By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Given your test, I would use the 44 psi as a point of departure. If you are also in the further experimentation mode run the test at a 32/35 psi.
Steve
bought some 716s seem good. 205 65 15
been looking at the 795s for my Camry but they seem narrower ( by almost 1 inch in tread width) than the dunlop d 60s on the car now. Also narrower than goodyear intergitys and goodyear invictas i see on other cars.
why narrower?
seems would be less safe
only the section width
http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html
Signs of spring here; may be time to change the studs out already. I won't miss the droning!
Steve, Host
Its 3/4 inch narrower. The Kunho 795 tires are narrower.
I wrote Tire Rack and asked was this true?
they wrote back and said, yes the section width is about the same but they are "skinny" compared to other tires, tread width is less.
tread widths:
Firestone lh 30
dunlop d 60, goodyear invicta and integrity and bridgstone turanza are all 6 inches to 6 1/4 or so wide where the tread is on the road.
Kumho 795s are only 5 3/4 inches wide.
Less rubber on the road. By about 10%
.
Steve, Host
Less rubber on the road. By about 10%"
So now that you know that for sure, what are you planning to do?
prior to all this I thought most tires in a size had the same rubber on the road.
Most do - in this one "brand' the 795 Kumhos are skinny. All the others tires i looked at are about the same width.
Michelin will not tell me the width of their tires (they say it is not a federal requirement and they do not have a standard way to measure(!))
they list every other measurement but not the one that counts. i can go to a tire dealer and measure tho. Strange there with Michelin cust service - dorky really. bridgstone firestone lists their tire tread road contact widths on their web sites
The cracking probably is a function of age. I am wondering if the tires are safe although there is still a fair amount of tread left (5K miles or so).
One tire store was not too concerned about them but did say they have less resistance to blowouts when hitting potholes - plenty of those around here.
I do not want to waste money by installing new tires but worth it if safety is an issue.
Thanks.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
They are more prone to failure, thereby being unpredictable.
1999 tires are not that old
Just think how wrinkled and cracked you'd be if you sat outside for 5 years!
I look at tire rack and consumer reports.
tire rack has a lot of info but its really not direct comparison. They ask, rate your tires 1-10 , on say noise, what do you give it?
Consumer reports does a comparison of a group of tires which i think is better than a survey. Surveys like Tire rack include all different kinds of cars so a tire that is quiet on a Caddy may be noisy on a Cavalier. Also with tire rack (I think) when a tire changes like Firestone Affinity , the old and new get lumped together as the name is the same..
C reports also does not test a lot of tires available in my area and sometimes (2001) they do not mention noise. they do in 2003. but then they only do it once a year and do not test a lot of brands. they seem to leave Goodyear out (maybe there is a reason)
any other on line tire comparisons?????????.
and in general is Michelin in any way responding to the Korean/ cheaper tires? Michelin seems to have really gone upscale - if you want only a 45000 mile tire, michelin sells only80k tires.
I don't pay much attention to the TR "reviews" since they're mostly impressions from consumers whose knowledge of tires is rather modest, to say the least. I like TR's comparos but they're pretty basic.
As for Michelin, I don't see why they need to respond to the El Cheapo competition. There is plenty of room in the marketplace for the high end and low end mfr's. Besides, Michelin owns many tire plants which make tires sold under brand names which aren't high end. So like Goodyear and Bridgestone, Michelin has all the bases covered.
I need a million dollar a year government grant. I'm ASE certified, former service manager, autocross racer and could evaluate tires in proper perspective.
Will someone make that recommendation to someone in authority please? I'll be glad to do the work for the aforementioned annual grant and all I'll do is test tires. On my many, many vehicles, at my many, many vacation homes.
One thing I must say about Hyundai and Honda, they put the good stuff, Michelin's, on many of their cars as OEM equipment. Now how much more could it cost a manufacturer to put better tires on all new vehicles?
The Sandman :-)
Is Goodyear in financial trouble? I read their pension fund was underfunded by 250 mil
what are Bridgestone RE930 tires? Sold by Cosco?
In the US, Michelin North America (MNA) owns the tires brands BFGoodrich and Uniroyal.
According to Bridgestone the RE930 was replaced by the RE950. However Bridgestone may be producing the RE930's for Costco exclusively. I'll ask Bridgestone and let you know.
Loud?
Quiet?
They were louder than the Michelin touring tires that I replaced but I would not classify them as "loud". The v-shaped performance tire tread pattern is naturally noisy but I was willing to trade some ride noise for added performance.
we had some on an infinity, they rode hard but that could have ben the 65 series size. They were not too noisy but were not as quiet as my present dunlop d60s (which design Dunlop does not make anymore, naturally )
i am looking for an all season or touring tire of 45000 or 5000 mile quality that is quiet and "round".
