Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

General Motors discussions

1269270272274275558

Comments

  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    I would rather have the Denali diesel in the 3/4 ton (2500) vs (1500) 1/2 ton.
    If I bought a half-ton I'd rather go the gas route and am plenty happy with the 400 hp 6.2 V8 already scheduled for the GMT-900 1/2 ton Sierra Denali. ;)

    BTW- I just called GMC and asked if the 3/4 ton might have a Denali version. The customer service guy wasn't sure but would forward my request. He did say something to the fact that he thought he heard a Denali version being a available on the future HD's but wasn't going to confirm it since he wasn't positive.

    Maybe they could bring back the Oldsmobile 350cid Diesel for half-ton trucks???

    GM, has been working on a baby duramax for quite some time NV ;)

    Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Sounds like a good product idea. GM, has been doing the same thing with the duramax. I assume the ford one will be a baby cummins ?

    Rocky
  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    I said V6 diesel from Europe and you think Cummins....

    Your uptake is a little slow.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    british,

    sorry I honestly wasn't thinking. Sounds like a good idea anyways. ;) Who would make the diesel ? VW ????

    Rocky
  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    Ford of Europe is supposed to make it. Edmunds reported on it a few months ago and I have heard rumors to back it up. It is supposed to be a V6 version of the TDV8 diesel being used in the new Land Rovers. I assume that same engine is going in some of the new jags as well at a later date.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    interesting......Thanx for the update. :)

    Rocky
  • torque_rtorque_r Member Posts: 500
    The design is stylish and pleasing to the eye. The nose might spark some debates, but I like it. I do see some Mazda6/Ford Fusion clues in the profile, but that's not totally a bad thing as those are good looking cars. So what new stuff does the Malibu bring? It is the first mid-size sedan to bring 4-cylinder/6-speed combination. The upgrade is the 3.6L V6 according to the article.

    This is what the Aura should have been. Are you reading Rockylee?

    The not-so-good news is that this car should be on sale now to shock the competition. Who knows what will happen after 9 months? There will be a new Accord, Mazda 6, Dodge Avenger at that time, new powertrains for the fusion. Let's just hope the Malibu does not grow old and ordinary before it goes on sale.

    http://www.thecarconnection.com/Vehicle_Reviews/Sedans_Coupes_and_Hatchbacks/200- - 8_Chevrolet_Malibu_Preview.S180.A11645.html
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    Love the way the IP center stack flows right into the center console. Sharp car. I thought that the exterior would have some retro touches but I do not see any.

    The real good news is that it sounds like it has stepped up in size to the Camry/Accord. Hopefully the interior is as large. Increased wheelbase over Camry should give it more backseat legroom.

    Just proves taht the next gen Impala will be something different than what it is today: RWD and larger.

    There was a question at one time about a one piece front end. The fascia does sweep back to the wheelwell just aft of the headlamps so no one piece. Short fenders though!
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    I agree with you so don't think I'm not. ;)

    The Aura will also get the 4-cyl/6-speed combo also. I however like the 08' Malibu a little better because it's more of a accord fighter while the Aura is more along the lines of Camry. ;)

    Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    62'

    I'm a balla, shock collar, 20-inch blades on the 09' Impala. :shades:

    V8 power and Smokin' RWD rubber on the "Big Body" Impala. :shades:

    Rocky
  • bumpybumpy Member Posts: 4,425
    The front and rear ends still need some work, but this is about a 90% car, far better than GM's other recent efforts. The most notable thing is that the 2008 Malibu will be the first nonrebadged Chevrolet sedan in history without a pushrod available. Took them long enough.
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    The most notable thing is that the 2008 Malibu will be the first nonrebadged Chevrolet sedan in history without a pushrod available

    I would not be so sure. Hopefully there will be an economical engine to keep the cost down. OHC's are awful expensive.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    OHC are the very best. ;)

    Rocky
  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    If they are so awful expensive how come every other car in the world including cars that cost less then many GMs have them...
  • sls002sls002 Member Posts: 2,788
    How good and engine is depends on the design. OHC's do not mean that the engine is better. Pushrods do not make the engine worse. How good the engine is depends on how it was designed. For example, the GM quad 4 (an OHC design with 4 valves per cylinder) is not noted for exceptional NVH qualities.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    Looks better when one can see the whole car and not just the truck-ish grille. Inoffensive as a package, but that front end is still out of proportion...Chevy's big mouth bass indeed. Not exactly a styling masterpiece.

