By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
and many china products are crap - I have bought China made galvanized nails from lowes rusted in the box, and when i worked for the navy the supply sysytem bought some chinese shackles that the pin would not screw in since the two holes in the shackle did not line up!!!!!!
so aftermarket + china made + = !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
My advice is to stick with a major manufacturer, stay away from "universal" applications, probably deal with a place like the Tirerack (not shilling for them, however my experience has ALWAYS been great, for both wheels and tires), and be prepared to justify shooting a mortgage payment on wheels
Luckily ny540i6, we've been mortgage free since the summer of 1996. That's what happens when the other half is a CPA!
The Sandman :-)
The Sandman :-)
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
The obvious option is to replace both (front) tires--at $190 each that adds up quick. Even then, 4wd may put too much stress on the center diff because of the differing tire sizes between front and rear--not that I am planning any 4wd excursions.
Can I get just one replacement and shave it to match the others... TireRack seems to do this.
Has anyone tried this before? Any advice or suggestions?
regards,
kyfdx
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
Will the thread size difference not be a problem when the new tire eventually gets rotated to the rear? (I agree that it probably makes little difference up front because it will seldom go 4wd.)
Alas, my full size spare matches the original factory tires, the Pirellis were aftermarket add-ons.
Cheers, OB
Hope this helps.
Since it is impossible to make things perfect, tires and wheels use weights to conteract the imperfections in weight (mass) distribution around the wheel (and tire).
What the road force machine did was measure the "out of roundness" the tire and wheel, as an assembly. (OK, it's not quite that simple, but without going into the detail, this is close.)
It is expected that a tire and wheel assebly will require some balance weights, and so it is standard practice to balance every tire and wheel assembly to within some tolerance. It is expected that the vehicle will be unsensitive to off balance within that tolerance.
It is also expected that a tire and wheel assembly will have some amount of "road force". In many cases matching the tire and wheel will reduce the force to within a certain tolerance. It is expected that the vehicle will not be sensitive to that tolerance.
Further, there are other things that can be out of balance or have runout - brake rotors, bearings, hubs, etc. - and it is expected that the vehicle will not be sensitive to the situation where everything is at its maximum value. Unfortunately, there are several vehicle there are exceedingly sensitive. I haven't heard that any Subaru's are on that list, but perhaps they are borderline and you godd a poor example.
Hope this helps.
The guy at the tire store swore this would imporve wet weather performance by 30%.
I'm starting to think I've been had?
Anyone have any thoughts/experience?
It makes a bigger difference, though, on a blocky tread design like an all-terrain or mud tire for a bigger truck than on an all-weather radial like you're putting on a CRV - those all-weather tires already have siping as a design, so the difference may not be as dramatic. Still, there'll be a difference.
-mike
Is my problem the tires?
They are the tires I bought the vehicle with--Goodyear Grandtreks. I have 18" Foose wheels. I have 34k miles on these tires.
I'm tempted to go buy new tires even though I don't quite need them yet, but do you think that will solve my problem? I do rotate every oil change.
Any opinions??
Is my problem the tires?
They are the tires I bought the vehicle with--Goodyear Grandtreks. I have 18" Foose wheels. I have 34k miles on these tires.
I'm tempted to go buy new tires even though I don't quite need them yet, but do you think that will solve my problem? I do rotate every oil change.
Any opinions??
I wanted to check out the Goodyear Assurance tire but they have no plans to make my size during 2005. The only 17 tire they will be making before the end of 205 is 215/55/R17.
Costco has some really nice looking Michelin MXM tires in my size but they are $209 each less a $60 rebate and will probably only get around 30-35K as well.
It seems like I should be able to do better than this. Are there not any good wet weather tires that I could get 40-50K miles. I know good traction and long mileage are not very compatible but I don't need a high performance tire....just good handling in the rain.
Any suggestions from you tire gurus?
Yokohama AVS ES100 - W-rated
Dunlop FM901 - V-rated
Yokohama Avid V4S - V-rated
Dunlop Sport A2 - H-rated
Dunlop SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical - V-rated
Pirelli P7000 Supersport - V-rated
These are all at the Tire Rack, in stock, and range from $101-114 each, plus shipping. I'm not a hard-core Michelin fan, given years of experience, and not being able to justify the extra 50-100% cost differential with handling results.
What I didn't tell you is that I sold a 2001 Pathfinder to buy this 03 Landcruiser. I was thinking I was crazy when the same problem I had in the PF started up in the LC!
No, I never got the PF problem solved, I sold it before I did. But you're right, it feels like the exact same issue.
I'll find someone with the Hunter 9000 and see if I can't get this problem solved once and for all. Thanks for your help!
How would the Bridgestone Potenza G009 compare to these tires? It is available at Tirerack and I was wondering if it was just not as good as the others you recommended. If so, what area would I be compromising?
This one shop is really convenient and I was hoping to buy from them but I told them I trusted your opinion more than theirs. They wanted to know why and I said because I got just what I wanted when you recommended my wheels and tires.
I christened my new Mazda 6s today by clipping a curb in the parking lot of my daughter's elementary school. It has some pretty good scrapes around the edges, next to the tire. Any suggestions?
No doubt that these low profile high performance tires cost more and don't last as long .... but they sure are fun for driving and look a lot better IMHO. I am definitely going to rotate them @3K miles instead of 5K this time around.
The Dunlop AP Sports that were only on the front for 5K still look pretty good but the tires that were on the front for 11K are damn near down to the wear bars. Hoping that with more frequent rotations I will get 25-30K on these Yoko's.
