of 40% domestic content.
That, and 40 grand for a cheap, one trick pony, econobox was absurd... :sick:
The government made loan money available to anyone with a job. The roads were not built to withstand the volume of traffic they got.
If they ever did sell a $2500 Tata Nano that alone may be the best reason to keep it out of the USA.
I don't know if anyone needs a new car badly enough to consider a Nano.
It helped the economy grow a lot, but the infrastructure wasn't ready to handle it.
Some people hate, some dislike, some loathe, but for all different reasons from:
1) anti-bailout
2) Sold a lemon and hung out to dry
3) anti-UAW workers
4) anti poor management
5) anti bonuses and golden parachutes for failing companies
6) anti junk cars
7) anti gov't motors
8) anti Obama motors
Mostly cuz they are ugly and don't have a high mileage diesel SUV.
And you forgot 10) Americans don't buy hatchbacks. :shades:
Oh well, 42BN for a domestic industry is still no worse than what we piss away on defending other nations and creating our own puppet states with no real benefit given.
2005 Buick LaCrosse CXL.
2002 Cadillac Seville STS.
2001 Chevrolet Impala.
1994 Cadillac DeVille.
1989 Cadillac Brougham.
1988 Buick Park Avenue.
1987 Chevrolet Caprice Classic.
1979 Buick Park Avenue.
1979 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight Regency.
1975 Cadillac Sedan DeVille.
1968 Buick Special Deluxe.
I didn't even include the awesome GM cars owned by friends and family.
1988 Chevy 3/4 ton 4X4 PU
1990 Chevy 3/4 ton 4X4 PU
1993 Chevy 3/4 ton 4X4 PU
1999 Chevy Suburban 4X4
It went down hill from there with a 2005 GMC Sierra Hybrid PU that was very poorly assembled. I have to assume it was worthless UAW workers unhappy having to work for a living.