Luxury Lounge

1394395397399400428

Comments

  • rockshocka1rockshocka1 Member Posts: 310
    No doubt about it. The S4 looks like a fantastic ride & deal in it's class.

    Almost everybody's sales were up in August in large part to the C4C, but Audi led the luxury pack & attributed less than 10% to C4C sales according to their press release.

    A6, A8 & TT seemed to be the only one's not improving in sales if I remember right.

    They even posted selling 44 S5 cabriolets, although I don't know if that just means they've been ordered or not. Regardless, those beautes should be popping up on roads in the near future. Probably first in Tag's neck of the woods in Cali. :shades:

    With C4C now gone, a downturn in sales is expected, but Audi seems to be gaining market share in the luxury game here in the states at a steady pace.
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    BMW is poised to pass Lexus as the top lux sales in the U.S.. I believe LG has been explaining some reasons why in some past posts.

    Poised to Pass

    Regards,
    OW
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    “No one is going to pay a $15,000 premium for a car that competes with a (Toyota) Corolla,” de Nysschen told MSN. “So there are not enough idiots who will buy it.”

    Audi Pres Predicts Chevy Volt to be a spark

    Regards,
    OW
  • lexusguylexusguy Member Posts: 6,419
    BMW is poised to pass Lexus as the top lux sales in the U.S.. I believe LG has been explaining some reasons why in some past posts.

    Its all about product. It comes down to a mostly stale, tired lineup vs. a mostly fresh one. I'm sure Lexus is depending heavily on the RX to stay in the game.
  • tagmantagman Member Posts: 8,441
    Its all about product. It comes down to a mostly stale, tired lineup vs. a mostly fresh one. I'm sure Lexus is depending heavily on the RX to stay in the game.

    Bye, bye Lexus. Hello Hyundai.

    That's admittedly a bit of a stretch, but not by nearly as much as one would think.

    TM
  • m4d_cowm4d_cow Member Posts: 1,491
    I don't think bigger turbos are really necessary. It would be very easy for BMW to simply recalibrate the ECU and allow a bit more boost (perhaps in combination with upgraded cooling and a more free flowing exhaust) to push the engine up to the 330/330 mark. I think that's pretty much what they did to create the new 326hp 740i.

    Nope. The 740i uses a different version of the turbo. It's the same turbo as in the January delivered X6 models. The 335 used the old version, which had overheating problems and some others I forgot about already. It's said that all the '09 models have the new revised turbo already, but I honestly have no clue as of how to tell them apart.

    As even the current turbo is already being pushed to the limits, ECU recalibration will most likely blow it up IMO. Bigger turbo? Well, I'd rather fix the current turbo before moving further, as BMW's lack of experience with turbos is very obvious.
  • 2001gs4302001gs430 Member Posts: 767
    I think MB is working on their turbo setups, or some other equivalent power enhancing technology. It's not that long ago, that Audi's engines were at the bottom of the power ranking, so now it's someone else's turn.
  • 2001gs4302001gs430 Member Posts: 767
    I am just amazed by how they kept hitting home runs with the RX in term of sale numbers.
  • 2001gs4302001gs430 Member Posts: 767
    I think it will happen too, but Audi is not going to make it easy for BMW.
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    Thursday, September 3, 2009
    Sneak peek: 2011 Hyundai Genesis

    Hyundai is readying the Genesis for a freshening. Originally scheduled for the 2012 model year, the refreshening may be moved up to 2011. Exterior updates will include new front and rear bumpers, updated headlamps and new signature styling on the grille, which will give an immediate tie-in to the Equus flagship.

    Also anticipated is a new eight-speed automatic transmission and -- sources say -- a supercharged version.


    In related news, Hundai took 7.2% of C4C sales. Not too shabby for a company that used to make junk.

    "We used to call them the Big Six, but now all of our files say `the Big Seven'," said Jesse Toprak, vice president of industry trends at auto Web site TrueCar.com. "We've added Hyundai."

    They might not be a true lux marquee yet but these guys aren't fooling around either.

    Regards,
    OW
  • anthonypanthonyp Member Posts: 1,860
    Hi Phil or Hola if your Spanish is good:)

    I found the a4 seat to be hard....but the car to be very roomy....Have you seen the E interior? Tony
  • lexusguylexusguy Member Posts: 6,419
    As even the current turbo is already being pushed to the limits, ECU recalibration will most likely blow it up IMO. Bigger turbo? Well, I'd rather fix the current turbo before moving further, as BMW's lack of experience with turbos is very obvious.

