Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see May lease deals!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I assume batteries are the same, and some other measuring technicality, or printing date, is responsible for the discrepancy.
Also, regenerative breaking at 82 amperes and 244 volts equates to 20 kW and 26 HP, not ±20 HP, as I printed. Sorry.
That's what Toyota.ca shows now.
Cheers, Tom
tom
Quick question regarding the battery charge level: I've noticed that the battery only charges one bar short of being fully charged. I haven't been able to recharge the battery to its full capacity. I think I'm only charged 80% most of the time. The indicator briefly lights up lime green but quickly turns back to two bars below full charge and turns blue...which leads me to believe that I'm probably charged 85% most of the time. This has been constant for me for the past two weeks.
Just wondering if anyone has been able to consistently fully recharge the battery.
You have noticed the key feature as to why the batteries are expected to last 'the lifetime of the vehicle' as stated on Toyota's website. The SOC is kept in a very narrow range where it never becomes fully charged nor fully discharged, except in error/emergency as noted above by devsienna.
This is why the cycling from charge/discharge can be repeated nearly indefinitely without deteriorating the battery's performance.
BTW...I picked up my TCH with nav, leather, sunroof...last Saturday...Paid MSRP 30,589 in Chicago burbs... desert sand mica...love the car..this message board is great also
Good point. I hadn't thought of that. Thanks!
the engine that runs on gas vs the electric motor that runs on the big battery that takes up so much of the trunk space
I am a 33 year old female, married, with no children yet. I am in the market for a new car. I have a 1992 corolla that is falling apart...it is time to get a new car. I have narrowed it down to 2 cars.....2007 Camry or 2006 Rav4. I can't decide if a small suv or sedan would be better. Both cars seem to have good ratings as far as performance and reliability. I guess it comes down to looks......I hate to be superficial but that is what it comes down to. What is your opinion on which car looks better? What is popular nowadays?
Also, are leather seats better than cloth?
Thank you
Yes, several times on long down grades I have had the full green bars (I'm not sure because of my eyes and the lighting but it appeared the top bar was a little darker green.
Also when you get down low the bottom bar turns violet/purple
I understand that in the Asian and European markets there is, on the Prius and Hylander a button to the left of the steering column (Blank in NA) that says "EV" (Electric Vehicle). Apparently if you push this while at a stop, the car will run up to a slow speed (maybe 40 MPH) on electric. (the ICE, will however start if the battery gets too low) There is a firm in FLA that make a simple kit to modify NA Prius's as the computer function is already there. Does anyone know anything about this for the TCH?
Thanks
Eric
I will not buy a car I don't like the looks of. However once my list is made of acceptable cars it then comes to make the final choice on something other than looks. Both vehicles are good looking designs in their class.
The Rav4 will have one of the best resale values in its class (probably doesn't matter if you keep it 14 years). A regular Camry (not hybrid) will also be a good long term vehicle. Although I have a TCH I don't necessarily believe it would be my choice if I planned to drive it for 14 years.
You don't indicate your milage/yr. There are considerations I believe you need to make to be responsible with your finances. An SUV, even one as good as the Rav4 will not be as cheap to drive as a Camry. Too many people are already driving SUV's when they don't need one. However and I don't know what your other family vehicle is, an SUV is a handy vehicle, just not a good daily driver. I have a TCH for most driving but I have a 4Runner to pull my trailer, jetskis and tractor. I used to drive an SUV for daily use and decided when I got the TCH that it's stupid and just not a good thing to drive something that gets 14.4mpg foor a daily driver.
Bottom line:
If you need to haul occasionally and don't drive a lot of miles consider the Rav4
If you drive a lot (>12,000 miles per year) the Camry is probably more comfortable and effecient.
I think another vehicle you should consider if you go SUV is the Highlander Hybrid. Right now they are being discounted heavily and if driven right will yield a very good mpg rating.
Cloth and leather is not a choice of better, it's a choice of what feels best. I've had leather for several years but my 4 Runner is a sport model and it came with cloth. I wasn't sure we'd like it but it has not bothered me. Some people don't like leather at all (they've probably never owned it either). Some don't like leather in cold climates but you typically have to have leather if you want heated seats. Some don't like leather in hot climates, but since automobiles have started using tinted glass I don't think it's that big of an issue (the leather used to get real hot with the sun hitting it while parked)
Personally, when I have a choice I choose leather
I don't think you can go wrong with either choice. Leather or cloth, Rav4 or Camry.
(My daughter has the Corolla S, I think that is a really good looking car and it gets great FE as well)
I am not an expert by a long shot, however really like cars and have had many very interesting automobiles in last 40 years. Corvette to Mercedes, BMW to Corolla!