    I see a horizontal bar theme re-emerging too. That cue doesn't work.
  • xrunner2xrunner2 Member Posts: 3,062
    Inoffensive as a package, but that front end is still out of proportion...Chevy's big mouth bass indeed.

    Agree. Front end is weird. Profile at back end roof reminds me of Acura TL. Perhaps trunk too in profile.

    Why can't Chevy get it right with styling. Do they still have Aztek people around at GM?
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    It wouldn't matter what GM, brought out to the market people like you would find something wrong with it. :sick:

    Rocky
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    Oh boo hoo...GM has had very weak styling for many years. They are just slowly emerging from that hole. I do suspect some people from the bad old days are still around.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Well Fintail there is a strong anti-GM bias that is among us in these forums. I will at least give you the benefit of the doubt because you seem to not still live in the past.

    Rocky
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    I think a lot of bias in the world comes from a legitimate origin.

    In looking at the Chevy lineup in terms of styling only...I see the Aveo - no real styling to speak of, just an appliance. Cobalt - very inoffensive, not really bad in any way, but not looking so new anymore, unremarkable. Malibu - pretty strange really, thank god for the new nose, but a nose job can only do so much. Impala - probably the most homogenous Chevy design, very inoffensive, not memorable but not easy to hate. Monte - all the right curves in all the wrong places, braille school of automotive design, could be mistaken for a joke. Vette - suits the vehicle perfectly. And the new trucks look pretty fine, but the ones they replaced were eyesores. Oh yeah, and those Colorado wheel arches are painful.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    I wasn't just speaking on styling per se for the biasness but it goes much deeper than that. Some people honestly believe their import is superior to a domestic. Many people such as lemko, I, and others have proven otherwise with the mileage we have put on our cars.

    Rocky
  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    Many people such as lemko, I, and others have proven otherwise with the mileage we have put on our cars.

    That doesn't prove anything. The domestics do make some good cars but in general a lot of their vehicles are inferior to some of the imports. You think in absolute black and white terms too much. That is a serious probably with a lot of people in this country it seems.

    I have been in the Automotive business for over a decade now and you wanna know which cars, not including diesels, I have seen with the highest documented mileage...

    Now this list does not really prove anything either but it is interesting.

    1: 1988 Range Rover miles

    327,xxx miles but it was no longer running when I ran across it. One owner who had put all of the miles on it and I was considering buying but most of the frame had rusted away from being stored outdoors in the woods.

    2: 1989 Honda Accord 289,xxx miles

    When I started servicing this car it had a about 180,000 miles on it and was on its second owner. Last time I saw it was a little over two years ago so it may have broken over 300,000 miles by now.

    3: 1991 Toyota Camry 278,xxx miles
    This was also a second owner car but I first saw it at 200,000 miles or so. Haven't seen it in about two years since I don't run my shop anymore.

    4: 1988 Dodge Ram 262,xxx miles
    This car was on its original motor but had gone through two trannys. That doesn't really surpise me as he did a lot of towing.

    5: 1988 Buick Park Avenue 254,xxx
    This car actually finally kicked the bucked at 254,xxx miles and was owned by a coworker of mine at my old shop. I sold him my 1989 Pontiac Bonneville for 600 dollars. It had 145,xxx miles on it when I sold it to him and he has close to 200,xxx miles on it now.
  • lemonhaterlemonhater Member Posts: 110
    Actually what causes the anti-gm and anti-domestic bias is not the fact that they can put out some nice high quality cars. Cadalic for instance doesn’t have that bad a reputation dependability wise.

    It is more the across the board. It is like having a lousy sports team with a great star. The great star may get some excellent plays and earn high scores but odds are the team will loose. Gm seems to put it best effort in things like Cadalic and Buick the higher end cars but then put less effort in the low end cars esp. the sub-compact. Case in point the Avero which I dislike the styling of, but even if I did like the styling it isn’t very fuel effecint(27 mpg in the city) something I expect out of a sub-compact. Another issue the Ford focus and it’s many recalls.