Any ideas or suggestions?
everyone on tire rack seems to call Dunlops loud as well as Mich "symmetry" tires.
whats wacky about comparing Consumer reports with tire rack results is say look at the "Firestone affinity LH30".
Tire rack rates it as 6th best of 36 tires (based on people opinions).
Consumer reports in a dedicated test last November done by one person or a few people using the same car, rates Firestone affinity lh30 as 18th (last) out of 18 tires.
so who do you believe? i think i lean toward Consumer reports since its a comparison test. In the case of firestone you have the intangible of the firestone/Explorer mess and also if you are older you remember all the d500's that came apart in I think the 70s.
@ do you choose a good tire??????????.
regards,
kyfdx
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
Differences range to 1 1/4 inches on a 195 70 r14 size tire. thats a lot of more or less rubber ( x4 of course) on the ground
Also I was in a Goodyear store today. Sold Goodyear firestone kelly and Fulda.
they said they were dropping Goodyear due to too many quality tires - they had adjusted 3 tires that day.
Any idea in rank order who sells the most, 2 nd, 3 rd etc?
Lots of good info there for those who are interested.
About the only somewhat AT tire I could find in that size is the Michelin 4x4 APC.
Good luck in your search. AT tires in that size for such a niche vehicle will be very very hard to find.
local dealer that sells them at two branches says they cup easily if not rotated regularly.
Any comments
________________________
Also Kumho 795s? any experience?
they are also very pricey and in consumer reports tests are not always on top.
Goodyear seems to be having corporate problems.
I have dunlop d 60s (great) now but they quit making them. the d65s that replaced them are supposed to be very noisy.
The D60 A2 was replaced by the D60 Sport (A2). One of my favorite all-around tires.
regards,
kyfdx
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
I'm not putting them on again when it comes time for replacements (more on that in my next message)... when I checked the recent reviews on Tire Rack, many many people complaining of poor treadwear (18-25K mi typical). Makes me feel fortunate I got 40K out of them...
--Robert
I had Comp T/A's on my '91 Grand Prix and put them on my '96 Lumina (replacing the junky Goodyear Eagle OEMs). They were OK but not outstanding. I've never had Continental tires before. One concern is that the Conti's are classified as Grand Touring All-Season, whereas the Traction T/A's are High Performance All-Season (like the Dunlops I presently have). I don't autocross or race, but like to take a curve quickly once in a while :-)
I could also look at the Bridgestone Turanza LS-H's, as well as the Michelin Pilot XGT's, though my opinion of Michelin tires isn't super high (the car came with MXV4's on it, but they were trash at 27k - though the car had been sitting for nearly a year when I got it, so I'm not sure how much was Michelin's problem, and how much was rot).
I'd welcome any input/suggestions/recommendations. I know I can call Tire Rack and get the info, but I need to buy the tires locally (since my car is sensitive to the balance of the tires - they need to be road-force balanced using a Hunter GSP9700 - I need to get them from the local dealer, since they'll be happy to swap/send back any tires that don't meet the spec. Unfortunately, they are busier than heck, and can't really offer me much advice on which tire to pick).
I live in Wisconsin, so snow/rain/ice is an issue. Handling/traction are important, ride comfort and noise less so.
I'd appreciate any input/suggestions.
Thanks, in advance,
--Robert
Actually your experience tracks with my sisters experiences despite the difference in cars (but Michelin 215/55/16's). She is not what I would call an "agressive" driver. One of her tires is just a hair over 2/32 at roughly 31k . So I do not think treadwear rot is an issue.
The Sandman :-)
Turanza LS - Smoother and quieter than the RE950. Consider it a Grand Touring/Luxury tire. Would be a good choice for the Acura Legend and Olds Aurora mentioned above.
RE92 - Bridgestone's OE tire they sell to automakers for that volume biz. Inferior to the tires mentioned above. Frankly I don't have much good to say about it.... well, it holds air and its round.... how's that?
Good handling and long life are mutually exclusive. The best handling tires usually last less than 20K or so. It really depends on your driving style. IMO long treadlife isn't worth the handling trade off. Get the RE950's, make sure they get mounted and balanced correctly, and enjoy the performance.
Looking at the tire construction I see that it contains nylon, which in years past was bad about flat spotting. Many tires use polyester cord not nylon.
A warning.
My trips are less than 10 miles many times .
No thump for me.
the other Bridgestons 92s 950 etc came on our Maxima and rode hard and were not quiet.
I did check out Tire Rack a few weeks ago and I believe they did do some of their own testing on the Traction TA's and they came out pretty good. The BFG Traction TA look to maybe be a good traction tire at a reasonable price, but since new, I don't know if there is much experience out there. Maybe by the time I am ready to dump the OEM's there will be more feedback.
Just hope he's right! I'm riding on the Potenza RE92's
The Sandman :-)