Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Examples:
BMW http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=bmw+paint+problems
Chrysler http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=chrysler+paint+problems
Toyota http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=toyota+paint+problems
Honda http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=honda+paint+problems
Ford http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=ford+paint+problems
It sounds like anyone living in parts of the country where it snows and they use salt or gravel on the roads should experience this problem. I am also confused why more people haven't reported this problem but maybe mcolis is right and it's just a matter of time after people wash their cars. Also I figure for every person reporting this problem here on this forum there are probably several more who don't know about this forum.
Fortunately I do live in SoCal so I might get the car anyway but the problem still makes me really nervous.
http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&q=bmw+tire+problems
The problem could occur on the Outanders with 16" wheels too. I have few minuscules paint chips on each side of the car, on the lower half of the doors, but I did not have mudguards at the time.
After installing the mudguards, the chipping potential remains on the very bottom of the doors. I'm pretty sure that the door garnish would help. I ordered them but I did not install them yet (too cold). However, I put them on the car and yes, they would cover the affected area. As an extra measure, I will also add more clear film on the rear doors, around the round part.
Over the past few weeks I've been looking at other SUVs on the road and most of them have some sort of garnish on the bottom of the doors (XC90, Santa Fe, RDX, CRV just to mention few).
I don't see this issue primarily as a bad design or poor paint quality, but I think the bean counters at MMNA decided to delete the garnish to keep the price down. As mentioned before, the cars on other markets are properly protected, but they pay more as well.
Personally, I'm not very concerned about this issue since there is a solution for it. True, I don't like that I have to pay extra, but on the other hand I think we would've ended up paying anyways if the door garnish were stock.
I would urge others similarly affected to take the time to write to MMNA (addresses available on their website) and to include photos. The more they hear about this (with visual evidence), the more likely that there'll be some sort of fix. Or at least we'll know that they've been duly informed. Relying on the rep that visits the dealership seems hopeless. Mine is allegedly "looking into it," but I won't hold my breath. It seems best to go right to the top.
I'd just like the side garnishes installed. It seems as though there needs to be a "Northeast package" or "winter weather package" as the folks driving on treated roads are most likely to be affected.
It's sad to have a new car and to already be thinking about what to replace it with, but that's the reality. I'm already in that frame of mind.
$200 + $50 shipping
http://www.zontarh.co.uk/epages/es108883.sf/en_GB/?ObjectPath=/Shops/es108883_sh- op/Products/RT800156/SubProducts/RT800156
www.zontarh.co.uk. $257 USD shipped.
I'm determined to keep after them with letters and pics, etc. No case closed as far as I'm concerned. If nothing else, to get them to admit that this is an issue. We're all actually doing them a favor...providing real-life feedback so that an obvious issue becomes known and can be addressed. As I said in one of my letters, the issue itself isn't as frustrating as a company that won't deal with it! Bad design happens, just admit it, and rectify it. Are happy customers worth nothing?
Love the disclaimer! Exactly what I've been thinking!!
This occurred with Mazda back in the 80's and they re painted and covered with clear plastic the offended areas under warrantee.
The fact that the newest ones in Japan come with the "plastic" cladding covering the side from belt line down to rocker panel should tell us all something.
Check out just about any other SUV and see how much chipping has occurred - hell even the Honda CRV has a better offset. I mention that one as I just saw a three year old one and while the plastic trim did show sand effects there was no paint chipped.
Let's not let this be accepted as o.k.
Have the flaps & running boards at my expense. When I drove the car home, around 110 miles it was already chipping. Besides, had an 04 Tahoe & from what I am reading plenty of other types of vehicles in the Northern states drive the same road with no problems. Mitsubishi has definitely got a design problem and they dont' want to fess up. Why did they put all the plastics on the wheel area & half way up the door on the Japaneese models if they didn't have a problem. Also take a good look at the enormous mud flaps they used also. They definitely know they have a problem, they just don't want to rectify it for anyone. I don't like the gravel the States are using either, but why is it only effecting this vehicle (and now the Lancer too)
Mine are just temporary trial type (read not that pretty), or do you know any source of OEM flaps (long ones), in dark gray or black color?
If you look at the top pic, you can see dirt and mud all over the wheel area, but look at the side of the vehicle, you can see that it doesn't have the splash pattern that will be created if there were no long mudflaps installed on the front wheels. Also note on the top pic that there will still be some water splash coming out of the wheel flare area. But no stone/gravel chips so far.