    Now that's interesting. I had just sort of assumed that there was still plenty of room for BMW to crank up the power without really doing anything, much like Audi did when they added 15hp and 24ft.lbs to the 2.7T S-line. Audi certainly has far more experience with turbocharging, that's for sure.
  • lexusguylexusguy Member Posts: 6,419
    I think MB is working on their turbo setups, or some other equivalent power enhancing technology. It's not that long ago, that Audi's engines were at the bottom of the power ranking, so now it's someone else's turn.

    Indeed. Audi V6 engines in particular were always quite weak until they released the 2.7T. What I do find interesting is how Audi keeps finding more and more power from their V8 - without increasing displacement. It's still at 4.2L, and yet the version that will debut in the new A8 will have some 375hp+.
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    I had just sort of assumed that there was still plenty of room for BMW to crank up the power without really doing anything, much like Audi did when they added 15hp and 24ft.lbs to the 2.7T S-line.

    It's not that easy to just boost the pressure on the turbo. Dinan does it right and suggests the internal parts will need to be fortified to ensure long-term durability under the increased power output as engine sizes decrease. Here is the current description (Stage 2 Performance Pkg.) of how the software works to work with the current I-6:

    The Dinan Performance Engine Software safely increases turbo-boost pressure from the stock 8.8 to 13.2 psi, along with properly retuned fuel mixtures, ignition timing and full map rescaling.The Dinan Performance Engine Software safely increases turbo-boost pressure from the stock 8.8 to 13.2 psi, along with properly retuned fuel mixtures, ignition timing and full map rescaling. In fact, over 2000 engine management functions have been recalibrated, offering substantial increases in power output while maintaining the civility and reliability expected of a Dinan performance product.

    Remapped Water Pump Speeds. In an effort to more effectively control oil and water temperatures, the Dinan software actually increases water pump speeds as boost pressure increases.

    Boost Pressure Control. Increased boost pressure exceeds the turbochargers’ design limitations at higher rpm, potentially shortening their lifespan. Dinan addresses this issue by tapering the boost gradually at higher engine speeds. This approach also addresses the fact that with increased boost at higher rpm the turbocharger temperatures would exceed the intercooler’s ability to cool the intake charge, resulting in a loss of power and compromising the long-term durability of the engine. The tapered boost keeps temperatures within the design limitations so as to optimize output and ensure engine reliability with the added boost pressure.

    The results of Dinan’s tuning are nothing short of breathtaking, with the added boost and related recalibration producing maximum output of 384 horsepower at 5700 rpm and 421 lb-ft torque at 4300 rpm. All of this additional power is available from Dinan’s software alone, which is easily downloaded by your Authorized Dinan Dealer in about an hour.


    BMW also introduced a factory performance upgrade for the 6 cyl. which adds 20 HP and 30lb./ft.

    BTW, Dinan matches the new car warranty.

    Regards,
    OW
  • tagmantagman Member Posts: 8,441
    BMW also introduced a factory performance upgrade for the 6 cyl. which adds 20 HP and 30lb./ft.

    ... Which was rumored to also become available through the parts and service departments... as an upgrade kit... last time I checked, it has never materialized.

    I'm still waiting.

    TM
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    Well, they seem to be coming out with some examples over in Europe...

    BMW 135i Performance Pack (2009) CAR review

    Regards,
    OW
  • tagmantagman Member Posts: 8,441
    Well, they seem to be coming out with some examples over in Europe...

    That was the original plan, but the hope has been that an upgrade kit would find its way to the U.S.

    As so often, the European market is the first-class market, and the American market is second-class. They get the cool diesels, too.

    Maybe, eventually the upgrade kit will find its way over here.

    TM
  • m4d_cowm4d_cow Member Posts: 1,491
    Now that's interesting. I had just sort of assumed that there was still plenty of room for BMW to crank up the power without really doing anything, much like Audi did when they added 15hp and 24ft.lbs to the 2.7T S-line. Audi certainly has far more experience with turbocharging, that's for sure.

    True. Audi has the most experience with turbos, while MB leads in supercharging. BMW has yet to find a way to create a better turbo, let alone cranking it up. Maybe BMW can cut R&D time and costs and cooperate with Dinan or Alpina instead to solve their problem. :shades:

    Another major problem is what was pointed out by the BMW mechanic I know:
    "BMW engines run at 90-95% of their full potential. MB and Audis OTOH run at around 80% of their full capabilities. At this point pulling more out of BMW's stock engine (without further mods like Dinan does) will affect the endurance of the engines themselves. Dinan style mods possible, but will be too costly for mass production."

    BMW sure got more problems than we ever thought.
  • tagmantagman Member Posts: 8,441
    BMW sure got more problems than we ever thought.