You really need to drive both to see the difference. I suggest renting for at least a full day to really get the feel. Two years ago, after our daughter wrote off my wifes new Camry, we looked at the RAV4 (then a very different car to the current RAV4) and chose the Honda CRV because it was longer. (Less porpoising on the road)BUT that car sure is noisy at highway speeds, and we did not really see this in the test drives. I do beleive that the current RAV4 is a superb vehicle. If I were to get a similar vehicle for my wife today, I would get the RAV4 or the Hylander Hybrid (chech that out too). I just picked up a Camry Hybrid last week and am absolutely thrilled with it One of the best cars I have ever bought! BE WARNED, however these Hybrid cars are very different! Excellent, but different. The trunk IS SMALL!!!When it takes off from a start in normal driving, you feel a "tug" as the gas engine starts. (In the Hylander with a bigger and V6 engine the engine start is almost imperceptable. So, different but excellent. If one was to buy one of these with only a short drive, they may be surprised after driving a bit at all the differences. all this to say these are new and different and I bought one as I feel they are the future, I love it and enjoy getting into it every time! More luxurious than a RAV4 and probably has more features and probably is more quiet.
Have fun!
Eric
Both wvgasguy and ericottawa have provided great arguments for choosing one from the other. I just recently purchased the '07 Camry and the RAV4 was not a deciding factor for me...although I think the new RAV4s are well-designed compact SUVs. I also like the way they look. My opinion, I really like the new design of the '07 Camry. The design not only looks great, it has a drag coefficiency of 0.28 (the hybrid version has a Cd of 0.27). Now, that may not be a significant factor for you but if you're concerned of saving fuel (in everyway possible)...it matters.
If you're just concerned of the way either vehicle looks on the outside, it's really a matter of preference...your preference. If you're considering other factors (i.e., hybrid, navigation, leather, interior space, trunk space), it really depends on what you'll be using the vehicle for. Like wvgasguy mentioned, if you're planning on primarily using your car as a commuter vehicle, then the '07 Camry is probably a better choice (especially the hybrid version). If you need the additional space to move things, you may want to go with the RAV4.
Many of the options or standard features available in the '07 Camry are also available in the Limited version of the RAV4. If money is a factor, you'll have to consider the base vs base of each model. If money is not a factor, compare the two with all the options that you prefer to have. Leather is a matter of preference again. You may like it in moderate weather but may hate it during extreme temperatures (hot or cold)...like wvgasguy said. You'll need to upgrade to leather if you want heated seats...a feature my wife really likes but I, personally, never use.
If your budget permits, you should consider getting a fully loaded Camry Hybrid. MSRP is approx. $30.5K ($33.5K after-tax). If you're able to purchase a Camry Hybrid before the reduction in the federal tax credit, you'll be able to reduce your tax liability by $2,600. So, after-tax credit cost is approximately $31K. You're still paying a premium to own a hybrid but if gas prices continue to rise (although the prices have declined in the past week), a hybrid will help with your gas consumption.
If you want a non-hybrid Camry, it's still a matter of preference. Do you want all the bells and whistles, which you'll have with the Camry XLE. It'll probably cost you approximately $35K+. I think the fully loaded RAV4 is probably the same but if you're looking for speed, it's the Camry XLE V6.
I think you're looking into the Camry Hybrid because this is a Camry Hybrid forum. Otherwise, you should find a forum that'll help you compare apples with apples because comparing the Camry Hybrid to any other Camry model is still comparing apples to oranges.
Bottom line: Go with the Toyota Camry Hybrid (TCH). It's a great car and so much fun to drive. All the electronic feedback allows me to see how efficiently or inefficiently I'm driving. I test drove a Camry hybrid (non-nav)...was originally impressed but I'm really impressed with my TCH. I've already noticed two Prius owners breaking their necks to check out my TCH. You can't travel the HOV/carpool lanes by yourself in the TCH (like the Prius) but neither can the RAV4.
Hope this helps...buy the TCH...it's a no brainer.
Another consideration is that the Camry Hybrid should hold much more of its value than the RAV4. If you end up not liking the Hybrid you can simply sell it at any time and not get hurt on resale. If you grow tired of the RAV4 you can also sell it at anytime but it will not hold its original value quite as well....good but not like the Hybrids that are in such high demand and currently limited production.
Fortunately, I found some great looking wheels (hard for a 16" wheel!): Focal F6, No. 176. They are 20.2 lbs. Great looking machined lip on them, the spokes are shiny black. If you chrome the wheel, they will almost exactly equal the weight of the standard ones.
If you took 6 lbs off each wheel (pretty easy) that would be like taking almost 100lbs off the car. (about 1:4-5 ratio unsprung:sprung from what I've read)
I'm not sure how much this would affect mileage, though. Maybe the difference is negligible (although Honda puts lighter wheels on their hybrids- it must make some difference)
I think I need some 13lb wheels!
tom
Just ordered a fully loaded TCH in Titanium. Am told my timing was really good, will be here next week! Was prepared for substantial wait.