Anyone know for sure?
Thanks.
There is a government standardized test that is supposed to be used to develop the treadwear rating for each tire. The test consists of a standard tire - the same for every company - and the test consists of a perscribed route on a pair of (or more) vehicles where the tires are swapped between vehicles to eliminate the vehicle effect.
HOWEVER, the government allows the rating to be TRACEABLE to this test, mainly to reduce the cost of testing particularly when the standard tire is a totally different size than the tire being compared to.
Add to this that there are different philosphies regarding the way this test should be applied to the rating. Some companies are conservative in their rating and some are quite aggressive.
And don't forget that sometimes a company might get great results on a given test, but the rating might be out of line when compared to the rest of their lineup.
So the key is that the ratings must be taken with a grain of salt (maybe the whole shaker?), but that the rating has to be justifiable - in other words a tire can't be rated beyond what the test results show.
Hope this helps.
For instance, the Dunlop Qualifier used to carry a 300 rating, now it's at 440, the BF Goodrich Radial T/A is now 400, used to be 290, and the Dunlop Sport A2 is now 420, was 260....
There are several tires (now) with ratings of 500 or above....has to be marketing, since a 500 TW tire should have the soft, supple feel of marble...
"tread wear ratings are assigned by the manufacturers following field testing and are most accurate when comparing tires of the same brand."
Wheels and Tires
"The most important thing to remember: Don't compare the UTQG rating of Brand A Tire B to Brand B Tire B. Unless you're comparing tires of the same brand, the numbers won't provide any insight into the pair's correlations or differences."
Auto Spies
Steve, Host
The net result is also filtered.
It's pretty complex and simple statements don't quite explain the situation adequately.
Now to explain why a tread wear rating might dramatically change while it is in production, but with no apparent change in the tire itself:
Sometimes, the first production runs are made before the testing actually takes place. In order to avoid hassles with the feds, a conservative, easily defendable rating will be applied, then after the test is run the value will be changed.
It is also possible that there was a change in compound. Because rubber technology is constantly moving forward, a breakthrough might be made that can improve one particular property - such as wear - without sacrficing another - say wet traction.
Further, sometimes the market will dictate that a change is needed in the compromise between 2 or more of the properties. For example, Original Equipment tires are generally made with low rolling resistant compounds (so the vehicle manufacturers can meet CAFE requirements). When this tire is no longer supplied to the OEM, it will revert to the regular compound - a rolling rsistance increase, but an improvment in wear.
Hope this helps.
One tire has developed chopping on the tread and took 4.5 oz to balance (also possible belt separation on this tire) and the opposite one took 2.5 oz. Just rotated to front and experiencing shaking/vibration through the steering wheel.
What can be done with this scenario and will Bridgestone do anything to alleviate the problem?
Thanks in advance for your reply.
If indeed the tire is separated, it would be warrantable, but my experience is that WAY too many folks at the tire store level confuse irregular wear with separations. So on the one hand you might find someone who isn't quite as knowledgeable as he should be (and you'll get an adjustment), but on the other hand, you'll be told something is terribly wrong, when it isn't
BTW, it only takes a couple of hundred miles for a separation to go from a barely detectable vibration to a tread coming off. So if you've been feeling this vibration gradually getting worse over the last 2,000 miles, then is not a separation.
OR
If the vibration has been getting worse and you can feel it change in only a hundred miles - then drive very slowly to a tire store and get the tire taken off ASAP!!!
Hope this helps.
I had Michelin X Ones before after the OEM Generals (ugh) wore out and they were fine for 2+ years and then seemed to get a bit unresponsive or something. People like to rave about their new tires in general when they are new, but tires seem to get stale after a few years of use. I intended to get a cheaper tire and replace it in two or three years, but...
There's a tire chain within 3 miles of my house that's got a good reputation but I wasn't convinced that I wanted their house brand and the Toyo's seem as good, reputation wise, as the other majors. I was thinking about the newer Michelins (Harmony?) but they were a bit hard to find at the time.
I live in Boise and we don't get that much rain or snow in the valley. The Toyos were a bit loud to my wife (primary driver) the first few days but she either tuned them out or they broke in fast. We have a 140' gravel drive that climbs 40 or 50 feet, and the van could only make it half way up in 4 inches of snow last winter. The X-Ones did a bit better in snow I think, but both of these are all-season tires (I have chains just in case).
If I didn't have the Subaru to use to get to the ski hill I might have looked into a more aggressive tire (or get these siped), but the Toyo's seem nice and smooth to me when I cruise around in the van and I usually don't notice that they are there. Our mpg didn't change.
So 80% of my decision was convenience, and the Toyo Ultra blurb about them being well suited for minivans was the rest. I think they probably shine more as a commuter and highway tire than an all-arounder fire road/twisty/ski hill going tire. Twistys in the minivan wasn't a big factor, lol. Compared to the OEMs, both the X-One's and the Ultras are in a whole 'nother league.
Steve, Host
This problem only came to light last week when the tires were rotated to the front and balanced again. This is when the vibration came to light. It is not present except at highway speeds. The truck's ride was flawless before.
So would this indicate separation? My repair shop offered to rotate the tires to the back again so that I wouldn't notice the problem. I'd like to get more miles out of these tires, but not at the risk to occupant's safety.
Will we see a rash of minivan minimart holdups or will the typical spike strip shred a runflat tire sufficiently to stop the crooks?
Steve, Host