    The single worst problem for BMWs is their HPFP. It is almost a certain bet that it will fail eventually. Mine failed shortly after I took delivery, and it was promptly replaced. BMW forums are loaded with this particular failure. I can only wonder how this is even possible.

    TM
  • m4d_cowm4d_cow Member Posts: 1,491
    Ah that's it, the HPFP is the most common problem, turbo overheating a close second.
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    Well, at least you have extended coverage on the part.

    Date: April 2009

    Subject: BMW emissions warranty of the High Pressure Fuel Pump (HDP) has been extended from 4 years or 50,000 miles to 10 years or 120,000 miles, whichever comes first.


    Here is a link if you need...

    BMW Technical Bulletin SI B 13 03 09

    ...and a little more info.

    the original vendor that provided the fuel pumps was replaced sometime in 08. the earlier ones were definitely prone to failure and many have. some people ended up blowing more than one b/c junk in = junk out.

    its pretty rare for fuel pump from the new vendor to blow but there are some cases. be happy that its a known problem so BMW should replace it for free regardless of whether you're under warranty or not.


    Regards,
    OW

    Regards,
    OW
  • anthonypanthonyp Member Posts: 1,860
    unfortunately my wife`s bmw satelite radio is back ordered for the last several months, and is hoped to get in maybe by December......Sorrowfully they have done just a so so job on the fixing of the damages from the problem of the drain hoses being stopped up.....It was a known problem and I think they should have notified us before this happened, ..several years after the fact....Tony
  • 2001gs4302001gs430 Member Posts: 767
    Is this common knowledge in the auto industry? I remembered this TT 3.0 engine won some top awards.

    Audi has the most experience with turbos, while MB leads in supercharging.
    Why is Audi supercharging their engines now :confuse: :confuse: , I guess we are going to see MB turbos in the near future. ;)

    I will have to test drive the S4 and the G37x sport, back to back to see if there is a big difference. I believe the new 7 gears in the G would make it a whole lot closer than we think.
  • m4d_cowm4d_cow Member Posts: 1,491
    Why is Audi supercharging?
    I have no idea. MB stopped supercharging their engines, as it's deemed too old tech and unrefined.

    Ever tried supercharged MBs with smaller engines? It starts slowly, bog slow, actually. Then somewhere in the midrange the boost suddenly kicks in, back pressed. Upper line... boost is gone again. That's my experience with C180k and C200k engines
  • lexusguylexusguy Member Posts: 6,419
    Why is Audi supercharging their engines now?

    From what I read, both twin turbo and supercharged versions of Audi's new 3.0L were developed, and Audi decided to go with the compact, belt driven supercharger fitted between the cylinder banks. The exact reasons for this are probably not known outside of Audi, but it may have been due to a lot of warranty claims on the B5 2.7T S4.

    The G37x is quick, but I don't think it's a sub 5 second car. The torque difference between the two cars is colossal. Put them on a track, and it will be no contest. The G37x will have no hope of keeping up in the corners.
  • lexusguylexusguy Member Posts: 6,419
    That's my experience with C180k and C200k engines

    MB has never been known for amazing 4-cylinders. I don't think turbo charging is inherently good or supercharging is inherently bad. Getting turbos to have anything even approaching linear response requires some fancy (and expensive) technology like variable vanes. If you just put a big turbo on a small engine, you end up with an EVO that's literally dead until it hits 3000rpm.
  • m4d_cowm4d_cow Member Posts: 1,491
    I agree. It's just that the kompressors in the MB models I tried were hopelessly unrefined. Totally disappointing for a MB.
  • anthonypanthonyp Member Posts: 1,860
    After driving the bmw today, I can say the seats are more comfortable than the Audi, and it looks almost new althought the interior materials are nothing to `write home` about...They wear well...This was a good experience for me so I have a balanced view....Tony
  • rockshocka1rockshocka1 Member Posts: 310
    Hola Antonio!

    Como estas? Bien? Estoy bien, gracias! Eh...los banditos tienen pantalones rojos y el gato esta anaranjado.

    That's about the sum total of my espanol these days. ;)

    I have not seen the E interior in person. The last time I was at the Merc dealer, I spent all my time crawling around the S, while my wife was test driving the SLK.

    As far as the A4 goes, I found that the standard seats were very poor & the only way to have one was with the sport seats. Did you have a chance to try the sport seats?

    If you're still in Miami can you see if one has to be a celebrity to purchase a part of the Dolphins, or if anyone's cash is good? ;)
  • rockshocka1rockshocka1 Member Posts: 310
    Tony, sorry about the bimmer. I agree it sounds like BMW did let you down on this.