    I think what is happing is that the imports are better at execution. Giving the market what it wants and greatly reducing as well as quickly fixing the problems that come up.

    Also any car can get high milage, the other big worry is how often it breaks down. Some of the recalls for things like brakes could be quite annoying. The tempo my mom had nikeled and dimmed you to death. Nothing major broke on it(unlike the Escort). But the little things slowly peaved her off.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    I've have had friends that have been nickled and dimed by their foreign cars also. I think their is a major perception problem with americans that think those problems only happen to domestic vehicals. :surprise:

    Rocky
  • lemonhaterlemonhater Member Posts: 110
    I also think the imports are better at marketing as well. GM needs to make its products stand out better. I have seen many GM commercials that left me wondering why on earth I should buy this car. Like the darned flying car one or the one where they have all those people jumping on to the trailer caring GM cars. Or the scaling buildings. The ads are flashy, but they do not address why I need their product.

    I think they need a bumper to bumper warranty (of say 3 years). That would give people who are import lovers the confidence to at least try the product and possible force Toyota to play catch up.
  • pch101pch101 Member Posts: 582
    This "perception" problem has been thoroughly documented by consumer publications, surveys, and industry experts.

    Let's face it -- the GM fans are lone voices of doubt and anecdotes surrounded by a vast wilderness of well-documented research and data. I'd like the GM folks to produce a shred of legitimate, verifiable documentation that proves these claims of bias.
  • lemonhaterlemonhater Member Posts: 110
    Oh I agree, but there is a good reason why the perciption exsists. At one time it was very true and it also depends on which imports you are talking about. Toyota is probably the best for across the board quality. Honda is a little more spoty. Niasain is as reliable or less than the domestics. Volkswagon probably the least.

    I know I wont buy a Ford after thoose two things because the replacements a 94 camery and a 94 trecel did a lot better than the previous two things. I don't think Toyota can walk on water, but at least they made two cars that didn't have any major issuses. That ran 9-12 years with only 1 or 2 breakdowns on the cammery(9 years) and none on the trecel. Both generally ran without unexpected repair costs.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    I think they need a bumper to bumper warranty (of say 3 years). That would give people who are importing lovers the confidence to at least try the product and possible force Toyota to play catch up.

    What ????????? :surprise: lemon, are you hiting the bottle tonight ?????? :P

    Did you not really know all GM cars have at a mininum of a 3 yr. 36K bumper to bumper warranty. Buick, Cadillac, Saab have 4 yr. 50K bumper to bumper.

    Rocky
  • lemonhaterlemonhater Member Posts: 110
    Yeap, and that comes down to marketing. Where did they state a three year warrenty while the trailer was carring cars. That sort of information is important.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    CR isn't a legit source

    Rocky
  • pch101pch101 Member Posts: 582
    CR isn't a legit source

    Then provide me with one. (By the way, CR and JD Power results tend to correlate, so if you refer to JD Power, be sure that you understand that you are effectively validating CR's legitimacy.)
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Toyota is probably the best for across the board quality.

    I could be great too if I lied about my flaws and didn't recall them....... :mad:

    Even as GM and Ford have accumulated award after award on vehicle quality, you’d almost never know about such quality gains made by American companies - or quality declines of foreign companies - by listening to the media. Did you hear about it when the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration announced that Toyota recalled more vehicles than it sold in the U.S. last year? Probably not. Did you hear about Toyota making an "elaborate apology" for their "worrisome series of recalls" that has "tarnished its reputation for quality?" Probably not. Did you hear about the Toyota senior manager quote that stated "We used to do quiet recalls called ‘service campaigns’ to deal with defects but we’re not going to hide anything anymore?" Such a statement suggests Toyota’s past recall numbers were probably much higher than we were led to believe, and they profited handsomely by having a perception of higher quality than they deserved. In Japan, prosecutors are looking into possible negligence on the part of Toyota for shirking recalls for the last eight years. How ironic. You probably didn’t hear about that one either because the American media doesn’t like to bash foreign auto companies -only American ones.

    http://www.howtobuyamerican.com/bamw/bamw-061129-auto.shtml

    Rocky
  • lemonhaterlemonhater Member Posts: 110
    Yap heard about it. Still think Toyota is across the board better because they quickly handled their problems. In addition, both Ford and GM have recalled more cars than they sold and it depends on what the recall is about. For instance the recall in Japan you listed involved a vehicle that was well over 5 years old. About the only worrisome recall I have seen from Toyota involved the 2007 Camry air bag.

