By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
LE model has 8 way power seat. XLE has a moonroof.
since 80% of camry sales are 4 cyls, my guess is most potential buyers are like me, they would be willing to give up 6 cyl power for better mpg. honda learned a hard lesson about that with the accord.
there is a pretty sizeable difference from invoice built into the msrp of the hybrid.
my opinion is that is the 'tch' is a good vehicle, but not a bargain. the hyrid upgrade is not a slam dunk better choice among other camry choices.
Can you set the system to tell it that the new higher pressure is nominal, and thus increase the "dangerously low" threshold?
Yes, there is a switch (looks like inside the glove box) to reset (re-normalize) the tire pressure sensor to key off the current pressure in the tires. See p. 174 of the TCH Owner's Manual.
Does the manual specify the warning threshold? Is it a percentage of the nominal pressure?
I don't have my TCH yet, so I can't look!
Do you notice much difference in the ride quality? Also, do you know if that's within the specification of the tires?
I see no mention of any threshold in either absolute or percentage terms... :surprise:
GM: will the new styling save it
and
Who will sell you your next car? GM, Ford, Toyo or Honda
There is finally a hybrid car that doesn't look like something out of a sci-fi movie. It moves very well and it has all the luxuries.
For those of you wondering about the price difference, the Hybrid is basically the XLE with hybrid technology, that's why it is on the high end of the Camry cost scale (mine is fully loaded and it cost just over 30K)
I think Toyota should adopt the new ad campaing that mirrors the 'Why do you think' anti-smoking campaign. I really feel that there is no reason not to drive a hybrid car. It looks great, it drives great, and the list of non-selfish reasons to drive it goes on and on.
However with only the Fed $2600 this is now about a wash. I can buy a loaded V6SE for a discount (most of you evedentually can't in your area) and the tax credit makes it a decision about what you want, they're pretty even from a financial view. However if you can't get a discount on an SE then the Hybrid and credit (and fuel savings) makes this a good choice. I'm not sure though the people interested in the V6 would consider the hybrid as an alternative.
The hybrid has the remote start (pretty neat), but other than that were pretty similarly equipped.
I know even when you rotate tires (at least on the Scion) you have to reset the monitoring system.
And yes I will risk my life driving without that safety feature hooked up over the winter months.
Conditions:
100% freeway loop, with long hills for about 20% of route
60 degrees, no detectable wind
Steady 65 MPH
First test: 37 PSI in all tires
Result: 39.5 MPG
Second test: 46 PSI front; 44 PSI rear
Result 42.3 MPG
If the 4c LE is good enough for a driver's needs then there is no reason to look farther.
If however one does want more from the vehicle then the TCH fits in nicely.
Down the road the bulk of Camry sales will be CE's and LE's as is normal. This is how it should be. There is no intent or thrust to jam the TCH down on everyone. It's just there for anyone who wants it.
The comparison I made between the Fusion and the Avalon was just to illustrate that one vehicle appeals to one buyer and the other to another buyer and normally these two are not compared together. They are quite different. Ditto the LE Camry and the TCH.
Now the TCH is much more comparable to the V6 LE or XLE depending on equipment. Or the V6 Accord, Altima, Milan, Impala, etc. Now there is a valid set comparisons.
http://www.stevenvillatoro.com/page30/page30.html
Here's my plan: right after I pick up the TCH from the dealer I'm driving a few blocks down the road to a Discout Tire store whereupon they will 1) crack open the factory tires 2) remove TPM sensors 3) install TPM sensors on new rims 4) mount and balance new tires and rims 5) re-assemble and balance stock rims and tires.
Then hopefully sell the stock rims on eBay for ~$500 - 600. Plausible? I hope so. And I hope steps 1 - 5 won't cost much more than $100, considering the discount they give you for purchasing the tires from their Internet storefront....Cheers!
Magnetic gray was my original color of choice, initially shying away from the metallic "barcelona" red - but after I left the dealership I realized, hey, I'm a hybrid driver now, so I can own a red car! I don't need to worry about cops seeing me, 'cause now I'm a sensible driver who doesn't exceed the speed limit much!
So when they called me up and asked if I wanted a loaded red one, I said to myself YES (but only said to them "yes") if you catch my drift....LOL
thanks
Question though: Aren't you at all concerned that in an accident first responders may not recognize that your car is hybrid, possibly endangering them or your family? Just curious if you had even considered it.
A fully loaded Camry Hybrid and a fully loaded V6 XLE are about the same MSRP, but the street price of the V6 XLE is about $2500 lower in my area.
So it doesn't seem that the Hybrid makes economic sense for those hit by the AMT, especially since they aren't really comparable given that the V6 XLE is significantly more powerful and faster.
Hopefully, street prices of Hybrids will come down, but at that point, the tax credit may not be available to anyone.
The batteries are non-toxic so that risk is minimal. I'd be more concerned about leaking gasoline from a ruptured fuel tank than anything else.
If somehow you could get an XLE V6 at invoice ( doubtful at present ) then paying full pop for a TCH would put you at a $1500 disadvantage, disregarding any tax considerations.
But with the TCH you are getting about 35% better fuel economy for the life of the vehicle and you are leaving a smaller footprint on the environment for the life of the vehicle.
That $1500 difference doesn't seem so significant.
If you lust for the power and efficiency of the amazing 3.5L V6 then you will love the V6 XLE, it is one sweet machine to drive.
Both are great options.
Thanks!
Trust me you don't have to make a lot of money to pay the AMT. I got stuck for 9 grand last year. Not sure how bad I will get hit this year after retiring. I would consider a Camry to replace our 1990 LS400. I would expect the Camry to last that long as well. That is why I am skeptical of the hybrids. I think many components will not make it 17 years.