    I have similiar feelings regarding our experience with Acura (as you know, part of of Micky D's group before they brought Audi in). 6 years into an '00 TL, the self-dimming rearview mirror leaked it's fluid all over the center shifter console staining the shine of faux-alluminum trim. ;)

    Service department told us that it was not an uncommon thing with those particular mirrors. :confuse: Sounds like a 'known issue' to me & deserving a warning. Maybe they thought everybody trades in their car every 3 years. Not everybody does.

    That does cause me worry with the Audi though. Instead of faux alluminum below the mirror this time, it's the entire MMI system. I suspect a similiar leak would do a lot more expensive damage this time around. I guess I'll be a little more proactive on finding out any potential problems this time around.
  • lexusguylexusguy Member Posts: 6,419
    6 years into an '00 TL, the self-dimming rearview mirror leaked it's fluid all over the center shifter console staining the shine of faux-alluminum trim.

    Could be worse, the transmission could've exploded as on many (most?) '99-03 TLs. I don't remember ever hearing about problems with leaky Audi self dimming mirrors. If something does go wrong with an Audi, its usually either an electrical fault or something to do with the suspension.
  • rockshocka1rockshocka1 Member Posts: 310
    Could be worse, the transmission could've exploded as on many (most?) '99-03 TLs.

    The infamous Honda V6 auto debacle, eh? It hit, but just a few months ago. Almost exactly at 150k miles. I can't really complain about that, but it does chip away at the ultra-durable Honda reputation somewhat. My son still has a 3 pedaled '93 Civic that runs fine though.

    I replaced the tranny at a discount only because my wife hasn't been able to make up her mind on a new ride. So, in the meantime, she rides the 'now' beater Acura. She only puts about 3K on a car per year these days, so there really isn't a rush. Maybe I can talk her into an RS5. :blush:

    The whole mirror deal just seemed like one of those brush it under the rug things. If I knew it was an issue, I would have popped a new one in there earlier obviously. I hope it doesn't become an issue in the Audi, especially because the MMI would get leaked on. :mad:
  • bmlexusbmlexus Member Posts: 755
    The infamous Honda V6 auto debacle, eh? It hit, but just a few months ago. Almost exactly at 150k miles. I can't really complain about that, but it does chip away at the ultra-durable Honda reputation somewhat. My son still has a 3 pedaled '93 Civic that runs fine though.

    I replaced the tranny at a discount only because my wife hasn't been able to make up her mind on a new ride. So, in the meantime, she rides the 'now' beater Acura. She only puts about 3K on a car per year these days, so there really isn't a rush. Maybe I can talk her into an RS5.


    RS5? Its already available :confuse: Btw, how old is ur son? Do u ever let him drive your S5 ;)
  • rockshocka1rockshocka1 Member Posts: 310
    RS5? Its already available

    Nah, don't think so. Thought it was supposed to make an appearance at the Frankfurt auto show. Just sort of wishful thinking anyhow. :blush:

    Btw, how old is ur son? Do u ever let him drive your S5

    He'll be 21 next Monday. :surprise: I do let him drive the S5 when he's home from school....just not solo. :shades:
  • m4d_cowm4d_cow Member Posts: 1,491
    I don't really understand why you'd want the RS5. Insane power yes, but it looks over-decorated for an Audi IMO.

    I've tried the E and checked it inside out. The interior is actually plush with very nice materials, but the sharp angles and boxy dash cheapen the whole look.
  • 2001gs4302001gs430 Member Posts: 767
    I agree that the G37X is outgunned by the S5 on the tracks, but in most daily driving, I think the 7 gears should make up much of the torque differences, while having the HP advantage. The big question is the actual performance of the gear box. I think MB has a pretty good 7speeds slush box.
  • 2001gs4302001gs430 Member Posts: 767
    As far as the A4 goes, I found that the standard seats were very poor & the only way to have one was with the sport seats. Did you have a chance to try the sport seats?

    That's my impression of the Audi cars in general. For the asking premium prices, one still has to option in the better seats to get the really nice package.
  • rockshocka1rockshocka1 Member Posts: 310
    I don't really understand why you'd want the RS5.

    I don't really. I'm quite content with my current ride. Thoughts of it on steroids does intrigue me though. ;)

    Besides, that would be kind of a silly 2 car combination. Variety is nice & am looking forward to the day my wife decides on something.
  • lexusguylexusguy Member Posts: 6,419
    I think the 7 gears should make up much of the torque differences, while having the HP advantage.

    I'm not sure how you arrive at that conclusion when the S4 has 7 speeds in its own gearbox - the latest S-tronic DSG - which is going to shift much faster than the G37's autobox, and also has no power sapping torque converter.