    I would rather have someone fix something at no charge without being compeled by the feds than deal with something like the Ford Firestone fiasco.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Yap heard about it. Still think Toyota is across the board better because they quickly handled their problems.

    8 years of hiding the truth and members of their management facing prison time is handling their problems quickly ? :surprise: oooookkkkkaaaaayyyy :surprise:

    In addition, both Ford and GM have recalled more cars than they sold and it depends on what the recall is about. For instance the recall in Japan you listed involved a vehicle that was well over 5 years old. About the only worrisome recall I have seen from Toyota involved the 2007 Camry air bag.

    http://www.automotive.com/new-cars/recalls/01/toyota/index.html

    I would rather have someone fix something at no charge without being compeled by the feds than deal with something like the Ford Firestone fiasco.

    I guess ford didn't get 8 years like toyota to hide their defects because cars were rolling over. The thing of it is it wasn't a Ford problem but rather a firestone problem. ;)

    Rocky
  • bobstbobst Member Posts: 1,776
    Rocky, we base our opinions on our experiences.

    We bought one Ford, a 1987 Taurus, and it broke down a lot. I will NEVER buy another Ford product.

    We have owner two Nissans and both were wonderful. I would definitely buy another.

    We have owner six Hondas and one Acura and all have been very good or better. We will probably buy more.

    I have never seen a GM or Chrysler car that I wanted to own.
  • lemonhaterlemonhater Member Posts: 110
    Well that is just it. It was ONE accident in Japan caused by a failed tie rod. Rather than the NTSB contacting Ford informing them that your SUVs are rolling over at an extreme rate.
  • 210delray210delray Member Posts: 4,721
    Yes, and as I recall (no pun intended), the vehicle was 11 years old at the time.

    The eventual recall for the trucks and SUVs involved was for model years 1989-96! Not exactly vehicles built just recently.

    BTW, I don't remember anything about the 2007 Camry being recalled for airbag problems (and my employer has bought 5 of them and is planning to buy a sixth). AFAIK, we've received no recall notices.

    The prior-generation models (including my 2004) were recalled for side curtain airbag problems -- some were twisted during installation. Mine turned out to be okay once the trim was removed for a look at the dealer.

    I'm with Bobst. I had a 1990 Sable (Taurus twin). It was a nightmare after 65K miles, including a failed transmission. When it came time to sell one of my cars in 2000, I chose the Sable rather than the 1980 Volvo 240 that had over 200K miles on it at the time.

    I also had two VW Rabbits back in the 70s. Never again for VW; I wouldn't say 100% never for Ford, but who knows if they'll survive?

    I have had 3 Camrys from 1997 on (two currently) -- very reliable. I also have a 1998 Nissan Frontier -- also extremely reliable and still looks great!
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    Never saw a Nissan or a Honda I wanted to own. About the only Japanese car I can see myself in is the Lexus LS as it is so much like my Buick Park Avenue. On the other hand, there are PLENTY of GM and Mopar products I could go for. I would've never looked at a Taurus in the first place. However, the current Five Hundred doesn't seem like a bad ride though the Crown Victoria is more my style.
  • 210delray210delray Member Posts: 4,721
    The reason we bought the Sable in 1990 was we wanted a midsize or larger affordable sedan with a driver airbag. None of the Camcords had airbags at the time -- just those "mouse motor" automatic belts. GM cars were worse -- most had those silly "automatic" belts that were attached to the front doors. Door opens in crash -- out you go!

    There were only 3 affordable choices with driver airbags -- Taurus/Sable, Olds Delta 88, and Dodge Dynasty. The Taurus/Sable seemed like a no-brainer at the time -- this was before the 3.8 V6 head gasket and transmission maladies were well known. (We were lucky to get the smaller 3.0 "Vulcan" V6 and never had any engine problems.)
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    Judging by my experience with my 1988 Buick Park Avenue, the Olds Delta 88 would've been the best choice, but I think the Dodge Dynasty was a prettier car. Were there any issues associated with the Dynasty? If so, I never heard about them. Andre?
  • 210delray210delray Member Posts: 4,721
    Yeah, the 88 probably would have held up better, but it seemed so stodgy-looking at the time. The comparable Buick LeSabre and Pontiac Bonneville had those detested GM seat belts.