The long flaps gives a clearance of about 5-6" from the road, and they're made of plastic (probably PVC) so it's very flexible that you don't need to worry about them getting damaged. And no, they don't drag on the road or bumps. These are not OEM flaps, but they look a lot like the ones sold by Mitsubishi Japan, but without the logo. Plus they're only 10$ a set at autozone, so that's a pretty good bargain there. These flaps can actually be a good replacement for the OEM mudguards if you didn't buy one yet. However, in my case, I found that the OEM mudguards add strength to the flexible plastic flaps. These flaps were heavily tested by me personally on the vacant lots in our subdivision. I ran the Outlander in snow slush and mud and I was very much delighted by the amount of protection I got from such a cheap solution. All of the mud stayed inside the wheel well area, and absolutely no splatter on the side. So no need for running boards for me.
If you plan to install this yourself without the pre-existing mudguards, you will need to buy the parts (grommets) for you to be able to screw the flaps to the vehicle body. See my tutorial on here: http://outlander.freeforums.org/mz380379ex-mud-guard-installation-t40.html It shows you what parts you need to buy. Equivalent parts can be bought from autozone too.
In my case, since I had the OEM mudguards already, it's just a simple drill and fit. I just matched the holes I drilled on the flaps to the screw positions of the existing mudguards. Simple, cheap, and easy.
Interesting solution though. (so far no damage on my LS AWD and I'll think about it in the spring)
Thank you for all the info and pictures. That's what I was thinking, and you are right, no more front wheels overspray to rear panels. I would try to find OEM for the next winter. I don't care about the logo, just think one piece may look cleaner. On my car, after 3 months of real winter driving with just standard mudguards, I can find few tiny (1/32") spots on both sides, but only if I'm looking really close. Those should disappear with a good wax.
I am wondering - looking at your photos I notice you are not running snow tires and wonder if others with little or no chipping also have not used snow tires. That could possibly(?) account for the difference. The snows I have are studded and a fairly aggressive tread with much larger grooves tha our stock 55 series treads - possibly picking up and throwing larger gravel. Just wondering out loud here :confuse: .
The dealer has the car now for two days and the service manager is as shocked as I about the chips and is making a report to MM to see if anything can be done. Meantime they are working on an automatic transmission problem.
Note: I do like this truck just a little frustrated.
My Outlander is covered in a thin layer of ice. That should do nicely for a short time!
Any pictures you can supply of that "protection package" would be very helpful.
Interesting - check out the Outlander 3000 on this Mitsu Japan web site
They are addressing this issue in the next design maybe '09 here?
http://www.mitsubishi-motors.co.jp/outlander/index.html
I would suggest to other owners that if you want to go off-roading, or if the roads you run on pose the danger of road debris damage to your paint work, then get protection for your vehicle.
The Outlander was never marketed as an off-roader, although it is capable of doing light off-road trips. It does not come protected from possible road debris damage due gravel or sand spread on winter roads, so you will need to get added protection for this vehicle.
This is a ridiculous design flaw that as of 15 minutes ago - Mitsubishi Canada says once again they are falling back on the warrantee. - until you read about a consumer back lash in the press - nothing will happen. Let's move on - and talk about the positives of the Mitsu :)they are more in number than this issue.
That was actually a general statement, for all owners, and NOT specifically directed to you. Off-roading or not, gravel and sand will still hurt the paintwork. My point is to protect the vehicle instead of doing nothing.
I wonder why this situation continue when apparently in Japan the problem has been solved by having mudflat like the shown here:
See more Car Pictures at CarSpace.com
This mudflat are flexible and not rigid like the USA version and can deform according to the condition of the roads. What we need in the USA is to find a Mitsubishi part dealer or a Mitsubishi part importers to bring hundreds of this mudflats and do a business with people like us who are desperate with this problem.
See more Car Pictures at CarSpace.com
The price is about $320 in Japan for the four mudflat kit (front and rear) and the part number is MZ531328. If you don't like the red color then you may order a black color and its part number is MZ531329 at the same price.
Perhaps members of this forum already know some importers or Mitsu dealers that can order this item from Japan. I don't know but I am eager to know who can do this. Somebody has recommended me to try a Subaru parts importer that import a great numbers of Japan parts for the Rally cars.
I would like to hear from someone that know how to do this.
As you can notice the mudflats are wide and protrudes out given a very good cover to the car finish.
I have no mudflaps and I don't see the damage others have reported. I've never seen paint affected this way before; Could it be the paint Mitsubishi uses?
What do you mean about cleaning it with clay?