    Audi rates the S4's power at 333hp @ 5500rpm, and 325ft.lbs @ 2900rpm. The G37x has 328hp @ 7000rpm, and 269ft.lbs @ 5200rpm. The Infiniti could have a 9-speed gearbox, there's no getting around the fact that its going to get beaten by the S4 in all performance metrics.

    Of course in typical "daily driving", the S4's extra power and handling probably wont be needed. I use maybe 10% of the S6's real capabilities day to day, which an M35x could just as easily do. For things like passing on a two lane though, 435hp and nearly 400ft.lbs is nice to have. The M35x has no hope of keeping pace in a 50-80mph dash.
  • anthonypanthonyp Member Posts: 1,860
    Hi Phil

    You got me beat--in fact it reads like i am well beat---but not the U this week :)

    I didn`t sit on the better seats in the Audi, just what they had at the time...I thought it nicely laid out and quite spacious, but not good seats..

    I`m up in the N C mountains---misssing Miami-- but my understanding is the new owners are just selling small bits to celebrity people....Makes sense....I have been a big U fan for the last six years or so, and it has been painful :)...

    I haven`t sat in the Mercedes yet, but it looked nice, when I saw it...I have tried to stay away until I have a better feeling about the diesel...and frankly the Audi is still very good.......The bmw was nice to drive again, and it renews my thoughts about how good it is to drive...Maybe the new model will have better materials inside, so I will really have to keep an open mind----after all four or five years is a long time.....I suggested to my wife we swap cars for a month or so, and when she saw I was serious, her intrest in the bmw went up :) nice Tony
  • rockshocka1rockshocka1 Member Posts: 310
    You got me beat--in fact it reads like i am well beat

    Only if nonsensical gibberish counts... ;)

    but not the U this week

    Wonderful game to watch, but painful on my end. :sick: I lived in PCB before here, closer to Nole country than the U. I feel your pain on the last several years though. ;)

    I'm taking my car in for service next week. Tire rotation & oil change (even though it's not called for until 15K, I feel better doing it every 5K w/the tires). If I can swing it, maybe I'll head over to the Merc dealer & look about the E.
  • anthonypanthonyp Member Posts: 1,860
    Gibberish counts :) as long as Jose` isn`t watching..

    I would appreciate your opinions on the E, and also just your overall opinion of the diesel.....I might be making too much out of it, as I really don`t drive that many miles a year.....Sometimes it is rediculous to complain about the cost of a gallon of gas when I spend a whole tanks worth on one meal.....:) Also if it turns out Tagman is right about the cost of fuel, than the whole economy would be turning up and we all should be better off finacially---maybe the big gas engine would be the ticket then :) Tony
  • 2001gs4302001gs430 Member Posts: 767
    You are correct. For some reason I was thinking the S4 got only 6 gears, and 300 hp :blush: . Yes, the specs and price on the S4 totally dominate everything in this class.
  • 2001gs4302001gs430 Member Posts: 767
    I think the new E looks nice too, have not seen the interior yet..
    The outside looks a lot like its big brother, the S class, but not as muscular.
  • lexusguylexusguy Member Posts: 6,419
    image
    image

    I don't get where all of the money is going. It looks like a Mercedes GT-R.
  • tagmantagman Member Posts: 8,441
    I don't get where all of the money is going. It looks like a Mercedes GT-R.

    Well... my money isn't going to Mercedes Benz for that... although I know of several individuals who will just have to own one... for all the usual and pathetic reasons... none of which have anything to do with the car itself, but more about ego.

    Here's an exterior shot, and a complete HD slide show here... link title

    image

    TM
  • tagmantagman Member Posts: 8,441
    The upcoming 2010 R8 Spyder! The meaning of true love.

    No words necessary. Ahhhhhh. Mmmmmm.

    image

    image

    image

    Likely... 525 horsepower and 391 pound-feet of torque.

    Anyone else here whose heart is now also beating faster?

    More here... link title

    :shades:

    TM
  • m4d_cowm4d_cow Member Posts: 1,491
    260k for that???????

    I'd rather get an R8 or Gallardo and keep the change :shades:

    Hell, a Murcielago costs about the same!!!
  • rockshocka1rockshocka1 Member Posts: 310
    Very nice! :D

    Wonder why the V10 badging appears washed out in the 1st pic. I think I miss the blade, I think.

    Interesting color too. I think I'd rather have the leather that color than the skin. Should be fun to customize one on a 'build your car'...
  • tagmantagman Member Posts: 8,441
    Should be fun to customize one on a 'build your car'...

    Yeah... chalk up some late nights ahead... ;)

    TM
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.