Many of the credits that are allowed when you calculate your regular income tax aren't allowed when you calculate your AMT. The more credits you claim, the more likely it is that you'll end up paying alternative minimum tax.
I looked at the tax forms for the AMT before buying the Hybrid. I realize it's not all about how much money, but "what kind" of money you make. I'm not self employed or have the types of investment income that is affected so when I ran a quick calculation it did not seem to affect me.
I think the hybrids reliability is going to be OK (I'm betting on it) but if I thought I would keep this car 15+ years I probably wouldn't have went with a hybrid either.
My wife hates all the new Lexus. We rented a 2005 Camry in Victoria for a week and we both liked that car. I don't think she is going to like the looks of the 2007 when she sees one. She likes the E & S class Mercedes, not enough to write that big of a check. No rush the LS400 still runs very nicely. Just no XM radio that she likes in my PU truck. Whatever we buy will have XM I guarantee that.
Again to me it's a non-issue based on my prior 17 yrs experience with 7 Toyota's but I can understand the pov for the very very very cautious.
Example, in Virginia, a speeding car loses the right-of-way in an intersection. Say I'm going 52 in a 45 zone, and a car runs the red light and hits me. My "black box" shows I was speeding, so now I'm at fault? Yes, this is somewhat a n issue with the law, but in this case, my car is testifying against me.
Anybody have any experiences with such things?
Event data recorder
Your vehicle has computers that monitor and control certain
aspects of your vehicle. These computers assist in
driving and maintaining optimal vehicle performance. Besides
storing data useful for troubleshooting, there is a
system to record data in a crash or a near car crash
event. This is called an Event Data Recorder (EDR).
The SRS airbag sensor assembly contains the EDR. In a
crash or a near car crash event, this device may record
some or all of the following information:
 Engine speed
 Whether the brake pedal was applied or not
 Vehicle speed
 To what extent the accelerator pedal was depressed
 Position of the transmission selector lever
 Whether the driver and front passenger wore the seat
belts or not
 Driver’s seat position
 Front passenger’s occupant classification
 SRS airbag deployment data
 SRS airbag system diagnostic data
If your vehicle is equipped with a vehicle stability control
(VSC) system, its Electronic Control Unit (ECU) may contain
another EDR. There are a variety of driving situations
which include activating the VSC under which the VSC
EDR will record certain information. The VSC EDR may
record some or all of the following information:
 Behavior of the vehicle
 Steering wheel angle
 Vehicle speed
 To what extent the accelerator pedal was depressed
 To what extent the brake pedal was applied
 To what extent the ECU controlled the condition of
the 4 wheels
 Vehicle stability control system diagnostic data
The information above is intended to be used for the
purpose of improving vehicle safety performance. Unlike
general data recorders, the EDR does not record sound
data such as conversation between passengers.
Don't virutally ALL modern cars have some of this info logged?
To increase my odds of not having this problem I won't be drag racing my hybrid against a 69 Road Runner. Hopefully I won't get T-boned by one either
Ooooh, I'm gonna name my car "Jetson!"
If all else fails, trust in Toyota.
Many of the people caught by it are middle class, not rich by any means. It started out to catch millionaires, but was not indexed for inflation (since the 1970's!) :surprise:
Reguardless, after having the TCH now for a couple of weeks, I would recommend it even without the credits.
It's not that it saves me so much over a 4c as some have to make a comparison to for justification, but it saves me a bunch over what I was previously driving and I just happened to be in the mood for something different. The TCH fits well with my desires and has a payback (at least over the 16mpg FX45)
I went through the form for calculating the AMT, and I appear to be well short of the requirement to pay AMT. Double income, no kids, mortgage interest, our only stocks are in 401k... That is one ugly tax form. I have no idea how anyone comes up with these tax codes and instructions. If I use the 2600 credit to help justify this to my wife, and it doesn't actually work, I would be in trouble!
I am in the same situation here - but very anxious to get out of my 18mpg '02 Chevy Trailblazer. I will probably get screwed on the trade in, but I don't want to sell it myself. I had been justifying it because I needed a tow vehicle for a pair of jetskis, but I just sold them, and I am ready for something new.
The looks of the new Camry ads caught my eye (I think all automakers should do their commercials in High Definition!). The hybrid option really sucked me in - double the mileage, decent power (only about 1 second slower than my wife's V6 '05 Accord Coupe according to Car and Driver), and all the inside goodies that I want (Nav, leather, etc).
I am also an engineer, so I am impressed by the technical side of Hybrids. I want mine NOW! This wait is excruciating.
without any changes in the laws, next year the income exclusion is supposed to drop significantly. that is why a lot more taxpayers are likely to be subject to 'amt'.
i don't know how many tch's are expected to be produced, but i doubt they will have any trouble selling them this year.
If somehow you could get an XLE V6 at invoice ( doubtful at present ) then paying full pop for a TCH would put you at a $1500 disadvantage, disregarding any tax considerations."
How are you figuring over $1000?
Hybrid (convenience pack., leather, moonroof, navi): $30,390 MSRP
V6 XLE (Smartkey, heated seats, VSC/Trac, Navi): $30,840 MSRP
Difference is $450 MSRP. Is there something I'm forgetting?
In my area, I can get a fully loaded 2007 V6 XLE for $28,400 with no haggling. Fully loaded hybrid is still firm at MSRP of $30,400. So it would be a $2000 difference I guess.
Would have been nice to get the tax credit, but oh well.