    Regarding the Dynasty, I rented one on a business trip in 1991, and it was a decent car. But I think they had those bum Chrysler transmissions that self-destructed early and often -- Andre ought to know.
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    The North American International Auto Show in Detroit opens in early
    January, and it appears General Motors is jockeying for position to "own"
    the show in terms of gaining attention and vividly illustrating its
    turnaround.

    Its timing may be perfect. Last year's auto show darling was Chrysler with
    its extravagant and theatrical vehicle unveilings that involved a snow
    blizzard inside the convention center and a Jeep crashing through glass
    doors to make its stage entrance. Chrysler likely will tone it down this
    year as it battles bulging inventories and a flow of red ink.

    The new GM exhibit is the Detroit show's biggest and GM's biggest in North
    America. Pieces of it will travel to other domestic and international
    shows.

    The exhibit is the auto show equivalent of an art gallery, said Mark
    LeNeve, GM North America's vice president of vehicle sales, service and
    marketing, who took the media on a tour of the exhibit while under
    construction.

    The revamp is aimed at showcasing GM's global brands, particularly
    Cadillac, Chevrolet, Saab and Hummer, differentiating all of GM's brands
    both global and domestic, highlighting technology, and positioning GM as a
    design leader.

    The exhibit uses high-tech overhead and vehicle lighting, open spaces and
    clean lines, minimalist architecture and premium materials to allow
    visitors to experience GM's eight distinctive brands in unique,
    gallery-type settings within a unified, GM-themed environment. The
    individual brand displays surround GM's advanced technology-themed
    corporate display.

    "While the stars of the show are the vehicles, we wanted the exhibit space
    to reflect the corporation's design-driven direction in a way that
    complements the brand essence of each vehicle and the overall GM brand,"
    said Ed Welburn, GM vice president, global design. "The finest work
    deserves to be displayed in the best galleries and I believe we've
    accomplished that with this exhibit."

    The dramatic entrance to the exhibit features a stainless steel ribbon 261
    feet wide and 26 feet high, sporting a jeweled GM corporate logo.
    Throughout the exhibit, 615 linear feet of LED lighting will be suspended
    above visitors' heads, complemented by additional lighting in the brand
    displays that bathe the vehicles in light. Each of the brand areas will
    have back wall video projection for product messages, as well as
    synchronized corporate messages.

    As for new models, GM has announced it will hold the worldwide debuts of
    two significant production models, the 2008 Chevrolet Malibu and the 2008
    Cadillac CTS. The automaker also is hinting it will make a major technology
    announcement in Detroit. During a speech at the Los Angeles auto show in
    November, GM CEO Rick Wagoner said the automaker has a plug-in hybrid in
    the works as well as hydrogen-powered fuel-cell vehicles.

    Further, to focus on design, GM will host a fashion show on the eve of the
    auto show's press preview. Called "GM Style," the exclusive event will
    feature a number of famous GM vehicles -- some never before seen in North
    America -- along with some of the hottest names in entertainment to join
    the vehicles for a walk or drive down the runway.

    GM is finalizing the celebrity line-up, but so far the guest list includes:
    Cheryl Hines, Emmy-nominated actress from HBO's hit comedy "Curb Your
    Enthusiasm;" Vivica A. Fox, a star of numerous films and television series,
    including the most-recent edition of "Dancing With The Stars"; Petra
    Nemcova, one of the world's top supermodels and a regular in the Sports
    Illustrated swimsuit issues; Danny Masterson, the evening's guest disc
    jockey and best-known for his role on "That 70's Show"; and "stylist to the
    stars" Rachel Zoe who will prep all the celebrities at GM Style.

    "This event is a tribute to style and a celebration of GM's design
    renaissance," said GM's Welburn.