This dealer is in Tucson. No markup over MSRP
Piece of cake. A deep socket wrench removes the "valve stem" from the outside of the wheel. The stem is attached to a small sensing/sending unit inside the rim. As long as the internal geometry of the new wheel is similar you shouldn't have any problem fitting it up. Didn't have any balance issues mounting the sensor, then the tire, then balancing the whole setup.
I’m getting a lot of good exercise walking from the far reaches of the parking lot.
AC was on ECO the entire trip. When I reset the trip upon gas fill, the BEST mpg now states 36.0 so it is not far off from actual useage calculation.
While this is less than some have experienced, I am quite happy overall with the economy I am getting. I have never made that trip in any other vehicle for less than 14-20 gallons of gas and this time had less than 10 gallons!
I noticed during the return trip in the headwinds that the MPG meter hardly ever went above about 35 mpg. I was surprised that these headwinds could make a 5-6 mpg difference.
I have just conculed my first 1,000 miles with the overall economy at 35.84 (calculated).
I’m getting a lot of good exercise walking from the far reaches of the parking lot.
I figure it's inevitable, but I do take certain steps to minimize it, like never taking a parking space which is really tight. Also, if possible, I'll park slightly closer to the car on my left figuring the passenger door of that car may not get used, but the driver's door to my right certainly will be. Gotta play the odds...
Speaking of paint dings, I got my first one this weekend. Turning left into a parking lot with a dip in front of the sidewalk driveway, and not slowing down quite enough, the front end bottomed, and took some paint off. You have to sort of squat and look closely to see it, but it's there. So, remember to really slow down for sharp dips!
Thanks for all the great tips!
It also relieves 'ding anxiety' as a side effect.
But in "B" mode, you are certainly not capturing any "brake energy" either way.
Your not alone... there are others out there that do the same thing just don't admit it... just don't let it control your life... and the next time someone askes why you parked out in left field just say...
" I do it for the exercise...(optional) and you know you could use a little excercise yourself!
Gampa
Do you need to reprogram it to automatically unlock all 4 doors when you approach the vehicle?
Thanks for your help.
Whether all the "braking" provided by the "B" mode is created by the generator and how that compares to what you'd get using the brakes, the manual doesn't say. I find the "B" mode a bit agressive on braking and prefer to be light on the brakes and listen to the faint generator whine while stopping. It sounds cool.
Not that I know of.
> Do you need to reprogram it to automatically unlock all 4 doors when you approach the vehicle?
Yes. As it comes from the factory, touching the passenger side door will unlock all doors and the driver side will only unlock itself. But that can be changed to unlock all doors.
I am not a Hybrid owner, but I did just purchase a 2007 4-cyl Camry which comes standard with, I believe, the same JBL 440 watt, 8-spkr system that you have. I was amazed and disappointed to see that in this package the tweeters are in the BACK, coupled with a subwoofer, and the front pair on the dash are just MID-RANGE.
Did someone change the rules since I bought my last Camry in 2003? That had a perfectly good pair of (JBL) tweeters up front as part of a balanced system, and I was happy with it. Now the only way I can get clear speech on my FM talk station is to shift the sound behind me...which sucks when I'm listening to news-talk.
Yes, it's okay for music, but there is still a lack of high-end clarity. And don't get me started on how off-center the L-R balance is. :mad:
On the jbltoyota.com website, JBL proudly touts this arrangement as their new "Distributed SubWoofer System", which "optimizes bass response". That's great if you want more bass, maybe, but I'd rather have a balanced sound image, and as it stands now, putting tweeters in the back leads to anything but that.
Any ideas on how this can be countered?
Thanks,
AZRob
Actually it's when you touch the door handle, not just "approach" the vehicle. Remember this is a safety feature before you change the programing. If your spouse is heading (running) to the car feeling a little insecure for some reason, having all 4 doors unlock is not a good feeling. If she/he is in a parking lot and open the door, somone standing in the lot on the other side of the car can just get in.
I don't live in an area where I really need to worry that much about this, but some of you do.
If you want to open all 4 doors you can always use the fob.
You've made a very good point regarding safety of not to unlock all 4 doors.
I am picking up the Jasper Green today after work. Probably the first of this colour from Toronto. My wife and I both think the colour is very cool especially under the bright sun.
The tweeters alone are in the front!!!!!!!!!!
The speakers in the back are coax speakers (tweeters and midrange).
It's your choice of course, but bear in mind it is a lot easier and cheaper to replace brakes than a transmission. Also it is better to spread your braking effort among all four wheels for stability reasons.