    As for the cars as stars, the first-ever GM Style will showcase 17 GM
    vehicles. Among them will be the 2006 Chevrolet Camaro concept; the 1951
    Buick LeSabre concept that became one of the world's most famous concept
    cars under the supervision of GM design icon Harley J. Earl; the 2006
    Pontiac Solstice Weekend Club Racer concept; the 2006 Saab Aero X concept
    from the Geneva show earlier this year; and the 2007 Saturn Sky Red Line
    unveiled in New York last spring.
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    I've already heard some people pooh-poohing the newest event connected to
    the upcoming North American International Auto Show.

    They're talking about General Motors Corp.'s "Style" show, which will be
    held Jan. 6, before the official media days of Detroit's annual auto show.

    Celebrities from Hollywood and pro sports are expected to be on stage and
    in the crowd as some of GM's most stylish vehicles and concepts strut their
    stuff on a fashion runway alongside the beautiful people.

    The invite-only event is a creative mix of fashion show and car show and
    was tested first by GM in the hard-scramble party-and-fashion town of Los
    Angeles a few years ago.

    Shame on anyone who's so old school and jaded that he or she can't feel
    some excitement that this high-energy, high-class event is coming to
    Detroit.

    I believe GM's Style will open the Detroit show, albeit unofficially," on a
    high and fun note.

    Stars are impressed

    Attending GM's shows in L.A., I can tell you they were such a success that
    GM and its pro event planner, Jeffrey Best of L.A., were inundated with
    requests for invitations, especially from Hollywood types.

    And in glittery Los Angeles, with its high-brow Mercedes-Benz, BMW and
    Aston Martin clientele, it took this kind of imaginative work to get GM and
    its Saabs and even Chevrolets in front of notable trendsetters in our pop
    culture.

    I remember actor Adrien Brody, who won an Oscar for his role in "The
    Pianist," playfully "leading" a Corvette down the runway. His obvious
    delight was infectious.

    Actor Ashton Kutcher was never on stage. But the star and his famous wife,
    actress Demi Moore, are regulars at GM's events.

    Pictures worth thousands

    There also was actor Dennis Hopper, mesmerized by Buick's Y-Job concept car
    at one GM event.

    The big, gleaming beauty was parked beside the red carpet, where the
    paparazzi gather, and an admiring Hopper wouldn't take a step further until
    he learned more about the car.

    What a picture it made with Hopper, famous for his rebel biker role in the
    1969 classic "Easy Rider," dazzled by a Buick.

    Pictures, by the way, are of paramount importance at Style. Shots of the
    stars and cars go around the world. And these pictures have a long life.
    Some from GM's events showed up in magazines and newspapers a year later.

    So this is a wonderful way to broaden the reach of Detroit's auto show.

    Car culture Ann Job is a California-based, freelance, automotive writer and
    can be reached at annjo84@hotmail.com .
  • carguy58carguy58 Member Posts: 2,303
    "In Japan, prosecutors are looking into possible negligence on the part of Toyota for shirking recalls for the last eight years. How ironic. You probably didn’t hear about that one either because the American media doesn’t like to bash foreign auto companies -only American ones."

    Toyota has taken a fair share of heat this year in the US for their recalls. I think because Toyota has sold more and more cars each year in the US their problems are going to become more headlined now in the US than they were in the 80's or 90's.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    62' It all sounds awesome :shades: I hope I get to see it all. :)

    Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    carguy,

    I think it's wishful thinking that the media will slam Toyota, the same way they have done the big 3 for years. :sick:

    Rocky
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    And then we have the disguised GM commercial known as the new 'Transformers' movie (so I hear anyway - every transformer is a GM car), so maybe they are going for a younger market. Just don't make the propaganda too transparent, or young people will laugh and walk back to their Hondas.

    But who am I to question GM marketing and promotion?
  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    Yeah that really disapoints me. I grew up with the original transformers and yes the whole TV show was just a commercial for Hasbro but at least you got lots of different vehicles in it.

    Now it looks like just about every car, I think there is going to be one Mustang, is going to be a GM car.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Gave the new Silverado the Golden Calipers for truck of the year. I like I said before they throw us a carrot once in a while. By next year the Silverado with be trashed as they prop up the Toyota Tundra. :sick:

    Rocky
This discussion has been closed.